|
|
halva
Joined: 04 Apr 2003
Posts: 513
Location: Greece |
Tue May 18, 2004 12:48 pm
|
|
|
I live in Greece.
Jay Reynolds is challenging your statements on the content of certain "contrails". Do you want to debate him?
|
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas

Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
Tue May 18, 2004 12:57 pm
|
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Archon:
If that's all the faith you have in the US service, on a level underneath the administration, perhaps it's time you took your ass to some other country! Maybe you would find China or North Korea more accomodating?
Wow!!! That's an original statement, "Love it ot Leave it".
If I remember correctly, there was a piece of paper called The Constitution written, oh, about 228 years ago. It was supposed to be a non-partisan blueprint, free of religious zealotry, so all people could be treated equally. A soldiers sworn duty was to defend the same Constitution.
You guys are fighting for making Cheney, Bush, and their fellow slime buckets rich. While you are fighting for Exxon/Mobil and Haliburton, the Bush Admonistration is destroying the Constitution you swore to protect. In my eyes, and many others, you are a traitor. To the soldiers who Question Authority, more power to you. To the robots that think you are fighting "Terrorism"........Well after reservists sodomize Iraqis, and "officers" blow away some innocent women and children, you can sip a cocktail of depleted uranium. But wait, when you get back, your minds will be so warped that a lifelong prescription of Prozac awaits, that's if you survive the effects of DU. You can always get a job as a cop, and bash in the heads of anti-war activists.
If you are questioning this war and administration, then the above statements don't apply to you, and we'd be glad to discuss issues. If you are a zombie/robot, then there is no hope for you..
[Edited 3 times, lastly by swamp gas on 05-18-2004] |
| |
|
|
Ellyn
Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 4458
|
Tue May 18, 2004 6:09 pm
|
|
|
My recent post entitled "Next?" by Kirwan certainly applies this this discussion. |
| |
|
|
Mech

Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
Wed May 19, 2004 11:54 pm
|
|
|
Archon:"I think it's ludicrous what the 'white trash' did to the POW's. At the same time, I think it's heinous what the Iraq militia did to berg. I would rather be breathing and have been sodomized anyday, than to have my body shipped backed to my mom w/o it's head."
Archon...
How do you know the Iraqis were in that prison for "murder"..."helping insurgents"..etc?
Ive heard MANY stories that a LOT of Iraqis are in those prisons for AS LITTLE as not haaving their paperwork in order at CHECKPOINTS or simply LOOTING to feed their families...GRANTED there ARE some "Murderers" there most likely...I STILL believe that US troops should abide by the Geneva Convention IMHO.The North Vietnamese might have tortured and got away with it..but that is NOT the American way as far as i'm concerned.
That's NOT what I was taught in boot camp...or "A" school for THAT matter.
---------
http://www.letsroll911.org/
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Mech on 05-19-2004] |
| |
|
|
Ellyn
Joined: 16 Jul 2000
Posts: 4458
|
Thu May 20, 2004 5:36 am
|
|
|
http://www.aztlan.net/nick_berg_how_done.htm
"How will it be done?" is heard in the Nicholas Berg decapitation video!
by Hector Carreon
La Voz de Aztlan
Los Angeles, Alta California - May 19, 2004 - (ACN) With the overwhelming evidence that has now accumulated proving that the Nicholas Berg decapitation video is a fraud, it is time to call for an international inquiry into the crime. Besides the evidence that the video was actually filmed at the Abu Ghraib prison as outlined in a prior article titled, "Berg decapitation video was filmed inside the Abu Ghraib prison", La Voz de Aztlan has, in addition, completed a sound analysis and isolated about 10 seconds of the sound track at the end of the video. A western voice saying "How will it be done?" can be clearly heard. It looks like the "editors" in their haste to complete the bogus video for propaganda purposes have left a lot of evidence behind. The voice left inadvertently in the video can be heard on this web page. The short wave file can be repeated by refreshing the web page.
The principal purpose of the fraudulent video was to defray world attention from the heinous sexual abuses and torture of Iraqi POW's and rape of Iraqi women detainees at the same prison where the Berg decapitation video was filmed. A secondary purpose was to "frame" Al queda and especially one of their leaders by the name of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. It is not known whether the producers of the video actually beheaded Nicholas Berg or just performed some shoddy film trickery. It is possible that they worked with an already dead corpse of Nicholas Berg.
It is a total shame that the mainstream media is not bringing this information to the attention of the public. It appears that the US news media is comprised of gutless pseudo-journalists who sell their services only to globalists, Zionists, corporations and the military-industrial complex. Are they restrained or do they not care about the common citizens any more?
Where do the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, The World Court, and Christian Institutions stand on this case? The evidence is there. It is not hidden, thanks to the mistakes made by the perpetrators. Where does the United States Congress stand on this fraud? Why are they allowing the Bush Administration and their Zionist cohorts to get away with it? US Senators and Congresspersons can't be that empty-headed! Or can they?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Related La Voz de Aztlan articles:
Nick Berg decapitation video declared "a fraud" by medical doctor
Berg decapitation video was filmed inside the Abu Ghraib prison
|
| |
|
|
Mech

Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
Thu May 20, 2004 9:57 pm
|
|
|
AZtlan can kiss my heiney.
I'll be damned if those SOB's attempt to "take back" (SIC) the southwest USA.
Lets leave illegal Mexicans in Mexico please.. |
| |
|
|
increase 1776
Joined: 07 Oct 2000
Posts: 3097
Location: Bizzaro World |
Sat May 22, 2004 6:07 am
|
|
|
WE can pay the way for a couple million more.Pretty soon they got to realize,There aren't any Friggin jobs left in this country.We could use some new drug dealers though.We can really start to expand f@#$% Prison systems.The only growth industry that America has left. |
| |
|
|
Swamp Gas

Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 4254
Location: On a Hill in the Lowlands |
Sat May 22, 2004 9:43 pm
|
|
|
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/FE22Ak03.html
Berg beheading: No way, say medical experts
By Ritt Goldstein
American businessman Nicholas Berg's body was found on May 8 near a Baghdad overpass; a video of his supposed decapitation death by knife appeared on an alleged al-Qaeda-linked website (www.al-ansar.biz) on May 11. But according to what both a leading surgical authority and a noted forensic death expert separately told Asia Times Online, the video depicting the decapitation appears to have been staged.
"I certainly would need to be convinced it [the decapitation video] was authentic," Dr John Simpson, executive director for surgical affairs at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, said from New Zealand. Echoing Dr Simpson's criticism, when this journalist asked forensic death expert Jon Nordby, PhD and fellow of the American Board of Medicolegal Death Investigators, whether he believed the Berg decapitation video had been "staged", Nordby replied: "Yes, I think that's the best explanation of it."
Questions of when the video's footage was taken, and the time elapsed between the shooting of the video's segments, were raised by both experts, reflecting a portion of the broader and ongoing video controversy. Nordby, speaking to Asia Times Online from Washington state, noted: "We don't know how much time wasn't filmed," adding that "there's no way of knowing whether ... footage is contemporaneous with the footage that follows".
While the circumstances surrounding both the video and Nick Berg's last days have been the source of substantive speculation, both Simpson and Nordby perceived it as highly probable that Berg had died some time prior to his decapitation. A factor in this was an apparent lack of the "massive" arterial bleeding such an act initiates.
"I would have thought that all the people in the vicinity would have been covered in blood, in a matter of seconds ... if it was genuine," said Simpson. Notably, the act's perpetrators appeared far from so. And separately Nordby observed: "I think that by the time they're ... on his head, he's already dead."
Providing another basis for their findings, in the course of such an assault, an individual's autonomic nervous system would react, typically doing so strongly, with the body shaking and jerking accordingly. And while Nordby noted that "they rotated and moved the head", shifting vertebrae that should have initiated such actions, Simpson said he "certainly didn't perceive any movements at all" in response to such efforts.
During the period when Berg's captors filmed the decapitation sequence, circumstances indicate that he had already been dead "a quite uncertain length of time, but more than ... however long the beheading took", Simpson stated. Both Simpson and Nordby also noted the difficulty in providing analysis based on the video, the inherent limitations presented by this. But both also felt that Berg had seemed drugged.
A particularly significant point in the video sequence occurred as Berg's captors attacked him, bringing the supposedly fatal knife to bear. "The way that they pulled him over, they could have used a dummy at that point," reflected Simpson regarding what the video portrayed. Separately, Nordby said Berg does not "appear to register any sort of surprise or any change in his facial expression when he's grabbed and twisted over, and they start to bring this weapon into use".
Subsequently, Nordby said it was likely that the filming sequence was manipulated at the point immediately preceding this, allowing Berg's corpse to be used for the decapitation sequence. Nordby also emphasized that the video "raises more questions than it answers", with the most fundamental questions of "who are you, and how did you die", being impossible to answer from it. But broad speculation exists regarding a number of factors surrounding both Berg's death and the video, and its timing in regard to revelations of US prison atrocities.
In a May 13 article, the Arabic newsgroup Aljazeera reported that a Dubai-based Reuters journalist first broke the story, "but while Fox News, CNN and the BBC" were able to secure the video from the "Arabic-only website" that hosted it, Aljazeera was unable to locate it. And also on May 13, the Associated Press (AP) reported that the US Central Intelligence Agency had determined that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was the individual who beheaded Berg.
Since Secretary of State Colin Powell's United Nations presentation of February 5, 2003, al-Zarqawi has been portrayed as the single most dangerous element facing the Bush administration's "war on terror". Powell's UN presentation has since been widely accepted as empty; nevertheless, al-Zarqawi appears to have surpassed even Osama bin Laden as the administration's No 1 terror target. And on May 15, Brigadier-General Mark Kimmitt, the Coalition Provisional Authority's chief Iraq military spokesman, declared that al-Zarqawi will be eventually caught, though that may prove particularly difficult.
On March 4, Brigadier-General David Rodriguez of the Joint Chiefs of staff revealed that the Pentagon didn't have "direct evidence of whether he's [al-Zarqawi] alive or dead", providing commentary on the nature of prior "evidence" linking al-Zarqawi to attacks and bombings. But that same day, AP reported that an Iraqi resistance group claimed al-Zarqawi had been killed the April prior in the US bombing of northern Iraq.
Speaking off the record, intelligence community sources have previously said they believe it "very likely" that al-Zarqawi is indeed long dead. Such a fact makes al-Zarqawi's alleged killing of Berg difficult to reconcile, and there has been broad speculation that blaming al-Zarqawi is an administration ploy. Further anomalies surrounding Berg's death have fueled added speculation.
According to e-mails sent from a US consular officer in Baghdad, Beth Payne, to the Berg family, Nick Berg was being held in Iraq "by the US military in Mosul". A May 13 AP report notes that a US State Department spokesperson subsequently said this was untrue, an error, and that Berg was being held by Iraqi authorities. But another May 13 AP report quoted "police chief Major-General Mohammed Khair al-Barhawi" as claiming that reports of Iraqi police having held Berg were "baseless".
And Berg is seen on the beheading videotape in what appears to be US military prison-issue clothing, sitting in what appears to be a US military-type white chair, virtually identical to those photographed as used at Abu Ghraib prison. However, the taking of hostages has occurred in the region, and beheadings are not unheard of.
According to a February 2003 report by Human Rights Watch (HRW), on September 23, 2001, radical Islamists captured a group of 25 Kurdish fighters in the Iraqi village of Kheli Hama. "Some prisoners' throats had been slit, while others had been beheaded," HRW reported, noting that the television station KurdSat had broadcast pictures of the dead that September 26. The report also noted that a videotape "apparently filmed" by those committing the atrocities had been found.
The strict Islamist community in Iraq denied that the acts were committed by their people, stating that the incident was fabricated.
Additional reports of beheadings also exist, with the victims usually noted as killed with a bullet before the beheading occurs. But HRW's report also raised an issue that the Berg video's makers, and Berg's father, both raised: prisoner exchange.
HRW noted that Iraq's radical Islamists did pursue exchanges of captives, and the Berg video specifically noted that his captors claimed they were killing him as their attempts to exchange Berg had been rebuffed by US authorities. Berg's father, Michael, has pressed the administration of US President George W Bush as regards what the facts of this allegation are, with the administration denying any knowledge that such a trade was offered. And added questions still exist.
Because Iraq's radical Islamists speak in a particular manner, and live by a closely proscribed code, apparent contradictions between these ways and the way Berg's captors appeared has generated speculation. Some observers have speculated on the possibility that the individuals weren't native Arabic speakers. Conversely, it is reported that in Saudi Arabia, where Sharia law allows for beheadings in cases of severe crimes, the condemned is heavily drugged with tranquilizers prior to the execution, reportedly leaving them in a state similar to that which Berg appeared in during parts of the video.
Again, Nordby emphasized that the video "raises more questions than it answers".
[Edited 2 times, lastly by swamp gas on 05-22-2004] |
| |
|
|

|
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 7:55 am
|
|
|
|
|