|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
Analysis of RadarMatrix.com radar anomalies
 Fri Feb 06, 2004 9:38 pm
|
 |
|
EVALUATION OF NEXRAD/RADAR ANOMALIES REPORTED BY RADARMATRIX.COM
Radarmatrix.com makes the case that HAARP is transmitting vast quantities of energy into the atmosphere from its location in Alaska. This energy is transmitted from Alaska through Seattle, over to Great Falls and Billings MT, and then south along the Rocky Mountain range--allegedly to adjust or influence the weather or serve as some kind of SDI defensive shield.
As a U.S. citizen that could be affected by such an operation--and who would be concerned about a secret government operation of this magnitude--I chose to further investigate the claim independently.
THE ANOMALY
The primary evidence that Radarmatrix makes available, and which differs from or goes beyond general "chemtrail" or "weather modification" theories, consists of NEXRAD radar images that are automatically published on the NOAA Internet site that include strange lines, spokes, or other anomalies.
RadarMatrix seemed to focus on Billings MT so that's where I started. As I read more material on the RadarMatrix site they also suggested focusing on Seattle, Denver, Salt Lake City, Minot AFB in ND, Reno NV, and Brownsville TX so within 24 hours of beginning my investigation I expanded my focus to include all of those locations. I also decided to monitor Anchorage and Fairbanks since they are in close proximity to the HAARP site in Alaska which is implicated in the RadarMatrix case.
METHOD OF VERIFICATION / DATA COLLECTION
My first step was to verify the strange radar returns first-hand. Before consulting third parties, I wanted to make sure it was real. It also made sense to obtain data for the radar sites of interest over a period of time rather than looking at single anomalies. This would allow patterns in the anomalies to be detected over time which could further aid in determining their source.
On Friday, January 23, 2004 I programmed my computer to download radar images from both Billings MT and Brownsville TX once each minute. The images are generally updated every 5 or 10 minutes, so by downloading the image every minute I was confident I wouldn't miss any. I later expanded the program to also download radar images for Seattle, Reno NV, Minot AFB, Denver, Salt Lake City, Brownsville TX, Anchorage AK, and Fairbanks AK.
According to this MIT document "In particular, it is important to compare the various data for a given spatial location for reasonableness rather than blindly taking the largest measured value for precipitation at that location." (section 4.3, page 5). Since I was essentially verifying radar returns I figured it would be good to follow this suggestion and be able to compare one radar image with another. So in the case of each of the above cities of interest I also had my system download images for at least one neighboring NEXRAD radar location. This was in an attempt to confirm what one radar saw by looking for similar results on a nearby station at the same time.
The neighboring stations that I included in the study for each city of interest were:
Billings MT: Glasgow MT, Great Falls MT, Riverton WY
Seattle WA: Portland OR, Spokane WA
Minot AFB: Bismark ND
Denver CO: Cheyenne WY, Grand Junction CO
Salt Lake City: Grand Junction CO, Elko NV
Reno NV: Elko NV, Las Vegas, Cedar City UT
Brownsville TX: Corpus Cristi TX, San Antonio TX
Anchorage AK: Fairbanks AK
Springfield MO: Kansas City MO, St. Louis MO (added 1/27/04, see below *).
In all, my system downloaded radar images from the 25 sites mentioned above each minute and images were archived in one directory for each station for subsequent review and analysis. At this point my computer was downloading over a half a megabyte per minute from NOAA radar servers.
* On Tuesday, January 27th, 2004 I expanded the program to download radar images from Kansas City MO, Springfield MO, and St. Louis MO based on reports at RadarMatrix of unusual activity that began on January 26th.
ANOMALY CONFIRMED
The anomaly was quickly apparent at Billings MT. The anomaly presented itself several times within the first 4 hours during the afternoon of Friday, January 23, 2004, and had the appearance of spokes of a wheel radiating out from the Billings station, primarily to the southwest. This is the point at which I expanded my study from only Billings MT and Brownsville to include the other stations listed above.
INITIAL RESEARCH
As I let my computer collect data from the above stations once per minute, I searched the Internet for information regarding Doppler radar images, NEXRAD, and especially radar anomalies.
ABOUT NEXRAD
The following information was obtained directly from the NOAA website and AccuWeather website. Links to original material are included.
"NEXRAD (Next Generation Radar) obtains weather information (precipitation and wind) based upon returned energy. The radar emits a burst of energy. If the energy strikes an object (rain drop, bug, bird, etc), the energy is scattered in all directions. A small fraction of that scattered energy is directed back toward the radar.
This reflected signal is then received by the radar during its listening period. Computers analyze the strength of the returned pulse, time it took to travel to the object and back, and phase shift of the pulse. This process of emitting a signal, listening for any returned signal, then emitting the next signal, takes place very fast, up to around 1300 times each second.
NEXRAD spends the vast amount of time "listening" for returning signals it sent. When the time of all the pulses each hour are totaled (the time the radar is actually transmitting), the radar is "on" for about 7 seconds each hour. The remaining 59 minutes and 53 seconds are spent listening for any returned signals.
The ability to detect the "shift in the phase" of the pulse of energy makes NEXRAD a Doppler radar. (NOAA NexRad FAQ).
"When looking at Base Reflectivity data (this is the type of image RadarMatrix uses and which I collected), it is important to remember that as you look farther away from the radar site in any direction, the radar beam is looking higher in the sky. Close in to the radar site, the radar beam is looking very near the Earth's surface. However, due to the curved surface of the Earth, the Earth literally runs out from underneath the radar beam as you get farther away from the radar site, the result being that the farther from the radar site you go, the higher up in the atmosphere you are looking. Figure 4 below gives corresponding range and height coordinates for each Base Reflectivity tilt angle." (Figure 4 shows that at 143 miles, the return is from an elevation of 52,000 feet). (AccuWeather)
NEXRAD ANOMALIES
"Sometimes you'll see a sharp line of echo extending directly away from a radar site. Usually this is produced by some other source of electromagnetic radiation. If the other transmitter is operating continuously, the radar will conclude that there's echo at all ranges and produce a radial line of echo on the display. When the sources are terrestrial, they are usually well-known to the radar operators, and keep appearing at the same angle. Another excellent source of microwaves is the Sun. If the radar happens to point directly toward the sun, as is likely just after sunrise or just before sunset, the reflectivity pattern will feature a ray of strong "echo" extending from the radar toward the east or west." (Use and Interpretation of Radar Data)
Two things here are of interest. One is that of "when the sources are terrestrial they are usually well-known to the radar operators, and keep appearing at the same angle." The other is that the sun is another potential source of radiation near sunrise and sunset which may create a "sharp line of echo"--or a "beam," so to speak.
"Echoes from surface targets appear in almost all radar reflectivity images. In the immediate area of the radar, "ground clutter" generally appears within a radius of 20 nm. This appears as a roughly circular region with echoes that show little spatial continuity. It results from radio energy reflected back to the radar from outside the central radar beam, from the earth's surface or buildings.
Under highly stable atmospheric conditions (typically on calm, clear nights), the radar beam can be refracted almost directly into the ground at some distance from the radar, resulting in an area of intense-looking echoes. This "anomalous propagation" phenomenon (commonly known as AP) is much less common than ground clutter. Certain sites situated at low elevations on coastlines regularly detect "sea return", a phenomenon similar to ground clutter except that the echoes come from ocean waves." (NOAA NexRad FAQ).
Regarding "blast" or "nuclear explosion" images surrounding a given NEXRAD site: "Nicknamed "nuclear explosions" by some meteorologists, these patterns occur when the radar operator places the WSR88D doppler radar into a test or calibration mode. They are supposed to set the radar status to "offline" (in which case you'll see a message on the image saying so) but sometimes they don't, and you get the resulting circular test pattern sent to the radar distribution network. These are rare, and usually are gone within the hour. Don't worry, the radar operators don't usually conduct these tests during storm activity." (Desktop Doppler FAQ
DATA COLLECTED AND INDIVIDUAL STATION OBSERVATIONS
This study was conducted personally by me, letxa2000, during the 2-week period of January 23, 2004 through February 6th, 2004. During the study additional NEXRAD sites were added to the study so not all sites were monitored starting January 23rd.
For the sake of this study, "anomalies" are considered any significant and well-formed "beam" or "spoke" observed in a NEXRAD image. "Noise" is any other artifact in an image that does not result in a well-formed beam or spoke to the degree that RadarMatrix has shown interest, but which is clearly not an accurate radar return. This may include what is commonly referred to as "ground clutter."
In all cases, the study addresses anomalies that are visually similar to those which RadarMatrix has drawn attention to while not dwelling on low-level and/or unorganized noise that RadarMatrix hasn't seemed to focus on either.
SUNRISE/SUNSET OBSERVED
Within a few hours of the start of my data collection, sunset began to occur on Friday, January 23, 2004. At that time I was unaware of the sunrise/sunset effect (explained above) so was surprised when I saw a single spoke to the southwest in Brownsville. I noted it in my observations for that station. However, within a few minutes I saw a similar spoke out of Corpus Christi as well as Riverton, Billings, and Glasgow MT.
For whatever reason, my mind just thought "sunset." So I visited the NOAA Sunrise/Sunset calculator to determine at what time sunrise and sunset should occur at each station. I then used the Solar Position Calculator to determine in what direction the sun would set. I then proceeded to measure the angles of the spokes I had observed and confirmed that the spokes were occuring at the correct time and at the correct angle to be explained by sunset. Later that evening is when I found (noted above) that this is a common and well-understood phenomena.
Most of the sites that I monitored exhibited this sunrise and sunset "spoke" each day. In most cases it appeared on a single NEXRAD image (since there is only a single image every 5 or 10 minutes), but some locations exhibited the sunrise/sunset effect for longer periods of time--up to as many as 4 or 5 NEXRAD images. These locations--not surprisingly--were generally those that had a clear, unobstructed view in the direction of the rising or setting sun. In some cases the sunrise/sunset was not observed for a given NEXRAD site on a given day--this is not surprising since, again, NEXRAD images are only generated once every 5 or 10 minutes and it is possible that NEXRAD will not be scanning near the horizon at the time during which the sun is setting.
For the rest of this study the images containing the spoke generated from the rising or setting sun are not considered important, not considered suspicious, and are not discussed further.
DATA: BILLINGS MT STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 13:00 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2071 (51.6MB)
Anomalies: 53 (2.6%)
The anomaly at Billings was quickly apparent. It had the appearance of numerous "spokes" projecting out from the radar site primarily to the southwest, from approximately 120 degrees (southeast) clockwise to 300 degrees (northwest).
Upon observing the spokes first-hand at Billings, I submitted a question to the "Contact Us" address at NOAA. My inquiry was forwarded to the person responsible for the Billings NEXRAD site. I received a response within several hours and had a follow-up conversation over the course of several emails regarding additional questions I had on the topic (included below).
As he had been most helpful and patient I thought it would be appropriate, before using his name, to mention the reason for my inquiry and specifically ask if he'd prefer to remain anonymous. He indicated that he would. Given the topic I can understand his desire to not have his name mixed up in the controversy. His replies, however, remain very useful from an informational standpoint:
From: Billings MT NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:07:11 -0600
Subject: Spokes Question
Thanks for your question concerning the WSR-88D imagery from Billings,
MT. We recently sent a team of engineers and technicians from our
organization to Billings to determine the cause and resolution plan.
This pattern is caused by interference from radars transmitting near
the same frequency. We are taking action to change transmit
frequencies in the area in order to avoid reoccurrence of the anomalous
patterns.
Thank you for your interest in WSR-88D data and the quality of the
data. Please contact me if you have additional questions.
I then followed-up with him and inquired as to whether the source of the interference was with other NEXRAD stations, or with any random radar in the area. He replied with:
From: Billings NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:28:15 -0600
Subject: Re: Spokes Question
The nearby WSR-88D systems are the source of the interference.
We have a narrowband of frequencies assigned. The WSR-88D
transmitted energy is spread over nearby frequencies, though the
center of the transmitted energy is at the assigned frequency. The WSR-
88D receiver at a site is tuned to the frequency of the transmitter at
its own site. Under certain atmospheric conditions and if the antennas
of adjoining radars happen to be pointing at each other, it is possible
for the sensitive receiver at one site to detect some of the energy
from another radar even though they are tuned to different frequencies.
Since he indicated the problem was from nearby WSR-88D systems (NEXRAD), I asked him if he could tell me which NEXRAD systems were causing the interference. He replied:
From: Billings NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:37:21 -0600
Subject: Re: Spokes Question
The Riverton and Great Falls WSR-88Ds are the sources of energy causing
the interference at Billings.
I then asked him why, if the energy sources are Riverton and Great Falls, they don't appear as single "beams" coming from Riverton and Great Falls (as is the case in Reno NV with the San Juaquin station to the south, see below). He replied:
From: Billings NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:53:45 -0600
Subject: Re: Spokes Question Again
Multiple spokes occur because the beam from the other radars is very wide at
long range and there are reflections of energy. The antennas of both radars are
turning. This is a case of "ducting" where the radar beam is bent downward rather
than propagating on a normal path of higher altitude. Not all interference is the
same.
At this point I thanked him for his time and left it at that since I considered that he had adequately answered all my questions.
If one analyzes the "spoking" at Billings, one finds that the spokes occur at the same radials (angles) each time. Any given spoke may or may not appear in a spoking event, but when they do, they appear consistently at the same angles. This is consistent with interference from Riverton or Great Falls reflecting off fixed targets--probably mountains. Since the mountains don't move, the angles hitting Billings are always the same, although the radials don't always appear since the interference doesn't always necessarily bounce off those mountains with sufficient intensity given changing atmospheric conditions. Hence on some occasions only a few spokes will be observed while in other events a large set of spokes will appear.
Beyond simply accepting the comments of the Billings radar operator, I chose to look at a map of Montana and Wyoming to see if I could find the possible sources of refelction. Since the spokes always appeared in the same radials it seemed logical I could follow those radials until it hit some target tall enough to be a probable source of the spoke. This was, in fact, the case.
Using both a road map and, in some cases, an aeronautical map, I traced each radial out from Billings until I found what appeared to be a probable source for the reflection. In the list below, the number indicates the angle of the spoke in degrees (0=North, 90=East, 180=South, 270=West). This is followed by the probable source of the reflection, followed by the height of the mountain in question.
Spoking from Great Falls MT (northwest of Billings):
0-4: Hills south of Ft. Belknap Indian Reserve near Zortman MT, 5760'
349: Mountain near Lloyd MT, 6000'
337-344: Porphry Peak, 6069'
332-336: Big Snowy Mountains just south of Lewiston, 8720'
321-328: West side of Big Snowy mountains just east of Garneill, 8213'
305-311: Big Baldy Moutain southeast of Monarch, 9175'
297-301: Little Belt Mountains just north of Martinsdale, 8255'
285: Conical Peak in Crazy Mountains north of Livingston, 10,731'
274: Sacagawea Peak north of Bozeman in Bridger Range, 9665'
260: Mountain south of Big Timber, 9316'
238: Granite Peak, Highest point in Montana, 12,799'
214: Beartooth Pass just inside of Wyoming, 10,947'
208: Heart Mountain WY north of Cody WY, 8123'
Spoking from Riverton WY (south of Billings):
298: Little Belt Mountains just north of Martinsdale, 8255'
279: Sacagawea Peak north of Bozeman in Bridger Range, 9665'
229: Colter Pass at border of Wyoming and Montana, 8000'
206: Heart Mountain
188-203: Francis Peak southwest of Cody, 13153'
175-184: Direct from Riverton
165-171: Guffy Peak northeast of Riverton 8046'
161: Mountain southwest of Barnum WY in Big Horn Mountains, 9109'
138-145: Dome Peak and other peaks in Big Horn Mountains southwest of Sheridan, 10828'
131: Pumpkin Buttes southeast of Buffalo WY 6216'
120-126: Black Hills SD, Inyan Kara Mountain approx 6368'
In addition to the above, it is worth noting that not once did all of the above spokes appear at the same time. It was either a set of "Great Falls spokes" or a set of "Riverton spokes." That is to say, you never see a spoke directly to the north (0-4 degrees) at the same time you see a spoke to the southeast from the Black Hills (120-126 degrees). That would only happen if there was simultaneous interference from both Great Falls and Riverton which is unlikely and, as a result, was never observed.
Further, it should be noticed that the above spokes all come in the direction of mountains. There were never any spokes observed to the northeast since there are no mountains in that direction for Great Falls or Riverton to reflect off of.
All anomalies observed at the Billings NEXRAD site were consistent with known interference from neighboring NEXRAD sites and the angles of the interference were consistent with reflections off of tall mountains in Montana and Wyoming.
DATA: RENO NV STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 12:13 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2731 (62.1MB)
Anomalies: 125 (4.6%)
Reno exhibited an occasional spoke directly to the south. This spoke was aimed directly at the San Juaquin NEXRAD station and, based on my conversation with the operator at Billings, I have no doubt that the San Juaquin station was the source of this occasional interference. This is even less surprising given the fact that Reno's NEXRAD station is located on Virginia Peak at 8300 feet.
Additional interesting activity was detected most weekdays during the early afternoon. The activity appeared similar to a sunrise event (a single high-power spoke in a generally eastward direction) but due to the time of day it could not be the sun. Further, the spoke "moved" counterclockwise to the north, then back clockwise, etc.--not consistent with sun movement. Some days the activity was much more pronounced and produced an interesting and striking combination of beams of different colors, all to the east.
I contacted the operator of the Reno NEXRAD site and asked him about the anomaly (providing him with a link to my archived images) and specifically mentioned that it did not appear to be the sun given the time of day. Within a few hours he responded:
From: Reno NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 21:01:29 -0800
Subject: Re: Reno NEXRAD radar anomaly?
Spikes, wedges, strobes, starbursts and other anamolies
can arise from other sources other than the sun, including
aircraft, three-body scatterers such as large hail (this
one actually says something about the severity of the storm),
ground based - wireless - cable TV - and other transmissions,
88-D failures (usually temporary and associated with
maintenance). Given the east direction of the spikes in your
figures, the signals might be originating from transmissions
from aircraft associated with flights out of the naval airbase
in Fallon, although this is only speculation since I have no
means to verify. I hope this explanation helps.
I followed-up asking if any/all aircraft would produce those types of spokes or whether the anomaly only occurs if an aircraft has its own radar activated and it happens to be pointed towards the NEXRAD site. He responded:
From: Reno NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 03:04:01 -0800
Subject: Re: Reno NEXRAD radar anomaly?
You are correct. Just like a raindrop, if the plane was
a return, it would be a blip. Of course our radar is a bit
different than the one used by the FAA and such, so we do
not see them. It is some sort of transmission similar in
wavelength to the suns rays as they pass through a longer
stretch of the atmosphere just before sunset and just
after sunrise.
Fallon Naval Air Station (about 50 miles east southeast of the NEXRAD site) is a training base for naval pilots--it consists of "carrier air wing (CVW) training and the "TOPGUN" SFTI course. Air wing training brings together all of an air wing's squadrons for four weeks, providing strike planning and execution training opportunities in a dynamic, realistic, scenario-driven simulated wartime environment." (Fallon NSAWC) In other words, this is the real "Topgun" which was moved to Fallon from Miramar in 1993 as a result of base closures and realignment. According to this site, "TOPGUN also provides academic and flight training to each Carrier Air Wing during their Integrated and Advanced Training Phases (ITP/ATP) at NAS Fallon. These large scale exercises involving as many as fifty aircraft serve as "dress rehearsals" for future combat scenarios and provide critical integration training to each air wing."
According to GlobalSecurity.org, "The Fallon Range Training Complex (FRTC) is enclosed within a Military Operating Area (MOA) which overlays 6.5 million acres. Embedded within the MOA are four separate training ranges: Bravos 16, 17, 19, and 20; an integrated air defense system comprised of 37 real or simulated radars throughout the Dixie Valley area; and a supersonic flying area. The four ranges and various electronic warfare sites comprise 84,000 acres of withdrawn land (1.3% of the MOA). The entire FRTC is instrumented with a Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS)."
"Bravo-17 (R4804) is located 23 NM east-southeast (099 DEG) of NAS Fallon at an altitude of 4153 feet... The Electronic Warfare Range is located 23 NM east (088 DEG) of NAS Fallon in the southern Dixie Valley at an altitude of 4170 feet... This area, together with B-17, is the most frequently used training destination for pilots flying out of NAS Fallon. "
Extensive flight operations are, obviously, to be expected as well as intense radio and radar traffic. It is not surprising that such a large operation would be detected by nearby radars. Additionally, all anomalies to the east of Reno ocurred Monday - Friday between 9:42am and 7:57pm local time. This seems consistent with weekday and primarily daytime flight training.
This link provides a map containing the training routes over Nevada and includes shaded areas that show the MOA's (Military Operations Areas) throughout the state.
Considering the location and nature of Fallon, it appears entirely likely that the explanation of the radar anomalies to the east of Reno is aircraft activity. In fact, since I was monitoring both the Reno and Elko NV NEXRAD stations, I was able to look at the radar returns from both. While activity was more visible from Reno, Elko was also able to pick up spokes from time to time. As expected, the spokes at Elko pointed to the southwest--towards Fallon. I was then able to superimpose the Elko radar image on top of the Reno image. The spokes from each image intersected each other in Restricted Airspace R-4816N and R-4816S--both of which are controlled by Fallon and are for military training operations between 1500 feet and 18,000 feet. The area of the restricted area may be observed by going to Maps.com, going to "Aeronautical Maps" and entering "Austin, NV," which is a small town to the southeast of the restricted area. Click on the arrow to take you northwest and you will find the restricted area. You will also find the "Carson Sink" restricted area to the northwest of Fallon which is also used by Top Gun. These restricted areas can also be found on the "Las Vegas" sectional chart published by the FAA.
Anomalies at Reno were among the most interesting observed since they were much more striking, visually, and did not always occur at the exact same radials as was the case with Billings. It was exciting to compare the Reno anomalies with Elko and to use the two sources to triangulate the physical position of the aircraft that was being picked up by the two radars.
It would appear that all anomalies at Reno are consistent with flight operations at the Top Gun training station at Fallon NAS. Corresponding spokes from Elko allowed triangulation which confirms the location of the interference was generally to the immediate east of Fallon in restricted airspace. The anomalies were observed only on weekdays and almost always during the early afternoon. However, the anomalies were never detected between 8pm and 9am local time. This, too, appears consistent with general daytime training exercises at Top Gun with an occasional after-sunset exercise.
DATA: ELKO NV STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 12:15 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2777 (68.3MB)
Anomalies: 18 (0.6%)
The only anomalies observed were the occasional spokes consistent with aircraft activity at Fallon and which were mentioned in the previous section that discusses the RENO NV station.
DATA: LAS VEGAS NV STATION
Study Period: 01/28/2004 11:23 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1492 (35.3MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: SEATTLE WA STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 22:58 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2836 (61.4MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: PORTLAND OR STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 22:54 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2953 (66.2MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: SPOKANE WA STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 22:55 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2229 (55.8MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: SALT LAKE CITY UT STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 00:29 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2720 (67.1MB)
Anomalies: 1 (0.03%)
No anomalies were observed, except a single case of a spoke which turned out to coincide with spokes being observed at Reno NV. The angle of the spoke from Salt Lake City was consistent with flight operations at Fallon NAS.
DATA: CEDAR CITY UT STATION
Study Period: 01/29/2004 14:43 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1478 (31.7MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: GRAND JUNCTION CO STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 00:36 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2116 (52.6MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: DENVER CO STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 00:19 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2356 (54.1MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: CHEYENNE WY STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 00:13 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1780 (45.7MB)
Anomalies: 0 (But lots of noise)
Cheyenne has a big problem with radar noise during the day. Virtually every daytime image contained some amount of noise which appears to be difuse radar interference, primarily in the direction of Riverton. The anomalies never reached the clearness of the spokes in Billings, but virtually every daytime image in Cheyenne had some amount of noise. Interestingly, the noise only appears during the day. Between approximately 10pm and 5am Cheyenne produces very clean images--it's only during the daytime hours between approximately 5am and 10pm that the noise is present.
Over a week after sending out an inquiry to Cheyenne (and after writing the above paragraph), I got a response just as I was preparing this summary. The response was:
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:40:33 -0700
From: Cheyenne NEXRAD Operator ???@noaa.gov
To: letxa2000
Cc: 6 Others at NOAA
Subject: Re: Cheyenne NEXRAD anomalies
I appreciated your email. Sorry for my delayed response, but we
needed to check things out. Yes..there is a chronic problem due to
interference with air traffic control radar across the field. When the
antennas come in sync, interference results. Unfortunately there has been a
delay on the part of the ARTCC radar owners to install a filter on their
system. We have raised this issue again for their action. Hopefully, we
well see a quicker response.
It was then interesting to visit the Cheyenne Airport Website and note that Cheyenne Air Traffic Control Tower has operational hours of 6 a.m. - 10 p.m. This fits perfectly with the time of interference as well as the explanation from the Cheyenne NEXRAD operator. Interestingly, he copied the above response to 6 other people at the NOAA--I suspect that was along the lines of, "See? This is a problem. Fix it!"
This was also very satisfying because I had already conclude it was "difuse radar interference" so receiving confirmation of my analysis directly from Cheyenne gave me a very good feeling.
DATA: RIVERTON WY STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 12:59 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1988 (50.1MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: GREAT FALLS MT STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 20:58 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1950 (44.7MB)
Anomalies: 12 (0.6%)
The anomalies at Great Falls were infrequent, but ocurred primarily on two occasions.
In one case, there were various spokes to the northwest at approximately 342 degrees, towards Lethbridge and Calgary Canada. Calgary does, in fact, have a NEXRAD site and there are no significant mountains between it and Great Falls. Calgary is the likely explanation of these spokes.
The other case was a single, well-defined thin spoke towards Swift Current Canada. This certainly is interference from the Saskatoon NEXRAD site.
DATA: GLASGOW MT STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 12:56 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2521 (51.5MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: BROWNSVILLE TX STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 13:00 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2648 (45.0MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: CORPUS CHRISTI TX STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 13:02 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2867 (63.2MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: SAN ANTONIO TX STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 23:01 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2833 (63.9MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: ANCHORAGE AK STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 23:30 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2142 (36.6MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: FAIRBANKS AK STATION
Study Period: 01/24/2004 23:31 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2079 (24.7MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: MINOT ND STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 22:54 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2296 (44.5MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: BISMARK ND STATION
Study Period: 01/23/2004 22:55 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 2023 (45.6MB)
Anomalies: 97 (4.8%)
A single, thin, well-defined spoke to the southeast was observed at radial 119. This corresponds precisely with the NEXRAD at Minneapolis, MN.
DATA: KANSAS CITY MO STATION
Study Period: 01/27/2004 17:44 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1385 (47.0MB)
Anomalies: 0
No anomalies were observed.
DATA: SPRINGFIELD MO STATION
Study Period: 01/27/2004 17:46 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1714 (60.3MB)
Anomalies: 2 (0.1%)
The only two anomalies was a single spoke at about 95 degrees (just south of east). This was originally reported by RadarMatrix but I only observed it for the first 10 minutes. It then disappeared and didn't appear for the rest of the study period.
95 degrees is directly towards Clarksville, KY where the Paducah, KY NEXRAD station is located. This appears to be another case of a neighboring NEXRAD interfering directly with the Springfield site, although not nearly as severely or frequently as the Billings case.
DATA: ST. LOUIS MO STATION
Study Period: 01/27/2004 17:41 CST - 02/06/2004 12:00 CST
Images Captured: 1681 (62.5MB)
Anomalies: 12 (0.7%)
A single spoke presented itself at an angle of 138 degrees. Like the Springfield case, this appears to be direct interference from the Paducah NEXRAD station.
SUMMARY OF DATA
1. The stations at Fairbanks and Anchorage--the two stations closest to HAARP--showed absolutely no "spoke" activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. The lack of activity was mutually confirmed (Anchorage acted as verification for Fairbanks, and Fairbanks as verification for Anchorage).
2. Seattle--the station in the far northwest of the continental U.S. through which HAARP energy is supposed to pass--showed absolutely no spoke activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. This was confirmed by the Portland OR station as well as the Spokane WA station.
3. Spoke activity at Billings MT was adequately explained by NOAA's operator of the Billings NEXRAD site. Occasional spokes represent interference from neighboring NEXRAD stations in Riverton WY and Great Falls MT.
4. No spoke activity was noted at radar stations that neighbor Billings (Glasgow MT and Riverton WY) at the times that Billings showed spoking. Nor, at any time, were spokes consistent with the Billings station observed in any of the neighboring stations.
5. Riverton WY--noted at RadarMatrix as part of the chain transmitting energy south along the Rocky Mountains--was completely without abnormal behavior. It showed absolutely no spoke activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. This was confirmed by the Cheyenne WY station. Riverton was, in fact, one of the "cleanest" sites monitored.
6. Denver--also noted at RadarMatrix as part of the chain transmitting energy south along the Rocky Mountains--was without abnormal behavior.
7. Brownsville TX, San Antonio, and Corpus Christi all demonstrated a complete lack of spoking with the only spoke activity corresponding with daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset.
8. Reno NV displayed spoke activity that was consistent with aircraft operation at the Top Gun flight school at Fallon NAS. This was confirmed by taking spokes observed at the Elko station and superimposing them on the Reno radar image. The resulting spoke intersection was within the restricted airspace controlled by Fallon.
9. While no "blast" images were observed at any of the NEXRAD sites during this study, the explanation regarding tests and calibrations seems to adequately explain the blast-type images provided at RadarMatrix.
PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected and summarized above, I have made the following preliminary conclusions:
1. There is no evidence that NEXRAD radar stations are capable of receiving and relaying the large amounts of energy that are said to originate with HAARP. HAARP requires a large array of antennas to do its work and there is no explanation of why or how NEXRAD radar stations, which are very small (see Picture of Reno NV NEXRAD station), could receive and, more importantly, retransmit the energy which takes a large array of antennas to transmit at the HAARP facility in Alaska.
2. Even if NEXRAD stations don't actually receive and retransmit energy from HAARP, there is no evidence that NEXRAD stations are capable of detecting such energy transmissions in the atmosphere. NEXRAD itself doesn't reach an altitude necessary to probe the ionosphere.
3. If energy is being transmitted from HAARP in Alaska and such energy is visible via NEXRAD (as suggested by RadarMatrix), this energy should be visible in the NEXRAD images from Fairbanks and/or Anchorage. There was absolutely no evidence of this in images captured from Fairbanks and Anchorage. Both these stations were completely clean without even so much as stray interference (logical since there's very little in Alaska that would be a source of interference).
4. If energy is being transmitted through Seattle and such energy is visible via NEXRAD, this energy should be visible in the images from Seattle WA, Portland OR, and Spokane WA. There was no evidence of this in any of the images captured from these three neighboring locations which all overlap the entire state of Washington. All images from Seattle appeared completely normal and were devoid of spoking except for daily sunrise and sunset.
5. The spoking observed at Billings was adequately explained by the Billings radar operator. Further, even if one were to speculate that the operator was concealing the truth, the spoking activity at Billings should be visible from neighboring Glasgow MT, Riverton WY, or Great Falls MT. In no case was spoking at Billings visible from the neighboring stations. When a phenomenon is visible to one radar but isn't visible to others that is consistent with a problem with the first radar. This is also consistent with the explanation provided by the Billings radar operator.
6. Even if we assume that the spokes visible at Billings are only visible at Billings (and not neighboring stations) because of the exact timing of the spokes, it seems illogical to assume that a secret government operation would be conducted in such a way as to be blatantly visible in radar images readily available to thousands of weather forcaster, pilots, and the general public via Internet. The NEXRAD images are only updated every 5 or 10 minutes--it would be very easy for the government to simply time the energy transmissions so that they not occur at the moment NEXRAD is making its radar sweep for the next update. Or, if necessary, to simply make sure that NEXRAD images that provide evidence are not made public.
7. As just mentioned, NEXRAD images are updated every 5 or 10 minutes. If the spokes observed at Billings were actual atmospheric phenomenon, it seems highly unlikely that neighboring stations (Glasgow, Great Falls, and Riverton) would not once capture the "spokes" eminating from Billings yet Billings itself would happen to catch these spokes on numerous occasions.
8. RadarMatrix includes the comment "Reno NV, Wierd! Watch how parts move separately. Beams abound in NV and includes the (very small) image. The beams in this image are between 120 and 135 degrees--well within the range of Top Gun flight operations and, in fact, precisely cover Fallon Naval Air Station itself. That the "parts move separately" is also consisent with naval aircraft activity engaged in combat training.
9. The RadarMatrix Yahoo group included this message posted at Tue Jan 27, 2004 4:48 pm that reads, "Well, the Missouri beam just quite but sent a wide beam south as it did. It still is not all the way down yet. North Platte sent out a double blast. Reno Nevada is beaming. Looks like New Hampshire is getting wet=)." It appears the author was observing the same "Top Gun" activity that I was observing that same afternoon.
10. No unusual or significant spoking was observed at any of the stations that cannot be adequately explained by moderate and occasional interference from other radar stations or radar anomalies openly discussed and acknowledged in the many sources cited in this study. No station had the level of spoking demonstrated by the Billings station which lends further credibility to the explanation of the Billings radar operator that it is a relatively isolated case of a radar receiving severe interference from other NEXRAD sites, perhaps compounded by the very mountainous area to the west and south of Billings, and that the interference problem will be addressed in the future by adjusting the operating frequency at Billings and/or neighboring NEXRAD sites.
CONCLUSION
Having reviewed 55,666 images measuring 1.28 gigabytes from a total of 25 NEXRAD stations over the course of two weeks, all the anomalies observed are adequately explained as normal anomalies of radar and known to any experienced radar operator. The specific Billings anomaly was addressed here before my investigation began and subsequently verified by consulting with the NOAA radar operator at Billings.
Occam's Razor demands that "one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. It underlies all scientific modeling and theory building. It admonishes us to choose from a set of otherwise equivalent models of a given phenomenon the simplest one."
In this case the simplest explanation is that the images captured by RadarMatrix--and by me during the observation period--are adequately explained as normal radar anomalies. Not only are these anomalies not unusual, they are entirely anticipated and commonly discussed in public and technical literature. It would appear that the author of RadarMatrix did not make a significant effort to search for a technical explanation for these anomalies--or refused to consider them--before concluding they were evidence of a much more elaborate, complex, and decidedly more unlikely operation. By doing so, the author of RadarMatrix violates Occam's razor and, consequently, ignores accepted principles of scientific modeling and investigation.
The data collected DOES NOT support the claims of RadarMatrix.com that the anomalies displayed by NEXRAD stations are evidence of HAARP activity, energy transmission, or weather modification. Any theories or conclusions that are based, in whole or in part, on the importance of these radar anomalies should be questioned and re-evaluated in light of this evidence.
PREDICTION
As time passes, it is probable that NEXRAD radars--including Billings--will be adjusted or have their radio frequencies changed in order to minimize the frequency of these anomalies. Those that believe that these anomalies are anything but normal radar anomalies will probably conclude that the government is censoring the publication of NEXRAD images that show the anomalies, or will conclude that HAARP has somehow changed frequencies or has discovered a method of transmitting the energy that is not visible to NEXRAD radars. Thus the eventual absence (or reduction in frequency) of these anomalies will, ironically, probably be used as further evidence of a cover-up rather than acknowledgement of an ongoing effort at quality control at the NEXRAD sites.
CAVEAT
This conclusion does not address the purposes of HAARP, chemtrails, weather modification, or any combination thereof nor the existince of same. While this conclusion may weaken the credibility of theories that are based on the importance of the radar anomalies, this conclusion does not in itself address anything other than the meaning and significance of said anomalies.
It is also not the conclusion of this study that the author of RadarMatrix is intentionally deceiving the public--it does appear he himself believes in what he is saying. However, it appears his belief is fundamentally and scientifically flawed and the public should consider this fact when contemplating the information contained on the RadarMatrix website.
|
| |
|
|
Wolf_Larson
Joined: 08 Aug 2003
Posts: 442
Location: The Sea |
|
Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:06 pm
|
|
|
Excellent Work!!!!! A big thumbs up!!! |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:07 am
|
|
|
Wow for someone who says "i have no time" and "I have better things to do". "I have a wife" Type remarks...it sure looks like SOMEONE is helping you.
I have a sneaking suspicion who that SOMEONE is...judging by all the hits here recently and the IP logs. |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 1:23 am
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Mech:
Wow for someone who says "i have no time" and "I have better things to do". "I have a wife" Type remarks...it sure looks like SOMEONE is helping you. I have a sneaking suspicion who that SOMEONE is...judging by all the hits here recently and the IP logs.
Wow, now I'M part of a conspiracy theory. I guess spending time on real research is out of the ordinary here, but still... 
Really, could you tell me why on earth you'd think this was the work of more than one person? And even if it was, what difference would it would make? I really don't care if anyone thinks someone helped me. All I want is people to be aware of the results. And if someone thinks this was the work of more than just me, well, I find that flattering.
PS--And, yes, I've caught hell from my wife for spending too much time on this. So, you'll be happy to know, you'll probably be seeing less of me in the future.
[Edited 4 times, lastly by letxa2000 on 02-06-2004] |
| |
|
|
Yaak
Joined: 11 Mar 2003
Posts: 45
Location: Terlingua, Texas, USA |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 5:34 am
|
|
|
A masterful job. |
| |
|
|
JerseyBluEyz
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Posts: 1257
Location: Northeast |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 6:36 am
|
|
|
Wow! Once again you put a whole load of time and effort into a post. Sheesh - where do you find the time? Was your derogatory comment about people here not putting TIME into research necessary? Always with the underhanded digs Letxa - I do not understand why they’re even tolerated here! You have no clue how much time individuals have devoted or devote into what they follow or believe in. Surely you realize that most people work for a living and do not have 24/7 to devote to posting on a forum (unlike the time you obviously have on your hands – and yeah, I am jealous of your time!). These days I do not have enough time for emails let alone to sit and absorb your post. Unfortunately, I do not follow the Radarmatrix site so I can't begin to even comment on your observations – wish I could.
Maybe someone here follows the Radarmatrix information and will jump on the bandwagon. But taking into account what you’ve concluded, I believe the person most qualified to respond is the owner FROM Radarmatrix. If there is a way to get in touch with someone there, I’ll be happy to send them this thread. Maybe they’d like to comment re: the error of their ways.
Once again, a specialist provides you with information but wants to remain anonymous? Why is that? Yes, it is perplexing! And don’t give me some lame reason like they don’t want conspiracy believers emailing them! Gee, I wonder if you might have told them that you’re putting together a report for what you like to refer to as a conspiracy site?
|
| |
|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 7:44 am
|
|
|
Excellent job, Letxa! OMG! It's amazing what one can do with a great computer and some investigating savvy! Great communicating with those radar guys, too!
BRAVO!
Que Bueno!
Marveloso!
And your conclusion, caveat, and predictions were great, too!
Now, send this post to the radarmatrix guy and your work will be complete! It should blow him away! Heh?
"You're a shining star... no matter who you are ... shining bright to see .. what you can truly be! " Earth Wind and Fire
And, like you said, it doesn't negate the existence of HAARP one bit! But it does make old radarmatrix dude look a bit silly! E-mail the post to him, would ya? I didn't understand the stuff anyway! And remember, just because he's misinterpreting doesn't mean the links on his site are therefore unworthy. I know you know that!
Thanks! Letxa! 
|
| |
|
|
JerseyBluEyz
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Posts: 1257
Location: Northeast |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 8:21 am
|
|
|
FYI - I sent the owner of Radarmatrix an email with a link to this thread. Hopefully he'll be able to respond! |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 3:46 pm
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by JerseyBluEyz:
]Wow! Once again you put a whole load of time and effort into a post. Sheesh - where do you find the time?
Unfortunately I really didn't have the time, but the whole topic became very interesting to me. In fact, I'm now intrigued by radars, am thinking of building a simple one here at home just for educational use, and am seriously considering applying my software development experience to radars because I found it so interesting--so hopefully I can do radar software development in the future.
I am self-employed, though, so I do have the luxury of being able to manage my time more than others which allows me to, occasionally, spend more time than I otherwise could on a personal project. The disadvantage is that I don't receive a steady paychcek every two weeks which is stressful.
quote:
Was your derogatory comment about people here not putting TIME into research necessary?
Probably not. On the other hand, was Mech's insinuation that it wasn't my work really necessary? It's hard not to get sucked into the whole mudslinging thing. I do apologize. I did put a icon after the comment, so it was meant to be a humorous jab rather than an offensive insult. Sorry if it was out of place though.
quote:
Once again, a specialist provides you with information but wants to remain anonymous? Why is that? Yes, it is perplexing!
Actually, I've been thinking about that and it really ISN'T perplexing.
If someone promotes a conspiracy is anonymous, it is a little suspicious and the justification is they're supposedly afraid the "powers that be" will "get them"--and there's no way to verify that the incredible claims they make are true.
But if a person experienced in his field and who could be accused by conspiracy theorists of "carrying the party line" doesn't want to reveal his name, what does he have to lose? It's not like the "powers that be" are going to come down on him for supporting the "party line." I just don't think they want their names related with a conspiracy debate, that's all. Much of society doesn't respect conspiracy theories and I suspect these people just don't want to be caught up in the controversy.
They're also not official spokesmen for the NOAA and, perhaps, don't want to assume that role. Kind of like if you're working for someone and an investigative reporter asks you to comment on something the company is doing--you'd probably send them to the PR department (or should).
That said, if anyone wants to verify my claims it's as simple as going to the NOAA site for each of those cities and emailing the "Contact Us" link. So in this case it is not impossible to verify the claims.
quote:
And don’t give me some lame reason like they don’t want conspiracy believers emailing them!
I think they just don't want to get sucked into it. The email may be a part of it. I'm on the edge myself--on one hand I'm tempted to publish some of my conclusions on a website with my real name. On the other hand, I'm not sure I'm willing to expose my real name. How many of us here do expose our real name? I assume your driver's license doesn't really read "JerseyBlueEye's".
quote:
Gee, I wonder if you might have told them that you’re putting together a report for what you like to refer to as a conspiracy site?
I told them each my purpose for the questions after they had answered my questions and when I was asking them if they'd prefer to remain anonymous. It seemed fair to give them the option of not getting potentially sucked into a time-consuming conspiracy debate. Like you said, not everyone has the time I do to spend on this.
quote:
Originally posted by BoomerChick:
Excellent job, Letxa! OMG! It's amazing what one can do with a great computer and some investigating savvy! Great communicating with those radar guys, too!
Thanks, BC. The computer made the data collection possible while I was able to get work done during the day. And, yes, I was very impressed with the radar guys. They all responded very quickly and in a very friendly manner--except Cheyenne who was friendly but took about a week to get back to me. I was impressed. I didn't even really expect a reply.
It's what led me to later email the MIT professor and Derrick Grimmer in the WTC thread. In all, the last two weeks has been eye-opening to me in terms of realizing that people out there are very willing to answer your questions. As my wife told me, "Why are you surprised? I'll bet the radar operators were thrilled someone was actually technically interested in their radar site."
quote:
But it does make old radarmatrix dude look a bit silly! E-mail the post to him, would ya?
I see JBE has invited him to read the thread. I hope he doesn't take my study to be an effort to make him look silly. It does appear he believes it. But I would be interested in his thoughts on the matter.
My expectation, though, is that his thoughts on the matter will be along the lines of "You can't trust the NOAA" or "the radar operators are just covering it up" or "the radar operators think they are radar anomalies but really they're something else." Of course, there's really no way to respond to that. But we'll see what he has to say on the matter. |
| |
|
|
electricmojoman
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 332
|
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 9:12 pm
|
|
|
I am the owner of Radarmatrix and I will gladly add my 2 cents. I do need to take some time and go thru Letxa2000's post because it is rather long winded but I definitely give Kudos to the poster! This is the most I've had someone try and discredit my views and to be honest, why someone would spend so much time trying to discredit something he didn't believe is a bit odd! I am no scientist and I base my views on Facts, Patents, Documents and my common sense. Much of my views are also based on 3 years of observation. DAILY!
Before I get into the details of Letxa2000's post, I need him to answer a few things just so I know his common sense is intact.
First would be that he does recognize that the government has been trying to change weather for sometime now! At this point I should not have to provide the documentation because it is on my site and I assume he has seen them. This question alone will make or break him because it is the Pandora's box of common sense!
Second would be that he recognizes the Patents for HAARP and how they are used to interact with the Ionosphere and to create Ionospheric mirrors.
Third would be that he explain why only Billings and North Platte shoot these things that I term "electrical fingers" No other radars do this! These 2 radars have been EXTREMELY active in the last few months. Both were very dormant in the summer.
Forth would be explaining why only 10% of the radar cause blast, which mostly happened around 2000 to the beginning of 2003.
They have calmed down a whole lot now. Also that he accepts that I have shown proof that a blast has actually sparked highs, lows and also those "magnetic strips" that are seen on Satellite. "Magnetic strips" are what I term them.
Fifth would be that he understands the vacuum that is created as the sun comes and goes. Especially along the East side of the rocky mountain ridge. This vacuum is key.
One must have a running understanding of electricity and magnetics to understand how this electrical grid works. Most of our radars now are polarmeteric. Which means they do not scan in one direction anymore. They now scan by sending out a vertical signal and a horizontal signal. Basically reading in 3D. This is a lot of electricity being thrown out by radars. You have 140 in the US. Of which some are at military bases and a far more powerful. Chemtrails, in my view, are used to make the air over radars more conductive. Carnicom has done a lot of studies and found that Barium is a key ingredient. Barium is found in magnets and if you ever get a cat scan you'll be drinking Barium before hand. If you locate your main radar and study in that direction over a year, you will see that a vast amount of the trails are sprayed in that direction and they tend to stick there!
Weather control is very easy to understand when you keep in mind that we live inside an electrical grid.
There are 4 main points of control: HAARP basically is for the jetstream, LOWS are used to steer a system, cold dense air is a conductor for the electricity and the rocky mountain wall is used to add electricity that creates a front that backs up energy or to let it build up.
HAARP is basically a Huge magnet. When HAARP starts pulsing at higher MHz, it heats straight up and basically plugs into all the electricity surrounding our planet. In fact HAARP's position is more important than anything else. It is located underneath the "Electrojet." This is where all the Sun's energy coagulates. This is full of energy! In regards to the jetstream, if it is going over alaska and HAARP comes on, it will effectively create a pivot point in which the jetstream will not be able to dip below it but will come down into the US just over the Rockies. At the beginning of this Fall we had a very bad cold spell in the US. It was WAY to early to get that kind of cold but this was the system that brought it in. HAARP was pulsing at the time. HAARP also can Attract the jetstream up from the gulf. Much like a magnet. Obviously this is my belief and not scientific. As for the connection from HAARP to the radars I have stepped back from that view for now. Accept when I see Billings Spark the "Electrical fingers" in HAARPS direction. I see a lot more correlation and connection between the 2 in summer time when the vacuum swells become so huge that, at the peak of the vacuum, the whole US will fire up storms. From top to bottom. I do believe HAARP has a help in drawing the vacuum harder.
If you ever see a gravity map of the US, you will see that gravity is the greatest over Alaska (where HAARP is) and down the Rocky Mountains. Gravity and magnetism are very closely related. The earth has a north and south pole and a magnetic structure around it. The way you make a magnet is by running a direct current thru something. Anything can be magnetised! Weather included. Especially with Barium and metals thrown in. Electrical lines have a magnetic field. The mountains being so high up and more gravity means that more electricity build up along this ridge. Many Many times you will see a front start on the mountains. Energy gets back up here.
It is my belief that Billings is charging this line when it sparks southward. Which in the last few months I would guestimate that this radar has sparked south on average 3 times a day. Easily! Again, only Billings and North Platte do these kinds of returns on a regular bases. This is fact! I save animations every day!
Now for the main control...LOWS. Take some time and watch the Colorado Ridge. When a low gets stuck on this ridge the vacuum will increase its size and power. This last system we had was all controlled from that one low. From that juncture it allows moisture to be pulled up from the gulf and collide with the cold fronts. Often times you will see the "question mark" effect of weather that spreads from Texas all the way north into a loop. 3 times last year we had hurricane size lows go across the US. They all started on the ridge. It was only last year that I noticed this ridge of radars flare up on purpose! From there I believe a low can be steered from radar to radar. Especially in this extremely cold dense air. Cold Dense Air is supper conductive. Many of you will notice the amount of shocks you get during this time. The electrical field is right on top of you. In the document "Owning the weather by 2025," fog was a big part of what they wanted to create. One reason is to be hidden but the main part is because fog is so highly conductive to electricity and EMP's (electrical magnetic pulses). In the fog you have radars, cell towers, GWEN towers and so on adding electricity around you. When Wellstone's plane went down it was in this type of environment.
Many of you who have visited my site know that I personally caught the "magnetic strip" that sparked as his plane went down. It showed up on Satellite and those 2 little prongs went on both sides of the airport. That is more than a coincidence! There is a Professor Fetzer from Minnesota that is claiming that Wellstone's plane was taken out by an EMP. I believe this to be true and I have sent Wellstone's lawyers and family my findings! This also brings into focus what the Deceased Astronauts discovered before they died. They were the first of ALL the astronauts to discover "Red Arcs of Light" circling the earth. Just little red strips firing away. NO OTHER ASTRONAUT has witnessed these! I believe they witnessed Star Wars in action. I believe that the "magnetic strip" I caught for Wellstone are the exact same things they discovered!
In the summer time watch a radar in Texas located at Dyess AFB. It sits smack dab in-between the most volatile air on earth. Tornado Alley. In this region a radar can actually ignite long lines of storms. Last year I caught this radar triggering storms for almost 48 hours. There was no activity on the radar accept from it's center northwards. it looked like a match with fire coming off it!
These are some random views so I will let you all chomp on them for a while. I have had many people try and discredit me and none have come close to convincing me otherwise. My belief is solid because I do stem my work from the point of common sense that our military wants to control the weather. George Washington himself won a battle by attacking in the dead of winter. Which was unheard of back then. So even in the earliest times of America, weather has been a factor of war. It is a great asset and it can be a great Burden. I did also call my local news channel and had one guy tell me point blank that the chemtrail activity was the military doing exercises. As you could imagine, my mouth dropped! I think 911 is allowing this to continue under the security perception! Obviously our representatives and American's would not be so keen on knowing the Government can control weather which is why we have ENRONS. They are a front to milk money to pay for this. The Patents for HAARP are sitting in the hands of OIL/ENERGY firms. Our government right now is being ran by the same people. Enron was Bush's number one contributor. His father was the spokesman for Star Wars. They own it and few people know the true reality of what it is.
Star Wars and this electrical grid has its place if and when a nuke comes at us. Being that true missile defense comes from creating an atmosphere were you can send out an EMP and discharge the electronics of the missile. This is all Tesla 101 and is also common sense. The whole "bullet to Bullet" defense is a joke and a smoke screen! Fortunately, nukes are not an everyday occurrence. So weather control best suits their money making ways. See ENRON and what they did to California for justification. That was on the heels of one of the hottest summers ever. That summer they did not have one blackout because Jim Jeffords switch parties and gave Dems subpoena power. Then Enron Fell! Chemtrails and the layers of crap that it creates will trap in UV rays. This may very well be what Global warming is from! I have actually witnessed a full campaign of spraying only to see the planes disappear and the sandy substance left behind get cooked away. On those night I could taste a chlorine/metallic taste in the air. When this happened I would stare at the stars as if I were looking thru a magnifying glass. I honestly wonder about this affect on us. Especially when the sun is out!
Chemtrails are real and anyone who sits and watch a clear blue sky get over cast from these high flying planes knows the truth. I have video taped it one to many times and correlated it with "NASA's contrail prediction program" (also located on my site) and it never lines up. The humidity is low and in many of my videos I tape regular planes that are on the SAME PLAIN and one will have a normal contrail and the other goes from skyline to skyline and fans out. I know what I see and when you type "Chemtrails" into google, 50,000 pages can't just be a conspiracy!
On the note of chemtrails, The 2002 winter Olympics was one of the first MAJOR weather experiments I documented. I suggest you check it out on my web page. Read about how the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Research Program (why the DOE is involved in weather is a mystery) but read how they performed test over Salt Lake by spraying "perfluorocarbon tracers" over the area. It was a major experiment! Perfluorocarbon tracers have been put inside the new 20 dollar bills and possibly others to trace large sums of money from satellite. You wanna talk about being marked well here is a starting place to study!
Watch the whole series of animations leading up to and past the Olympics. IT WAS THE MOST VOLATILE TIME IN MY STUDIES FOR RADAR BLAST AND BEAMS! This whole time was a HUGE experiment. On the day of the opening Ceremonies, in which Bush is to give an opening speech, 3 radars north of Salt Lake, HELD a weather pattern. I did save a lot of it but what I didn't save only would show more time of what I have. Those 3 radars had this plasma like look to them. All the energy circled the radars for the whole day. Until just before the ceremonies when they let go and all the energy seemed to drip down the US. Now the DOE's experiment over Salt Lake is sound evidence of a weather experiment folks. Those animations I provide show you all you need to see to get a good grasp. I have told you the points that control this. If you are not subscribed to weathertap.com I suggest you do. It will show you the electricity. It is the best there is! It will show you all the blast, beams, sparks, static etc.
My web page only has limited space so much of my proof sits on my computer and not on my web page so keep that in mind folks. Common sense dictates here. It does not take a large leap to believe weather modification is in place. Here are some titles on my site under PROOF.
Official Documents A.K.A PROOF
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
House Resolution H.R.2977
NATIONAL WEATHER MODIFICATION POLICY ACT OF 1976
Battlespace Atmospheric and Cloud Impacts on Military Operations Conference
2000
Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification
Benign Weather Modification (SAAS)
Directed Energy Weapons: A Bibliography
Directed Energy Weapons Page
Electromagnetic Radiation (emr) Weapons
Weather Weapons
Weather Warfare:
WeatherModification.org
Weathermod.com
Mass amounts of facts on Weather modification
History and Problems in Weather Modification
Weather Control Technology: A Chronological Log
What about weather modification?
A Partial History of Aerosol and Weather Related Technologies
electrical beam weapon
[Edited 1 times, lastly by electricmojoman on 02-07-2004] |
| |
|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 9:30 pm
|
|
|
I can hear the announcer now.
"Lets get ready to rumbllllllllllllllle!" |
| |
|
|
JerseyBluEyz
Joined: 09 Jul 2003
Posts: 1257
Location: Northeast |
|
Sat Feb 07, 2004 10:18 pm
|
|
|
Whoa!!! I feel as if I’m in school studying Electro-Radar 101 ! This shows me that I should spend more time trying to learn and understand those various radar and weather images.
Thanks Electricmojoman for putting your time and effort in responding to a post here! It was quite interesting to learn of the weather anomalies but what was even more eye-opening was their tie-ins to current event issues - the Wellstone crash, the Olympic games, etc. I look forward to future lessons!
|
| |
|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
|
Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:05 am
|
|
|
Thanks so very much Electricmojoman! So glad you took the time and effort to explain your work to us! Amazing stuff! I hope you visit back and respond to any scientific mojo stuff that may be posted here.
We who are educating ourselves on chemtrails do see the tie ins with HAARP, the magnetic fields, grids, and various weather manipulations -- no doubt --- and I found your site ultimately informative especially concerning the government projects referring to weather control and experimentation. I don't understand radar so your explanation and Letxa's both were illuminating, especially concerning your study over time and your relating such radar anomolies to HAARP transmission times and weather control -- Olympics and Wellstone! Thanks so much!
Kudos to you, too, JBE, for asking him to post! Tankie girlie!
Our radar specialist and skeptic, Letxa, will probably have questions for Electricmojoman! I do hope he will answer them!
bc
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Boomer Chick on 02-07-2004] |
| |
|
|
electricmojoman
Joined: 07 Feb 2004
Posts: 332
|
|
Sun Feb 08, 2004 12:11 am
|
|
|
"On Friday, January 23, 2004 I programmed my computer to download radar images from both
Billings MT and Brownsville TX once each minute. The images are generally updated every 5
or 10 minutes, so by downloading the image every minute I was confident I wouldn't miss
any. I later expanded the program to also download radar images for Seattle, Reno NV, Minot
AFB, Denver, Salt Lake City, Brownsville TX, Anchorage AK, and Fairbanks AK."
My report: There are only 2 radars that are very active right now. One being Billings MT and the other being North Platte NE.
In between you will find some activity out of the 3 radars in Nevada beaming. One cannot just up and study all radars that I speak of ,in such a short time, and come to a conclusion or expect activity. To do so would be to conclude that weather modification is a daily thing. It is not! I posted my BILLINGS challenge because it is the most active and lately it has been going absolutely bonkers!
"Two things here are of interest. One is that of "when the sources are terrestrial they are
usually well-known to the radar operators, and keep appearing at the same angle." The other
is that the sun is another potential source of radiation near sunrise and sunset which may
create a "sharp line of echo"--or a "beam," so to speak."
My report: This is very true. The sunrise and sunset will trigger the sharp line echos that go across the US. However, of late these sharp line echos are going off in between those times at a more frequent pace! Sometimes just in certain regions.
"Regarding "blast" or "nuclear explosion" images surrounding a given NEXRAD site: "Nicknamed
"nuclear explosions" by some meteorologists, these patterns occur when the radar operator
places the WSR88D doppler radar into a test or calibration mode. They are supposed to set
the radar status to "offline" (in which case you'll see a message on the image saying so) but
sometimes they don't, and you get the resulting circular test pattern sent to the radar
distribution network. These are rare, and usually are gone within the hour. Don't worry, the
radar operators don't usually conduct these tests during storm activity." (Desktop Doppler
FAQ"
My Report: This one is very easy to discredit. I have mentioned on my site that only 10% of the radars produce these blast. If what they say was true then all of the radars would do this at certain points and times. These blast do not just happen and go away. They go off for hours at a time. So unless the controller is sitting there flicking the switch then there is something else involved. We also need to note that if this energy is being blasted out and showing up on national radar, then obviously the energy is real. I preceeded to prove that fact, in my 3rd column, by showing these blast were affecting the air with a blast causing a Low and a blast sparking a "magnetic strip." In the 2002 olympic series of animations, a KY radar blasted a ring that was about 6 states wide that looked liked a donut with the center cut out. It blasted for a very long time and a huge high dome formed. I know all about this one personally because a line of showers hit that bubble and rode over it. Giving St. Louis rain for a very long period of time. It was a narrow band of showers that would not move east one bit. It just rode the bubble. As for the Beams, one needs to study Nevada radars. In particular Reno Nevada! Which I believe to be a weapon of some sort! You will not catch many others sending out a beam accept on rare occassion. One final problem here is the different types of blast. Someone saying that it is just from a person switching modes is one thing but now they would need to explain each type. And I mean to tell you there is a lot of explaining to do here! As for ground clutter and flocks of birds.....it is one of the funnier things I have heard. Like I said, only 10% show these blast so apparently the other 90% do not have birds or ground clutter problems!
From: Billings MT NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:07:11 -0600
Subject: Spokes Question
"Thanks for your question concerning the WSR-88D imagery from Billings,
MT. We recently sent a team of engineers and technicians from our
organization to Billings to determine the cause and resolution plan.
This pattern is caused by interference from radars transmitting near
the same frequency. We are taking action to change transmit
frequencies in the area in order to avoid reoccurrence of the anomalous
patterns.
Thank you for your interest in WSR-88D data and the quality of the
data. Please contact me if you have additional questions."
My report: This radar has been doing this for over 3 years and just now they are looking into it? The second problem is that it sparks in 2 directions. In the summer it will spark towards Alaska and in the winter it sparks southward. Though it will do both at different times also. If you all get a chance, check out a relief map of the US and how the Rockies go around Billings. I also do remember seeing a 60 minutes, or something to that affect, talking about the energy corruption in Billings. This would be a good place to do some investigating as well!
"Under certain atmospheric conditions and if the antennas
of adjoining radars happen to be pointing at each other, it is possible
for the sensitive receiver at one site to detect some of the energy
from another radar even though they are tuned to different frequencies."
Why is this and North Platte the only ones having this problem? And several times a day every day of the week and every week of the month?
"Multiple spokes occur because the beam from the other radars is very wide at
long range and there are reflections of energy. The antennas of both radars are
turning. This is a case of "ducting" where the radar beam is bent downward rather
than propagating on a normal path of higher altitude. Not all interference is the
same."
By saying this I should assume that both of these radars, Great Falls and Riverton, would show a beam everytime Billings Sparks. I sincerely doubt this. Again, no other radars have this problem. Accept North Platte. If the Great Falls and Riverton radars are affecting this radar so much then I can only conclude that there is a power grid between them.
"If one analyzes the "spoking" at Billings, one finds that the spokes occur at the same radials
(angles) each time."
Not true, at this particular point it is but a two weeks study of time. Which is not much time to make a valid statement on this. Again, if this radar is sparking energy towards the mountains and towards alaska, then it seems to me to be connected to more than ground clutter. There are many other radars around the mountains that have no problem like this.
"Spoking from Great Falls MT (northwest of Billings):
0-4: Hills south of Ft. Belknap Indian Reserve near Zortman MT, 5760'
349: Mountain near Lloyd MT, 6000'
337-344: Porphry Peak, 6069'
332-336: Big Snowy Mountains just south of Lewiston, 8720'
321-328: West side of Big Snowy mountains just east of Garneill, 8213'
305-311: Big Baldy Moutain southeast of Monarch, 9175'
297-301: Little Belt Mountains just north of Martinsdale, 8255'
285: Conical Peak in Crazy Mountains north of Livingston, 10,731'
274: Sacagawea Peak north of Bozeman in Bridger Range, 9665'
260: Mountain south of Big Timber, 9316'
238: Granite Peak, Highest point in Montana, 12,799'
214: Beartooth Pass just inside of Wyoming, 10,947'
208: Heart Mountain WY north of Cody WY, 8123'
Spoking from Riverton WY (south of Billings):
298: Little Belt Mountains just north of Martinsdale, 8255'
279: Sacagawea Peak north of Bozeman in Bridger Range, 9665'
229: Colter Pass at border of Wyoming and Montana, 8000'
206: Heart Mountain
188-203: Francis Peak southwest of Cody, 13153'
175-184: Direct from Riverton
165-171: Guffy Peak northeast of Riverton 8046'
161: Mountain southwest of Barnum WY in Big Horn Mountains, 9109'
138-145: Dome Peak and other peaks in Big Horn Mountains southwest of Sheridan, 10828'
131: Pumpkin Buttes southeast of Buffalo WY 6216'
120-126: Black Hills SD, Inyan Kara Mountain approx 6368'"
I would like to see these "spokes" from these radars that you speak of. They surely are not the Spokes that Billings is doing. Are you saying that the spokes, which seem to be evenly spaced, are hitting mountain tops? I think your refering to the echo beams that go off at sunrise and sunset.
On to Reno Nevada, boy could I show you some weird stuff from this radar! As for this response:
"Spikes, wedges, strobes, starbursts and other anamolies
can arise from other sources other than the sun, including
aircraft, three-body scatterers such as large hail (this
one actually says something about the severity of the storm),
ground based - wireless - cable TV - and other transmissions,
88-D failures (usually temporary and associated with
maintenance). Given the east direction of the spikes in your
figures, the signals might be originating from transmissions
from aircraft associated with flights out of the naval airbase
in Fallon, although this is only speculation since I have no
means to verify. I hope this explanation helps"
Again, when it comes to Beams, not the sunrise/sunset beams, but actual scanning beams, Nevada is the motherload. Many times you can catch Reno, Las Vegas, Elko NV and Cedar City UT all beaming at one another. This region is full of Odd activity! You won't find other radars doing this stuff!
"According to GlobalSecurity.org, "The Fallon Range Training Complex (FRTC) is enclosed
within a Military Operating Area (MOA) which overlays 6.5 million acres. Embedded within
the MOA are four separate training ranges: Bravos 16, 17, 19, and 20; an integrated air
defense system comprised of 37 real or simulated radars throughout the Dixie Valley
area; and a supersonic flying area. The four ranges and various electronic warfare sites
comprise 84,000 acres of withdrawn land (1.3% of the MOA). The entire FRTC is
instrumented with a Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS).""
This really just makes a point that they are militarized. We could come up with all kinds of conspiracies of what the Beams are for. The main question would be, why do all the radars in that are have a tendency to Beam at one another or cross their beams? I thought dopplar radar was a spinning mechanism that sends out radio waves? how do we get to beams in one direction? Also note that I have and animation of the Reno NV radar, in which you can see a distinct section of the radar move opposite the spin and then shoot out a large beam. Reno NV is a very very strange radar. At certain times it looks almost like a large underground satellite dish. it just sites there and hums with no rotation at all. And it is radiating a very large section of the ground. I do believe this one to be a weapon!
As for the rest, I stated earlier that not all are doing something just as weather modification is NOT done every day. I think your term spoke is a bit off from what I am speaking of. I would term Billings and North Platte as spokes and the Nevada radars as full out Beams!
SUMMARY OF DATA
1. The stations at Fairbanks and Anchorage--the two stations closest to HAARP--showed
absolutely no "spoke" activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles
consistent with sunrise and sunset. The lack of activity was mutually confirmed (Anchorage
acted as verification for Fairbanks, and Fairbanks as verification for Anchorage).
Obviously!
2. Seattle--the station in the far northwest of the continental U.S. through which HAARP
energy is supposed to pass--showed absolutely no spoke activity other than daily sunrise
and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. This was confirmed by
the Portland OR station as well as the Spokane WA station.
As I stated in my first response. I have backed away from the channeling of HAARP's energy to the rockies. This does not mean that I do not believe it but it is harder to prove. Seattle often times has what i term, "Electrical Fingers" coming out of it. They tend to be black with several going one way and several going another. Question is why and why this radar? I find it very unusual. My original reason for this connection was because of my views on Billings. It has always been the most active! You should study the Unisys High and Low map and correlate how often you see fronts form along the Rockies and Decide wether or not Billing's Sparks are adding to that in some way. Not to mention all the radars along the rockies!
3. Spoke activity at Billings MT was adequately explained by NOAA's operator of the Billings
NEXRAD site. Occasional spokes represent interference from neighboring NEXRAD stations in
Riverton WY and Great Falls MT.
A lot of holes in this arguement!
4. No spoke activity was noted at radar stations that neighbor Billings (Glasgow MT and
Riverton WY) at the times that Billings showed spoking. Nor, at any time, were spokes
consistent with the Billings station observed in any of the neighboring stations.
The Glasgow and Riverton Radars were a focus of mine when I was watching the 2002 Olympics modifications. Other than that I cannot say they are major players.
5. Riverton WY--noted at RadarMatrix as part of the chain transmitting energy south along
the Rocky Mountains--was completely without abnormal behavior. It showed absolutely no
spoke activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with
sunrise and sunset. This was confirmed by the Cheyenne WY station. Riverton was, in fact,
one of the "cleanest" sites monitored.
I still believe that the radars along the Rockies, by virtue of their height and their electrical output, increases the energy along this ridge. If you do believe weather modification is possible and understand that weather moves from east to west, the rockies become a logical place to hold energy or build it up.
6. Denver--also noted at RadarMatrix as part of the chain transmitting energy south along
the Rocky Mountains--was without abnormal behavior.
Without activity meaning you are not seeing blast or beams I suppose? Denver in particular often times catched lows and freezes them there. This is something that a conductive material sprayed or even a combination of height to a low helps a radar attach itself to a low.
7. Brownsville TX, San Antonio, and Corpus Christi all demonstrated a complete lack of
spoking with the only spoke activity corresponding with daily sunrise and sunset at times and
at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset.
The only 3 radars that are worth watching in Texas are Dyess AFB for triggering storms, Amarillo Tx for holding and steering a low and Galvestone TX.
8. Reno NV displayed spoke activity that was consistent with aircraft operation at the Top
Gun flight school at Fallon NAS. This was confirmed by taking spokes observed at the Elko
station and superimposing them on the Reno radar image. The resulting spoke intersection
was within the restricted airspace controlled by Fallon.
9. While no "blast" images were observed at any of the NEXRAD sites during this study, the
explanation regarding tests and calibrations seems to adequately explain the blast-type
images provided at RadarMatrix.
Again, I never stated that these radars blast all the time. Nor did I say they were active all the time. In fact the radar blast, now a days, have calmed down considerably. One must have jumped to the conclusion that I said that this was a constant and that in a short time frame you would catch one. Not so!
This is a major flaw in your over all research. They way in which you attacked it did not come from a repectable position of contacting me and asking my views. This could have saved you some un-needed work and time for your wife!=)
In closing: 2 weeks do not make up a study on what radars are up to..... unless something is up. No? Maybe next time I see something going down you could pump up your system and capture all this data for me. Also, Unless you watch weathertap, your not going to see a lot of the anomalies unless you watch all radars at all times. Weathertap is the best for showing the electricity and static in the air. It will also show you how Billings and North Platte spark in unison. Have someone explain that because this is a pure fact that has been happening for the last month or so. How can Billings' spark coinside with a North platte spark based off of their explination? And why only these 2? This shows another connection of electricity!
You cannot believe what a radar tech tells you or someone who is only programmed to read a screen. They are told what to say. Ask a radar tech how fried he would get sitting close to one of these radars. We are talking about electricity being thrown out into the air here. Lets discuss the electricity factor! I am suggesting that with 140 radars spinning out energy, GWEN towers and cell towers, coupled with chemtrails creates an enviroment of electricity in the sky. That there is a connection in this grid. Only a cerain few are players in controlling weather. When there is fog or cold dense air, radar become involved. Not all, but some.
My previous post spells out the simplicity of control.
Your next study should be to get on CTTUSA chemtrail group and when someone post heavy spraying, you call their local news or local air traffic controller and ask them what those planes are that are spraying all those lines. You just may get lucky and find someone who will spill a thing or 2 about military exercises.
I would also like to see you get these people at Nexrad to explain each type of radar blast. Why some have cutout portions, why some look like electrical spokes, why the New Orleans and Long island one produce a "spiral graph" return. This should be interesting.
I came into this with pure speculation myself. It took me being outside on a clear blue day and watching these high flying white plane show up, by the dozens, and cloud my sky to finally wake up and study more. I lived right next to a major airport when i first started studying these high white planes. I could not believe that they were allowing all this taffic over an airport. I know that reality dictates that weather modification and Star Wars are real by virtue of the documents found on military sites and the publications. So the next question is how? Most of what I studied came from a specific time when certain things were going down. My views on things have changed from different theories thru the 3 years. Do me a favor and don't just study for 2 weeks. Try a year of studying your sky outside, locate your main radar and look in its direction. This is of course you see what looks to be chemtrails on a regular bases in your area. When big events happen like a Prominent Senator dying in a plane wreck, go check the satellite and radars.
Especially pay close attention to everything come election time. Low Voter turnout is going to be needed for Bush on that night so watch and see how much rain/snow or even cold hits the US and see if you can correlate it to odd radar activity. Owning weather by the oil/energy trade is a cash cow. Just by making it cold a few days early in the fall will cause people to switch their thermostats from cool to heat. Even if it is on automatic you are now switched over to continue the milking of money. See the California Crisis for an example of this behavior.
This is my 2 cents. If you would like to go in depth email me at radarmatrix@aol.com and we can dig deeper!
mojo
[Edited 1 times, lastly by electricmojoman on 02-07-2004] |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Sun Feb 08, 2004 5:16 am
|
|
|
Good evening, mojo. Thanks for stopping by and commenting on my study.
Before I respond to some of your post, let me just reiterate that my study was on the subject of the radar anomalies. I will respond to the points you have as they relate to the anomalies but I am not planning on responding to those issues that are not related directly to the anomalies. As I already said, my conclusion was not directed at HAARP, weather modification, or chemtrails. It was simply a study of the anomalies themselves and their probable source.
quote:
This is the most I've had someone try and discredit my views and to be honest, why someone would spend so much time trying to discredit something he didn't believe is a bit odd!
Because it was an interesting exercise and also because it's one of the few things talked about here that I could actually monitor and study myself first-hand. My dad also worked on radar in the Navy and then again in the private sector and when I ran the RadarMatrix theory past him he was decidedly unconvinced. So I decided to launch my own little investigation.
quote:
Third would be that he explain why only Billings and North Platte shoot these things that I term "electrical fingers" No other radars do this!
The question itself is incorrectly worded. Just like 100 people can use a cordless phone and not have any problem, one of them may constantly have interference. The question isn't why the 100 people don't have interference but rather why that one person does have interference.
I already explained why Billings has spokes.
I wasn't studying North Platte because I didn't see it as being of specific interest on your site--had I been aware it was of interest, I would have studied it, too. It may be nearby NEXRAD stations, interference from a new local radar or cell station, etc. Have you emailed the radar operator at North Platte to ask? If it happens often they're certainly aware of it and can probably give you an explanation.
quote:
Forth would be explaining why only 10% of the radar cause blast, which mostly happened around 2000 to the beginning of 2003. They have calmed down a whole lot now.
Since "blasts" are associated with calibration and maintenance, I'd assume that the radars have now been calibrated successfully and that's why you don't see them as much anymore. Radars don't need to be calibrated every day.
quote:
Also that he accepts that I have shown proof that a blast has actually sparked highs, lows and also those "magnetic strips" that are seen on Satellite.
I do not accept that. I'd like to see the proof. I did not see it on your site which, I must say, is hard to navigate without Internet Explorer and which isn't as organized as I might like. If you could give me the link I'll check it out.
That said, I'd want proof. A correlation is not itself proof unless a direct relation is demonstrated.
quote:
It is my belief that Billings is charging this line when it sparks southward.
But do you have any proof that Billings is "charging" this line? Do you have any evidence that a NEXRAD station is capable of doing any such thing? Have you seen a NEXRAD station up-close and personal? I got my private pilot's license at Front Range Airport just southeast of Denver International Airport. The Denver NEXRAD is at Front Range Airport and it was "right there" every day I went to fly. It's not a huge instrument. Why would HAARP need an antenna array but NEXRAD would be capable of "beaming" or "charging" with such a small unit?
quote:
My Report: This one is very easy to discredit. I have mentioned on my site that only 10% of the radars produce these blast. If what they say was true then all of the radars would do this at certain points and times. These blast do not just happen and go away. They go off for hours at a time. So unless the controller is sitting there flicking the switch then there is something else involved.
That's illogical. Not all radars need to be calibrated at any given time, and when they do need calibration the radar operator is supposed to disable the feed from the radar. Sometimes you'll get a "No RADAR image available" from a station which is what you should see instead of a blast if they're doing maintenance. I saw that ("no radar image available") from time to time on the sites I was monitoring. Had they not disabled the feed I'm sure I would have seen "blasts" instead.
Perhaps the reduction in "blasts" is because more NEXRAD operators are being reminded to disable the feed from their radar when they're working on it.
quote:
We also need to note that if this energy is being blasted out and showing up on national radar then obviously the energy is real.
The national radar is a composite made up of the feeds from the individual NEXRAD sites. The fact that it appears on national radar simply proves that the national radar image is made up of individual NEXRAD sites, not that the energy is real.
quote:
My report: This radar has been doing this for over 3 years and just now they are looking into it? The second problem is that it sparks in 2 directions. In the summer it will spark towards Alaska and in the winter it sparks southward. Though it will do both at different times.
In my 2-week study I saw it do both. I still have those images archived if you'd like to see them.
As for why they are just now looking into it, I can't say. Perhaps they've been working on it since then. Make an adjustment, see how it does, try again, etc. The interference involves Riverton, Great Falls, and Billings and a lot of mountains. To suggest that it can be resolved by simply flipping a switch would be seriously underestimating the complexity of interference.
If you have a solution to completely eliminate RF interference you'll be a rich man, and not just in the radar industry.
quote:
By saying this I should assume that both of these radars, Great Falls and Riverton, would show a beam everytime Billings Sparks. I sincerely doubt this. Again, no other radars have this problem. Accept North Platte. If the Great Falls and Riverton radars are affecting this radar so much then I can only conclude that there is a power grid between them.
If this was a real phenomenon in the atmosphere, why would it only be visible at Billings and never at Riverton or Glasgow? The fact that it only happens at Billings and the same activity cannot be seen by other nearby sites would be accepted in virtually any technical community as proof of an interference problem at Billings.
That Billings receives interference from Riverton and Great Falls does not automatically mean the reverse is true. Just like someone in New York might suddenly hear an AM radio station from Denver does not mean that someone in Denver will automatically be able to hear an AM radio station from New York. It doesn't work that way.
quote:
I would like to see these "spokes" from these radars that you speak of. They surely are not the Spokes that Billings is doing. Are you saying in this that the spokes, which seem to be evenly spaced, are hitting mountain tops? I think your refering to the echo beams that go off at sunrise and sunset.
No, I'm not talking of sunrise/sunset. Those result in a single beam to the southeast or southwest. I'm talking about multiple spokes.
What email address should I forward the images to? I'll be happy to send you the images. In fact, give me a day or two (when my wife isn't looking) and I'll throw them up on a Geocities site so everyone can see them.
quote:
this really just makes a point that they are militarized. We could come up with all kinds of conspiracies of what the Beams are for. The main question would be, why do all the radars in that are have a tendency to Beam at one another or cross their beams? I thought dopplar radar was a spinning mechanism that sends out radio waves. how do we get to beams in one direction?
Yes, NEXRAD involves a spinning transmitter/receiver that takes a minimum of 12 seconds to do a complete 360 degree scan. But it's not like the old radars where every time they spin around once we get an updated image. It spins around multiple times at multiple angles above the horizon to come up with a single image called a "volume scan." The images we see on the NOAA site are not from a single "pass" but a combination of multiple scans at multiple angles above the horizon. Technical details may be found here.
Why do all the radars have a tendency to "beam at one another?" They don't! If that were the case when you see beams at Reno they'd be aimed directly at either Elko, Cedar City, or Las Vegas. That's not what we see. What we see is "beams" from these sites aimed at nothing in particular. Like you said, they "move around independently." Not once did I see a beam directly between any of the NEXRAD sites. With triangulation it was clearly coming from something mobile in the restricted area east of Reno.
Why do we see "beams" as a result of this activity? Many of the planes have their own radars and if just so happens that their radar is pointed directly at a NEXRAD site when the NEXRAD site is doing its scan, a beam will appear on NEXRAD. That's also why the beams move around--because the planes move around.
The activity at Reno and Elko is perfectly consistent with the radars picking up naval aircraft and completely inconsistent with the various NEXRAD sites "beaming between each other."
quote:
Also note that i have and animation of the Reno NV radar, in which you can see a distinct section of the radar move opposite the spin and then shoot out a large beam. Reno NV is a very very strange radar. At certain times it looks almost like a large underground satellite dish. it just sites there and hums with no rotation at all. And it is radiating a very large section of the ground. I do believe this one to be a weapon!
What do you mean "it just sits there and hums with no rotation at all?" What do you mean "rotation?"
quote:
You should study the Unisys High and Low map and correlate how often you see fronts form along the Rockies and Decide wether or not Billing's Sparks are adding to that in some way. Not to mention all the radars along the rockies!
I'm not surprised that changing atmospheric conditions cause radar anomalies. I just don't see anything to convince someone that the changing atmospheric conditions are caused by the radar anomalies.
quote:
In closing: 2 weeks do not make up a study on what radars are up to unless something is up. no? Maybe next time I see something going down you could pump up your system and capture all this data for me.
I'd be happy to. I'd even be happy to put a webpage on my Internet server that would let you enter a list of sites and it would constantly download them for you so it wouldn't depend on me reacting fast enough. In one case you mentioned activity in Missouri and I immediately turned on monitoring for the 3 sites in Missouri but I was only in time to catch two images of it.
If we do this, I would simply ask that you not monitor every site constantly. If you see something of interest, "turn it on" and then turn it off when you're done. Each site generates about 30MB of graphics per week and you'll eat up all my hard drive space and consume a lot of bandwidth if you leave it on constantly. But I'd be happy to move my radar collection script from my local machine to my Internet server so you can turn it on and off and we can look at the same data. Also if we do this I'd need a little time since I'd need to give the program a web interface--right now it's an ugly geek tool within Linux that runs in the background with no interface whatsoever.
I might even go one step further... as I mentioned earlier, I've become very interested in radars and am seriously considering focusing my software development career in that direction. As a first project I might be able to write a program that would automatically analyze each image as it is downloaded and only keep the ones that demonstrate some interesting anomaly. That's not a simple program to write, but it'd be an interesting challenge and might even help me get some resume fodder for a radar-related software job in the future.
quote:
You cannot believe what a radar tech tells you or someone who is only programmed to read a screen. They are told what they are. Ask a radar tech how fried he would get sitting close to one of these radars.
These are people trained to know what kind of anomalies to expect out of radar. What is your radar training or why should we believe they don't know what they're talking about?
As for "sitting close to one of these radars," how close? As I said, I used to do flight training at Front Range Airport in Colorado and the Denver NEXRAD station was right there. The only thing we had to do was avoid flying into it (which I was successful at, I'm happy to say). But the NEXRAD tower itself was right there next to the tarmac and right outside the building of the flight training building. No-one got fried that I know of.
quote:
I would also like to see you get these people at Nexrad to explain each type of radar blast. Why some have cutout portions, why some look like electrical spokes, why the New Orleans and Long island one produce a "spiral graph" return. This should be interesting.
Laying that burden on a single NEXRAD person would be begging to not receive a reply. Rather, I'd suggest that you email the operator of each NEXRAD that produces a weird image. That's how I got a response. I didn't ask the Reno NEXRAD operator about something happening at Billings, etc.
quote:
This is my 2 cents. If you would like to go in depth email me at radarmatrix@aol.com and we can dig deeper!
I'd be interested in continuing this, but here in public. Anything we do in private is only of benefit to you and me. What we discuss here in the forum benefits everyone.
As of 2/7/2004 10:00pm CST I have re-started my program to capture images from Billings, Glasgow, North Platte and Hastings. |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 10:26 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
