|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
DELETED
Sat Mar 26, 2005 9:32 pm
|
|
|
DELETED DUE TO THE POLICY OF CTC IN LETTING THE DEBUNKERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS LIKE "FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe" AKA, "MAY41970' OVERRUN THE SITE.
FOR THAT REASON I WILL NOT HAVE MY POST ARCHIVED HERE WITH EXCEPTION TO THOSE POST THAT HAVE BEEN "LOCKED" BY THE ADMINISTRATION IN VARIOUS THREADS AND I NO LONGER WISH TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE THAT SO BLATANTLY FACILITATES AND ENABLES THESE DEBUNKERS, TROUBLEMAKERS AND THERE ILK TO FREELY AND CONSTANTLY ATTACK OTHERS, DISRUPT AND DESTROY THREADS AS THEY PLEASE.
I HAVE HAD QUITE ENOUGH OF THEM AND OF THIS SITE INDULGING THEM IN THERE FANATIC DEBUNKING, TROUBLEMAKING QUEST.
Louis Aubuchont.
Parsonsfield, Maine.
_________________
Last edited by Louis Aubuchont on Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|
BigJoe

Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1602
Location: A Remote/Well Fortified Complex |
Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:15 pm
|
|
|
Lou, Many thanks for taking the time and effort to contribute to this project. It couldn't be for a better cause!!!
I'm really looking forward to your postings.
Now, how do we convince the rest of the membership to take this on? 
Last edited by BigJoe on Sat Mar 26, 2005 11:03 pm; edited 10 times in total |
| |
|
|
Jeanie

Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
helpful hint
Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:21 pm
|
|
|
Hi Louis; If you are copying an artical that has it's print covering a width greater than usual you might want to copy and transfer to your word pad. Then copy again and paste to the forum. I've had pretty good luck with doing it that way...The name and info about the forum member that appears on the left takes up quite a bit of the width you need for the artical. Maybe someone else has an idea too.  |
| |
|
|
Jeanie

Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
methodical coverage
Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:31 pm
|
|
|
Big Joe; I am south of you in N.W. CT. Last night early there were quite a few trails in the sky but this A.M. the sky was clear. Not surprisingly they "sky patrol" rolled in sometime early afternoon and now you guessed it , major sky slop.  |
| |
|
|
BigJoe

Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1602
Location: A Remote/Well Fortified Complex |
DITTO
Sat Mar 26, 2005 10:43 pm
|
|
|
Same here, Jeanie. They're totally out of control up there right now. Even LOTS of neat special and dazzling effects, including an awesome rainbow ring around the sun about noon, some dazzling high-tech Technicolor chemical clouds!!!... and quite a few of those mysterious black lines today. With the binocs, watching a few twin engined 757 sprayers spewing just ONE huge HORIZON/HORIZON SINGLE TRAIL!!! Hey, I thought 757's had TWO engines!!! The sky is just infested with these horrid jets!!! The sats show this to be a truely massive operation! And YES, it looks like they're really giving Connecticut the complete chemical treatment too! This morning, when this whole thing began, we could actually see some of the larger trails raining, or "weeping" down, for lack of a better term, their chemicals, on the landscape and populated areas below. They've been spraying so heavily here that some of these chem clouds actually have dark undersides, just like natural clouds. First time I've ever seen something like THAT!  |
| |
|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
DELETED
Sun Mar 27, 2005 12:47 am
|
|
|
DELETED DUE TO THE POLICY OF CTC IN LETTING THE DEBUNKERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS LIKE "FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe" AKA, "MAY41970' OVERRUN THE SITE.
FOR THAT REASON I WILL NOT HAVE MY POST ARCHIVED HERE WITH EXCEPTION TO THOSE POST THAT HAVE BEEN "LOCKED" BY THE ADMINISTRATION IN VARIOUS THREADS AND I NO LONGER WISH TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE THAT SO BLATANTLY FACILITATES AND ENABLES THESE DEBUNKERS, TROUBLEMAKERS AND THERE ILK TO FREELY AND CONSTANTLY ATTACK OTHERS, DISRUPT AND DESTROY THREADS AS THEY PLEASE.
I HAVE HAD QUITE ENOUGH OF THEM AND OF THIS SITE INDULGING THEM IN THERE FANATIC DEBUNKING, TROUBLEMAKING QUEST.
Louis Aubuchont.
Parsonsfield, Maine.
_________________
Last edited by Louis Aubuchont on Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|
Jeanie

Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
chemtrails
Sun Mar 27, 2005 1:52 am
|
|
|
© Colin Bennett
Colin Bennett
Chemtrails: A Fortean View
A New Look at a Mystery of the Skies
Chemtrails: What's Going On?
Dateline: Saturday, January 22, 2005
By: COLIN BENNETT
By: Phenomena Contributor
The so-called “chemtrails” that are seen almost everywhere in the skies of the world are an incredible phenomenon of our time, if only because like UFO sightings, the broad span of social, political, and intellectual life of major nations largely ignores such things utterly. Even those with imagination (artists, playwrights, novelists, poets) ignore such anomalistic things as UFOs and chemtrails, even though they offer images, symbols, metaphors, intrigue, mysterious technology, and much more besides! This changing of the skies of the world full previously of traditional pantomime clouds to a sky scored by lines of whitish-grey streaks is totally ignored by major news, media, and communication outlets. This is strange again given that the effects are quite spectacular and beautiful when lit by the evening sun. The trails spread out at different rates, they come from different angles, and the aircraft that create them can be seen streaking across the sky, often several at once, and at extremely high speeds.
The word “chemtrails” is used here for lack of a better word, but it is unlikely that what we see spreading out across the sky are chemicals of some sort. Such an amount of chemicals would surely have the most immediate and obvious effect on both our minds and environment. We would be please to hear from environmental group who have more specialized knowledge about any kind of chemical/environmental approach.
Over the past year, the Combat Diaries team have conducted a special investigation of chemtrails over Britain. With the help of specialists (some ex Royal Air Force), we conducted a 16 hour period of observation by web, telephone, and amateur radio of the skies over America and Central Europe, from first light to last light, taking into account time differences. The results were quite disturbing. It was obvious that simultaneous operation by large numbers of quite visible aircraft were being mounted over continental areas on both sides of the Atlantic. Through contacts, we managed also to get reports on this selected same day from the civilian staff of merchant and cruise ships crossing the Atlantic. They reported that sky trails were visible in whilst sailing in mid Atlantic.
Thus we concluded that chemtrails represent a continuous operation of incredible magnitude. The aircraft involved show remarkably similar characteristic and performance, though their profile we have yet to find in any book of aircraft recognition. Roughly, they resemble in shape and size the Boeing 757 (the type that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11), but carried no markings. This is remarkable in itself, because technically it is illegal. Measured by range theodolite and ex-service hand-held rangefinders, they were doing approximately the same speed at the same height. The speed was steady, quite precisely maintained, being 1200 –1400 mph. This is somewhat high for an outmoded passenger aircraft type, meant for inland short/medium range commuter flights at a top speed of 450 mph!
These things are wonders in themselves, but it is the sheer number of these pseudo 757-type aircraft that is beyond belief. On this chosen sample day, our reporters in France, Germany and Holland, Spain, Italy and Israel alone reported at noon the sky trails of no less that 234 almost identical aircraft at between 40-50,00 feet Since this hourly rate continued during the day it represented some 2340 sorties over ten hours. Worldwide, multiplying the quite reasonable factor of 10, we have 23,400 sorties per day by planes of a non-military non-supersonic configuration, travelling at speeds equivalent to the combat speed of F16 or Typhoon Euro-fighter.
By comparison, NATO figures for annual full-scale exercises amount to something like 300 (jet supersonic) combat sorties at full stretch for the same time period, involving some no more than 150 aircraft. Again, the absence of reported noise is strange. Even a single Tornado on afterburner over central London would shake the population up considerably.
Since our observers at military and civilian airfields reported no such activity by any such aircraft, we have here a modern mystery in our skies visible to all on a clear day. National airspace regulations don’t appear to be a problem at all with any country as far as these infringements are concerned.
This vast number of aircraft appear to have no detectable bases, they have no apparent air-refuelling needs, they do not carry drop tanks, and the routes appear to stretch across the sky from all compass points, often crossing one another on a pretty random basis. They appear also to have no detectible manufacturers, support base, or refuelling facilities. And they don’t appear to land or take off! Again, since no air force in the world (not even the United States Air Force) has any supersonic transport aircraft, the presence of many hundreds of supersonic transport aircraft is rather strange!
The cost such of such visible operations on a worldwide basis by the approximately the same type of powerful aircraft must be stupendous. The maintenance, fuelling, and repair facilities of such a great number of high-performance aircraft can only be imagined. The training schemes and accommodation of the personnel appear not to exist! Since no such numbers of this aircraft type are on manufacturer’s lists, and the number that have been manufactured are all busy on conventional routes flying conventional passengers and cargo, we have here a true mystery of our time.
Where are they from, and what are they doing on their seemingly purposeless routes across the sky?
Investigations are continuing. We are trying, by various means to monitor their VHF, but they do not appear to have any measurable frequency signature and neither do they appear to make any physical noise. This again is amazing because the represent a very great number of aircraft that are entering and leaving (an indeed manoeuvring) inside national airspace at will, with no recognition signals, and no visible identification. Since they are supersonic, they are over the visible horizon in seconds (the comparatively lazy motion of a 400-mph 747 Jumbo may be compared to them). Where these many aircraft all break into Mach 1 is another mystery.
We have discovered something else that multiplies these astonishments. Using (passive) night scope infrared amplifiers, we found that the operations did not cease after nightfall!
This means that roughly speaking we can possibly multiply the scale of operations by a factor of two, bringing us into absurd realms as regards cost, maintenance, and purpose.
Our collective “not-seeing” is unusual if only because chemtrails are much more visible and more frequent than UFO visitations. We are forced to consider the idea that levels of conscious acceptance and recognition within a culture have often nothing to do with how much “evidence” is available. All anomalistic structures have this common peculiarity. Somehow, like a bioelectric switch, as a society we turn most anomalies “off” as far as social cognition is concerned. This is a most common effect. The phenomenon may be large or small, fantastic or mundane, it makes no difference. We cannot see the kitchen matchbox in front of us, say, because we are have been diverted into thinking about something else. We don’t have enough RAM to hold all our files open at the same time!
From a Fortean point of view, the phenomenon of chemtrails might enable us to construct a new and healthier definition of what we mean by “skepticism.” We might see skepticism not a revealing of mundane truth, so much as an automated control mechanism by means of which maintain a kind of wonder-management rather than differentiate fact from fiction. This was Charles Fort’s original view of the function of skepticism. It puts “doubt” in a new dynamic context rather than it being seen as a depressing semi-automated denial of all that is wondrous and magical in the world.
Meantime, we are starting the long, hard road of corresponding with the appropriate civil and military authorities about chemtrails.
We can hear both Franz Kafka and Charles Fort laughing from their graves!
Colin Bennett was born in Robin Hood’s Sherwood Forest, within arrow-shot of the Sheriff of Nottingham’s castle. He left school after studying science and mathematics, became a professional musician, then a mercenary soldier before winning a scholarship to read English at Balliol College, University of Oxford.
After leaving Oxford, he had several plays performed on the professional stage in London including the Royal Court Theatre before retraining as an electronics engineer to cure what he calls “a bad dose of left-liberal decadence.” After his reconstruction, he then ran his own electronics consultancy and printing firm. He has had two novels published, and now lives within a spear-throw of Portobello Road, London, and hopes he has done with reconstructions. He is frequently consulted on security, conspiracies, and computer hacking. He now heads a team who spend all their time running the Combat Diaries web site at http://www.combat-diaries.co.uk
He is the author of Looking for Orthon (Paraview Press) a biography of George Adamski. His following book, on the life work, and ideas of Charles Fort, was Politics of the Imagination (Head Press). This won the Anomalist Award for Best Biography, 2002.
His third biography is due out in March 2005. This is An American Demonology (Head Press) the story of Captain Edward Ruppelt, who headed Project Blue Book in the early 1950s. This Project was the official United States Air Force investigation into the UFO phenomenon. Both the above books are available on Amazon.
You must be logged in to post comments.
Login or Register. |
| |
|
|
BigJoe

Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1602
Location: A Remote/Well Fortified Complex |
Sun Mar 27, 2005 1:17 pm
|
|
|
WOW!!! Excellent article, Jeanie, Thanks! I was especially interested in the part on those "psudo 757's", as they are the one's that seem to be doing most, if not all, of the spraying... laying down those truely massive HORIZON/HORIZON trails. And keep in mind that these are TWIN ENGINED jets, that should be leaving TWO exhaust trails. Yesterday, during our truely AWESOME blitz here, I spotted quite a few of these "757's" leaving only ONE massive trail. Observing these strange jets through my binocculars, there was absolutey NO DOUBT of this, and the source of this trail was the REAR of the jet!!!... there was ABSOLUTELY NO VISIBLE EXHAUST BEING EMITTED from the two wing mounted engine pods!!!... NOTHING, not even a trace, and obviously these were NOT normal contrails... these awesome chemtrails stretched from horizon to horizon and quickly merged together. Sometimes, when watching these jets with my binocs, yes, I do see two huge massive trails coming from them, but once again... they are NOT being emitted from the wing mounted twin engines. Instead, these trails are coming from the TIPS of the small rear wings (horizontal stabilizers)! It's a truely incredible and unbelievable thing to see when viewed through a good pair of binocculars. As if a new form of propulsion was being used! For those not aware of this, I would recommend a good pair of binocs, and keeping them trained on these strange "757's" during the next spraying operation over your region. I suspect that you WON'T be disappointed in your findings!
As expected, on all of the local forecasts I saw yesterday, not even the word "contrails" was mentioned. It was the usual stuff... how lucky we were that we weren't getting that awful, nasty rain just to our south over Pennsylvania, but instead, it was such a beautiful day up here in Western New York, and we should all be outside enjoying the "hazy" sunshine!!!
Just as an aside, here's a fact that they very rarely, if EVER seem to mention... we haven't had any decent precipitation here in Western New York in quite some time now... we sure could use a little bit of that awful, pesky, unwanted rain up here in Western New York right now, because our annual precipitation shortfall has now climbed to 1.37 inch BELOW NORMAL. I'm sure hoping they're right with their latest forecast... they still seem pretty sure of themselves on this soaking rainstorm they are forecasting for this Monday/Tuesday. I have my rain gauge set up and waiting... |
| |
|
|
BigJoe

Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1602
Location: A Remote/Well Fortified Complex |
Sun Mar 27, 2005 2:23 pm
|
|
|
9:20 A.M. There was a brief overnight lull in this massive spraying operation, but within the hour, the spray jets have returned, and our sky is once again overcast with a thick chemical haze. All of this ahead of a large weather system that is still being forecast to bring 1+ inch of rain here Monday/night/Tuesday. Precipitation totals from this soaking rainstorm will be posted.
Precipitation Data...
2005 to date................................................ 5.14 inches
Normal to date............................................. 6.51 inches
Precipitation for 2005 to date.......................... 1.37 inch BELOW NORMAL |
| |
|
|
BigJoe

Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1602
Location: A Remote/Well Fortified Complex |
Sun Mar 27, 2005 8:00 pm
|
|
|
Lou, just doing a little checking on Portland, Maine weather data, which I believe isn't too far from you. I love New England, wish I were up there.
Last edited by BigJoe on Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:59 pm; edited 4 times in total |
| |
|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
DELETED
Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:50 pm
|
|
|
DELETED DUE TO THE POLICY OF CTC IN LETTING THE DEBUNKERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS LIKE "FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe" AKA, "MAY41970' OVERRUN THE SITE.
FOR THAT REASON I WILL NOT HAVE MY POST ARCHIVED HERE WITH EXCEPTION TO THOSE POST THAT HAVE BEEN "LOCKED" BY THE ADMINISTRATION IN VARIOUS THREADS AND I NO LONGER WISH TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE THAT SO BLATANTLY FACILITATES AND ENABLES THESE DEBUNKERS, TROUBLEMAKERS AND THERE ILK TO FREELY AND CONSTANTLY ATTACK OTHERS, DISRUPT AND DESTROY THREADS AS THEY PLEASE.
I HAVE HAD QUITE ENOUGH OF THEM AND OF THIS SITE INDULGING THEM IN THERE FANATIC DEBUNKING, TROUBLEMAKING QUEST.
Louis Aubuchont.
Parsonsfield, Maine.
_________________
Last edited by Louis Aubuchont on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|
Jeanie

Joined: 18 Nov 2001
Posts: 1323
Location: North East U.S.A. |
Sad Observations
Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:50 am
|
|
|
Louis, I'm sure all agree we welcome your observations and too that "official sources" of info. are not always factual. Very sad world we are living in when the powers that be carry on clandesitine operations of world wide magntude without our understanding or permission, especially when it involves dumping toxins into our breathing space 24/7 year in and year out...To add insult to injury, our taxes are paying for it, the cost of which must be staggering... Jeanie |
| |
|
|
BigJoe

Joined: 07 Dec 2002
Posts: 1602
Location: A Remote/Well Fortified Complex |
They should have asked us!!!
Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:50 pm
|
|
|
The forecast here has been changed, just as we expected it would be.
The "drenching rainstorm" has now been downgraded to "just a few light showers".
Precipitation at 9:48 A.M. EST................0.00
Precipitation for 2005 to date.................1.46 inches BELOW NORMAL
On the doppler radar, the areas of rain continue to break up as they head north towards our region.
Further precipitation updates from this "drenching rainstorm" will be posted. |
| |
|
|
Louis Aubuchont
tagged & banned
Joined: 08 Mar 2005
Posts: 946
Location: Parsonsfield, Maine |
DELETED
Mon Mar 28, 2005 4:37 pm
|
|
|
DELETED DUE TO THE POLICY OF CTC IN LETTING THE DEBUNKERS AND TROUBLEMAKERS LIKE "FUIwon'tDoWhatUTellMe" AKA, "MAY41970' OVERRUN THE SITE.
FOR THAT REASON I WILL NOT HAVE MY POST ARCHIVED HERE WITH EXCEPTION TO THOSE POST THAT HAVE BEEN "LOCKED" BY THE ADMINISTRATION IN VARIOUS THREADS AND I NO LONGER WISH TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH A SITE THAT SO BLATANTLY FACILITATES AND ENABLES THESE DEBUNKERS, TROUBLEMAKERS AND THERE ILK TO FREELY AND CONSTANTLY ATTACK OTHERS, DISRUPT AND DESTROY THREADS AS THEY PLEASE.
I HAVE HAD QUITE ENOUGH OF THEM AND OF THIS SITE INDULGING THEM IN THERE FANATIC DEBUNKING, TROUBLEMAKING QUEST.
Louis Aubuchont.
Parsonsfield, Maine.
_________________
Last edited by Louis Aubuchont on Fri Nov 23, 2007 12:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
| |
|
|

|
|
Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300 Next
All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 4:16 pm
|
|
|
|
|