|
|
Mech
Joined: 06 Jun 2001
Posts: 8237
Location: THE 4th REICH USA |
Henry Kissinger, and Eugenics (bioethics)
 Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:41 pm
|
 |
|
Kissinger, Eugenics
And Depopulation
By Leuren Moret
11-20-4
Dr. Henry Kissinger, who wrote: "Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World."
Research on population control, preventing future births, is now being carried out secretly by biotech companies. Dr. Ignacio Chapela, a University of California microbiologist, discovered that wild corn in remote parts of Mexico is contaminated with lab altered DNA. That discovery made him a threat to the biotech industry.
Chapela was denied tenure at UC Berkeley when he reported this to the scientific community, despite the embarrassing discovery that UC Chancellor Berdahl, who was denying him tenure, was getting large cash payments - $40,000 per year - from the LAM Research Corp. in Plano, Texas.
Berdahl served as president of Texas A&M University before coming to Berkeley. During a presentation about his case, Chapela revealed that a spermicidal corn developed by a U.S. company is now being tested in Mexico. Males who unknowingly eat the corn produce non-viable sperm and are unable to reproduce.
Depopulation, also known as eugenics, is quite another thing and was proposed under the Nazis during World War II. It is the deliberate killing off of large segments of living populations and was proposed for Third World countries under President Carter's administration by the National Security Council's Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy.
National Security Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and titled "Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests," says:
"Dr. Henry Kissinger proposed in his memorandum to the NSC that "depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World." He quoted reasons of national security, and because `(t)he U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries ... Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of U.S.
Depopulation policy became the top priority under the NSC agenda, Club of Rome and U.S. policymakers like Gen. Alexander Haig, Cyrus Vance, Ed Muskie and Kissinger. According to an NSC spokesman at the time, the United States shared the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the "population crisis" is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than nuclear annihilation.In 1975, Henry Kissinger established a policy-planning group in the U.S. State Department's Office of Population Affairs. The depopulation "GLOBAL 2000" document for President Jimmy Carter was prepared.
It is no surprise that this policy was established under President Carter with help from Kissinger and Brzezinski - all with ties to David Rockefeller. The Bush family, the Harriman family - the Wall Street business partners of Bush in financing Hitler - and the Rockefeller family are the elite of the American eugenics movement. Even Prince Philip of Britain, a member of the Bilderberg Group, is in favor of depopulation:
"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels" (Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund, quoted in "Are You Ready for Our New Age Future?" Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December 1995).
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has been proposing, funding and building Bio-Weapons Level 3 and Level 4 labs at many places around the U.S. even on university campuses and in densely populated urban locations. In a Bio-Weapons Level 4 facility, a single bacteria or virus is lethal. Bio-Weapons Level 4 is the highest level legally allowed in the continental U.S.
For what purpose are these labs being developed, and who will make the decisions on where bio-weapons created in these facilities will be used and on whom? More than 20 world-class microbiologists have been murdered since 2002, mostly in the U.S. and the UK. Nearly all were working on development of ethnic-specific bio-weapons (see Smart Dust, Roboflies &).
Citizens around the U.S. are frantically filing lawsuits to stop these labs on campuses and in communities where they live. Despite the opposition of residents living near UC Davis, where a Bio-Weapons Level 4 lab was planned, it had the support of the towns mayor.
She suddenly reversed her position after a monkey escaped from a high security primate facility on the campus where the bio-weapons lab was proposed. Residents claimed that if UC Davis could not keep monkeys from escaping from their cages, they certainly could not guarantee that a single virus or bacteria would not escape from a test tube. The AWOL monkey killed the project (see Smart Dust, Roboflies&).
Population is a political problem. The extreme secrecy surrounding the takeover of nuclear weapons, NASA and the space program and the development of numerous bio-weapons labs is a threat to civil society, especially in the hands of the military and corporations.
The fascist application of all three of these programs can be used to achieve established U.S. government depopulation policy goals, which may eliminate 2 billion of the worlds existing population through war, famine, disease and any other methods necessary.
Two excellent examples of existing U.S. depopulation policy are, first, the long-term impact on the civilian population from Agent Orange in Vietnam, where the Rockefellers built oil refineries and aluminum plants during the Vietnam War. The second is the permanent contamination of the Middle East and Central Asia with depleted uranium, which, unfortunately, will destroy the genetic future of the populations living in those regions and will also have a global effect already reflected in increases in infant mortality reported in the U.S., Europe, and the UK.
References
Birth defects: The Tiny Victims of Desert Storm,Life photo-essay
(1995), http://www.life.com
/Life/essay/gulfwar/gulf01.html.
Statement by Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh,
http://homepage.mac.com
/kaaawa/iblog/C337802379/E1557478132/.
Smart dust, roboflies, microbugs: UC is spying on youby Leuren Moret,
San Francisco Bay View, Feb. 26, 2003,
http://www.mindfully.org
/Nucs/2003/Berkeley-Library-Classified22feb03.htm.
San Francisco Bay View
National Black Newspaper
4917 Third Street
San Francisco California 94124
Phone: (415) 671-0789
Fax: (415) 671-0316
editor@sfbayview.co
http://www.sfbayview.com
/110304/ucregents110304.shtml |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
| NAFTA panel says U.S. biotech corn is a threat to Mexico
Wed Nov 24, 2004 5:49 pm
|
|
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "News Update from The Campaign" <newsupdate@thecampaign.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2004 4:28 AM
Subject: NAFTA panel says U.S. biotech corn is a threat to Mexico
News Update From The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear News Update Subscribers,
A scientific panel convened under the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) has determined that genetically engineered corn from the United
States may pose a threat to Mexico. As a result, the panel recommended the
genetically engineered corn be labeled as such and milled before it comes
across the border into Mexico.
These recommendations are good common sense to protect the integrity and
purity of Mexican corn. Yet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and the U.S. Trade Representative issued a joint statement adamantly
opposing the recommendations of the report. They stated: "Implementing many
of the report's recommendations would cause economic harm to farmers and
consumers of all NAFTA countries and restrict international trade."
Unfortunately the EPA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) all continue to ignore the mounting
evidence that genetically engineered foods pose risks to both human health
and the environment.
The National Corn Growers Association continues to argue that genetically
engineered crops are "proven safe." But a review of the scientific research
finds only one very limited human feeding study. And even less is known
about the long-term effects of these crops on the environment.
Many people argue that the USDA, the EPA and the FDA have been derelict in
their duties to adequately review the safety of biotech crops. For example,
under current regulations, the FDA is not even required to be notified by
biotech companies before bringing new genetically engineered products to
market. (The only exceptions are if the nutrient content had been
significantly altered or a known allergen was used in the genetic
engineering process.)
The report recommends that genetically engineered U.S. corn be ground up in
a milling process before export to Mexico to prevent the corn from being
planted and cross-pollinating with other plants. In recent years, several
African nations also wanted U.S. corn that was being distributed by the
United Nations to be ground up. By refusing these requests to mill the corn,
some people argue that the U.S. is deliberately trying to contaminate
non-genetically engineered crops around the world so that everyone will
eventually just accept America's biotech crops.
Posted below are two stories. The first is from the Washington Post titled,
"U.S. Genetically Modified Corn Is Assailed." The second article from the
Sacramento Bee is titled "Labeling of U.S. corn is sought."
Craig Winters
Executive Director
The Campaign to Label Genetically Engineered Foods
The Campaign
PO Box 55699
Seattle, WA 98155
Tel: 425-771-4049
E-mail: mailto:label@thecampaign.org
Web Site: http://www.thecampaign.org
Mission Statement: "To create a national grassroots consumer campaign for
the purpose of lobbying Congress and the President to pass legislation that
will require the labeling of genetically engineered foods in the United
States."
***************************************************************
U.S. Genetically Modified Corn Is Assailed
NAFTA Report Calls Grain a Threat to Mexico; Administration Disputes Study
By Marc Kaufman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, November 10, 2004; Page A02
A scientific panel of international experts has concluded that the
unintended spread of U.S. genetically modified corn in Mexico -- where the
species originated and modified plants are not allowed -- poses a potential
threat that should be limited or stopped. But the United States yesterday
attacked the report and its conclusions as unscientific, and made clear it
did not intend to accept the recommendations.
The report, written by a group convened under the North American Free Trade
Agreement, rejected the U.S. position that the modified corn is, in effect,
no different than conventionally bred corn hybrids. It said that because the
Mexican government has never examined or approved the use of transgenic
crops, their presence in the country is an inherent problem.
"How would Americans feel if we started getting living transgenic seeds that
had been judged to be safe by the Cuban government but not the American
government?" asked Norman C. Ellstrand, a University of California at
Riverside geneticist and member of the NAFTA-appointed panel. "We would be
outraged, and so are many Mexicans. Like us, they have the right to make up
their own minds about genetically modified crops."
The Mexican government embraced the NAFTA report and said it expected to
implement many of its recommendations.
The report, only the fifth in the treaty organization's history, was
requested by Mexican farmers and officials in 2002 after researchers found
that some forms of genetically modified corn were present in Mexico and were
being naturally spread by cross-pollination. One variety contained
genetically modified bacteria that protect the plant from certain insects,
and another protects the plant if a particular kind of otherwise deadly weed
killer is used on the fields.
Although it remains uncertain how the modified corn got into Mexican fields,
the report concluded that the large-scale importation of U.S. corn was the
likely cause. The Mexican government distributes massive amounts of U.S.
corn for grinding into cornmeal and flour, but some farmers are believed to
have planted the corn instead. Once planted, the genetically modified corn
spread naturally in fields over the seasons.
Genetically modified corn can be legally used as food in Mexico but cannot
be planted and grown, except in small test plots recently approved by the
government.
The NAFTA report concluded that the modified corn does not pose a health
risk, but it did say that the environmental consequences are less well
understood. It also raised the possibility of the spread of potentially more
hazardous types of modified corn -- such as varieties grown in the United
States to produce pharmaceuticals and industrial products.
"If those types of corn ever made it to Mexico and got planted, then yes,
there would be a health and safety problem that would be very hard to
solve," Ellstrand said.
The U.S. rejection of the NAFTA report was broad and pointed.
"This report is fundamentally flawed and unscientific; key recommendations
are not based on sound science and are contradicted by the report's own
scientific findings," the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Trade
Representative said in a joint statement. "Implementing many of the report's
recommendations would cause economic harm to farmers and consumers of all
NAFTA countries and restrict international trade."
The U.S. statement specifically criticized one recommendation -- that all
U.S. corn coming into Mexico be milled at or near the border so it cannot be
planted. That practice, it says, "would increase the cost of U.S. corn
significantly, negatively affecting Mexico's livestock producers and
consumers."
The NAFTA report and the U.S. response are also far apart on what
constitutes a scientific assessment of the issue. The report included
information about the attitudes of Mexican farmers to the genetically
modified corn, saying many find it frightening and a threat to their staple
food, while American officials said those views have no place in a
scientific study.
In support of their formal critique, the U.S. agencies cited the report's
conclusion that "scientific investigations and analyses over the past 25
years have shown that the process of transferring a gene from one organism
to another does not pose any intrinsic threat over the short or long term,
either to health, biodiversity or the environment."
The NAFTA report went on, however, to conclude that the specific
characteristics of any newly created organism need to be examined -- making
the case that the benefits and dangers of any genetically modified plant can
be determined only by testing in the locales where it will be used. In the
United States, the EPA, the Agriculture Department and sometimes the Food
and Drug Administration must approve genetically modified plants before they
can be introduced.
The National Corn Growers Association also sharply criticized the panel's
conclusions. "The report needlessly raises concerns where there are none
about a technology that is proven safe and already greatly benefits the
environment and farmers around the world," NCGA President Leon Corzine said.
A copy of the NAFTA report was leaked last month to the environmental group
Greenpeace, which distributed it in Mexico. The report was released Monday.
After the initial release, Mexico's equivalent of the EPA, Semarnat, said in
a statement: "There is no doubt that the recommendations in the official
document will be beneficial for Mexico and its environment. . . . Semarnat
is awaiting the official publication of this report and is confident that
the majority of the recommendations made will be implemented."
***************************************************************
Labeling of U.S. corn is sought
International panel responds to altered varieties in Mexico.
By Edie Lau -- Sacramento Bee Science Writer
November 9, 2004
An international review of a controversy over bioengineered genes in Mexican
corn recommends that Mexico combat the biotech intrusion by requiring
labeling or milling of kernels imported from countries such as the United
States.
The suggestion, made by a panel of scientists advising the Commission for
Environmental Cooperation of North America, was not welcomed by the U.S.
government, which offered harsh words after the report's official release on
Monday.
"This report is fundamentally flawed and unscientific," said a statement
issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
"The authors acknowledge that no economic analysis of their recommendations
was conducted, and that many of these recommendations are based solely on
sociocultural considerations," the EPA complained.
The environmental commission was set up under the North American Free Trade
Agreement and is composed of the heads of the environmental protection
agencies in Canada, Mexico and the United States. None of the countries is
obligated to adopt the recommendations. But objections by one country can't
stop another country from acting.
A statement by the Mexican government last month in anticipation of the
report's official release was much more receptive.
"There is no doubt that the recommendations ... will be beneficial for
Mexico and its environment," a translated version of the response states.
The report and reaction reflect long-standing, sharply divided world
opinions over the value and risks of agricultural biotechnology. The
technology enables scientists to insert genes into plants and animals in
ways not possible in nature.
The United States leads the world in introducing and adopting genetically
engineered crops. Federal policy and industry similarly emphasize biotech's
potential benefits, such as reducing reliance on chemical pesticides.
But countries in other parts of the world - most notably Europe and Japan -
are concerned that the technology will cause environmental problems, such as
the development of superweeds, or harm consumers' health.
In 2001, scientists at the University of California, Berkeley, reported that
they had discovered biotech genes in cornfields cultivated by indigenous
farmers in Oaxaca, Mexico. The finding caused an international storm because
it was viewed as evidence that the technology was out of control.
The discovery was all the more provocative because at the time, cultivating
biotech corn in Mexico was illegal. (Limited experimental cultivation has
since been authorized.) Like wheat in the United States, corn is the basis
of many foods in Mexico. As such, it is given special consideration in that
country.
The finding also had ramifications for the United States, because it's
generally believed that the biotech genes originated from American grain
imports.
Though the imports are intended as food, indigenous farmers often
experimentally plant kernels they buy at the store.
Outraged, Greenpeace Mexico, along with a coalition of Mexican people
representing affected rural communities there, petitioned the Commission on
Environmental Cooperation to undertake a review.
The commission assembled a diverse team of scientists to produce the report.
Among them was Norman Ellstrand, a geneticist at UC Riverside and an
international authority on "gene flow" in plants - the movement of genes
from organism to organism, be it by pollen dissemination, manipulation by
people or other means.
Ellstrand said biotech genes, or "transgenes," do not travel in nature any
more readily than naturally occurring genes. Still, the panel felt that the
Mexican government should be allowed to evaluate the impact of the
technology on its crop, just as the U.S. government now evaluates each
biotech food crop before it is "deregulated" for release in this country.
"It's presumptuous to think that just because they've been deregulated here,
it's OK there," Ellstrand said.
"What if there were transgenic seeds that the United States was receiving
that had been deregulated in Cuba and not in the United States?" he asked.
"How would the United States feel about that?"
The EPA singled out the suggestion to mill the corn as particularly onerous.
Such a requirement "would increase the cost of U.S. corn significantly,
negatively affecting Mexico's livestock producers and consumers," states a
letter to the commission from Judith Ayres, assistant administrator in the
EPA's Office of International Affairs.
"Furthermore, the report does not consider logistical considerations, such
as whether it is, indeed, feasible to mill at border facilities the roughly
6 million tons of maize that Mexico imports annually."
The response does not address the recommendation of labeling U.S. imports as
potentially containing biotech genes, but federal policy has consistently
opposed labeling, as well. |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
| Molecular Terrorism
Wed Dec 08, 2004 8:41 pm
|
|
|
http://www.bioelectric.ws/eng/mycoplasma.html
(Mentions Chemtrails)
Molecular Terrorism
Genetically Engineered Stealth Microbes May Be The Source Of Your Health Problems
Author: Gary Tunsky
Source: Crusador Newsletter
You wake up dead tired. You feel like you've been hit by a truck. Sleep becomes sporadic, if at all. When sound sleep occurs, the restoration of energy is minimal causing you to meticulously save your energy like a miser hoards gold. If you force yourself into activities beyond the scope of your normal daily chores, you pay a heavy price. A possible consequence is being bedridden for days.
You have trouble concentrating. Short-term memory spells make you feel like you're trapped in a brain fog. You have unexplained muscle aches and joint pains like a never-ending flu. Your spouse and family don't understand this new metamorphic change in you, going from active and bubbly to sick and decrepit in the prime of your life almost overnight. Your social life has disintegrated and once close friends are slowly drifting away because the monotonous explanation that you're too tired to see a movie or go out to dinner has waned thin. Your taking an abundance of sick time and your boss is starting to question your sanity. Nobody understands. Nobody believes. Nobody offers help. Well, almost nobody.
Thanks to the research of Professor Don Scott and Dr. Garth Nicholson, there is a growing awareness of a mysterious and debilitating illness that is affecting over 800,000 Americans, and being carried dormant by everyone in North America just waiting to be triggered into molecular terrorism. This man made, hidden stealth pathogen is named Mycoplasma, and is the common culprit in almost every disease process today including AIDS and Lymes disease.
Chances are if you feel sick and tired and your doctor is unable to make a definite diagnosis because lab tests, blood chemistry profiles and tissue cultures fail to reveal any disease pathogen, you might very well be infected with Mycoplasma. According to Professor Don Scott, this newly formed virulent pathogen is a weaponized crystalline form of the nonpathogenic Brucella bacterium which resides naturally in the oral cavity, gut flora and superficial body sites that has been genetically engineered with the retro virus visna from sheep (scrapies) by our own military. This mutated sub-viral particle acts by attaching to a gene in either the cell nuclei or mitochondria and given a suppressed immune system, acidic pH, low oxygen cell environment coupled with a triggered physical or emotional trauma, the Mycoplasma/amyloid will initiate a replication process of useless protein fibrils called nucleation. This process triggers programmed cell death disabling the ATP producing factories (mitochondria). These sub-viral bacterium particles have been termed prions by Dr. Prusiner, stealth viruses by John Martin, amyloid by Dr. Gajdusek and Mycoplasma/Brucellosis by Don Scott and Garth Nicholson.
Despite government manipulated statistics, there has been an undeniable rapid increase of all neurodegenerative and autoimmune diseases coming out of nowhere since the mid 1990's with absolutely no origin to their genealogy. My question to medical science is why are there such an unprecedented number of Americans caught up in a medical merry-go-round of being bounced from one doctor to the next without ever receiving a proper diagnosis? The simple answer is mainstream medical doctors are not trained in detection of non-detectable pathogens. Since Mycoplasma hides intracellularly and invades multiple organs and systems, it manifests a vast array of symptoms throughout the whole body, making a correct diagnosis virtually impossible for a mainstream doctor's linear, magic bullet mentality.
Due to the misdirection of medical science compartmentalizing the human body into 10 separate specialty fields (dermatology, endocrinology, urology, neurology, psychology, oncology, gastric specialty, general practice etc.), like an auto mechanic would segregate engine parts, none of the mainstream physicians understand how all 10 body systems work synergistically as a whole like a flowing river. This has led medical science to perpetuate trash can labels to terms for symptoms of Mycoplasma to hide their ignorance.
Syndrome X, Graves disease, Systemic Lupus, Sjogren-Larsson syndrome, Huntington's chorea, Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Rift Valley fever, Hashimoto, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, post traumatic stress syndrome, ADDH, even the recent West Nile virus, are all virulent Mycoplasma invasions in disguise. The names of the mysterious diseases are simply the location of the Mycoplasma invasion/destruction, not a new disease. Almost every neurodegenerative and autoimmune disease has a pathogenic Mycoplasma species responsible for the initiation of the disease process.
7 Mycoplasma Variants Linked To Numerous Diseases
The seven weaponized Mycoplasma variants that enter fluid and blood circulation that were created covertly by the U.S. government and are now wreaking havoc on the population are the following:
1.) M. Fermentans (incognitas strain). The term fermentans reveals fermentation process (i.e.: yeast, molds, fungus, spores, cancer).
2.) M. Penetrans penetrate the cell membrane and invade host cells.
3.) M. Pneumoniae attacks upper respiratory epithelial cells, inflaming them and causing upper respiratory infections and chronic pneumonia.
4.) M. Genitalium (Genitalia) invades urethral tissue and cells in the genital area causing pelvic inflammation and urethritis.
5.) M. Hominus is found in joint tissues in rheumatoid arthritis.
6.) M. Pirum is found in AIDS as a co-factor accelerating AIDS progression.
7.) M. Salivarium is found in salivary glands and joint tissues in rheumatoid arthritis.
High-level exposure of Mycoplasma to blood, semen, mother's milk or vaccines will lead to AIDS. Low-level exposure to bodily fluids where concentrations are less will contribute to chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune diseases. Specific diseases can be targeted by controlling the Mycoplasma concentrations to bodily fluids.
Mycoplasma Thrives On Cholesterol
What makes these designer diseases so elusive is that they're genetically engineered only for DNA replication, transcription and translation with no organelle or cell wall. They have lost their genes for amino acid and fatty acid synthesis, forcing them to invade and steal proteins, sugars and sterols (cholesterol) from healthy neighboring cells to survive.
These cholesterol dependent molecular terrorists immediately take up residency in the individual's genetically pre-disposed weaknesses, (the weak link in the chain of organs or systems), or the path of least resistance. Since Mycoplasma has absolute dependence upon the uptake of preformed sterols (cholesterol structures), they have an affinity toward cell membranes, nerve cells, sex hormone cell factories, glands and the gray matter in brain tissue, where cholesterol sterols are found. Since cholesterol is a co-factor in glandular hormone production, the endocrine balance is drastically altered with cholesterol being pulled out of the cell cycle. That is why pathogenic changes are seen most often during pregnancy, hormone replacement therapy, steroid therapy, menstrual cycles and xenoestrogens from pesticides, herbicides, meat and dairy.
With the disruption of the hormones, comes an open invitation for the RNA directed HIV to replicate. The newly formed HIV RNA makes its way to the host cell surface where it connects and breaks away carrying with it a GP 120 protein envelope that was hijacked from the previous cell's surface. It repeats by countering another cell, adheres to the cell surface and accesses the interior genetic material of its new host where the cascade process is repeated.
Unless Mycoplasma penetrates into tissues and cells they cannot exert their terrorist effects. They will lay dormant, sometimes for a decade, until physical or emotional trauma, severe stress or vaccine contaminants wake up the sleeping giant to invade and feed on the cell's genetic material like an intracellular parasite, taking the cell hostage until it ruptures and dies.
Mycoplasma Triggering Mechanisms
Mycoplasma is activated and stimulated by initiators (ignition) and potentiators (promoters). The potentiators are the toxic substances in our food, beverages, environment, pharmaceuticals, heavy metals (mercury amalgams) and chemicals that we bath in, etc. that store in fat cells and weaken our cellular terrain and immune system to allow the initiators (i.e. stress, viruses, bacteria, fungus, parasites, emotional and physical trauma, fear, increased estrogen, anger, etc.) to ignite or light up the gasoline that's poured on the barn -Mycoplasma.
If the gray matter of the brain tissue is the target of Mycoplasma invasion, you'll portray symptoms of dementia, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease or memory and cognitive thinking disturbances depending on the area of the brain terrorized.
If the spinal cord is the victim, you will exhibit symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases like myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barré and ALS (Lou Gehrig's disease). If your weakness happens to be the synovial fluid cells in your joints, rheumatoid arthritis with severe joint pain will be your disease. In fact, many of the 21st century diseases that were thought to be autoimmune turned out to be Mycoplasma invasions. I do not believe that God made our immune systems that stupid to attack our own tissues.
If Mycoplasma invades the beta cells in the pancreas that manufactures insulin, you can't regulate blood sugar and Diabetes Mellitus will be your demise. If your cardiac tissues are your weak link, cardiomy-opathy will manifest. If M. Pneumoniae or M. Fermentans attacks the bronchial lining of the bronchial tubes, the inflammation will trigger asthma and upper respiratory infections. If the myelin sheaths of the nerves are targeted, you will exhibit neurological symptoms of multiple sclerosis. If the intestinal lining is penetrated, the damage to the mucosal lining will perpetrate Crohn's disease or leaky gut. In the case of Lou Gehrig's disease, 80% of the patients have detected at least two Mycoplasma strains -M. Penetrans and M. Fermentans.
In ALS, the oligodendritic nerve cells which require cholesterol to synthesize neurosteroids are eaten. If Mycoplasma population is large enough, they gobble up so much cholesterol they diminish neurosteroid synthesis which leads to severe central nervous system malfunctions. Even Lymes disease, which is the fastest growing infectious disease in the U.S. and possibly Europe, with the exception of AIDS, was found to be linked to both Borrellia and Mycoplasma infections as a co-infection. The Mycoplasma species of M. Pneumoniae and Chlamydia invading the pericardium lining of the heart, seem to be common dominators of myocarditis and pericarditis infections.
Mycoplasma steroid stealing properties also make the energy producing mitochondria leaky by robbing cholesterol lipids that are necessary in mitochondrial membrane integrity. When mitochondria bleed, they cannot generate ATP energy necessary for cell energy and function and nerve cells are the most sensitive to energy deprivation. This explains why chronic fatigue and neurological disorders are the main symptoms of the trinity diseases chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), fibromyalgia (FMS) and Gulf War illness (GWI). In my opinion, they are the same disease ideology with all three characterizing common symptom traits of chronic fatigue, short term memory loss, low grade fevers, tissue and lymph swelling, joint and muscle pain, stomach and digestive disorders, immuno-suppression and severe systemic chronic infections that invade various organs, tissues and cells including the brain, nervous system and heart.
Mycoplasma Infection Leads To A Medical Merry-Go-Round
Since the disease pattern of CFS, FMS and GWI affect all major body systems (cardio vascular invasion involving the left ventricle, neurological damage ranging from mild cognitive problems to bi-polar depression or schizophrenia, genitourinary damage presenting incontinence or urethritis, pulmonary symptoms of asthma and the development of fibro masses or nodules in the lungs etc.), this multi-faceted symtomatology is causing a medical merry-go-round in the medical profession starting with a general practitioner who will usually prescribe an anti-inflammatory and a short-term antibiotic regimen for the chronic infection. Since you also exhibit symptoms of neurological disorders and your general practitioner is not versed in neurology, you will be referred to a neurologist. After the examination with a neurologist and a couple scripts later for your anxiety and insomnia, you will be pawned off on an endocrinologist for your hormonal imbalance because the neurologist has limited knowledge in endocrinology. Due to the combined adverse side effects of the antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, analgesics and tranquilizers, you may exhibit signs of gastric disturbances and skin reactions where you will be further drugged by a dermatologist or a gastrologist. Next in line on the "gist" medical treadmill is the cardiologist who will push a beta-blocker or a diuretic on you for your cardiomyopothies. After seeing ten different disease specialists and spending thousands of dollars on MRI's, CT Scans, X-Rays, surgery, pharmaceuticals, etc., without finding a solution to your dilemma, you will be labeled psychosomatic, hypochondriac or suffering from severe depression where you will end up with a psychologist. You're now a walking drug store with more complications than what you started with thanks to the combined adverse reactions of the drugs and the limitations of medical doctors who specialize in only 1/10th of the body. What a racket!!!
The government perpetrates non-detectable, virulent, stealth pathogens on the population by way of mosquito vectors (West Nile), primary aerosol, chemtrails, vaccines and possibly the food chain, and then you're put through a medical merry-go-round of disease specialists that know little or nothing about Mycoplasma ideology and do not have access to the necessary diagnostics for detection. The pharmaceutical companies and the warlocks in Washington and Wall Street are laughing all the way to the bank as they profit hundreds of billions of dollars on humanity's suffering while fulfilling their agenda of population control.
Protocols To Treat Mycoplasma
Since Mycoplasma cannot be successfully treated with the usual short course duration of antibiotics due to their intracellular location, slow proliferation rate and inherent resistance to most antibiotics, the few Mycoplasma experts that specialize in this field are recommending six-months to one year of non-stop treatments using strong antibiotics such as Cipro and Doxycycline. However, if a patient does not want to destroy their body and immune system with Cipro and Doxycycline, a total overhaul of every cell from head to toe using a multi-faceted, non-toxic, holistic treatment approach is absolutely necessary to overcome Mycoplasma infections naturally. This is why vitamins and nutritional supplementation are so important in the therapy. Chronic illness patients must also be weaned off antidepressants and other potential immune suppressing drugs before they can fully recover from their illnesses. |
| |
|
|
mark sky
Joined: 14 Oct 2000
Posts: 3616
Location: SW coast of Oregon |
| golly jeppers
Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:41 am
|
|
|
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory?id=308883
U.S. Clears 4 Mln Experimental Flu Shots
Reuters
Dec. 7, 2004 - U.S. health officials, taking another step to ease the season's flu
shot shortage, approved the importation of up to 4 million flu shot doses from
Europe on Tuesday for patients willing to sign a consent form.
The government will immediately buy 1.2 million doses made by GlaxoSmithKline at a
plant in Germany and distribute them to needy areas, Health and Human Services
Secretary Tommy Thompson said. Another 2.8 million doses from the company are
available for later in the flu season.
"With the latest purchase we will be able to protect more high-risk Americans this
flu season in communities across the country," Thompson said at a news conference.
The government will pay Glaxo $7 per dose, Thompson said.
Because the vaccine, called Fluarix, is still considered experimental in the United
States, patients will have to sign a form stating they know the vaccine may pose
risks.
Food and Drug Administration officials inspected the German plant and are confident
the shots are safe and effective, Acting FDA Commissioner Lester Crawford said. The
vaccine, approved in 30 countries, does not have the usual full U.S. approval
because that would have taken too long, he said.
Regulators have been seeking overseas sources of flu vaccine after losing almost
half the country's anticipated supply in October, when one of two major makers,
Chiron Corp., lost the license for its British plant because of contamination
problems.
The United States now may have as many as 65 million flu vaccine doses for the
current flu season. Officials had hoped to vaccinate 100 million Americans, in part
to encourage more firms to get back into the U.S. flu vaccine market.
Currently, Aventis-Pasteur, a subsidiary of French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis, makes
flu shots for the U.S. market. Maryland-based MedImmune also makes an inhaled
vaccine called FluMist.
Flu vaccine has become a political issue, with Democrats accusing the Republican
Bush administration of failing to make sure the country has adequate supplies.
Experts say the problem is complicated because the government does not control which
companies make vaccine, and demand is unpredictable.
The U.S. government was pursuing 1.2 million more doses from ID
Biomedical Corp., but the Canadian firm said Tuesday its remaining supplies will go
to the Canadian market.
GlaxoSmithKline, Europe's biggest drugmaker, said it aimed to supply Fluarix to the
United States permanently. After upgrading its Dresden, Germany, manufacturing
plant, the company said it hopes to supply 10 million to 20 million doses for the
2005-2006 flu season.
Crawford said he expected the United States would have four suppliers by 2007.
Some lawmakers said the administration's decision to import the flu vaccine
contradicted its arguments that allowing Americans to buy cheaper medicines from
abroad was unsafe.
"Hopefully this action means the administration will work with Congress to pass
importation legislation soon, rather than continuing to hide behind false safety
claims," Rep. Rahm Emanuel, an Illinois Democrat, said.
The flu kills 36,000 Americans and puts 200,000 in the hospital in an average year.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says people over 65, babies between
six months and two years, people with chronic conditions and pregnant women should
get flu shots every year.
Glaxo shares were up 1.6 percent, or 70 cents, at $45.22 in morning trade on the New
York Stock Exchange.
(Additional reporting by Susan Heavey in Washington and Ben Hirschler in London) |
| |
|
|
 
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 5:09 pm
|
|
|
|
|
Login
