Chemtrail Central
Member List
Image Database
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Flight Explorer
Silver Orbs
News Archive

Chemtrail Central
Search   FAQs   Messages   Members   Profile
Prophecy about Pope's death

Post new topic Reply to topic
Chemtrail Central > Conspiracy

Author Thread

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
492. S.S.G. in VT shooting spree (8) (6/23/07) PostWed Aug 22, 2007 11:08 pm  Reply with quote  

492. S.S.G. in VT shooting spree (Cool (6/23/07)

10. The two key person in VT case practiced in shooting range shortly before the VT killing.

The news made me think Cho was instructed by an organization to buy a gun and practice it in a shooting range .

Re: " Camps/ Thousands gather at memorials

VT Police Chief Wendell Flinchum said police had not entirely ruled out the possibility that two people were involved. (in camp shooting) ......

The person of interest was identified as Karl David Thornhill of Blacksburg. According to federal affidavits released Tuesday, Thornhill was said to be a friend of Emily Hilscher, the woman killed in the first shooting. Police wanted to talk to him because the woman's roommate, Heather Haugh, told them Thornhill and Hilscer fired guns at a shooting range as recently as two weeks ago.

Some reports Monday indicated that Cho was angry at Hilscher for breaking off a romantic relationship. Haugh said Tuesday that she did not believe Hilscher knew Cho."
(Mercury News 4/18/2007)

1. E. Hilscher was a freshman, Cho was at his final year of education. And Cho was a lonely, silent person who avoid personal communication. There was rare chance for them to meet together. Hilscher's roommate proved it.

2. The story that Cho had a romantic relationship with Hilscher could be used to justify why Hilscher was selected as first victim to be shot at. But it came out without any foundation. So who had the motive to create that story?

3. When police didn't rule out the possibility that two people were involved in shooting case, what made them to think so? Remember the man of interesting was not an oriental but Karl David Thornhill. Someone may have witnessed the person with Hilscher at her last moment was not an oriental but a similar racial like K.D.Thornhill. Boy friend does not necessary become a suspect when a woman was murdered.

4. The most important thing is that Hilscher, a woman of 18 (?) and Cho were least likely to have a gun hobby. But they suddenly went to the shooting ranch to practice the gun just weeks before the VT shooting case. One was the first victim in the case and the other was accused of being gunman, both were the key figure in that big tragedy, was it a coincidence? Shooting range is certainly not a popular thing as cinema. Were they preparing for something? Or most likely, they were instructed or led to do so. Which organization was powerful enough to force them to do it?

5. To my knowledge with the Feds, they prepared with support group which would give cover up and "reliable witness" for each case let alone the big one such like Virginia Tech. massacre.
I think Hilscher and Cho were all recruited informant and were used as S.S.G. in this case. (there probably were more S.S.G. in this event, only we never know.)

6. Then why Emily Hilscher was killed as first victim?
Not everyone is as evil as the Feds. Hilscher may have thought it was fun to work for the intelligence. To follow the suspect to the beach, luxury hotel and casinos, exciting and romantic life like what she saw in film "007". When she was told her job was to kill the undead innocent students, her morale told her to refuse such a mission. She was instantly killed by her handler.

I think Hilscher's death was an incident, not in Feds plan. S.S.G. used to be instructed their detailed work at the last minute before they were sent to carry out their mission if it was a secret job. This one was a top secret. Since there was a Feds command team for that plot in Virginia Tech. on 4/16 already, so there could be a "stand down" order immediately from Feds to local police. They didn't want their plan to be disrupted. The local police also was told the suspect was out of state, an information only Feds could give. And to tie Cho with Hilscher, they even developed a story of romance later.

But even they have that story, it's still a big flaw that Cho killed two people in dormitory, then went on for other business for more than two and half hour, then came back to go on with his shooting spree. It doesn't make sense. Could you imagine that the two gunmen in Columbine High, went to school, killed a teacher, then left for a breakfast in McDonald, then came back continue with their shootings?

As a matter of fact, Cho, (or some other S.S.G.) like other students, didn't know there was a shooting happened in the dorm two hours ago. (The information was censored that morning.) So he could unhurriedly chained the door of Noris building to the plan.

(to be continued)

493. Beware of terror attack around 7/4 (6/28/07)

Now media reports a poll showed Bush is in a new low. His approval rate was only 26%. I think in other way. Since media is controlled by intelligence, it is an extortion on Bush: Act now or you will be the worst President in history.

What action the intelligence demanded? Terror attacks to justify a new war. Terror attack benefit ruling class, it's common sense.
Quote, "Arkansas GOP head: We need more 'attacks on American soil' so people appreciate Bush
Josh Catone Published: Sunday June 3, 2007
In his first interview as the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan told a reporter that America needs to be attacked by terrorists so that people will appreciate the work that President Bush has done to protect the country.

Here is another news from ABC. May indicate a new plot of terror attack.
Quote, "Exclusive: Suicide Bomb Teams Sent to U.S., Europe
June 18, 2007 4:45 PM
Large teams of newly trained suicide bombers are being sent to the United States and Europe, according to evidence contained on a new videotape obtained by the Blotter on
Teams assigned to carry out attacks in the United States, Canada, Great Britain and Germany were introduced at an al Qaeda/Taliban training camp graduation ceremony held June 9.
A Pakistani journalist was invited to attend and take pictures as some 300 recruits, including boys as young as 12, were supposedly sent off on their suicide missions."

Is it true story? I believe so. It's a news from "reliable" mainstream media: ABC. They even invited journalist taking pictures as evidence. But the whole event is a well planned plot. To justify massive terror attacks in Europe and US. Here is my analysis.

1. To convince tamed sheep the news is reliable,a journalist was invited. Have ever heard that covert work to be drum beaten and trumpet blown? Have you ever heard of that CIA, KGB, Mossad .... all secret organization in the world hold a ceremony for their special mission team? It means: "Please get ready to arrest the men we will send to you." Will a bandit have a news announcement before they rob a bank?

2. Even American citizens have problem with their government in travel across the board, many of them were in "no fly" list. How can Al Qaida send large team to wherever they want to go?

3. Taliban lost its own rule in Afghanistan, Al Qaida run cave to cave. They can't even take care of themselves. How can they do whatever they want in abroad?

4. If Al Qaida have nuclear weapon or other WMD weapon, why don't use it in Mid-east where there is US army Base everywhere? And to transfer weapon and militants to US and Europe is much more difficult and dangerous than to use it in Iraq and Afghan.

5. This news proved my allegation. The leadership of Al Qaida or Taliban or insurgence are the informants of the Western intelligence. They work for the interest of the Inside Group. They recruit discontented people, train them into militants, insurgents, or suicide bombers. We are familiar with this tactic. (A typical sample is Miami terror cell. Poor, innocent, discontented people were recruited. Then instructed by FBI informant to swear loyal to Al Qaida and plan attack to FBI office.) In Mid-east, they were trained as suicide-bomber. As you have seen, the suicide bomb target were always innocent people in the market place or the new Iraqi police. On the purpose to provoke a civil war. For the propaganda interest of US intelligence, they now had an education ceremony of the suicides and invite journalist to take photograph despite the danger for its own recruited fighters.

Watch the date of this news: 6/18. After the failure of 6/15 plot, they rapidly develop a new one. I think the "terror attack" will be around 7/4 the independence day. The Feds used to find excuse for the "enemy". And it will be massive suicide bombings in Europe and US.

I felt this two weeks ago. Feds poisoned the food in nearby small oriental super market. I had a severe cough these days. It was a result of food contaminated by radioactive material. The purpose is to force me to the big shopping center to buy food where a bombing will be more justified. I have experienced the same tactic last year. Only the Holiday was not Independence Day but Christmas shopping season. (see "448. Highway 680 pass-over bridge was a bomb target (11/15/06)" and "453. November Surprise (12/5/06)")

494. Preconception, a tactic of the Feds (9)(7/3/07)

I used to remind people that a terror attack may come when there is a news about terror case or terror warning from government. I think it is a psychological operation of the intelligence. They pre-settle public's mind for the coming event they plotted. The news of Al Qaida/Taliban suicide teams (see #493) is a typical sample. When that kind of bombing happens, the first thing goes to public's mind will be: it must be done by Al Qaida. The real criminal will be ignored.

On 6/28, I alerted people that there might be massive suicide bombings in Europe and US.(see #493) Next day and the day after, there were three car bombing cases in UK. I think it was part of the July 4th plot.

11. VT case was originally planned as a Terror attack.

In Virginia Tech. shooting case, Feds also had a preconception process. They had issued an article about "terrorist attack school" two weeks before VT shooting case. I have been alarmed by that article in early April and posted a reply to that message. I immediately recalled the article when the massacre took place and back traced it.

Re: Terrorists - coming to a school near you
Police ill-equipped to defend against an American Beslan
Posted: April 2, 2007
Authorities fear the school massacre that shook Russia a few years ago may be a dress rehearsal for what al-Qaida plans to do in America - only on a grander scale, launching multiple school attacks simultaneously across the country.
In 2004, Chechen terrorists associated with al-Qaida seized a school building in Beslan, Russia, and slaughtered 338, including 172 children.
Three years later, schools and local police in this country are still unprepared to deal with such an assault, experts warn. Most don't have response plans for handling a single active shooter, let alone a cell of trained terrorists launching a large-scale attack.

Clues show that the VT shooting case originally was planned as a "terror case".

Re: "Bomb threats last two weeks
Police said there had been bomb threats on campus over the past two weeks but that they had not determined a link to the shootings."


Re: "Virginia School Shooting: Another Government Black-Op?

The shootings came three days after a bomb threat Friday forced the cancellation of classes in three buildings, WDBJ in Roanoke reported. Also, the 100,000-square-foot Torgersen Hall was evacuated April 2 after police received a written bomb threat, The Roanoke Times reported. "

We can see how the warning article matches the bomb threat in Virginia Tech. camps.
4/2. Article of terror attack on school issued.
4/2. First bomb threat in Virginia Tech.
4/13. last bomb threat in Virginia Tech.
4/16. Shooting spree in Virginia Tech.

In massive reports from the mainstream media after the case broke off, there were few words about the bomb threat. Because Feds changed their tactic at last minute. So the propaganda was concentrated on individual gunman instead of "terror bombing".

(to be continued)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostThu Sep 13, 2007 1:32 am  Reply with quote  

495, Murder tactic, bombing the shopping center (7/8/07)

In my message #493 posted on 6/28, I warned possible massive terror attack in Europe and US.
Next day and the day after (6/29 and 6/30), there were three bombing case in UK. I think it belongs to the July 4th plot I warned.

That three cases obviously are terror propaganda from intelligence.

1. The two car bombs found in London were loaded with gasoline, nails and gas canisters. It would have caused significant casualty had it exploded. If the third car in Glasgow Airport packed with same thing, the result would be disastrous. But it only caught a fire. Why? Did the terrorist care about the innocent passengers' lives? No, it's because the operator was inside the car. He cared about his own life.

2. If it was a terror attack with a flaming car, one man was enough. Drove a car and crashed it into a terminal, then ignite the gasoline. It's that simple. What was that second man for? Nothing but a "reliable" witness intelligence needed.

3. A typical terror cell created in this way: An informant, disguised as anti - Western fighter, recruit discontented people. In Mid-east, they become insurgents or Al Qaida. In Western, they become terror cell. These people, usually become sacrifice in the plot planned by intelligence.

I think the driver of that Jeep Cherokee is such a sacrifice. He was seriously burned and could die of it. The other one, is a living evidence. In Mardrid bombing, the suicide bombers carelessly left a phone to identify themselves. In 911 attack, the passport of suicide team leader Atta survived the impact and fire. It proved that Arabs attacked US. The unhurt man in Glasgow case plays the role of Atta's passport and forgotten phone.

4. Media has different attitude on different case. It may reflect the attitude of the intelligence. VT shooting case is the worst camp killing in US history. In less than a week, the news about it completely disappeared from the media. They wish people forget it forever. Three bombing case in UK result no death, (improved tactic?) The media keep it alive until now. Each day there is a new development. "Eight in custody for British attacks", "Suspects all in medical field", and recent one, "Two suspects sought to work in US".

That is their real purpose - to justify terror attack in US. Since 7/7/05 London bombing, I always alleged it was a cover up work to justify the real bombing coming up later in US. The real target is me. Though the bombing is in the name of terror attack on Independence Day, the tactic is to lure me to the big shopping center by cheap food so that a murder fulfilled in a "terror attack". The recent ads from nearby supermarket full of the food I used to buy. All with good price rarely seen these days. Of course, I dare not go to the trap. I stay home on stored food.

Then I saw this message.

Quote, "FBI: Suicide Bombs a Big Concern

PAT MILTON Wed, Jul. 04, 2007
The Associated Press

NEW YORK - Suicide bombers have not hit the United States since the 9/11 terrorist hijacking attacks, but they remain a constant concern because of their prevalence around the globe and determination to die for their causes, according to the FBI's chief of counterterrorism.

Billy, the FBI assistant director in charge of counterterrorism, made his comments during a rare wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, days before the failed car bombing in London and the airport bombing in Glasgow."
The interview was made days before 6/29. It was for July 4th plot. Notice that Associated Press issued it on July 4. It means though National Holiday is over, the bombing plot will continue. So when there is a bombing happens in US, check if it is in North San Jose or its nearby area. I have to go out shopping anyway.

496. Cover up and demonize ( VT shooting case 11) (7/13/07)

Distract is a very important tactic Feds used to use. A terror bombing in school could well achieved the goal. Then why did the Feds changed their tactic in last minute? Because terror bombing in school only distract, an Oriental gunman kill US students could achieve more.

The extra advantage if it was a Chinese gunman who did the VT shooting.

1. A hostility between China and US in appearance would cover up the collaboration of the secret police of these two countries in this case.
2. Demonize the Chinese because the main target of the whole plot were Chinese Americans. They would be wronged in a framed drug case. It's a psychological operation: let people believe Chinese were criminals.

Here is my experience of this tactic.

1. Re: "Because of persecution on me was intensified at that time, I left for HongKong in March, 1999. The visa granted me a three months stay in HongKong. My wife and parents urged me to go to Shanghai but I refused. I had been there in 1994 and 1995. The bitter experience then told me Chinese secret police was co-operated with US agents in persecution. I told them I'd go somewhere else but not China.

On 5/8, NATO bombed Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia. Three missiles hit the building and caused three deaths. The official explanation was that army Misunderstood the target by using an old map. Of course most people don't believe it. There were big protest in China and HongKong. Media reported anti-US sentiment growing in China. I fell in that propaganda. And thought that in such a situation, China secret police might not work so eagerly for US agency. Maybe I would be safe to go to China at this time?

I visited Chinese travel agency in later May. And applied for a visa there on 6/1.

Then I was hesitated because there was an unusual warm welcome from my relatives. One lesson for me after the drug case is the drift apart of friends and relatives. (see "9. Estranged friends and customers") People were intimidated by agents. Though they won't refuse if I ask for help. To actively welcome a person of "trouble" is perversive. With continued call from my relatives in Shanghai, I had a feeling the invitation were from secret agent. After a re-consideration, I decided to go to South-east Asia.

I was once curious at the event of Chinese Embassy bombing. Was it a designated one or a coincidence? I was almost fell in that psychology trap and went for a dangerous trip to China. But in 1999, it seemed NATO was far from FBI, DEA. "You may over sensitive." I told myself. (That missile bombing actually was done by Pentagon without acknowledge to NATO)

Later development proved my suspicion is reasonable. Similar event re-acted in 2001." (see #193)

2. Re: "194. D.o.D. worked for D.o.J. (1/6/04)

In April 2001, an US EP-3 spy plane collided with a Chinese fighter above South China sea and was forced landing in HaiNan Island of China. In same month both directors of FBI and DEA announced resignation that they would leave in June.

A news in internet revealed that FBI and DEA took part in a secret deal in which they paid a large sum of money to China to release the spy plane and the crew. (The main point of that secret deal was to frame a drug case original from China) I realized in the name of solving spy plane crisis, D.o.J. bribed Chinese secret police to frame a drug case on me. The attempt repeated several times and finally proved by the break out of Fujian drug case. (see attempted drug case at message #61 to 65. See spy plane case at: 'Why DEA, FBI involved in secret deal of spy plane?'
See Fujiang drug case at messages: 141,142,143,150, 155)

The two accidents (bombing Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia and collision of spy plane)
played cover up role for the plot of D.o.J.. They create a hostile appearance between US and China to make any plot more deceivable. People would hardly believe there was a conspiracy between two hostile countries. So they would believe framed drug case a true one."

So on the day of 4/16, when the TV reported the heavy casulty in VT shooting spree and it was done by a "Chinese who came from Shanghai via San Francisco." I realized it was created for my case.

(to be continued)

497. July plot: a nuclear bombing (7/18/07)

To make a secret deal under table, then to cover up it by a dispute in appearance, it's a trick often played by the secret police. Another typical story is the death of Litvinenko. Litvinenko was killed by radioactive poison. It creates public panic on radioactive material so bombing Iran nuclear site is justified. It also creates a dispute between Russian and U.K. to cover up a secret deal between western and eastern. What is the secret deal? A dirty bomb attack or nuclear bomb attack on Europe or US. The radioactive material or the nuclear bomb will come from Russia. A dispute in appearance makes a cover up. People won't suspect there is a conspiracy behind the scene.That was November plot. (see "451. The death of former Russian spy (11/25/06") It was soured then but now is revived.

In early July Russian leader Putin visited Bush family's Main home. I allege a secret deal have been reached there.

1. A hostility cover up created. On July 14, Putin tears up Arms Pact with NATO. They successfully run up a dispute event.
2. In July, UK ousted 4 Russian diplomats based on Litvinenko's case. After seven months, Litvinenko's case revived again.
3. Though it seems Russia's relations with West hit a new low point, it is only a fake mask. In July, Russia is granted to host the next Winter Olympic game. It is a pre-payment for the secret deal. Too familiar with it that UK was granted to host 2012 Olympic game on 7/6/05, next day (7/7) the first bombing in London broke off. And China was granted the host of 2008 Olympic in 2001 after it signed secret deal with the Feds to frame a big drug case in US.
4. An unusual massive preconception psychological operation in domestic. Here are some major operations: On 7/10, Homeland Security Chief M. Chertoff warned terror attack based on his gut feeling. On 7/11, Government Report Concludes Al Qaeda Now as Strong as in Summer of 2001. Then came with 50 seconds' Bin Laden's tape calling for "martyrdom". The latest is the yesterday's (7/17) "Grim view of terror threat" from National Intelligence Estimate which suggests the threat of terrorist violence against the US is growing worse.
You see, another terror attack is ready. Psychological propaganda has been done. Here is a pre-warning of the planned nuke terror:

Expert: Nuke terror better than even bet
Attack likely to exploit existing network of cross-border human, drug traffickers
Posted: July 6, 2007

© 2007
WASHINGTON - A nuclear terrorist attack on the U.S. is better than an even bet in the next 10 years, says a former assistant secretary of defense and author of a book on the subject.

Though the article issued on 7/6, I learned it yesterday. When circumstance evidences show Feds prepared a nuke attack, that article strengthens the idea. So I clicked on it for the original one. I surprisingly found it was the same site that had predicted the VT camp violence. (see "494. Preconception, a tactic of the Feds (9)(7/3/07)). It seems that I have found the original preconception source of the Feds. Read #494 and watch the reference articles from worldnetdaily. You'll understand how Feds manipulate public's mind.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostSun Sep 23, 2007 12:52 am  Reply with quote  

498. Why VT shooting planned on 4/16 (12) (7/23/07)

On 4/8 and 4/13, I wrote #477 and #478, alleged there was an April plot and the action date would be 4/17. I thought Feds planned an unreasonable search that day based on I would file a tax return that day. With which as a reason they would activate a field raid to frame a drug case. (Detail see "478. April plot and tax return (4/13/07)")

I didn't file tax return last year because I don't have to - I have little income which is below the margin IRS requires to file. IRS has no reason to raid a discontinued account unless there is special reason. I believe IRS told Feds (DOJ, FBI, DEA) to provoke me to re-file the tax return so they could have a reason to raid.

That was what I saw in bank statement in later March that IRS had added a refund at my account. I asked my wife why she used my account for tax purpose since we separate our finance for nearly a year. She said it was probably the last year's when she still used the joint account. But several days later (in early April) my wife informed me that IRS would withdraw from my account more than thousand dollars. Because there was just a refund from IRS, she had to admit that this time the withdrawal was from this year's tax file. (2007 file for fiscal year 2006) Of course, she had no words to explain why she used my account for her own tax return.

It really rattled me. Obviously, Feds tried to tie me to my wife's tax return. Last year, my wife and accountant firm filed a return without my consent which deliberately under reported and mis-reported. I had to separate my finance from my wife's because I didn't know what she actually did. But it seems that she still tied me with her tax return by my bank account. I guess she and the accountant firm might still file tax return as joint account without my consent. (with no my signature)

What the best way I can do? Maybe I should file a separate tax return (although I don't have to because I have little income) to prove my finance is separated from my wife? I almost did so before I realizing this was another trap. (I'll talk about it next time)

On 4/17, my wife left for a two weeks' trip. I learned it when she chatted with friend several days before. She refused to tell me where she would go when I asked her. Now I still don't know where had she been in these 16 days. So if something happened on 4/17, nobody knew what took place at my home. And to my experience, my wife would be murdered too in her travel. She played a role in the plot and could be a witness. Similar scene had been acted in 2005 when she, too, took a trip between 9/22 - 9/29. That was for 9/24 plot - a big plot in a created event famous for Katrina and Rita Hurricane. (see "339. The September plot (9/2/05)")

Why it was 4/16? Because I used to mail tax return on the day before the last day. ( in case something un-expected happens on the last day). So when I heard the news of VT shooting spree, I talked to myself, "Gosh, they (Feds) really studied my habit."

If Cho Seung Hui was the real gunman, then he should have been identified immediately. Because no dead person else should have a gun (or two guns) and bullets in his pocket. (You don't expect that when police broke in the building was the time he just exhausted his bullets, do you?)
But it took a day to identify him.
Quote, "MSNBC's FBI profiler: 'students lined up and shot execution style'

19 hours after the first shooting, the shooter(s) has/have not been identified. [00:15 EDT 17 Apr 2007]
Dead Gunman Yet to Be ID'd 16 Apr 2007 In a press conference tonight"

The fact is: The shooting spree took place at about 9:39 am, 4/16.
The gunman was a Chinese from Shanghai via San Francisco was reported several hours later on same day. Very efficient.
Another report that gunman was out of state broadcast at same time. Very efficient too.
Only next day ( 4/17), people knew the gunman was Cho Seung Hui.
On 4/18, large quantity of Cho's life were reported by media. What he said, what he wrote, his life details. All got in hours. Very very efficient. Seems there was a file get ready already. (consider Cho's ID revealed on 4/17 and the newspaper must be printed at midnight of 4/17)

Then why the gunman's ID was released so inefficient? My interpretation is: Feds was waiting for a tax return to be mailed that day. When I didn't do it, they knew plan went soured. Feds released a second scheme the next day. (Cho became gunman.)

My family came from Shanghai and live in San Francisco. I allege Feds framed a big drug case on me and my family. I talk about this very clearly. I also predicted 4/17 was their action day. Obviously their first scheme of VT shooting spree tried to connect the gunman to my case. Please read the origin news again at #480.

(to be continued)

499. July plot (2) (7/28/07)

I believe Feds have planned another big plot in July. They would have framed a drug case in Bay area, then distracted it by a big terror attack - a dirty bomb attack or a nuclear bomb attack. And finally would have started war against Iran.

1. From 7/2 to 7/8, in three big Chinese newspaper of San Francisco Bay Area, FBI had a continued ads: "FBI, to protect the freedom and democracy of our country..... We particularly welcome those who know very well about the Chinese State Security Dept. to contact us. If you don't understand English, our Chinese speaking investigator will help you. Please call (415) 553-6400 or write to: FBI, P.O. Box 36015, San Francisco, CA. 94103. Contact Hao Shi." The ads shocked the Chinese community in San Francisco area. It remained as a hot issue in the first two weeks in Chinese media.

If you have read my previous articles about the Virginia Tech. case, you know what is it.

1. Demonize. Either a Chinese mass killer, or Chinese spies, it used to demonize that Chinese are evil, a pre-conception for a drug case which Chinese will be involved.
2. Cover up. The most direct cover up on the relationship between Chinese State Security Dept. and FBI. As a matter of fact, the two are the partners in secret deal to frame the drug case.

Be noticed that the ads was from the FBI office in San Francisco Bay area. The targets are Chinese. Think of the origin news about the VT shooting gunman was "a Chinese from Shanghai via San Francisco."

2. I have said that July terror attack would be a nuclear attack. (see #497.) Here are other development.

On 7/16, a magnitude 6.8 earthquake stroke a Japanese city Kashiwazaki. What caught my eye in news was a map which showed a nuclear power plant near the site. Was it used for a nuclear pollution panic? Though the first day news said there was no leakage, the later news was different.

Quote, "Level of damage raised at Japan nuclear plant" (S.J. Mercury News, 7/19/07)
"Radioactive leak lasted three days
The indefinite shut down of the world's most powerful electricity generating facility raised serious fears of a summer power shortage." (S.J. Mercury News, 7/20/07)

So that was why the earthquake took place in Kashiwazaki - where there is the world's most powerful nuclear power plant. It was the time when Feds prepared for a nuclear terror attack and war on Iran. If everything went on to their plan, a nuclear pollution would have been propagated and war on Iran would be justified.

( I always think Pentagon has had the technique of earthquake. I have said in "324. Tsunami (6/27/05)"

1. US has developed such technique to create an earthquake and tsunami. Cohen had talked about it as early as 1997, though he blamed the "others". Re: "Others are engaging even in an eco type of terrorism, whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes or volcanos remotely, through the use of electromagnetic waves." American Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 1997.

3. Iran war.

"Iran to allow inspectors into nuclear facility" (Mercury News, 7/14/07)

Though the media played it a small news, it was a big one actually.

Iran resisted U.N. inspection on its nuclear cite for a long time. Even bear the punishment to be sanctioned economically. Iran thought it was their sovereignty. What made it to do such a big compromise?

With my own observation, I have concluded that in July, Feds would frame a drug case, made a false flag "terror attack" to distract, and with which US would activate Iran war.
Iran, as a state, has its own intelligence. Iran, too, realized an attack from US was imminent in July. It had to make a concession.

500. IRS raid (8/3/07)

In later March, I learned from my bank statement that IRS has added a refund at the balance. I think it was a tactic Feds tried to tie me to my wife's tax file. A trick to push me to file my own to separate from my wife's. If there were two conflict tax files, then Feds could do a field raid (in the name of IRS). I didn't react.

Then in early April, my wife noticed me that IRS would withdraw thousand of dollars from my account. It was interesting to observe the psychology of the Feds. When they saw I didn't response, they thought that was because increasing balance wouldn't touch me. They immediately change the method by decreasing the balance. But I would not know there was a withdrawal until in later April when I received monthly statement. What Feds wanted was to push me filing another tax return. The final date was 4/17. So they let my wife inform me orally. How could she know what IRS would do on my account?

At same time, there was something unusual happened.

In later March, my wife told me that Lady R.P. (a relative of hers who live in Philippines) having a trip in US and would live at my home for several days. Lady R.P. had stayed at my home for a short period 17 years ago. She didn't come this time anyway. Then in early April, Mrs. Mao visited my house. She said she intended to live at my house for several days too. (Mrs. Mao was my tenant about 20 years ago.) The sudden requests to live at my house were unusual, apparently it was arranged by Feds. What was their purpose? I puzzled.

A rain forecast solved my problem.

In that period, for continual Saturdays, the weather forecast reported rain. It was evident when there was only one rain logo (for Saturday) compare with other days' sun logo. I knew why. It was a trick to frame my brother in law to a drug case. His merchandise - umbrella - came from China. Secret police must have planted drug in it. My brother in law would deliver umbrella himself at week-ends when his employee were on vacation

Anyhow, there was little rain on Saturdays because Feds had to frame me first. Then I saw a change. On 4/9, it forecast 4/11 (Wednesday) as rain day. I was watchful on rain days because I collect rain water. (Feds has poisoned tap water and sometimes contaminated it
with radioactive material.) I knew Feds controlled the weather these particular days, they had no reason to supply me the water I needed. So there was other purpose.

I worried there would be a house raid in the name of "IRS". Should I collect rainwater on Wednesday? Then the raid team could coincidentally meet me at front yard. All of a sudden, I solved the puzzle of request to "live at my house".

I don't answer the door when I am home alone. "IRS" team may not enter my home unless there was someone else at the house. So Feds planted someone to answer the door. But why they changed Lady R.P. with Mrs. Mao? Because Lady R.P. speaks English. The search, anyhow, would be an unreasonable search. There would be argument. Feds didn't want a witness telling the truth. So they changed her by Mrs. Mao - an old Chinese lady speaks little English. And finally, they decided no one should witness the truth. They thought of rain.

Feds really did a lot of work in April plot. They manipulated IRS to access my bank account in a month, by first adding some money then withdrawing some. They really studied my behavior and relative history by picking up two people whom had once lived at my house so I could hardly refuse their request. I surprisingly saw how quickly they changed their scheme several times by answer door people to natural rain.

I didn't do to the Feds' wish. So there was little rain and no one come to live at my house in
the end.
If everything went on to their plan, Virginia Tech would have a terror bombing to distract in early April. That's how we saw bombing threat from 4/2 to 4/13. (see #494)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostWed Oct 03, 2007 1:09 am  Reply with quote  

501. Surveillance without warrant (8/8/07)

The honorable Senator
US Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator

I'm writing you to oppose the newly passed law (Passed in Senate on Aug. 3, signed by Bush on Aug. 5) which gives government expanded surveillance authority without court approval.

I urge you to re-consider the law because of the following reason:

1. The proposed bill is a violation of the Constitution and an affront to our civil rights as US citizens. It especially damaged the Fourth Amendment which protecting people from unreasonable search and arrest.

It's easy for coruptive police to manipulate a "terrorist suspect" to e-mail, or dialogue in an internet forum, to frame innocent people. (In Miame terror cell case of 2006, a FBI informant had instructed the cell member to attack FBI office ).

2. There is no reason to say old FISA rule doesn't work. Under which the government can do eavesdropping any time when it requires. Even if it's in emergence, they can wiretap first and submit an application to court later. Nothing hinder their surveillance work.

A surveillance without warrant means a blank check to the secret police. It opens the door to a fascist country.

3. Surveillance not only means eavesdropping, it also means harassment. FBI, DEA are notorious for abusing power. They harass, plant and frame case. There is lack of a surveillance on these so said "law enforcement". The new law gives them further more room for abusing power. It is an attack on the principle of Check and Balance.

4. A negative side of this law from my personal experience. I posted a lot in internet web forum. I used to reveal the dark side of the government, especially about the law enforcement. I suffered continuous harassment from the Feds cyberspace team. Recently I was blocked from three web sites. (two of them are media's web site)

(1) On Aug. 1, blocked to enter " " by technical problem.
(2) On Aug. 4, banned to enter ""
(3) On Aug. 5, banned to enter ""

Since my posting were all of political opinion, there was no reason to ban me accessing the site. The ban is so thorough that I couldn't complain nor read. I allege it was from surveillance team not from the web site. I think it was done when Feds (FBI, DEA) has been inspired and encouraged by the would passing new surveillance law.

In conclusion, I urge you to re-consider the new intelligence surveillance law, at least do some amendment to limit the unrestricted power of law enforcement. I also urge you to investigate the abusing in internet communication caused by the Feds (FBI, DEA). (see below)


Kat Hak Sung


More complain about law enforcement internet abusing.

1. Made my article unreadable by misplacing the paragraph:

2. Block to enter the forum by various tech. problem. (such like frozen the window frame, blank frame, url changing, function losing, etc. )^2@.ee6d2e3

3. Ban in a rogue's way:
"You have been banned for the following reason:
Date the ban will be lifted: Never"
This is not a normal web site notice but a rogue's reply - a typical Feds' style.

4. Block to post by "incorrect password";f=1

5. Intercept e-mail.

Complain e-mail returned. Application e-mail and enquire e-mail no answer.

502. Warrantless surveillance and August plot (8/13/07)

I think the new law that allowed warrantless surveillance target on me.

In early May, 2002, I wrote "65. Birthday Party on May 3 (5/10)", revealed Feds had a plot on May 3 that year. In later May, two people in my lane - one was my tenant, the other was the landlady of a house, suddenly moved away at same time. They both came from China. (There are four house units in the lane. Feds put two Chinese secret agents in two units) Then in August, news reported that former A.G. Ashcroft was rebuked by FISA judges for cheating in May. I then knew I was under the surveillance of FISA warrant. I started to realize how important the Fourth Amendment is to innocent people. It protects them from unreasonable search and arrest from corrupt agents. (see "86. FISA Secret Court ruling")

Still continuously I am under surveillance, legally or illegally. Feds must have created a lot of justification to renew the warranty. This time, after the big attempt in April, (marked with Virginia Tech massacre) they may exhaust their cheating tactics. Feds, with the help of its resource in legislative, passed a law to do surveillance without the monitor of the court.

Be mind that law is not only effect on a small number people who related to terrorist. Most Americans have computers and surf the internet. Feds have plenty resource of controlled "terrorists". Or anytime they can get help from collaboration of foreign secret police to frame a case. That means, almost every Americans faces unreasonable search and arrest if Feds wanted. (by a message from "terrorist" to your e-mail or web-site you go) They give themselves an unrestricted power.

It is not only an eavesdropping or wiretapping. It also means surveillance which can lead to unreasonable search and arrest. Do you know what surveillance is? To my experience, it also come with harassment and persecution - radiation of unknown EM wave ray; poisoned food; provocation between family members..... various trap to a framed case.

"Enemy combatants" in Guantanamo are ripped the right to access for legal help. They could be jailed all their life. The new warrantless law does the same thing actually. Every Americans is ripped off the protect of Fourth Amendment. You could be under surveillance any time the Feds wanted without any protect of the law.

I e-mailed a petition to California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein on 8/8. No confirmation e-mail received so far. An e-mail to Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren was rejected as not deliverable. But a reaction from Feds was very swift. Next day on 8/9, my wife said she would have a trip to Peru between 8/16 to 8/22. My brother and one of my sister will go with her. If you still remember, in mid April my wife has just taken a sudden trip too (the plot marked with VT shooting case)

On same day, (8/9) the neighborhood landlord had a yard work team come. He said he would have his yard re-modeled, including repair the fence between us. The work will last till the end of the month.

One of murder tactic of Feds is travel accident. Each big plot always came with this program. So they prepare again the death for part of my family members. As for me, you can expect that yard work team is a specially trained team. And you know what special skill they have had. The plot time should be between 8/16 to 8/22. For the rest of my family member, there is other traps waiting for them.

503. Earthquake in Peru (8/18/07)

Then there was an earthquake in Peru on 8/15. Of course I view it as part of the August plot. It would be used to justify a tour accident.

That night, I asked my wife what time tomorrow would she leave home for Peru. She happily said, "No, we won't go. Don't you know there is just a 7.5 earthquake in Peru?" Her happy expression revealed it was not a trip she likes to go. I was puzzled. Was it a big coincidence that an earthquake taken place the day before the trip? To my opinion, the quake was created to justify a tour accident, not to cancel that planned trip. Did I make a mistake?

I didn't make mistake. Later that night, after several call, my wife said she still would go. She said the tour guider from Lima confirmed nothing serious happened there. Everything was OK. She left next morning.

Was everything OK in Lima? We now know the earthquake was 8-magnitude not 7.5. The death toll increased to more than 500. I knew there were several tour bus accidents in Peru before. Now you know how reasonable Feds has made it for an mountainous road accident after that big quake. Everything was on Feds' plan.

So was my neighborhood. After the landlord informing me the yard work last week, they suddenly disappeared. The neighbor house emptied for seven days. On earthquake day of 8/15, a yard work team came to dismantle the fence between my backyard and their's. On 8/16, workers used my backyard as their access path. I had to go out to tell them I wouldn't allow them entering my yard.

My daughter, has been home on her summer vacation for more than two months, will leave for a trip too. (8/18 to 8/22?) So these four days, I was home alone.

What about my other sisters and relatives? Between 8/31 and 9/3, the Bay Bridge will be closed for three days. This is a tactic repeated many times. (see their purpose at #433, 482) In less than a year, Feds closed the Bay Bridge for three times. All related to a framed case. I allege at that time ( the end of August or early September), there will be a framed drug case occurring in San Francisco, followed by massive terror attack on US soil. (one will be a tunnel bombing in San Francisco Bay)

That's the whole plan of Feds August plot. (from 8/15 to 9/3) A similar one was the 2005 September plot. (marked with hurricane Katrina) In which the action date was 9/24 - the landing day of Hurricane Rita. Feds had arranged a Vietnam trip for my wife between 9/22 - 9/29/05, so she wouldn't be home on 9/24. And another East Coast trip for my brother and one of my sister (whom this time are in trip of Peru) between 9/10 - 9/17/05. The coincidence was there was a hurricane Ophilia developed in East Coast at same time on 9/10. The Ophilia went along the East Coast for several days then disappeared when my relatives left East Coast for Canada. (see #339, 342, 345)

In these typical cases, Feds both organized murderous tour for my relatives. And activated with their new natural disaster weapon. In 2005, it was hurricane. This time it was earthquake. Both were on top grade. (Hurricane is category 5, the quake is on 8 magnitude) The climate weapon now is a ripe skill for Feds. Remember the earthquake in Kashiwazaki just one month ago (7/16)? It occurred there because there is the most powerful nuclear power plant of the world. At the purpose to push for a nuclear pollution panic. (see #499)
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostSun Oct 14, 2007 7:43 pm  Reply with quote  

504. Fence (8/23/07)

Last night my wife came back from her Peru trip. It means the first phase of August plot was over. In that phase, my relatives and I were the murder targets. The ending signal is the noise from back yard this morning. A fence has been installed hours ago. The synchronization of the events is amazing. It starts from my petition to Senators on 8/8. I think the new passed law is a violence to the Constitution. The response from Feds was swift. Next day -

8/9. ** Yard work team appeared in next house. Landlord informed me he would remodel the yard and would change the fence which separated our yards. I agreed.
** At night my wife came home said she would have a tour to Peru. (the first phase of plan starts)

8/11. Both yard workers and neighborhoods disappeared. Leave it an empty house. I then realized the seriousness of that fence affair. Feds determined to carry out the plot. They didn't leave any chance for me to recall the agreement for dismantling the fence.

8/15. ** Yard work team appeared in neighbor's yard. The fence was dismantled.
** An 8 magnitude earthquake took place in Peru. (The action of first phase starts)

8/16. ** My wife and my relatives left for Peru.
** Yard workers used my yard as their access path. I rebuked them.

8/13 and 8/18. I wrote messages #502 and 503, alleged the August plot.

8/22 ** At night my wife came back from Peru.
8/23 ** In the morning, yard worker appeared and the new fence is installed. (The first phase ended)

During the period of my wife's trip, my backyard was left open. Feds created an excuse to access my backyard. I had to write #503 to announce I didn't allow those workers access my backyard.

The fence actually can't stop a burglar. The fence is only a legal symptom to protect your privacy. Anyone surpasses it without permission is illegal. The Fourth Amendment is same thing. It's a fence of law to protect us from unreasonable search and arrest.

I thought that first phase action was a swift response from Feds to my petition on surveillance without warranty. The coincidence is when that first phase ended on 8/22, next day (this morning) Mercury News has an article about that case. "Intelligence director reveals surveillance facts, figures" (S.J.M.N. 8/23/07)

The fallacy are:
1. Quote, "McConnell confirmed for the first time that the private sector assisted with President Bush's warrantless surveillance program. AT&T, Verizon and other telecommunications companies are being sued in federal court in San Francisco for their cooperation. "Now if you play out the suits at the value they're claimed, it would bankrupt these companies," McConnell said, arguing that they deserve immunity for their help."

The point is these companies don't work with the permission of the Court. Should they practice to the law or they are outlaw?
The point is can the firm be immune from the crime they committed because it is big and famous and facing a bankruptcy? Will thus encourage more violence?
The point is the Feds has an unrestricted power now. They behaved like an outlaw. It makes firms, individuals, organizations all obeyed to it not to the law. That is dangerous to society.

2. Quote, " McConnell said it takes 200 hours to assemble a FISA warrant on a single telephone number. "We're going backwards," he said. "We couldn't keep up.""

All court cases (civil or criminal) take a long time to file. Even to buy a house, there is a long time to fulfill the procedure. It must be dealt with great care. It also takes a long procedure to recruit an agent for FBI. Have you ever heard they complain "We couldn't keep up."?

Nothing hinders Feds to do the eavesdropping. There is a three days grace period for them to re-submit the application. So they can do it any time when they think it's urgent.
What Feds want now is to be an outlaw. Do whatever they want.

Warrantless surveillance means you lost the protect of the Fourth Amendment. Without the protection of that fence, you may face unreasonable search and arrest. The 4th Amendment is set up against the corruptive law enforcement agent. Now the corrupt agent disable the law, they can intrude your house to plant and frame the case. If you still want your civil right, stand up to protect that fence.

505. Assassination, murder and terror attack (8/28/07)

The rest of the August plot started from 8/20 to September. The action date is between 8/31 to 9/3 when Feds closed the Bay Bridge. (see #503) At that time there will be massive terror attack in US and in Europe. I think that's why Karl Rove resigned in advance. His last date in office will be 8/30. So he will leave before the "Super 911". To get rid of any responsibility of involvement in false flag terror attack. As a matter of fact, he is probably one of the men who took part in the planning of the terror plot. (see #447. Karl Rove had promised an "October surprise" to Republican for Mid-term Election)

The second phase of August plot is between 8/20 to 8/29. A sub-plan to assassinate the President of Taiwan - Chen Shui-bian.

On 8/20, a China Air-line Boeing 737 caught fire after the landing in Okinawa, Japan. All 165 passengers escaped in minutes. People may impressed by the fireball that damaged the plane from TV news.

8/21 -8/29, the President of Taiwan - Chen Shui-bian, takes a trip to Central and South America to visit three countries there. His private plane is a Boeing 737-800, the same type of the plane that damaged in Okinawa and the plane is from the same company - China Air-line.

Yesterday - 8/27 - Federal regulators ordered airlines to inspect the wings of all 737 Boeing jets. The order was prompted by the China Airline accident in Japan.

It is obvious an accident created by Feds to justify the coming air plane accident of the Taiwan president. It is a payment to Chinese secret police who helps Feds to frame a drug case in San Francisco. Chen Shui-bian's life had been several times become a chip in their secret deal. (see "382. The life of the President of Taiwan as a payment (2/2/06)")

It's amazing how close the justification created to the formal trip happening in this plot.
The earthquake in Peru was on 8/15. One day before my wife's Peru trip. (8/16 - 8/22)
The Boeing 737 accident was on 8/20. One day before Chen Shui-bian's trip. (8/21 - 8/29)
This is how Feds playing the pre-conception tactic.

Then comes the third phase - the main stage.
8/30. Karl Rove will leave his office.
8/31 - 9/3. Bay Bridge will be closed for repair. I think one of my parents will be murdered by "natural cause". One of my sisters will be murdered in "terrorist tunnel bombing" when she takes Bart to visit my parents. (because the bridge was closed) And the others will be framed in a drug case.

To distract the framed drug case, there will be massive terror attacks in US, possibly a nuclear bombing or dirty bomb attack. The radioactive material, (or nuclear bomb) will come from Russia. That's why you saw recently Russian revived their cold war patrol. Their long range bomber fly to Quan and England. Russian just play their role for a secret deal. To justify the source of nuclear material.

The whole thing is a soap drama. Feds tries to play it as true as they can. Will you be a loyal audience?

From 8/25 to 8/28, for continuous four days, I was blocked to go internet.

506. The resignation of A.G. Gonzalez (9/3/07)

8/25 and 8/26 were week-ends. While I was blocked to the internet, I wonder this August plot was an unprecedented one. Feds censored my voice one week before the main action. Next day I knew why.

The news on 8/27 said Attorney General Gonzales handed his resignation to Bush on Friday.(8/24) News didn't report it until two days later when Bush accepted the resignation on 8/27. A.G. Gonzales didn't step down for the case of firing eight US attorneys. He stubbornly remained at his post despite the no confidence of the Senate. He quits without a signal.

I think Gonzalez resigned on my case. In early April, I have said the scandal of firing eight US attorneys was a cover up. His post depended on my case. Re: "He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17" (see #477) It was an apparent intimidation from Feds to A.G. Gonzalez. April 17 was the action date of April plot. Then we saw the Virginia Tech. shooting spree on 4/16. Gonzalez maybe the one who approved the shooting case. Four months later, in late August, he may have to take the responsibility when the Virginia Tech published its investigation review (on 8/22) and other investigation report are due.

Gonzalez may also step down for the approving of August plot which related to big operations - an 8 magnitude earthquake in Peru; a secret deal with China to murder Taiwan's president; an accident of Boeing 737 in Japan; Minneapolis bridge collapse which was used to justify the shut down of Bay Bridge.

His resignation is as mysterious as the resignation of former FBI director Louis Freeh and DEA director. No reason was given in both cases. I allege all quits for framing a drug case related on me.

I was blocked to internet from 8/25, the day after Gonzalez proposed the resignation, to 8/31, the day Bay Bridge closed for repair. (Feds released the control on 8/29. So I could surf in internet whole day that day. Also there was a release of control for about one hour total on 8/26 and 27, so I could post in several web sites at that time.) There were about six days I was banned from internet. I view it as a result of my revelation. My analysis and allegation are accurate. Feds are scare of it.

The censorship is not a surveillance, it is a violence of the Constitution. I think the order is from A.G. He will leave anyway. He doesn't care to approve any illegal request of the Feds. But even for Attorney General, can he be exempt from a crime he committed?
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
507. The coming stock market crash (9/8/07) PostWed Oct 24, 2007 10:33 pm  Reply with quote  

507. The coming stock market crash (9/8/07)

In early August, when I learned that the authority would shut down Bay Bridge in Labor Day week-ends, to my experience with Feds, I knew there would be another plot planned that month, and the action date was at 8/31 to 9/3.

Then news said Karl Rove would leave his office on 8/30. People couldn't find the reason why Rove resigned at this time, they could only guess that he was leaving a sunken ship. I related it to the August plot. Because to distract a framed drug case, there would come a massive terror attack. He left the day before another "super 911", to extricate himself from the suspicion of being the mastermind of terror attack and also to lull the people into a false sense of peace that an evil brain of Bush was absent so no conspiracy was in progress.

Then there came such a news:

Quote, "$4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks

Anybody have a clue as to what these 'investors' are expecting?
August 26, 2007

The two sales are being referred to by market traders as "bin Laden trades" because only an event on the scale of 9-11 could make these short-sell options valuable.

There are 65,000 contracts @ $750.00 for the SPX 700 calls for open interest. That controls 6.5 million shares at $750 = $4.5 Billion. Not a single trade. But quite a bit of $$ on a contract that is 700 points away from current value. No one would buy that deep "in the money" calls. No reason to. So if they were sold looks like someone betting on massive dislocation. Lots of very strange option activity that I haven't seen before.

The entity or individual offering these sales can only make money if the market drops 30%-50% within the next four weeks. If the market does not drop, the entity or individual involved stands to lose over $1 billion just for engaging in these contracts!

Clearly, someone knows something big is going to happen BEFORE the options expire on Sept. 21.


The following theories are being discussed widely within the stock and options markets today regarding the enormous and very unusual activity reported above and two stories below. Those theories are:

1) A massive terrorist attack is going to take place before Sept. 21 to tank the markets, OR;

2) China, reeling over losing $10 Billion in bad loans to the sub-prime mortgage collapse presently taking place, is going to dump US currency and tank all of Capitalism with a Communist financial revolution. Either scenario is bad and the clock is ticking. The drop-dead date of these contracts is September 21. Whatever is going to happen MUST take place between now and then or the folks involved in these contracts will lose over $1 billion for having engaged in this activity.

Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11.

Back then, they bought huge numbers of PUTS on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were involved in the September 11 attacks.

Despite knowing who made these trades, the Securities and Exchange Commission NEVER revealed who made the unusual trades and no one was ever publicly identified as being responsible for the trades which made upwards of $50 million when the attacks happened.

The fact that this latest activity by a single entity gambles on a complete collapse of the entire market by the third week in September, seems to indicate someone knows something really huge is in the works and they intend to profit almost $2 Billion within the next four weeks from whatever happens! This is really worrisome."

Source: Ticker Forum <>

I'll post my analysis on this stock option in next message. And besides theories 1 and 2, this group has another way, that is to sell down the market in the name of "sub-prime" crisis - a tactic they are carrying on now.

508. The stock market crash (2) (9/13/07)

There was also another similar trade done earlier in European stock market.

Re: "Renée Schultes
16 Aug 2007

Carry trade unwinds as yen hits one-year high

An anonymous investor has placed a bet on an index of Europe's top 50 stocks falling by a third by the end of September, as world equity markets plunged for a third day and volatility hit a three-year high.

The mystery investor has bought put option contracts on the DJ Eurostoxx 50 index that will result in a profit if it plunges to 2,800 or below by the end of September. Based on the 2,800 strike price, the position covers a notional €6.9bn, and potentially even more using a market price of about 4,100 when the trades were done on Tuesday and Wednesday.

The identity of the investor is unknown but market sources speculated it was either a large hedge fund hedging itself against deepening losses, or a long-only fund manager pressing the panic button to protect its gains.

The investor has bought a total of 245,000 put options on the index. The September put option with a 2,800 strike was the most popular DJ Eurostoxx 50 contract yesterday, according to data from Bloomberg.

The news was dated on 8/16. So the main trade was done on 8/15 (yesterday of 8/16). That was coincidence with the first phase of August plot. (8/15, Peru earth earthquake. 8/16, my wife's Peru travel started.) The operation of "make a fortune" started at same time of operation elimination.

Someone unknown foresaw a big stock market collapsing any time between 8/16 to the late September. It could be the result of expecting a mass terror attack. And I have alleged that kind of terror attack would happen right after the action date of 8/31 to 9/3 when Bay Bridge was shut down.(to distract a framed drug case)

This is why on 9/5, we saw two news in media, one was about terror attack and the other was about China dumping US dollars. Both were planned as the first wave of attack on stock market.

Re: "Germany arrests 3 in alleged plot on U.S. sites
By Noah Barkin and Sabine Siebold Wed Sep 5, 9:03 AM ET

Re: China threatens `nuclear option' of dollar sales

Then why did the Feds set the liquidate date of the stock option on 9/21 and the end of September not in early September? Because they planned a main attack on stock market in Mid-September. At that time, Federal Reserve would have a meeting to discuss about the bench mark interest rate.

Feds build up an expectation that the Federal Reserve will reduce the interest rate to save the economy which is hit by the sub prime loan crisis. If the interest rate remains unchanged or goes upwards, then it will touch off a selling wave to crash the stock market.

509. Murder the investigator (9/18/07)

Federal Reserve cut the interest rate by half percent today. Stock market rally. It's a reverse operation. Cut the rate or increase the rate, they always have reason to justify. They still can make money on it by buying an up market.

On 9/6, there was a news in Mercury News: "Rep. Paul Gillmor, R-Ohio, was found dead Wednesday morning in his Arlington, Va. townhouse. Arlington police are investigating the lawmaker's death but police spokesman John Lisle said it appeared to be from natural cause."

Then an article in internet speaks in other way. Paul Gillmor was a member of House Finance Committee. He was investigating that suspicious option trading. He likely was murdered for it.

Quote, "9-11-2007- WHAT'S GOING ON?

September 11, 2007 at 09:58:57

Going into Labor Day weekend, there were lots of rumors anticipating a false flag operation, another 9-11. Trainloads of armored vehicles rolled into Houston. The San Francisco Bay bridge closed for three days. Suspicious activity was reported on ferries in Puget Sound. Ominous civil defense exercises are being held in Oregon, as part of Operation Noble Resolve, which also involves military jets flying over New York. An antiaircraft division is ordered to Washington DC.

We made it through the holiday safely.
Then last Wednesday, Congressman Paul Gillmor (R-OH) was found dead in his home. This was reported as a heart attack, until word leaked out that he had blunt trauma to the head and neck. <> Now we're being told he fell down the stairs. Gillmor was investigating a series of option trades that are suspicious- someone is betting billions of dollars that the market will fall 50% by September 21st. Even with the housing crisis, it would take a major catastrophe, like a "terrorist" attack, to precipitate such a plunge. As part of his job on the House Finance Committee, Gillmor was investigating this deal. Was he murdered because he was about to reveal something?

Would this death, on top of the deaths of Senators Wellstone and Carnahan, and the anthraxing of Senators Daschle and Leahy, have a chilling effect on people in Congress? Maybe that's why they're "spineless".

I think Paul Gillmor was murdered by Feds. The murderer who is behind the "Bin Laden option trades", and other terror attacks such like Virginia Tech shooting; DC sniper shooting; anthrax letter; 911 attack as well.

Paul Gillmor's death may prove that "Bin Laden option trade" was part of the "August plot"(8/31 to 9/3). The plot went soured under my continuous warning in advance.

His death also proves what we need is not warrantless surveillance and the Patriot Act and its derivatives. These are all the tools Feds used to persecute and murder US citizens. What we need is a law to strengthen the check and balance on Feds, on DOD and DOJ. Those departments, under the cover of "national security" and "top secret", become ruthless, corrupt and outlaw. They are the cancer of democracy.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
510. A nuclear attack in August plot (9/23/07) PostFri Nov 02, 2007 11:53 pm  Reply with quote  

510. A nuclear attack in August plot (9/23/07)

9/6, under the briefing news about Rep. Paul Gillmor's death, Mercury News also reported: "Nuclear warheads flown between bases in error

A B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown for more then three hours across several states last week,.....
The plane carried Advanced Cruise Missiles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D. to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug 30."

Then in same internet article, I learned that in military procedure, nuclear weapons must be shipped on the ground in the continental US in case there is an accident.

Re: "9-11-2007- WHAT'S GOING ON?

September 11, 2007 at 09:58:57

Now we learn that on August 30th, six nuclear warheads were "accidentally" shipped by B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. (Five arrived, did one get "lost"? Or is someone unable to count?) This violates all military procedure, which requires that nuclear weapons always be shipped on the ground in the continental US, so that if there's an accident, a bomb detonation won't occur. It would take an order from the Commander-in-Chief to put nukes on a plane.

The warheads were reportedly fastened to cruise missiles, which have a range of 1500-2000 miles. Not enough to cross the Atlantic, but enough to hit cities in the US as part of a false flag operation. This scenario is being claimed by "military investigators" on the Hal Turner show, and is making its way around the internet. It's being said the plan was to hit 5 American cities with nuclear weapons over Labor Day weekend in order to install martial law. If so, we have been saved by the grace of God, operating through loyal American whistleblowers, who made the "accidental shipment" of nuclear warheads public."

If you are a regular reader of my journal, you know as early as 8/18 I have predicted that 8/31 to 9/3 would be the action day of the August plot.(the day when Bay Bridge closed) I also repeatedly alleged there would be false flag terror attack (likely dirty bomb attack or nuclear weapon attack) to distract the framed case. This news proves my allegation. The attack would be from the government insider not from Islamic terrorist. It also alerted me that I under-estimated the Feds. Their tactic is not distract but pre-distract.

In distract case, a framed drug case broke off. Suspects died in arrest or in custody. Then terror attack follows to distract, turns public attention away from the case. But the news of drug case would leave trace in some people's mind.

In pre-distract case, something bigger takes place in advance of the framed case. Next day, when people are in the peak of panic, any other news would be ignored. Or, most likely, there is no report on any other small news (small compare to a nuclear bombing, and there are six of them. You can imagine how many pages and times spent by media to cover up the scene of each bombed city) No one knows about the drug case. Pre-distract is a thorough censorship.

I have predicted 4/17 as action day of April plot. (The last day for file a tax return) There was a massacre in Virginia Tech which shocked the whole country on 4/16.

I have predicted 8/31 to 9/3 as action day of August plot. (Bay Bridge closed) There was an attempted nuclear bombing incident on 8/30. All planned one day before the main action day. So the pre-distract plays its utmost.

I think my continuous revelation soured the plot. If their plan went through, six US cities would have been destroyed, Feds would take over the states with Martial law. A framed drug case in California next day, would sink into oblivion.

If the plan went through, that B-52 would have been shot down after it released the missile. The crew, actually worked like a suicide bomber. They only deliver something to the order. They never know they were the sacrifice. The news of the "accident" of B-52, would have sink into the ocean of nuclear panic too. That's why the bomb is not regular nuclear bomb. They were advanced cruise missiles armed with nuclear heads. All targets were pre-settled. They shoot automatically by the remote control command. At that time, I believe the TV would broadcast another tape from Bin Laden to claim a victory of Jihad. And Russian would admit they lost six nuclear bombs in their warehouse.

511. Seven most wanted cities by Feds (9/28/07)

In October plot last year, seven cities were targets.
On 10/9/06, North Korea had a nuclear test. (Manipulate N.Korea through China to push for a nuclear panic and justify the source of nuclear material used in dirty bomb.)
On 10/11, Lidle's small plane crashed to a sky-rise in New York. (To justify the terror attack method, that small plane's action is out of control.)
On 10/12, a warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs".

Homeland Security Department said the threat was being viewed "with strong skepticism". The FBI also expressed doubt about the threat.

However in August plot this year, there is a strange coincidence that a news said Al Qaida targets at seven US cities. This time there was no doubt expressed.

Re: Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear
Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
NewsMax Wires

Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida.

Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke - but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously

Obviously Feds has 7 US cities as their most wanted. Then why there were only six nuclear missiles prepared in this operation? Because a B-52 can only hang 6 missiles in each of its wing. One wing must hang un-nuclear missiles to justify a security check has been done. So six was their utmost.

Re: "How warheads made an unplanned flight

By Joby Warrick and Walter Pincus, The Washington Post
September 23, 2007


The airmen attached the gray missiles to the plane's wings, six on each side. After eyeballing the missiles on the right side, a flight officer signed a manifest that listed a dozen unarmed AGM-129 missiles. The officer did not notice that the six on the left contained nuclear warheads, each with the destructive power of up to 10 Hiroshima bombs."

Which are the most wanted cities of Feds? Two in October plot 2006 were Oakland and Houston. One of my sister (I think she is a murder target of the Feds) lives in Oakland. In August 2007 plot, Feds prepared a shut down of Bay Bridge (which connects Oakland and San Francisco). I think they planned a tunnel bombing for my sister so Oakland could exempt from a nuclear attack last month. Houston is a city one of my cousin lives. (Is my cousin a target too?) I'm sure it's a target because in Katrina case, Houston was the predicted landing spot of Hurricane Rita. And the Hurricane landing day was September 24, the action day of the plot.

The other two cities would be Washington DC and Boston, I think. The White House was said one target of the four planes in 9/11/2001. Only that plane crashed in mid-way. But to justify a war on Iran, to destroy Capital is a necessity. Boston has been in hit list in several terror case. In 1/20/2005, there was a Boston dirty bomb case. In late January 2007, there was an ad scare case in Boston. The ad box which could turn into bombing box appeared in 10 US cities. All planned by Feds, I allege.

Do you live in one of these cities?

512. Attempt dirty bomb attack on 9/14 (10/3/07)

There was a stand down order in Air force on 9/14/07. I think it was an immediate follow up to the soured 8/30 nuclear attack.

Quote, "ACC orders commandwide standdown Friday

By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Sep 10, 2007 17:38:42 EDT

On Sept. 14, flight lines will be very quiet at Air Combat Command bases.
The entire command - about 100,000 active-duty airmen - is standing down training flights and many other operations as part of a command-wide safety day.

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety standdown in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane.

I don't see there is anything can be done to improve the "mistaken loading of nuclear missiles" by a stand down order two weeks later. It only eroded the air defense of the US on that particular day. I remembered there was a similar stand down order on the day of 9/11/2001. The order, would open the American sky for another terror attack.

This time the terror attack would be a dirty bomb attack. I alleged in October plot of 2006, Lidle's air crash was used to justify that the dirty bomb attack would be done by small planes. The plot went soured. The plan is still there. Feds tried to use this plan again. They opened the sky for a terror attack on 9/14.

The 9/14 attack could replace the 8/30 nuclear attack and continue the big August plot.
1. 9/14 attack still would cause a nuclear panic Feds needed to distract a framed case and activate war on Iran.

2. The "Bin Laden option trade" could still go on planned process. The due date was in 9/21 and in the end of September (in European stock market).

3. The original plan on financial market could still be carried on. That was:

(1) Around 9/14, there was a financial crisis breaking off in UK. I think that was a procedure in August plot.
Re: "Fears grow for British economy as panic over Northern Rock spreads

Heather Stewart and Heather Connon
London Observer
Sunday September 16, 2007

US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson flies in to London tomorrow to discuss the worsening global credit crisis with Chancellor Alistair Darling, as fears intensify that the lending squeeze could be the last straw for Britain's buy-now-pay-later economy.

Thousands of anxious customers queued outside branches of Northern Rock to withdraw their savings this weekend, ignoring calls for calm from Darling, after he helped broker an unprecedented emergency loan from the Bank of England to rescue the bank."

The crisis suddenly ended mysteriously. But if 9/14 attack went true, then situation would have been thoroughly different. Because the Little Rock crisis was designed as "the last straw for Britain's economy". European stock market would be hit heavily if UK economy collapsed.

(2) Federal Reserve meeting was at 9/18. If there was a 9/14 terror attack, Bernanky could go in opposite way by raise the interest rate with "consideration of inflation".

So the 9/14 attack still could fulfill the purpose of the original August plot: A terrorist bombing as first wave attack, followed by the second wave of financial crisis.

There was also a coincidence to the terror attack date and the resignation date of two evils.

1. Karl Rove's resignation day was 8/30, same day of nuclear missiles "mistakenly transferred" by a B-52". (8/30 attempt nuclear attack)
2. A.G. Gonzalez' resignation day was 9/14, same day when Air force had a "stand down" order. (9/14 attempt dirty bomb attack)

I have speculated that Rove's resignation related to the coming terror attack. As Gonzalez, I suspect DOJ is behind all that "warrantless surveillance" and the drug case they framed on me was always connected to the terror attack. He might have signed an order of unreasonable "search and arrest" before he left the office. Feds made use of their puppet to its utmost.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostTue Nov 13, 2007 12:25 am  Reply with quote  

513. October plot 2007 (10/8/07)

Now we have a review on August plot.

1. In May, the so said opposing party Democrats suddenly withdraw their fighting against the Iraq war policy and released the extra fund requested by Bush. It indicates a plot of false flag terror attack combined with Iran war had been planned. The extra fund, was for Iran war, though in the name for surge.

2. In June, extra US troops were in Iraq. It was for Iran war.

3. A three month plan. (July to September) Marked with 8/30 nuclear missiles attack and Bay Bridge shut down for framed drug case (8/31 - 9/2) and the Bin Laden stock option trade (August to late September) When the nuclear missile attack was abandoned, there was a refill attempt of dirty bomb attack on 9/14.

4. In mid-September, when the August plot went soured, government pushed out a general to explain the surge, described it as a not successful, not failed mission. Because their final goal, is still a war on Iran. So the troops still has to stay there.

5. A new request of 140 billion by Pentagon is approved by the Senate. I think 100 billion is for military activity in Iraq and Afghanistan. The 40 billion, similar to the amount Bush requested for surge, is for Iran war. In addition to that, Bush wants another 50 billion this time. That amount, I think, is for war on Syria. Bush wants to finish the Mid-east road map before he leaving the White House.

For these war, another 911 alike terror attack is inevitable. So attempt of a dirty bomb attack will be tried repeatedly. The news for this month:

Attack on Iran Said To Be Imminent
Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 28, 2007

Yesterday's edition of Le Canard Enchaîné, a French weekly known for its investigative journalism, reported details of an alleged Israeli-American plan to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. The frontpage headline read: "A report sent to the Elysée - Putin tells Tehran: They're going to bomb you!"

Like most stories in the French paper, the article was based on unnamed sources who said that in order to reduce casualties, the attack against Iran is planned for October 15, the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Re: "U.S. Plans Biggest Terror Drill Ever
Three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam
WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2007

The agency said the Oct. 15-19 exercise would be "the largest and most comprehensive" to date. "

Months ago, Michael Chertoff had "gut feeling" about TWIN "dirty bombs" going off in Los Angeles AND San Francisco, so the drill in Oregon and Arizona has a connection to it. Among them, I think San Francisco is the main target.

As old tactic, there is another hurried travel for my family member. My brother and his wife, along with my uncle, will take a Panama cruise from 10/9-10/28. An 18 days cruise trip for only $600. To lure my relatives to such trip trap, Feds used to offer big bargain trip, sometimes free.

514. More for October plot 2007 (10/13/07)

1. Chen Shui-bian, President of Taiwan, flew to Marshall Islands on 10/12 for a visit. I have alleged he was a target in August plot (2007) when he was arranged in a visit to three South America countries. He used to be a chip of payment in US-China secret deal. It's easy to create an accident in a long trip.

2. On 10/11, White House announced that Bush would meet the spiritual leader of Tibet - Dalai Lama - on 10/16. The Congress also would award Dalai Lama a gold medal on 10/17. China protested US for the interference on internal affair of China. To create a hostile appearance to cover up a covert collaboration. It becomes a routine in secret deal.

3. On 10/13, Washington Post reported that two of Bush's most senior Cabinet members - Condoleezza Rice and Robert Gates - pitched an unusual new missile defense partnership to Russian President Putin, but they received a firm public rebuke . It also reported that Putin kept Gates and Rice waiting for more than a half hour before he met them. The event plays the same role as Russian sending long rang bombers to Guam and England in August plot. To show Russian is unfriendly with US. The purpose is to cover up the covert collaboration between the two countries.

It means Russian will justify the original source of the radioactive material used in dirty bomb attack. There is a possibility Russian will play a role of witness. I alleged in June 2002, former A.G. Ashcroft had made a secret deal with Russia, let Russian be a witness that Saddam planned a dirty bomb attack on US so to justify Bush's Iraq war. That is famous Padilla case. For Iran war, similar plot repeats. (see # 68. Ashcroft's revenge :Re. 9. Ashcroft in Moscow")

4. As for me, there is a new event. Yesterday was garbage collect day. My wife says our garbage bin was missing. She said a neighborhood told her to call the garbage company to get a new one. Since the area residents mostly, if not all, are agents and informants, and the garbage company is run by the Feds, nobody would take our garbage bin away except the Feds. They want us to have a new bin. What the trick they put in that new bin? I don't know. But tactic is old: to make an arrest by finding drug trace in the bin, I think.

5. E.M wave radiation. At night, when I was asleep, I was attacked by Gama ray. (I call it so though I don't know what kind of radiation exactly is it.) It penetrates metal plate. It hurts internal organ, especially kidney. There was warm feeling when they apply it on me. They used to shot the ray with sleep wave so the radiation could apply longer on victim without being felt. When I was awaken, there was a heavy feeling of kidney. The urine would be red. (bloody urine) It's a malicious tactic to murder under the cover up of "kidney failure".

To arrest by framed drug case, to eliminate by high tech. weapon, or to set up bomb traps... Feds do try their best.

515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)

From June 2006 to September 2007, in 15 months, Bay Bridge was closed (or partly closed) for four times. All related to the alleged framed case.

1. My father fell and had a surgery in later May 2006. He was in critical condition then. There was an announcement for work on Bay Bridge at the week-ends of 6/4 to 6/5.

2. Bay Bridge closed on Labor Day (9/3-9/5/2006). It coincided with alleged 9/2 action day of September plot 2006. (see "433. 9/2 plot (9/5/06)") Combined with event happened in June, I realized that Feds would murder my parents, and force my sister to take Tunnel Bart in emergence visit. A terror attack would take place in tunnel.

3. Then on 4/29/2007, an oil tank crashed at highway 880 and burned down Highway 580 which happened to be the main exit of the Bay Bridge. It played the mission to close Bay Bridge partly. (see " 482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07)") Authority originally announced that the re-build of the highway would take six months. But they then finished the work in less than a month.

I think the burned down of Highway was a hurried plan after the failure of 4/17/2007 plot when I started to reveal 4/16 Virginia Tech massacre was done by Feds. But in May when a much bigger plot was made, Feds dramatically finished that highway re-construction.

4. In that much bigger plot, they closed the Bay Bridge on 8/31 to 9/3, planned a nuclear terror attack on 8/30, and a stock market harvest and Iran war as well.

Feds made the decision in May. Then hurriedly finished the burned down highway work. At same time, Democrats suddenly ended their fight against Bush in the House and released the Iraq war fund. That fund, was for Iran war.

In June, US troops increased in Iraq in the name of surge. Actually, it was for Iran war. On 6/30, a brief news said Bay Bridge would be closed on Labor Day.

In July, Putin was invited to Bush's private ranch in Main. I alleged a secret deal has been made. Russia would be witness of "Iran's ambition for nuclear weapon" to justify the coming Iran war. Then new President of France was invited to US for a vacation. Another secret deal has been made. France would be new ally in Bush's Iran war.

On August 1, the interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed. Media made it a big news.
When I read the full pages news and picture in Mercury News on 8/2, I thought, it might be a cover up job for the shutdown of Bay Bridge. Really, when I turned to Local edition, a big article with a big title caught my eye. "Bay Bridge will be closed on Labor Day". A collapsing bridge made the shutdown of Bay Bridge full justified.

Interesting reference:
Quote, "1stmilitia PHILADELPHIA,
Posted: Aug 3, 2007 7:46 AM
We have received information across our newswires that indicates an Ultra-low Freqency Blast as reported by the Russian Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics in Irkutsk originated from Latitude: 45° 00' North Longitude: 93° 15' West at the precise moment, and locale, of a catastrophic collapse of a nearly 2,000 foot long bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This is obviously the Interstate 35W Bridge spanning the Mississippi River. The Russian Military further stated that a calamity of this size could only have occurred with the use of an "acoustic" weapon which the U.S. military is "known to possess." Interestingly enough, Augsberg College has involved itself into research pertaining to acoustic weaponry and is located ONE MILE from Interstate 35W Bridge!! To further elucidate on the power of such weaponry we cite this CNN report;



Posted By: Guarded_Optimist <Send E-Mail>
Date: Thursday, 9 August 2007, 12:08 a.m.

Bridge engineers Ted Galambos and Robert Ballerini say the Minnesota I-35W bridge should not have collapsed the way it did. They seem to have expected a situation similar to the Webber Falls, Oklahoma bridge collapse of May 26, 2002, where a barge hit the bridge, but only one localized section fell.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostFri Nov 23, 2007 12:59 am  Reply with quote  

516. Iran war next stage (10/23/07)

In early October, there was a summit of Caspian Sea states. The leaders of other Caspian Sea states ruled out any military strikes on Iran from their region. Russian President Vladimir Putin also made clear to Washington on 10/16 that Russia would not accept military action against Iran.
Putin visited Iran in Mid October and met with Iran's supreme leader Khamenei on 10/16. Putin offered a special proposal to Khamenei. The special offer, must relate to a nuclear deal.

Recently, Russia didn't play friendly to Iran. U.N. Security Council has imposed limited sanction on Iran. Russia voted yes. In the project of Iran's first nuclear power plant, Russia delayed the construction and delayed the supply of fuel, attributed all these to payment problem. Iran denied the accusation, said payment were on time, that Russia was just bowing to West pressure.

In the crisis of July to September, (the plot of Iran war justifying by a false flag nuclear attack in US, marked with 8/30 accident of "mistaken loading nuclear missiles on a B-52") Iran felt the approaching war threat from the US and made a compromise by accepting U.N. nuclear inspection in July. It was the time Iran needs the help most. None of the Caspian sea states and Russia gave a word. Why do they suddenly change the direction of 180 degree now?

I think it is a plot continue to the 8/30 plot. After the false flag nuclear attack went soured, Feds set up another trap for Iran. The fishing pole is Russia, the bait is "to finish the construction of the nuclear power plant on schedule", possibly with the permission of "production of highly enriched uranium" which can be used in nuclear weapon. Once the fish bite that special offer, the war will break off. What Bush needs is a justification.

To push Iran to bite the bait, a group of swindlers play a soap opera. Bush threatens World War 3 if Iran goes nuclear, to make Iran think that it belongs to a group. (The word "World War" is particularly selected because it means there are two camps, not two states) Caspian Sea states and Russia made Iran feel it is supported by a group. To create a safe feeling for Iran to accept that special offer.

Whether the fish will bite the bait, we don't know. But one thing is sure: when wolf wants to eat a goat, it will always find a justification. Either it's for "WMD", for "democracy", or for "your security". When Bush asks for more money from Congress, it's not for maintenance of troops in Iraq. It's for Iran and Syria war. And American people must prepare for a "dirty bomb" attack from their own government.

517. The California fire is an organized crime (10/28/07)
Quote, "With no new evidence, Fox continues to ask: Did al Qaeda burn California?

David Edwards and Nick Juliano
Published: Thursday October 25, 2007

For the second straight day, Fox News stood virtually alone in advancing thinly supported speculation to raise fears that the wildfires ravaging California are not the result of a confluence of arid heat and high winds but were set deliberately by al Qaeda terrorists bent on destroying America.

Fox & Friends, the conservative cable channel, was panned Wednesday for breathlessly reporting a sketchy, four-year-old FBI memo as if it offered new information linking America's enemies in the "Global War on Terror" with a plot to burn down southern California.

One point I agree with Fox news is that the California fire was caused by arson. But I think the mastermind behind arsonist is Feds not Al Qaida.

1. Al Qaida is always used as scapegoat for every big case in recent years. 911 attack was done in the name of Al Qaida. (a lot of people now realize it was done by insiders to justify Mid-east war) The conflict in Iraq between Sunni and Shiite was provoked by Al Qaida. (killing innocent civilians by "suicide bombers" and bombing shrine mosques) A soured nuclear attack on US on 8/30 was also warned previously by HSD chief Chertoff and FBI director Mueller that Al Qaida would nuke US cities. So was this time.

2. Media is a manipulate tool of Feds. The base of this news came from FBI.

3. Though they could blame it for Al Qaida, one thing Al Qaida unable to do is to create a wild fire situation like this. The fire in Southern California is caused by arid heat and high winds. The technique to control climate needs a long time experiment and huge fund support. So far I haven't see any other country has the ability to do it except US. I have alleged in my case Feds used their climate weapon to create high wind, hurricane and heat. See heat: 424. An unprecedented heat wave (7/30/06), see wind : 345. hurricane, a tool to distract (9/27/05).

4. This was an organized arson case. From TV, several days ago, I caught a brief news that police had shoot dead an arsonist. It also said police were tracking 5 suspects in separate arson case. It used to be individual even if a wild fire was caused by arson. Five separate arson in a wild fire certainly is an organized crime. (consider there were more undiscovered arson in the case) Who has the power to do it?

5. Media censorship. The arson obviously played an important role in this California fire. I caught it from a brief news from TV. Later I tried to find this report from newspaper for detail. I couldn't find any, not a little bit. Obviously it was censored by media. Someone doesn't want people connect the fire to arson despite the fact it was a big one. (Police even killed one suspect.)

6. Motive. I think it is the continuation of the elimination plot. The attempt to finish the plot was so eager that the plan goes one after another.

* 8/31-9/3. Bay Bridge shut down. (marked with 8/30 B-52 nuclear missiles accident)

* 9/14. Air operation stand down. (an attempt of dirty bomb attack)
*10/15 - 10/19. A biggest ever terror drill for three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam.

* 10/21 Sunday. Alleged dirty bomb attack in Great Mall, Milpitas. My sister and my parents came to my house. My sister asked me if there was a McDonald nearby. They intended to have a lunch there. The nearest McDonald is in Great Mall. I didn't go. Just 10 months ago, there was an alleged bombing attempt plot in that Mall for me. see # 459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)

* On same day, 10/21, California fire started. If I went to McDonald that day, I believe a bombing would have happened and there would be more arson to make the fire a much bigger disaster.

7. California fire not only planned to distract but also carried up a mission to eliminate my daughter. One week before 8/31, local newspapers, both Chinese and English, had big articles about May Zhou's death. The point was that Santa Rosa police concluded May Zhou's death was suicide while May's father referred to an independent pathologist who spoke in other way. The similar articles, must have been shown in San Diego media too, because May's family lives there. Eight months ago, I wrote "467. Attempt to murder my daughter (2/15/07)", alleged May Zhou's death was created to justify would be my daughter's death. Feds revived the issue in August plot again. Obviously determined to make it a big elimination.

To continue the plot, that big fire targeted at San Diego though it also burns in other places. San Diego University evacuated the students. My daughter wondered in Los Angles in a car with her classmates next day. She went home on 10/23 till today.

That is the event for a girl who doesn't live with us in Bay area. Feds prepared different way of elimination.

518. Earthquake after wildfire (11/3/07)

On 10/28, I wrote #517 alleged California fire was an organized crime.
On 10/31, there was a news in World Journal (Chinese) said a teenage admitted he caused a fire when he played with match on 10/21. That until 10/30, 18 fields out of 23 wild fires has been 100% controlled.
On 11/2, there was a brief news in Mercury News.

Re: "Boy, 10, admits causing devastating wildfire.

.....Corner had raced up a hill toward the source of the flames. At the top, she saw a stunned-looking 10-year-old boy and his parents frantically trying to beat the flames down with towels.

The 10-year-old boy quickly admitted he had been playing with matches.
....The fire he admitted starting was one of more than 15 roared Southern California. ...Causes have ranged from arson to downed power lines to sparks set off by construction work."

So 23 different cases caused this wild fire coincidentally. Among them, how many caused by downed power lines? How many caused by construction work? And how many, caused by arsons?

While I try to track the brief news from TV that police are tracking 5 suspects in separate arson and one suspect being shoot dead story, the two news were the only report I could find. Obviously it's a cover up of the arson. Since there were too many to cover up, Fox News even developed a fallacy that Al Qaida did it. But as I said, Al Qaida has no such ability to create an arid heat and high winds which requires huge resources. Feds has.

The California fire was under control in the end of October. Then it came an earthquake.

At 8 p.m. Oct.30, a 5.6 temblor rattles Silicon Valley. It was the first time I encountered with such big a quake. The house shook for 30 seconds. My wife and I rushed out of the house. It was quiet outside. I was surprised to find my wife and I were the only two in the lane. No other people was at sight. I could only think my street neighbors were agents and informants who knew what kind of the quake it would be in advance so they behaved different from ordinary people. Or the surveillance team members didn't want to show their face off. The picture of newspaper next day showed crowd of people outside their house, description: "Frightened San Jose residents wait for firefighters to give the all-clear sign after inspecting the Apartment."

I think the quake was created by Feds. Recently, the framed plot came one after another. In timing, it follows closely to the Southern California fire.
By location, the epicenter is the closest to my house. Scientists used to warn the danger of a big quake at Hayward fault. Hayward fault runs parallel to San Francisco and Oakland, stops at Fremont. The nearest fault to my house is another one: Calaveras fault. The 10/30 quake took place there.

So the temblor is out of scientists' expect. Topic," Energy sent south, away from danger"

"The rupture on the Calveras Fault, just seven miles east of Milpitas, directed its energy to the south, away from the Bay Area's most heavily populated urban centers and the dangerous of Hayward Fault." (Mercury News, 11/1/07)

It was not the energy went south. It was the local energy released artificially.

I looked at the map of the newspaper. The shortest distance from my house to Calaveras Fault is just the distance the epicenter to my house. So my house would be affected by the temblor to its utmost. The technique of artificial earthquake is to apply EM waves on fault to touch off a temblor. Feds picked up a point on fault that is the nearest to my house. Or will someone say it's another coincidence? ( In last message, I just said the nearest McDonald to my house is at Great Mall, Milpitas. Measure with radius, the distance from my house to epicenter may be shorter than Milpitas to it.)

The quake, maybe an intimidation, or a practice, or a pre-drill for a bigger one. It may prove my allegation last year was true. see "396. Rain to create a liquefaction quake (4/5/06)"

From August to now, Feds practised climate weapon many times. There was a Peru earthquake (8/15) to justify an attempt murder disguised as accident on my family members. (their Peru travel 8/16 to 8/22). There was a Minneapolis Bridge collapse (8/1) to justify the close of Bay Bridge. Both showed in media in big articles on 8/2. There were huge winds and hot weather to help California fire a historical big one. (10/21 to 10/2Cool And on 10/30, there is a quake the epicenter just 7 miles from my house.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07) PostMon Dec 03, 2007 1:23 am  Reply with quote  

519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07)

On 11/2, I saw a letter in my front yard. It was from Senator Dianne Feinstan's office. I had a petition to her in early August urging her to reconsider the warrantless surveillance law. (see #501) She said she supports it after she had conversation with Mike McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence. The letter dated on 10/17. Why it took two weeks to arrive at my front yard? I puzzled.

Next day, I knew why. The News said Feinstein and Schumer to vote for Mukasey on 11/2. Obviously, Feinstein's letter was dropped there by an agent to show off how they could manipulate the law makers and had their favorite get nominated.

The confirmation of Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey seemed being in trouble until last Friday. He likely would have failed his hearing in Senate because Mukasey refused to clarify his stand on water boarding torture. Now all of a sudden, his master came to help. DOJ will have an obedient puppet to work for them.

The letter in front yard may mean more. What is it? Two days later, news reported that on 11/4, US Defense secretary Robert Gates arrived in China to question the top officials there about the purpose of their military buildup and to pressure them to stop providing arms to Iran. I am familiar with that kind of cover up. It is another confirmation of a secret deal.
The sudden pass of G.A.'s nomination and the sudden China visit of Gates means a new plot is planned. Feds will have a yes man to cover up their illegal activity. The plot is an old one: a drug case. China will frame the case and offer witness for it. The plot have repeated many times since April 2001.

To confirm my speculation, yesterday's weather forecast show it will rain on Saturday. It is old tactic too. (see #500. IRS raid (8/3/07))
It means the action day will be on this week end.

How will Feds apply the case on me? The only speculation I can have is the garbage bin. Four weeks ago, it was stolen. (see #514. More for October plot 2007 (10/13/07) One week later, my wife said she found it was used by a neighbor cross the street and got it back. She had suggested me to call the garbage company for a new one. I didn't do it. So they returned it a week later. Will Feds make an arrest by claiming they found drug trace in it? I don't know. May be Mukasey will approve it. But if Feds arrest people not for what they doing but by discovering something in their garbage bin, then is it too convenient for them to wrong anyone they dislike by just planting?

520. A brilliant proof for secret deal allegation (11/13/07)

Quote, "The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY - 10th November 2007

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board."

Does Chinese submarine so advanced that US Navy couldn't detect it even it was at the heart of a Navy exercise? I don't think so. One important principle for military is to hide its ability so its rival can't find a proper tactic to deal with it. How could Chinese Navy broke that principle? Even Chinese sub has that ability to avoid being detected by US Navy, it was unnecessary to pop up to reveal its ability. Was China stupid enough to make such a show off? No, it's not. Then what is it?

It was another soap opera directed by DOJ and DOD. Chinese Navy and US Navy acted it to deceive the public. I view it as a brilliant proof of the allegation of my last message "519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07)". It is the result of a secret deal between US and China marked with Gate's Nov.4 visit.

The submarine's pop up event plays the same role of Russian's long range bomber which patrolled to Guam and approached Britain in July - September plot. To show a hostility existed between two countries to cover up an actual collaboration between them.

It may also help DOD to ask for more money from the House. In this May, DOD got 46 billion extra money for surge. I alleged it was for Iran war. The war on Iran failed to be carried out. It doesn't cost that much for surge. Where did the money go? I think they used it in climate war.

For the last big plot, (or also you can say when they got the extra money for surge) there were a big earthquake in Peru, an earthquake in San Jose, a bridge collapse in Minneapolis, and a huge wind and hot weather in southern California. All these were large operation took a lot of money. Intelligence had no such budget, DOD had.

For the coming plot, more climate manipulation will involve. Bush has request another extra 46 billion for it. The submarine event will help his proposal.

521. An air express lane for Iran war (11/18/07)

Quote, "Bush announces plan to ease airport delays
(New York - WABC, Nov. 15, 2007) - Ahead of the holiday travel crunch, President Bush ordered steps Thursday to reduce air traffic congestion and long delays that have left passengers stranded.

The most significant change is that the Pentagon will open unused military airspace from Florida to Maine to create "a Thanksgiving express lane" for commercial airliners. It will be open next week for five days - Wednesday through Sunday - for the busiest days of Thanksgiving travel"
We know the air traffic delay mainly caused by inefficiency of the airline company and airport, not by the lacking of airspace. If you cross the continent by a car, the traffic jam likely to happen in the city where you start the travel or in the destination city (for air travel it's airport). Seldom you have trouble once you are on freeway. (airspace) It is a joke if Bush says he solves the city traffic problem by adding more cross country freeway. Then why did he make such a ridiculous solution?

In 911 attack, one plane targeted Washington D.C. crashed in midway. Another plane targeted Pentagon likely was hijacked to somewhere else where all people on board were terminated. Circumstance evidence showed that what hit Pentagon was a military drone or a missile not a commercial plane. All four planes left their original airway. Now if there is another 911 alike hijack, what will the crew of the planes do? They will do whatever they can do because they know otherwise it will be death. That may change the result of the original plot planned by the perpetrator. How to comfort the crew member when the plane is led to a different route? The best way is to convince them they are directed to a "Thanksgiving (or Christmas) express way." So there will be little time for crew member to re-act when the last moment comes. (At that time the plane is taken over by the auto-pilot system.) It is a pre-concept psychological operation.

Though it is a speculation, I believe so. Consider Bush and Pentagon never cares human's lives. (The negligence of hurricane Katrina and New Orleans people and the soldiers' lives who died in mid-east war.) Consider Bush only cares for looting people's civil rights (Patriot Act, warrantless surveillance) and money (keep on asking for big war funding), how can Bush suddenly care for your trip delay? Consider Bush is eager to start war on Iran; Consider recent soured plots to justify Iran war (August 30 B-52 mis-loading nuclear missiles, 9/14 air force stand down, 10/15 dirty bomb drill), I allege the likely target of "terror attack" will be some military nuclear facilities or nuclear power plants which located in deserted area under the protect of "military airspace" for security reason. Nobody can sight them even from air before. Now for the necessity of Iran war, they open that forbidden airspace for commercial planes. (or a designated human plane bomb)

The Thanksgiving express lane is an express lane to Iran war. I allege.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostWed Dec 12, 2007 10:59 pm  Reply with quote  

522. Bombing shopping center (11/23/07)

On 11/9, newspaper said FBI has issued a warning that Al Qaida has clearly stated "they intend to attack the U.S. or its interests". ABC news reported that Al Qaida was preparing to attack shopping malls in Chicago and Los Angles this holiday seasons.

So far, almost all "terror attack" activated by so said "Al Qaida" were for the interest of the Inside Group. 911 attack targeted at civilians so Americans would support Bush to start the Mid-east war. Bali bombing targeted at Australian tourists so Australians would support their government to join the Iraq war. Al Qaida in Iraq targeted at Iraqi civilians by bombing the market and Shiite shrines to provoke a conflict between Sunni and Shiite. I allege this is a tactic of Pentagon and CIA to wipe out the resistance of Iraqis. Under the cover up of Sunni and Shiite conflict they assassinate Iraqi elite and anti-American force by the death squads. Bin Laden and his vice used to issue a video tape when Bush administration need help either in election, to intimidate people for more power and money, or frame a terror case.

So Al Qaida is only a tool of the Inside Group. We can see how Al Qaida helped Bush administration since he took the seat of US president. This time when FBI repeats the Al Qaida threat, that's old wine in new bottle - to justify a bombing in the name of terrorist. The likely spot will be shopping center near my residence. Especially the big mall - The Great Mall in Milpitas.

There was such attempt in last December when they offered a free ticket for a new Chinese movie. (see "459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)") Last month on 10/21, the day when Southern California fire started and other my family members on a bargain cruise trip, my youngest sister and my parents came, asked for instruction to the nearest McDonald. It was obviously a trick to lure me to the Great Mall where the nearest McDonald was. I think my youngest sister was under the order of Feds. She didn't know it was a death trip. The event remind me of 7/7/05 London bombing. The four "suicide bombers" were in same situation. They were instructed to there but never knew it was a death mission.

One month later, on 11/21, there was a burning smell in sitting room. There was a short circuit in switch box. The electrical power to kitchen and sitting room was cut. The wire in switch box was burned so severe that I have to restore power by setting up a new electrical wire. I have no material. My wife wouldn't do the shopping. She said, "I am afraid the Home Depot is closed on holiday." Today will be the third day kitchen remain in dark. Of course I won't go Home Depot. It is in Great Mall. I'm afraid a bombing there.

Not only I won't go Great Mall, also I don't go nearby shopping centers for more than half a year for same reason. I'll talk about it later.

523. Cyberspace harassment and power abusing (11/28/07)

From 11/11 to 11/13, for consecutive three days, Mercury News put an investigation series of "Cybercrime" on its first page. It is a big article with big title. I then knew FBI would expand their power abusing in internet area. That article was used to request for more power and budget.

The article said that Cyberspace force is the third biggest force in FBI. They are:

1. The biggest one: counter terrorism, (5,987 employees)
2. Next big: Counterintelligence. (4,479 employees)
3. Third big: Cyber Division. (1,151 employees)

What does that third big division do? Cyberspace law enforcement which deal with internet attack, compact-disc privacy and online child pornography.

What about communication of terrorists? It should belong to counter terrorism. Communication of spy? It should belong to counterintelligence. Other agencies also take big role in cyberspace area. The Secret Service, practiced in combating counterfeiting, handles computer-driven financial crimes. Homeland Security Department, the Federal Trade Commission, U.S.Postal Service and Immigration and Customs also have roles. So is that third big division too small as FBI said? I think it is too big that caused internet harassment.

Since I started to post in internet forum, I suffered endless harassment. I allege Feds have organized harassing team in internet which used to spread disinformation and attack dissenters. For my personal experience, I allege:

1. Feds organized team to attack me personally with words such like "insane, tin-foiled man, schizophrenia...."

2. Feds intimidate readers of my article. I reveal plot of Feds and having analysis on how they did it. My article used to attract more and more readers. It may appeal readers by hundreds each time I posting a new one. Then all of a sudden, the readers disappeared. The number dropped to less then a dozen.(I keep a record each time I post) It may caused by (1) Feds called reader of my article, tarnished me as a bad guy they were tracking. (2) blocking my article to readers by cyberspace technique. (such like technique of "ignorance")

3. Feds intimidate web-site host. Some administrator obeyed under the pressure to ban me though I didn't do anything against the rule. Some boards run by media would rather finish the service of discussion board. I think media still put "free speech" as their first principle and wouldn't to ban without appropriate reason. They include "New York Times", ",,

4. Harass by misplacing paragraphs of the article, made my post hard to read. It happened in, Islam, U.S. Constitution and Politics Discussion Forum.

5. Recently I was blocked to post in some web-sites or even being blocked to enter the site. Such like "myspace"; OC on line,;; I think it was done by the surveillance server of the Feds.

The ghosts in the browser is no other but Feds. They commit the crime of violation of the Constitution. Yet they can go on with the power abusing because they are part of the DOJ. When they demand more resource to expand their power, a darker age of cyberspace is coming.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostSun Dec 23, 2007 12:20 am  Reply with quote  

524. Bin Laden's tape and dirty bomb attack on Europe (12/3/07)

Bin Laden used to issue a tape when Bush administration needs help. Or you can view it is the work of misinformation of US intelligence. 11/29/07, Osama let out another one.

The only "achievement" Bush can boast, (or he thinks he can boast for himself) is the "war on terror". Al Qaida is a tool created by US Inside Group to squeeze money and power from people. When they need a war, or pass a "Patriot Act", or for an election, Bin Laden's Al Qaida always came out to help, either by a bombing or by a tape. So was this time.

Bush's population is so low, how can his war party - GOP to win the next election? There is another war plan still needs to be fulfilled. That is war on Iran. Bin Laden must work to support Bush.

1. Bush's Iraq war was supported by Tony Blair. To show he is not alone on his war policy. For the next war, (Iran war) Bush still needs a support from Europe. It is likely he developed some supporters such like France and German. But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on to Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "Al Qaida will have a terror attack on you to push you support US".

2. It's strange to see that in this tape Bin Laden said he was the "only one responsible" for the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington - six years after 911 attack.

The background of his confession is that after six years, one third of Americans realize 911 attack was an inside job. And majority of Americans think Government knew 911 attack in advance but let it happen. So government needs a strong defense lawyer. No one can be strong enough than Bin Laden. The Inside Group had push out a "defense witness" - Moussaoui. He cried loudly in court "I am Al Qaida." and admitted he was plotted to attack on 911. Bin Laden is just another Moussaoui. Their purpose are so clear and direct: " Don't doubt on Bush and his administration. I did the terror attack." Isn't that easy and convenient to suppress the suspicion on Inside Group?

Rudy Giuliani is a leading runner of president candidate. He is trumpeted by media as a 911 hero. As a matter of fact, he is a leading role to cover up the truth of 911 attack. The Inside Group needs him to go on the cover up job on a false flag attack. So they need someone to justify that 911 was a real terror attack not an inside work. Bin Laden does it in his new tape.
I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape" on 11/29 when I learned the news.(see above) One day later, another news proved my allegation.

Re: "Britain faces threat of dirty bomb attack at Christmas, Home Secretary warns
30th November 2007

Britain faces an increased threat of a "dirty bomb" attack over the Christmas period, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith warned today.

525. NIE (2007) and Trojan horse (12/8/07)

On 12/3, media reported that US National Intelligence Estimate said Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. The revelation caused a debate on Bush's Iran policy. The point missing in this debate is how could such an important information be learned by government and public so late - it took more than four years. (2003 - Dec. 2007) It took three years and eight months for US to get in World War II. ( Dec. 1941 - Japan surrender Aug. 1945) If US intelligence is so incompetent, that it took four years to reach an important conclusion, then by the time when they got a NIE of "Japan will attack Pearl Harbor", the war had finished already. This NIE of Iran is absurd. It's not intelligence but National History estimate.
This new NIE on Iran (2007) is a contradict to another one (2005) which asserted that Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapon". If 2007 NIE took four years to conclude event of 2003, apply same efficiency on 2005 Assessment, does that mean "Iran seeking nuclear weapon" was something on 2001? Or more likely, this government just select information that fits its demand?

Review recent situation, Bush administration and media used to demonize Iran as a nuclear threat to the world. US had its Navy battle squadron gathered at Persian Gulf to show its force. Iran war for several times were just inches away from breaking off .

Bush administration also took a blind eye on that new assessment (Iran halted nuclear weapon programme). Bush knew that estimate in August.
Re: "Bush told Iran may have halted atom work

Thu Dec 6, 2007 7:03am GMT
By Tabassum Zakaria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush was told in August that Iran may have suspended its nuclear weapons programme,
Yet, two months later in October, he warns World War III if Iran goes nuclear. This proves he treated the NIE as a junk piece.

Then why the intelligence let out such a "junk" information (possibly a truth but not favored by Bush administration) at this time?

I think it is a part of Iran war tactic.

1, Iran will be directed to a nuclear weapon "trap". The war will be done in Bush's remnant term. Bush has a swift re-action to that new NIE. He insists Iran a threat despite new report. When Iran war breaks off, Bush will be painted as a hero.

2. A psychological operation to push Iran to a nuclear weapon trap. Iran may feel safe that Bush is under criticism for his aggressive Iran policy and accept a "special offer" from Russia's Putin. The special proposal maybe a bait of enriched uranium which can be also used in military weapon. (see #516. Iran war next stage (10/23/07)) It's a tactic to push Iran to accept a Trojan horse. Russia's nuclear deal with Iran is that Trojan horse.

Bush activated Iraq war. Bush tries to plant a Trojan horse in Iran. Bush will start war on Iran once the Trojan horse is planted.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostThu Jan 03, 2008 12:13 am  Reply with quote  

526. Beware of a holiday season attack (12/13/07)

When I learned the new Bin Laden tape, I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape". (see #524) Then other news surged which combined with Bin Laden's new tape, could justify a dirty bomb attack in Europe. It may prove my opinion is correct: "But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "I'll push you to support US" (by terror attack on you)."

The three events (watch the time of the news date) : 1. Bin Laden's new tape. (11/29)

2. Gang selling enriched Uranium. (11/29) 3. British warns dirty bomb attack. (11/30) if you put them together, could make another perfect 911 story. Do you think they came out coincidentally? Who can manipulate these three events and make their debut at same time? (Bin Laden or Western intelligence?)

Re: Gang arrested trying to sell enriched uranium

Times Online
November 29, 2007

A gang arrested by Slovakian police was trafficking uranium so enriched that it could have been used by terrorists in a dirty bomb, it emerged today.

Two Hungarians and a Ukrainian man were arrested as they tried to sell the uranium last night. The consignment had been tracked by police after it came to their attention inside the former Soviet Union.

I always said that Feds frames case with the collaboration of Russia and China. In this Christmas and New Years holiday plot, there is no exception. It's interesting that to cover up the secret deal, they use Hungarians and Ukrainian this time. But the source finally leads to Russia. All roads go to Moscow in the end. (or Beijing)

There is a lot of advantage to plot with Russia and China. 1. Even if others get suspicious and want to track, they will kick at an iron wall. These two countries belong to another camp. Litvinenko's case is a sample. 2. It's deceivable. Public won't doubt when Russia and China involve in the case. It's hard to imagine that government work with former enemies.

As for Al Qaida. It is a tool of the US intelligence. I always say so.

527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)

In Fed's framed case, shut down the Bay Bridge always played an important role. I noticed that in 15 months, they managed to close the Bay Bridge four times. see "515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)".

On 11/7, about 8:30 in the morning, a Chinese commercial ship - the Cosco Busan, rammed a support tower of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, caused an oil spill. The media bang on the 58,000 gallon oil pollution. I didn't relate it to the framed case because though the ship got a big scratch, there was little damage on the Bay Bridge. (or at least media didn't report it) News concentrated on the dead sea birds, ban of fishing, polluted beach and ship and its crews and the pilot. No word about the Bridge. The only question was it was foggy that morning, why the ship still left Oakland port while it could stay until the sight view was clear.

The ship owner is a Chinese company in Hongkong which bought the Cosco Busan last year. (second hand ship) The company said it would take all the cost of oil pollution. The first thought I had was: "What a generous company it is. The cost to clean the oil will be huge."

Early December, an analysis article in Chinese newspaper reminded me this is not an accident. The opinion was from an experienced captain - Jing Gang - a retired captain from Taiwan who had served in Navy for 20 years and also had more than ten years experience as captain of commercial fleet, said the accident shouldn't have happened.

Besides the professional analysis, (omitted here), the captain has some suspicions: 1. The span between the two bridge supporters is 2,000 feet - very broad for a ship to sail through. The error tolerance of the GPS is less than 60 feet. The ship should also have at least two radar. The accident shouldn't have happened. 2. Coast Guard had informed Cosco Busan that it sailed on wrong direction. Why there was no response and correction? And there is no explanation later. 3. Most puzzled thing for him is, the Cosco Busan was sailing parallel along the Bridge. It could only happen when the main engine or helm damaged. 4.Cosco Busan could avoid to hit the bridge support tower unless it was on speed.

If captain could view the incident from another angle, his puzzle can be solved. The "incident" was a deliberation. The purpose was to damage the Bridge supporter to close the Bay Bridge. Then it explains everything. Why did the Cosco Busan sailed parallel to the bridge not vertical to cross it? Because the shape of the foundation of a bridge supporter is in olive shape. Which has more chance to hit an olive - by head on head or to hit it from its side? Other questions such like speed, radar, GPS, no response to the warning from Coast Guard.... all could be answered if it was a deliberate hit.

To close the Bay Bridge by a ship bomb is just a copy of 911 attack while the bomb in 911 case were planes. It was one plan in Feds cabinet. The plan was prepared one year ago when they bought an old ship. (ready to be destroyed in an "accident'). The company is likely a cover up one of the intelligence. When the 8/31/07 plot went soured, (marked with the shut down of Bay Bridge and the B-52 misloading of nuclear missiles) they immediately prepared another one. I called the new one as "holiday season plot". It marked with "Bush's air express lane offer; Bin Laden's new tape; London dirty bomb warning; Chinese sub's popping up; Gate's visit China.... " and also this one: a ship collapsed the Bay Bridge.

It almost succeeds. Only several yards away they could close up the Bay Bridge for a long time. Much longer than the one when they burned down a highway by a fuel tanker. (that highway is a main access to Bay Bridge)

Was that a mission went soured by a hair or a mission soured by its own operatives? Nobody knows. When Mohammed and Malve became scapegoat of DC sniper shooting case, or the Atta and his hijack team became sacrifice of 911 plane bomb, more and more people realize the trick played by intelligence. When four Arabic British became sacrifice of 7/7/05 London tunnel bombing, we saw four suspects of the following bombing (7/21/05) all survived well. The designated bombs didn't explode. All four of them.

So what did the pilot and the crew of the Cosco Busan think the moment when the boat would hit the support tower of the bridge? Were they willingly to become a suicide ship bomb? Suppose they were the operatives of the intelligence. Your bet.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostSun Jan 13, 2008 12:07 am  Reply with quote  

528. Bird Flu in Holiday season plot (12/23/07)

In late 2005 and early 2006, Feds activated a wave of propaganda about bird flu. (or avian flu). I think Feds planned to kill a lot of people in the framed case on me. For nearly six months, media is full of scaring article such like:

"March 14, 2006, ABC news

"Society just can't accept the idea that 50 percent of the population could die."

Virtual Pandemic: 90 Days to Infect Entire U.S.
By Robert Roy Britt LiveScience Managing Editor, 05 April 2006

A new computer model reveals how a pandemic like the avian flu might spread quickly across the United States and what methods would best thwart the scenario.

I wrote #410. The pandemic and the death of the Director of WHO (6/5/06), alleged Feds plotted a pandemic of bird flu. To cause a world wide panic, they murdered the Director of WHO and let their own candidate to take over the control of WHO. I think my revelation is very correct. Since then, the Frightening Warning disappeared from US mainstream media thoroughly. How can a pandemic which could kill 50% of population and infect entire US in 90 days suddenly lost its importance? Here we get familiar with Feds' pre-conception psychological operation and how mainstream media helps it.

Although US mainstream media rarely talk about bird flu since June 2006, the pandemic still remains as a mean of mass murder. In local Chinese newspaper, it becomes a routine to report the death caused by bird flu in Indonesia and Vietnam.
Here are some briefing news I collected:

12/20/05 Indonesia bird flu. . the man will be the tenth in Indonesia died of Bird Flu.
4/29/06 Another Indonesian lost in bird flu. The man will be the 25th victim of Bird Flu.
10/14/07 Indonesia Bird Flu. A boy died of Bird Flu. The death toll increases to 88.

Each week or so, Indonesia reported a Bird Flu death. I alleged the president of Indonesia works for US intelligence when the Big tsunami happened in 2005. Indonesia becomes a practice field for US bio and climate weapon. They made the bird flu (avian flu) a continuous disease there. Because the framed drug case on me is a continuous one - new plot created immediately after the failure of old one. So when their framed case goes succeeded, they can have a bird flu case right away on hand to justify a pandemic. When people live in panic of death threat, no one will notice the mysterious death in an unreasonable search and arrest case.

When Gates visited China in early November, I knew there was a new case created by the cooperation of US and Chinese intelligence. The ship which hit the Bay Bridge was one step in the plan. There is more.

On 12/8, Chinese newspaper reported: "Man to man. Avian Flu took the lives of Father and son in JiangSu Province"

"Chinese Health Department confirmed the 24 years old man of Nanjing died of infection of Avian flu virus H5N1. His 52 years old father had infected the same virus.... WHO in Geneva said they wouldn't exclude the possibility that son passed the Avian Flu virus to his father. (a man to man case).......

Besides, the neighbor city Shanghai, enters a high alert situation to watch the passengers from Nanjing."

The Holiday season plot is a big one. Not only they will activate terror attack in Europe, they will also create a bio-attack - a bird flu pandemic world wide. There will be mass killing in the plot, both in US and China, especially in Shanghai where I have a lot of relatives. Those people know of my case and had cooperated with authority to monitor me when I went to Shanghai in 94. But Feds won't allow witness of their crime alive even these people work for them. Atta and his hijack team of 911 attack were, "Suicide bombers" of London 7/7/05 bombing were, Cho Seunghui and Emily Hilscher in Virginia Tech shooting case were all sacrifice. They were killed by their master without hesitation.

529. Feds' main target (12/28/07)

In recent years, Feds planned a lot of false flag terror attacks, some are real big one such like 8/30/07 nuclear attack on US (A B-52 misloading 6 nuclear missiles) or 07 Holiday season plot (marked with Bush's military airspace offer which may imply the bombing on US nuclear facilities). Within 18 months, for five times Feds has shut down (or try to shut down) the Bay Bridge. All these plots went soured. I think because either I had revealed the coming plot in advance or they failed to eliminate the main target of the plot - that's me.

Though Feds can gain a lot - both money and power - from the terror attack, they would rather postpone the plan when they failed to eliminate me first. Feds won't lose anything if they haven't carry out a terror attack, but it will hurt them if I am alive and go on revealing their crime. The method of elimination are:

1. To make an IRS search to arrest. (I think Feds has planted drugs in my house.) To reach this goal, Feds manipulated my wife to misreported tax-return last year without my consent as well as this year. (because I have unsold merchandise stock in my garage.) To search and arrest in the name of IRS is one tactic Feds used to use.

2. To make a search in the name of natural disaster - earthquake. Early last year they attempted to do so with a Liquefaction quake. (see #397 and #399) In October this year there was a 5.6 quake at my area. I think it was a pre-practice. see "518. Earthquake after wildfire (11/3/07)". Since then, I almost felt daily earth shaking. So mild that media never report it but I could just feel it. I think they are practicing and adjusting the vibration frequency. There will be a big one if Feds has certainty. Honestly, I haven't feel it for days so far. The earthquake team may be on holiday vacation.

3. By applying EM wave on me. (I allege it was a gamma ray)

4. Poison food, especially the water.

5. Shopping center bombing. I used to go different shopping centers. Early this year I stopped to go around to avoid a mall bombing. I think that's the main murder method Feds apply on me now.(see #459, #517)

Some people don't believe there is earthquake technique. Here is the information released ten years ago.


DoD News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen

April 28, 1997

There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Joined: 14 Apr 2005
Posts: 727
PostWed Jan 23, 2008 12:38 am  Reply with quote  

530. Storm and Iowa Primary (1/3/0Cool

When recent media poll dramatically changed the rate of Democrats' candidates - by pulling down Hillary Clinton's and push up John Edwards', I felt that Feds would put their own representative - Edwards - to the throne of President. Generally, unless something big happened, the public's opinion is not so easy to change. A dramatical change of the polling data without convincible reason only reflects intention of Feds. Feds is the one who manipulates the media.

Yesterday, two news touched my mind. They were about weather. It said snowstorm socked Midwest, dumping more than a foot of snow and creating hazardous driving condition there. Since it becomes common that Feds alters a climate condition to help its operation, I think Feds created that storm to help John Edwards in today's Iowa Primary. I wrote "John Edwards".

I used to put that kind of article in political thread. But before I could finish the article in a reply, it disappeared - I lost connection to internet. It happened before when I wrote article Feds disliked. I had to re-write it on WordPad than copy and paste it to avoid the loss of article. Then there were repeated losing connection of internet when I tried to post it on the board. The harassment convince me what I wrote is accurate. Feds is afraid of it. I decide to put it in this thread too. Here is it:

John Edwards (1/2/0Cool

John Edwards works for the Inside Group. He has the characters of a Feds. Feds is a tool of the Inside Group to control this country. They monitor and spy on people. Blackmail and intimidate politicians. Murder and assassinate if necessary. Infiltrate different groups with moles. Manipulate media and rig the election. Feds has no its own opinion. It works to the order from its master. He smiles at the man whom he plans to kill tomorrow.

John Edwards is such kind of man. Media used to post a picture of his smiling face. Is he liberal or conservative? Nobody can tell. Because he has no distinctive opinion. He ducked the debate to avoid express his own opinion. (when he was a Senator) He tried not to offend anyone, either individual or group. Because his work is to monitor others but not to be noticeable. That may be why he resigned from the Senate. (tries not to express his own opinion so no mistake can be exploited by his opponents when he later joins the campaign)

But in crucial moment, they came out to carry out their master's policy. That's how he voted for Patriot Act and Iraq war Authorization bill. He only shows his true face in critical moment.

Now is a crucial point. Bush is so unpopular that to rig a victory for GOP will be too obvious a forgery. The Inside Group needs a representative in Demo. Hillary, though is a follower of the Inside Group, can't compare with Edwards - a representative of Feds' own.

This is how to rig the Iowa Primary. Different from normal election which is easy to rig. ( a rigged election done by the election office controlled by Feds and the result justified by manipulated media poll) Iowa Primary (Demo) depends on the presented individuals. It's hard to rig the count of the presence of people. (just like it's hard to rig the campaign donation money of Ron Paul's) Then how Feds can do to rig the primary? - by altering the weather. They create an extra cold condition for the Iowa.

Edwards will win the Primary because his supporters (A troop of Feds informants who work under discipline) will attend the vote despite how cold the weather is. The supporters of other candidates will be affected by natural humanity softness. Most people will stay at home if it's too cold and dangerous outside. That's how Feds to rig an election with climate change.
The other news that reminds me this is a rigged election (by altering weather)

"Clinton Backers: Californians try to sway voters

By Mary Anne Ostrom
Mercury News, 1/2/08

Cear Rapids, Iowa - Iowans are being warned to stay indoors because of deadly cold temperatures and dangerous roads, but a dozen Silicon Valley campaign foot soldiers are in a race over snow and ice to get them to come out for Hillary Clinton."

An Iowa victory will justify the later rigged election for Edwards. Make the rigging more reasonable. That's why Feds tries its best to make Edwards "win Iowa".

531. Swift response from Feds (1/8/0Cool

Feds used to react swiftly to my revelation. When I found this, I put the date on my post.

*I posted Judi Bary's story on 3/25/2002.(see #60) Several days later, I was surprised to read the news that her case was going to trial on 4/8/2002. Judi brought the case to the court in 1991. It was delayed again and again. Judi herself couldn't see the trial. She died of breast cancer in 1997 which I alleged a radiation murder. On 6/11/2002, the jury found FBI and Oakland police lied in the case and violated victim's Constitution right of 1st Amendment and 4th Amendment. Judge ruled a 4.4 million compensation. The late justice came after 11 years dragging. I thought it was a swift response to my message. They try to clean up the odds. Anyway, it's a small case for them. (see #96)

*On 12/18, I wrote "527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)". Two days later, I surprisedly heard the news that Cosco Busan, the ship that caused oil spill left Bay Area on 12/20.

Just on 12/14, Captain Anya Hunter of Coast Guard said the vessel could not be released before authority finishing the civil and criminal investigation. That day, the ship changed its anchorage to Pier 9 where the fee for berth was cheaper. Obviously it would stay there for some time.
But one day after I revealed it was a criminal case, they let go an evidence despite the investigation far from finishing.

*On 12/28, I wrote "Negative campaign fund planting (12/28/07)" in which I alleged Norman Hsu worked for Feds in order to manipulating politicians. Five days later (1/3) he was put on a trial and sentenced 3 years prison on same day.

Norman Hsu is a fugitive of a fraud case 15 years ago. (1992) A fugitive should live in covert, try not to be noticeable. But Hsu went on with his forgery. He even became a fundraiser of Democratic Party. He appears in high profile event with Hillary. There was no trouble for him. It means he has background. He can go on with his crime until when Feds needs a case to tarnish Hillary Clinton.

Here is the original article. Notice the sentence which touched off a swift one day trial on Norman Hsu.

Re: Negative campaign fund planting (12/28/07)

"Ron Paul To Keep White Supremacist Donation". A recent popular article about Ron Paul's campaign fund.

People are too innocent not to recognize it's another dirty trick of election. Feds used to plant negative contribution to candidate so they have an issue to attack these candidates.

The similar way they do to Clinton by Norman Hsu's contribution.

GOP is skilled in those dirty tricks. You also saw Swift Boat Team attack on Kerry in 2004's election.

Ron Paul is a disfavor of ruling class. So once again, FBI plays trick to tarnish the most hopeful candidate. The two most fearsome rival for GOP are: Ron Paul (Republican) and Hillary (Demo). So the attack concentrate on them.

Who control those organization: Communist Party; supremacist; peace movement; even ACLU and other groups? FBI.

Quote, "FBI Ran Aryan Nations After Butler's Death
Federal Informant Rick Spring, Close Associate Of NSM / Schoep, Admits He Was On Federal Payroll

9/19/2007 4:09:21 PM
Discuss this story in the forum <>
Overthrow Staff

-- In a confessional emailed out to white nationalist leaders, federal informant and convicted bank robber Rick Spring admitted today that he operated the Aryan Nations as a false flag front group for the FBI after the death of Richard Butler.

"I have to bare my heart and soul to the good folks of the movement, although this is hard for me to say, I must tell the truth. I Rick Spring have been working for the FED's for some time now and I am sorry," Spring wrote in an email today.

Now you know why supremacist donate to Ron Paul's campaign? And why some one cooks this issue hot? It may all be done by the same hand.
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.
 View user's profile Visit poster's website Send private message

Post new topic Reply to topic
Forum Jump:
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are GMT.
The time now is Sun Apr 22, 2018 6:18 pm

  Display posts from previous:      

© 21st Century Thermonuclear Productions
All Rights Reserved, All Wrongs Revenged, Novus Ordo Seclorum, All Your Base