|
Author
|
|
Topic: Debunkers bought the real hoax. | Topic page views:
|
|
Nola30
Senior Member
Tuscaloosa AL U.S.A. 41 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-21-2000 07:58 PM
These puppets who believe every thing the Governments press handlers put out are the real jackasses. Also , everyone knows that the Government has been involved in so many cover-ups that they are having a problem keeping up with their own lies. And as for these people who believe that the Goverment would not harm it's own citizens. What about those retarded children in the fifties the Government did radiation experiments on? They experimented on disabled children for lands sake. They wanted to see what the effects of different levels of contamination would do. That is a proven and well documented fact. So don't tell me they are suddenly above spraying us with an unknown substance without us knowing.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Nola30 on 09-21-2000] 
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-22-2000 02:57 PM
You know what they say:It's easier to ask for forgiveness, than to ask for permission. A pattern has been firmly established by the government/military: deny and lie now, tell truth several decades later. Here is the latest example... "No, we don't know nuthin' 'bout no Bio-Warfare tests..." 
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ 700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-22-2000 08:17 PM
Re: those retarded children in the 50's - those "experiments" took place at the Walter E. Fernald School in Waltham, MA: http://www-tech.mit.edu/V115/N49/radiation.49n.html Excerpts: >>According to the government report, the Fernald School experiments were "morally troubling" and the government owes the test subjects an apology.<< >>But because there was no evidence that the subjects were harmed by exposure to any dangerous levels of radiation, the government is not obliged to monetarily compensate them.<< --------------------=> "Morally troubling" hardly covers it. "Criminal" is more appropriate. That the unwitting "subjects" were "not harmed" is irrelevant. The mindset that motivates the type of people who think it's OK to "subject" the unknowing to this sort of abuse is the same mindset that can glibly attribute at least some of what we are witnessing in our skies to "fuel dumping" - as if THIS is also "OK" and cannot be "proven" to cause, or have caused, any "harm" to those on the ground who must ultimately inhale the air into which this "harmless" substance is dumped. Signed, Disgusted

|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-22-2000 11:04 PM
Not to be insensitive, but that was 50 Years Ago !Man....do you people keep slapping your dog everyday for the trash he knocked over last week ????? Sure caution is best but geeze do we have to keep dwelling on studies like these ? How about some here and now stuff.... Here's a good one...were they ever successful in recreating storms to produce a soaking rain and not t-storms ? gee freakin' whiz..... 
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ 700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-22-2000 11:42 PM
Seeker -Some things never change. As usual, you miss the point entirely. Your response qualifies as a complete non-sequiter. Fooey. 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-22-2000 11:55 PM
Listen deborah, I comment on what I feel is the important thing to me , if you feel it is nescessary for me to say that our government is not beyond carrying out some program of some sort as you imply ....I have said it before I am in agreement...It is you and your one way "us and them" thinking that has made you overlook this fact, what I have posted time and time again....Bet it was a shock to you to find out how long "merck" has been involved in the NWO... I see you still need to 'wake-up'..... 
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ 700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-23-2000 09:29 AM
You don't know a damn thing about my state of awareness. I've known about Fernald for decades. It's "in the neighborhood" as they say. Merck is old news as well. If I choose to post a reference, it is for the benefit of those who may want more information on a topic under discussion.As for my so-called "black-and-white", "us-and-them" thinking - again, you do not know me - and I have no interest whatever in enlightening you, as you appear to be attracted only to conflict and dissension. You like to think you have everyone "scoped out" but you are pathetically off-base in a significant number of cases. You can't seem to resist "sticking it" to those whose thinking you don't quite understand. Why don't you simply ask a person to clarify themselves instead of always looking to reduce them with your venom? That is, if you are genuinely interested in productive dialog, and not just looking for a fight. 
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ 700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-23-2000 10:02 AM
postscriptThe truth is, you and I would probably do fine over a couple of beers. 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-23-2000 12:45 PM
(postscript) = You got that right  
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ 700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-23-2000 01:09 PM
HA HA! Gimme five! 
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 09-23-2000 01:12 PM
Cheers!"Us and Them": That's an illusion, all there is is Us. Now, Seeker, maybe you can help me with my Skew-T...
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 09-23-2000]

|