|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
 Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
|
 |
|
Letxa,
Like I said, the radarmatrix itself, his work, is way above our heads! Just go to the links he offers! They're up-to-date!
My browzer has no problems with his maps, but I'm not "into" radar, so I go to his other links and areas!
bc |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:33 am
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Boomer Chick:
Like I said, the radarmatrix itself, his work, is way above our heads! Just go to the links he offers! They're up-to-date!
I tried, but like I said, it moves painfully slow and does a lot of pop-ups that makes it move even slower. That's why I was hoping you could tell me which link it is that explains what he thinks is weird about the radar in Billings.
That said, I found this link on Google. It appears to be written by the webmaster of RadarMatrix...
If so, it seems he is claiming that the lines that suddenly "spark out" from the radar in Billings in all direction is some evidence "taping into HAARP's electrical influence." Is that what the issue is? I remember seeing that kind of thing on Channel 4 there in Denver back in the late 80's. Little bursts of "garbage." So at first blush I'm not exactly overwhelmed by the claim.
But I'm not a radar expert... My dad, however, was in the Navy as, believe it or not, a radar operator on the U.S.S. Lloyd Thomas. I'll ask him tomorrow if this is in the realm of possibility or not.
quote:
My browzer has no problems with his maps, but I'm not "into" radar, so I go to his other links and areas!
I'll ask my dad, first. Then I'll try to see what I can get out of his site based on the initial understanding my dad gives me. I'm not an expert in radar, either, so it makes sense to talk to someone who has worked with them first. |
| |
|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
|
Wed Jan 21, 2004 5:01 am
|
|
|
Press "home" and a whole page pops up with all kinds of stuff -- radarmatrix!
Go!
bc |
| |
|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
|
Wed Jan 21, 2004 5:14 am
|
|
|
Got this off of radarmatrix!
Patently Obvious
A Partial History of Aerosol and Weather Related Technologies
July 30, 2003
Lorie Kramer seektress@ev1.net
1225521 - May 8, 1917 - Protection From Poisonous Gas in Warfare
Referenced in 4704942 - Charged aerosol
"A method of defending against a warfare cloud of toxic aerosol utilizes
a charged defensive aerosol which is sprayed into the cloud.
The defensive aerosol is made of a defensive agent
which may be chemically or biologically active."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1302332 - April 29, 1919 -Toy Machine Gun - F.V. Du Pont
Referenced in - 4141274 which is for a smoke generator,
which evolved into the particle and aerosol devices in use today.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The history of interest in aerosol and weather related technologies and devices is evident when a list of related patents is compiled and examined, even a partial list.
The following patents are all verifiable, along with additional information that can be found by reading the referrenced patents included in the documentation. Patent information can be found by visiting the
United States Patent and Trademark Office
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1338343 - April 27, 1920 - Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1619183 - March 1, 1927 - Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1631753 - June 7, 1927 - Electric Heater - Referenced in 3990987
1665267 - April 10, 1928 - Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 - December 27, 1932 - Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1928963 - October 3, 1933 - Electrical System And Method
1957075 - May 1, 1934 - Airplane Spray Equipment
2097581 - November 2, 1937 - Electric Stream Generator - Referenced in 3990987
2409201 - October 15, 1946 - Smoke Producing Mixture
2476171 - July 18, 1945 - Smoke Screen Generator
2480967 - September 6, 1949 - Aerial Discharge Device
2550324 - April 24, 1951 - Process For Controlling Weather
2510867 - October 9, 1951 - Method of Crystal Formation and Precipitation
2582678 - June 15, 1952 - Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
2591988 - April 8, 1952 - Production of TiO2 Pigments - Referenced in 3899144
2614083 - October 14, 1952 - Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
2633455 - March 31, 1953 - Smoke Generator
2688069 - August 31, 1954 - Steam Generator - Referenced in 3990987
2721495 - October 25, 1955 - Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
2730402 - January 10, 1956 - Controllable Dispersal Device
2801322 - July 30, 1957 - Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel - Referenced in 3990987
2881335 - April 7, 1959 - Generation of Electrical Fields
2908442 - October 13, 1959 - Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds
2986360 - May 30, 1962 - Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device
2963975 - December 13, 1960 - Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet
3126155 - March 24, 1964 - Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator - Referenced in 3990987
3127107 - March 31, 1964 - Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals
3131131 - April 28, 1964 - Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions
3174150 - March 16, 1965 - Self-Focusing Antenna System
3234357 - February 8, 1966 - Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device
3274035 - September 20, 1966 - Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke
3300721 - January 24, 1967 - Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases
3313487 - April 11, 1967 - Cloud Seeding Apparatus
3338476 - August 29, 1967 - Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers - Referenced in 3990987
3410489 - November 12, 1968 - Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump
3429507 - February 25, 1969 - Rainmaker
3432208 - November 7, 1967 - Fluidized Particle Dispenser
3441214 - April 29, 1969 - Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds
3445844 - May 20, 1969 - Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System
3456880 - July 22, 1969 - Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere
3518670 June 30, 1970 - Artificial Ion Cloud
3534906 - October 20, 1970 - Control of Atmospheric Particles
3545677 - December 8, 1970 - Method of Cloud Seeding
3564253 - February 16, 1971 - System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
3587966 - June 28, 1971 - Freezing Nucleation
3601312 - August 24, 1971 - Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipatation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
3608810 - September 28, 1971 - Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions
3608820 - September 20, 1971 - Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein
3613992 - October 19, 1971 - Weather Modification Method
3630950 - December 28, 1971 - Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process
USRE29142 - This patent is a reissue of patent US3630950 - Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
3659785 - December 8, 1971 - Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material
3666176 - March 3, 1972 - Solar Temperature Inversion Device
3677840 - July 18, 1972 - Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use
3722183 - March 27, 1973 - Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere
3769107 - October 30, 1973 - Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke
3784099 - January 8, 1974 - Air Pollution Control Method
3785557 - January 15, 1974 - Cloud Seeding System
3795626 - March 5, 1974 - Weather Modification Process
3808595 - April 30, 1974 - Chaff Dispensing System
3813875 - June 4, 1974 - Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmopsphere
3835059 - September 10, 1974 - Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore
3835293 - September 10, 1974 - Electrical Heating Aparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors - Referenced in 3990987
3877642 - April 15, 1975 - Freezing Nucleant
3882393 - May 6, 1975 - Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere
3896993 - July 29, 1975 - Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds
3899129 - August 12, 1975 - Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification
3899144 - August 12, 1975 - Powder contrail generation
3940059 - February 24, 1976 - Method For Fog Dispersion
3940060 - February 24, 1976 - Vortex Ring Generator
3990987 - November 9, 1976 - Smoke generator
3992628 - November 16, 1976 - Countermeasure system for laser radiation
3994437 - November 30, 1976 - Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
4042196 - August 16, 1977 - Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
RE29,142 - February 22, 1977 - Reissue of: 03630950 - Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
4035726 - July 12, 1977 - Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al
4096005 - June 20, 1978 - Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
4129252 - December 12, 1978 - Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
4141274 - February 27, 1979 - Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
4167008 - September 4, 1979 - Fluid bed chaff dispenser
4347284 - August 31, 1982 - White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays
4362271 - December 7, 1982 - Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
4402480 - September 6, 1983 - Atmosphere modification satellite
4412654 - November 1, 1983 - Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
4415265 - November 15, 1983 - Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy
4470544 - September 11, 1984 - Method of and Means for weather modification
4475927 - October 9, 1984 - Bipolar Fog Abatement System
4600147 - July 15, 1986 - Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus
4633714 - January 6, 1987 - Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
4643355 - February 17, 1987 - Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
4653690 - March 31, 1987 - Method of producing cumulus clouds
4684063 - August 4, 1987 - Particulates generation and removal
4686605 - August 11, 1987 - Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
4704942 - November 10, 1987 - Charged Aerosol
4712155 - December 8, 1987 - Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
4744919 - May 17, 1988 - Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
4766725 - August 30, 1988 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
4829838 - May 16, 1989 - Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
4836086 - June 6, 1989 - Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
4873928 - October 17, 1989 - Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
4948257 - August 14, 1990 - Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
4948050 - August 14, 1990 - Liquid atomizing apparatus for aerial spraying
4999637 - March 12, 1991 - Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
5003186 - March 26, 1991 - Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
5005355 - April 9, 1991 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5038664 - August 13, 1991 - Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface
5041760 - August 20, 1991 - Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration
5041834 - August 20, 1991 - Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted
5056357 - October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium
5059909 - October 22, 1991 - Determination of particle size and electrical charge
5104069 - April 14, 1992 - Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
5110502 - May 5, 1992 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5156802 - October 20, 1992 - Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics
5174498 - December 29, 1992 - Cloud Seeding
5148173 - September 15, 1992 - Millimeter wave screening cloud and method
5245290 - September 14, 1993 - Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
5286979 - February 15, 1994 - Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin
5296910 - March 22, 1994 - Method and apparatus for particle analysis
5327222 - July 5, 1994 - Displacement information detecting apparatus
5357865 - October 25, 1994 - Method of cloud seeding
5360162 - November 1, 1994 - Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
5383024 - January 17, 1995 - Optical wet steam monitor
5425413 - June 20, 1995 - Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
5434667 - July 18, 1995 - Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
5441200 - August 15, 1995 - Tropical cyclone disruption
5486900 - January 23, 1996 - Measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device
5556029 - September 17, 1996 - Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
5628455 - May 13, 1997 - Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
5631414 - May 20, 1997 - Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
5639441 - June 17, 1997 - Methods for fine particle formation
5762298 - June 9, 1998 - Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth's weather
5912396 - June 15, 1999 - System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions
5922976 - July 13, 1999 - Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
5949001 - September 7, 1999 - Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
5984239 - November 16, 1999 - Weather modification by artificial satellite
6025402 - February 15, 2000 - Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin
6030506 - February 29, 2000 - Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
6034073 - March 7, 2000 - Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity
6045089 - April 4, 2000 - Solar-powered airplane
6056203 - May 2, 2000 - Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds
6110590 - August 29, 2000 - Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
6263744 - July 24, 2001 - Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
6281972 - August 28, 2001 - Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
6315213 - November 13, 2001 - Method of modifying weather
6382526 - May 7, 2002 - Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6408704 - June 25, 2002 - Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus
6412416 - July 2, 2002 - Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method
6520425 - February 18, 2003 - Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6539812 - April 1, 2003 - System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound
6553849 - April 29, 2003 - Electrodynamic particle size analyzer
6569393 - May 27, 2003 - Method and device for cleaning the atmosphere
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interesting, heh?
bc
|
| |
|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
|
Wed Jan 21, 2004 5:42 am
|
|
|
Letxa,
When you get on the home page, look for "Chemtrails Over America" -- it is a 3 or 4 page study of various government programs including radar and low frequency projects involving particulate spraying. It also claims to have been written by a staff of researchers and some insiders. No names are given and if you think people will risk their reputations and jobs to divulge information on obviously "top secret" military experiments -- you're naive. I even found some government sites that show titles of discussion on particulate spraying and contrail cloud formation, etc. But when you go to see the discussion or the outcomes of projects, it says I have no permission to view! Amazing stuff! Very technical and scientific. You would be wise to go to radarmatrix and read all you can! Excellent!
bc |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:11 pm
|
|
|
Ok, I talked to my dad regarding radar. It turns out he worked with sonar and radar in the Navy, did his disertation for his Phd on sonar (very similar to radar in theory), and then worked for a private contractor doing radar work when we lived in the middle of the California desert (China Lake Naval Weapons Center).
I didn't give him the full details of what is being suggested on radarmatrix.com because I didn't want to bias his response. But I asked him, in general terms, if a radar's capabilities would be affected by a large amount of electricity in the air or, for example, lightning. His response was "no," that radars have appropriate filters and logic and will only display returns (echos) from the signals they send out.
So the idea that the radar in Billings is picking up returns from HAARP "energy" in the atmosphere seems to me, at this time, not based in science.
However, re-reading some material it is unclear to me whether radarmatrix.com is saying that these "weird" radar returns are, in fact, energy in the atmosphere, or are they saying that the weird radar returns is because clouds are being organized in weird ways by HAARP? Obviously a radar would pick up weird cloud formations. But now I'm not sure what radarmatrix is saying... are the "weird" returns because of weird cloud formations or, in fact, supposedly the energy in the atmosphere from HAARP? Can anyone help me out here?
At this time I have my computer downloading the latest radar image from Billings MT once every minute. Every single image is being archived in a directory. If/when I see for myself these "weird" radar images I'll send it to my dad for his observations. Once he's given me his initial, unbiased observations I will then let him know what radarmatrix.com is suggesting and let him comment on that.
But... first I need to capture this myself. Supposedly it is common at the Billings MT radar site so hopefully I won't have to wait to long. But my computer is automatically making sure I don't miss a thing.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by letxa2000 on 01-23-2004] |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:13 pm
|
|
|
Ignore this post... I finger-fumbled.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by letxa2000 on 01-23-2004] |
| |
|
|
Boomer Chick
Joined: 01 Sep 2003
Posts: 407
Location: Colorado |
|
Sat Jan 24, 2004 2:00 am
|
|
|
Great project, Lexta!
Further reading of the various articles, especially the government sites would be to your advantage as well. It amazed me, frankly that the topics themselves on those sites were related to particulate matter, cloud making, and other studies which I feel, overall, related to both communications and weather manipulation. It doesn't mean that the weather manipulation part is necessarily evil or bad, either, but the secrecy aspect is what causes questions to be asked, naturally.
The melanin dispersal apparatus referred to in one patent and a few other patents using reflective particulate matter seem to indicate an effort to reflect the sun's rays and reduce global warming. Other patents point to weather control, cloud formation, contrail inhibition, contrail formation, various spraying units for particulates, fibers, and biologicals. Concerning HAARP, one doesn't have much to rely on in the patent material except that it's a fairly good piece of evidence pointing to particulate matter in the atmosphere and that's about it. Lasers were mentioned once I think, but one cannot assume that lasers were used in conjunction with the other listed equipment, either. Well, if you get time, read more on the gov. sites on radarmatrix, OK?
And if your father worked on any top secret projects, I doubt that he would tell even you. Do you think he would?
Good investigative work! But remember, you need the big picture to get a clue about the smaller ones, right? As far as HAARP and it's role in Utah, I would have no clue! Some experiments could be local and others global! Perhpas sending a question to the author of radar matrix would be in order? Some experiments may have to do with military field communications and others could have to do with global weather modification or global communications with or without HAARP aid and satellite aid in terms of bouncing waves off the ionesphere and satellites. I just don't know enough physics or engineering to figure it out except to read about the basic science of Eastlund, Tesla, and ongoing explanations about HAARP and what it does. In the Naval aspect of the HAARP communications, the ionesphere is used to bounce waves off of to reach various sectors of the great oceans wherein submarines reside for reception. This is all I know about that aspect. The other aspects have to do with heating the ionesphere for various puposes. The GWEN towers are another and possiblity related aspect of the communications part of it all, too. It's a giant picture of many ongoing interrelated and unrelated projects.
If any of it has to do with our national protection against similar technologies advanced by Russia or other countries, I'm thrilled. But how much of it is true defense, and how much of it is testing for weaponry, and how much of it is testing in order to help the planet or even help local weather systems? I just don't know! All I know is, chemtrails are real, various military and airline vehicles are spraying, and it is a secret. We shouldn't jump to conclusions about all of it, that's for sure. It doesn't necessarily mean we're all doomed or under some kind of population control edict, either! Most of it may be done with our protection in mind, but the inadvertant consequences of human illness and negative biosphere consequences backfire on however good intentions may be. HAARP, though, seems like a veritable time/space/energy experimentation of gigantic proportions on a global scale and if it indeed has produced a powerful weapon capability, the consequences of WHOOPS experimentation could be literally destructive of the whole planet and rip a hole in the time space continuum for all we know and for all the physicists involved, know! This is the danger of galactic babies playing with galactic fire!
Low frequency waves have also been experimented with and I wouldn't discount such future deployments involved in crowd control or even mood control connected to this. Russia has advanced programs in this field as well. So far radarmatrix seems to keep track of certain areas and again, I would suggest a series of well thought-out questions to pose to the man if you can't get the gist of it through his site.
OK, I've rambled on enough!
bc |
| |
|
|
letxa2000
Joined: 30 Apr 2002
Posts: 588
Location: U.S. citizen in Mexico |
|
Sat Jan 24, 2004 6:57 am
|
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Boomer Chick:
Great project, Lexta!
The Project is coming along very well already. I have already observed the anomaly "in person" and have expanded my survey to include radar sites that surround Billings (Glasgow MT and Riverton WY). I've also included Brownsville since RadarMatrix had a shot of some interesting activity there and recommended monitoring all of Texas, plus it's physically cloes to my location--in addition to Brownsville I'm monitoring neighbor radars in Corpus Christi and San Antonio. I'm monitoring Minot AFB and neighboring Bismark ND. In addition, RadarMatrix suggests Seattle is of interest so I'm montoring Seattle and neighboring Spokane WA and Portland OR.
In all I am currently monitoring 12 radar sites--each of them once per minute (gotta love Linux).
I'm going to let this thing run for at least a few days and then I'm going to sit down and review all the data.
quote:
It doesn't mean that the weather manipulation part is necessarily evil or bad, either, but the secrecy aspect is what causes questions to be asked, naturally.
Why would they make something like weather modification a secret?
quote:
The melanin dispersal apparatus referred to in one patent and a few other patents using reflective particulate matter seem to indicate an effort to reflect the sun's rays and reduce global warming. Other patents point to weather control, cloud formation, contrail inhibition, contrail formation, various spraying units for particulates, fibers, and biologicals.
I would note that patents, while interesting, don't in themselves prove anything. There is literally a patent on how to excercise a cat (next time you use a flashlight or laser pointer to play with a cat, send the guy five bucks.  ). And not all patents actually work--they're often filed when there is any possibility they will work to make sure no other company can prevent them from doing it if it ends up working.
But it can give you an idea of the kind of stuff companies or individuals are playing with.
quote:
Well, if you get time, read more on the gov. sites on radarmatrix, OK?
I will. Believe me, my investigation on this will be very complete.
quote:
And if your father worked on any top secret projects, I doubt that he would tell even you. Do you think he would?
My dad had some level of clearance. I don't know if it was secret, top secret, or what. And, no, if he worked on any secret projects I'm sure he wouldn't tell me nor would I ask him since that would put him in an uncomfortable position. He is now retired.
I didn't mention the reason I was asking, like I said, so on the off chance the whole discussion we're having had something to do with his work he wouldn't automatically go into defense/deny mode.
We did get into a very interesting discussion about sonar, though. I actually have a pretty good understanding of radar (though not an expert by any definition), but sonar has always seemed somewhat strange to me. I knew in theory it works the same as radar, but I couldn't really understand how it could work. Anyway, he explained that all to me so now those submarine movies make a lot more sense.
quote:
Good investigative work! But remember, you need the big picture to get a clue about the smaller ones, right?
I'll continue to read RadarMatrix and the government sites. I'll read as much or little as necessary to explain things to my satisfaction. While getting the "big picture" is often a good idea, it's also sometimes useful to not immediately expand your investigation needlessly. I'll start with the radar returns, note the anomalies, and see if there is a way to explain them. If there is no satisfactory answer, I'll have to expand my search to include other options I might not initially consider.
As Occam's Razor states, "one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed. It underlies all scientific modelling and theory building. It admonishes us to choose from a set of otherwise equivalent models of a given phenomenon the simplest one." So if there's a simple, logical explanation for the anomalies, scientific principle dictates that that's most probably the right conclusion. But I'll go wherever my research leads me.
I've already spent probably 2 hours today getting my system up-and-running to grab those radar images every minute. Plus I spent probably another 2 reading up on Doppler radar, radar anomalies, etc. All very interesting.
quote:
Perhpas sending a question to the author of radar matrix would be in order?
Perhaps, although it seems he has most of his thoughts online. If I run into any questions, though, I'll certainly ask him.
Who is he, by the way? Is he an "interested party" or does claim to have some inside knowledge or something?
quote:
Some experiments may have to do with military field communications and others could have to do with global weather modification or global communications with or without HAARP aid and satellite aid in terms of bouncing waves off the ionesphere and satellites... In the Naval aspect of the HAARP communications, the ionesphere is used to bounce waves off of to reach various sectors of the great oceans wherein submarines reside for reception. This is all I know about that aspect
Just so you know, bouncing waves of the ionosphere is nothing new nor particularly difficult.
When my dad was in the Navy back in the late 60's they used a VLF antennna that is literally miles long in Hawaii to transmit messages to submarines (like you mentioned). The messages literally bounce around the atmosphere and eventually reach the submarines. They were doing that back in the 1960's.
This is part of what my dad mentioned to me today (like I said, it was an interesting discussion). He didn't know the range of such bouncing and said he suspected the exact range was classified (or perhaps he does know and simply couldn't tell me).
But I'm not sure how useful it would be to extend the range of such a thing. I mean, I'm sure they already have multiple such antennas around the world to get global coverage--so I'm not sure if it would make much sense to scatter particulates worldwide just to extend the range of a system that already has global coverage--assuming the particulates can actually extend the range of anything.
quote:
So far radarmatrix seems to keep track of certain areas and again, I would suggest a series of well thought-out questions to pose to the man if you can't get the gist of it through his site.
I may have to... I've found a lot of stuff, but most of it because I "stumbled on it." His site seems rather unstructured, doesn't work in my default browser (I have to go into Windows and use Internet Explorer), loads slowly, and there isn't a lot of organization. You pretty much have to click each link and see if you stumble onto something interesting.
Anyway, I'll keep you and everyone posted. Like I said, I'll probably let this thing collect data for a few days. I'm seeing the anomalies often enough that I probably won't need to collect data for more than 2 or 3 days, but we'll see how it goes.
Glad I bought a large hard drive for all these images!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by letxa2000 on 01-24-2004] |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
 Goto page Previous
1, 2
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 9:20 am
|
|
|
|
|
Login
