|
|
defender
Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64 |
 Sun May 13, 2001 10:18 pm
|
 |
|
You're a real con-artist cq. You seem to need to try to categorize people and call them names....I've seen you try to bully new members off the board with your little snide remarks, threats and jokes. I've been trying to give you the benefit of the doubt, but it seems to be a waste of time. |
| |
|
|
cydoniaquest
Joined: 12 Aug 2000
Posts: 797
Location: nowhere |
|
Sun May 13, 2001 10:50 pm
|
|
|
You're delusional. I've been nothing but cordial with new members. I only respond to attacks with attacks....I do not start this stupidity....the record is there for all to see in the threads.
Otherwise...I'm real easy to get along with. You went on the war path friend, don't be surprised if I fire back from time to time...
[Edited 2 times, lastly by cydoniaquest on 05-15-2001] |
| |
|
|
defender
Joined: 27 Oct 2000
Posts: 1113
Location: Level 64 |
|
Tue May 15, 2001 12:39 am
|
|
|
I rest my case. |
| |
|
|
cydoniaquest
Joined: 12 Aug 2000
Posts: 797
Location: nowhere |
|
Tue May 15, 2001 7:35 am
|
|
|
Let's see...who said this Defender?
I sure am glad someone else had the energy and intestinal fortitute to address this disingenuous pukes comments. I for one, am sick and tired of repeatedly pointing out the OBVIOUS to these souless sellouts.
Goldrush, why don't you be a good little liar... run along now, and go play hopscotch with TopScumm0069
You can both Phuque Auph. .
...And at what point in the conversation did I enter? Was my reply justified?
Well I think it was. GoldRush did not deserve this remark!
Your case has more holes than your head...and that's saying something. You rest nothing.
Shall we continue? Have you driven enough people from Mark's board for one day? Have you discredited the chemtrail issue to your satisfaction yet? Or are you going to reply once more with another one of your on-topic chemtrail-relevent remarks?
Notice when you don't say anything...I don't reply.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by cydoniaquest on 05-15-2001] |
| |
|
|
Molliani
Joined: 16 Mar 2001
Posts: 428
Location: Illinois |
|
Tue May 15, 2001 7:57 am
|
|
|
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
VULGAR OUTBURST HEARD ON MY
COMPUTER WHEN YOU EXIT PAGE
ONE AND ENTER PAGE TWO OF
THIS THREAD ??
SOMEONE IS REALLY SICK.
|
| |
|
|
cydoniaquest
Joined: 12 Aug 2000
Posts: 797
Location: nowhere |
|
Tue May 15, 2001 8:02 am
|
|
|
Uhhhh....that would be me, the sick one. I'll remove it if you wish. I know it might distract you from the fascinating chemtrail-relevent topic being presented on this thread.
This is from "Men In Black" by the way, where he is about to be devoured by the giant cockroach. I thought it was an appropriate thing for an agent to post.... |
| |
|
|
Molliani
Joined: 16 Mar 2001
Posts: 428
Location: Illinois |
|
Tue May 15, 2001 8:24 am
|
|
|
You don't have to remove it for
my benefit. It's Thermits Board -
let him decide what's proper.
As far as being an "Agent Man"
relegated to the lowly duty of
monitoring a chemtrail board ....
you must be in deep doo doo
with the "Agency".
|
| |
|
|
cydoniaquest
Joined: 12 Aug 2000
Posts: 797
Location: nowhere |
|
Tue May 15, 2001 8:50 am
|
|
|
Why?
Seems to me, if my objective as an agent were to cause people to discredit the issue of chemtrails...well then I must be doing a great job!
Or maybe people have to take responsibilities for what they say and not blame everything on agents.
If, on the other hand, my objective as an agent were to just monitor the board, then it would be best to just read, maybe ask a few leading questions from time to time? In that scenario..I guess, you’re right, I've failed my job as an agent altogether.
OR
Maybe the whole idea of AGENTS infiltrating message boards is preposterous to begin with......and people who theorize about agents are their own worst enemy, to themselves and the chemtrail issue. |
| |
|
|
Thermit
Joined: 08 Jul 2000
Posts: 3136
Location: Texas |
|
Sat May 19, 2001 1:44 am
|
|
|
The show should be airing tonight for those in the Dayton area... |
| |
|
|
nsasucks
Joined: 02 Jan 2001
Posts: 526
Location: Earth |
|
Sat May 19, 2001 2:22 am
|
|
|
Cq thinks agents populating boards is preposterous?
Why am I not surprised. |
| |
|
|
cydoniaquest
Joined: 12 Aug 2000
Posts: 797
Location: nowhere |
|
Sat May 19, 2001 2:25 am
|
|
|
I didn't think you would be. You're the one that is primarily responsible for promoting the idea. Those with low reasoning skills, caught the ball and ran with it. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2, 3
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 9:33 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
