Chemtrail Central
Login
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote


Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
Orion's tails ?

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Science & Technology

Author Thread
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
Orion's tails ? PostSun Apr 13, 2003 10:41 pm  Reply with quote  

above the airglow layer...



below...



There are many stars in this image shining through the atmosphere. Why aren't more of them streaked? The answer: Earth has an exponential atmosphere--its density increases very rapidly as you sink into it. Orion's belt stars are the lowest of the bright stars in today's image, hence they are refracted most. A few other stars are at about the same low altitude, but they are too dim to display the faint tails.


http://science.nasa.gov/ppod/y2003/11apr_mysterymeteors.htm
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Mech





Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA
PostMon Apr 14, 2003 5:12 pm  Reply with quote  

Are those Hubble Images Seek?

Nice shots.

Verrry neat.

Looks like those young stars are still "cooking".

Probably would look even cooler from a spaceship.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 04-14-2003]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
emfx13





Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
PostMon Apr 14, 2003 6:46 pm  Reply with quote  

Thank you for sharing,orion has alway's been one of my favorite constellation's!The mythological figure which the constellation represent's is the hunter,with 3 stars figuring his belt,and 3 his sword hung from it.These 6 stars and 5 at orions head,shoulders and feet form the main stars of the constellation.Of the prominent stars in the constellation,only betelgeuse(alpha orionis)is an odd man out being a red super giant at much greater distance.The stars appear bright to us,first because they are relatively nearby(1330 light yrs),and second because they are intrinsically luminous.Rigel(beta orionis)is a blue supergiant star.Many of the other stars in the group including all 3 of the stars of the belt of orion(delta,epsilon and zeta orionis)are giant stars.As stars exaust their fuel they paradoxically brighten for a short time.Since the stars of the belt are brighter than the stars of the sword,one might expect that the belt stars have used most of their nuclear fuel,while the sword stars are still in the prime of life with plenty of fuel in reserve-and this is indeed the case.the belt stars are about 5 million yrs old and the sword stars about 1 or 2 million yrs old.the youngest stars of all are found near the TRAPEZIUM and the ORION NEBULA.If any of you have telescope there is a wealth of objects to behold within this constellation,this is a great place for a beginner to start!Again thanx for the pics seeker!

[Edited 1 times, lastly by emfx13 on 04-14-2003]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
emfx13





Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
PostMon Apr 14, 2003 8:58 pm  Reply with quote  

Mech,ISS science officer Don Pettit caught them in a 15-second exposure on January 3, 2003.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
Mech





Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA
PostMon Apr 14, 2003 9:01 pm  Reply with quote  

Well...I guessed half right.

The pics were taken OUTSIDE the earths atmosphere.

They look pretty crispy.


 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
emfx13





Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
PostMon Apr 14, 2003 9:13 pm  Reply with quote  

Actually outside the atmosphere is the only place you would be able to take a picture of the "airglow".
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostTue Apr 15, 2003 10:10 am  Reply with quote  

wish my digital looked that crispy....

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Mech





Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA
PostWed Apr 16, 2003 4:40 am  Reply with quote  

The first time I saw the Orion Nebula through those Hubble images I was blown away. Kind of illustrated the concept of a "stellar nursery".

Carl Sagan was some of the first authors who turned me onto astronomy with his "COSMOS" series. I know...a lot of you so-called conservatives out there would call him a "potsmoking liberal" but..I still think he wrote some brilliant books and did a lot for the JPL.



[Edited 2 times, lastly by Mech on 04-15-2003]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostWed Apr 16, 2003 5:32 am  Reply with quote  

NOT ME...and as a matter of fact I took a lot of heat at the time for wear those trade-mark turtle neck shirts...

sagan was cool...

"billions and billions"
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Mech





Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA
PostWed Apr 16, 2003 6:17 am  Reply with quote  

Right on Seek!

I have a couple of turtlenecks floating around....somewhere.

"Nu-Klay-ic acids and Nu-kleo-tides.

Part of Theeeee....Cosmic soup."

Damn I miss that man.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message
Lulu





Joined: 22 Dec 2000
Posts: 2501
Location: right here
PostWed Apr 16, 2003 6:32 am  Reply with quote  

Nice to see you two getting along Most excellent pictures seeker. Orion has always held a special fascination for me...especially the belt.

Science Trivia ~ who coined the term googleplex and what does it mean?

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Lulu on 04-15-2003]
 View user's profile Send private message
emfx13





Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
PostWed Apr 16, 2003 11:33 pm  Reply with quote  

The word "googol" came from
an American mathematician, Dr. Kasner ,it
represents a very, very, very large number; googolplex represents an
enormously much larger number. Both are finite.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
Lulu





Joined: 22 Dec 2000
Posts: 2501
Location: right here
PostWed Apr 16, 2003 11:35 pm  Reply with quote  

hmmmm I heard David Suzuki say that his young son came up with the term--meaning an infinite amount of numbers.

I'll give you the prize anyway Eddie!

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Lulu on 04-16-2003]
 View user's profile Send private message
emfx13





Joined: 25 May 2002
Posts: 959
Location: Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
PostThu Apr 17, 2003 3:31 am  Reply with quote  

 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message Send e-mail
theseeker





Joined: 25 Jul 2000
Posts: 3403
Location: Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
PostThu Apr 17, 2003 8:11 am  Reply with quote  

I only play music triva...

this week...



nuthern....




Best Damn Other-wordly Site Period



[Edited 2 times, lastly by theseeker on 04-17-2003]
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page
1, 2  Next

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 12:28 pm


  Display posts from previous:      



Conspiracy List | Arcade Webmaster | Escape Games


© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum