|
|
KNOW-THIS

Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
Scientists express concerns over Pentagon's ray gun
Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:33 pm
|
|
|
Funny how these supposed "less than lethal" weapons seem to keep becoming more and more LETHAL!!!
Scientists worry about Pentagon’s new ray gun
quote: LONDON - Scientists are questioning the safety of a "Star Wars"-style ray gun due to be deployed in Iraq for riot control next year.
The Active Denial System weapon, classified as “less lethal” by the Pentagon, fires a 95-gigahertz microwave beam at rioters to cause heating and intolerable pain in less than five seconds.
The idea is that people caught in the beam will rapidly try to move out of it and therefore break up the crowd.
quote: But New Scientist magazine reported Wednesday that during tests carried out at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, participants playing the part of rioters were told to remove glasses and contact lenses to protect their eyes.
In another test, they were also told to remove metal objects like coins from their clothing to avoid local hot spots developing on their skin.
“What happens if someone in a crowd is unable for whatever reason to move away from the beam,” asked Neil Davison, coordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at Britain’s Bradford University. “How do you ensure that the dose doesn’t cross the threshold for permanent damage? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?”
_________________ "You find me offensive? I find you offensive, for finding me offensive" |
| |
|
|
KNOW-THIS

Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
Thu Jul 21, 2005 6:56 pm
|
|
|
Yeah, how will this work once we're all required by law to accept an implant? What about a pacemaker? It can't help much..... _________________ "You find me offensive? I find you offensive, for finding me offensive" |
| |
|
|
KNOW-THIS

Joined: 14 Jul 2003
Posts: 3694
|
Thu Jul 21, 2005 7:09 pm
|
|
|
In this country, leaving someone without sight is considered non-lethal since that isn't in itself actually death. In Israel, they just deafen your ass. So why not just break some legs and cripple people then? Is that still seen as being "non-lethal" since technically they'd still be alive? That's the kind of dangerous direction this slippery slope of flawed logic leads.
Coming to a protest near you: "The Scream"
quote: Welcome to the advent of "The Scream". Straight from the pages of Science Fiction, "The Scream" is a device that penetrates painful bursts of sound that leaves its victims reeling with dizziness and nausea.
President Bush's speeches have that effect on me for Christ's sake. Maybe they ought to broadcast his voice on loadspeaker? Now that's a true repellant.
quote: Here is what happened to ordinary people when the army employed the new device: "Protesters covered their ears and grabbed their heads, overcome by dizziness and nausea, after the vehicle-mounted device began sending out bursts of audible, but not loud, sound at intervals of about 10 seconds. An Associated Press photographer at the scene said that even after he covered his ears, he continued to hear the sound ringing in his head."
quote: "A military official said the device emits a special frequency that targets the inner ear.Exposure for several minutes at close range could cause auditory damage, but the noise is too intolerable for people to remain in the area for that long, he said.
"Another official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because of his sensitive position, said the device hasn’t been tested on subjects hours at a time, so he couldn’t discuss effects from prolonged exposure.
_________________ "You find me offensive? I find you offensive, for finding me offensive" |
| |
|
|

|
|

All times are GMT. The time now is Sat May 26, 2012 3:22 pm
|
|
|
|
|