Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Chemtrails
  CDC Doctors Flu Data (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:  1 2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   CDC Doctors Flu Data

Topic page views:

LTC8K6
35 HOTEL / MOLE / LAME MORON

Tar Heel State
267 posts, Oct 2000

posted 10-25-2000 04:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LTC8K6     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Throat, the change was apparently applied in 1999. I kept looking under 1993, so I couldn't find it.
http://www.cdc.gov/epo/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm4845a3.htm

"In 1993, the WHO International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding guidelines were updated to International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Public Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10), and were implemented by CDC's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) in 1999 (1). For ICD-10, the application of a coding rule was broadened such that when pneumonia is listed by a certifying physician on a death certificate as the underlying cause of death, nosologoists should give preference to coding the cause of death to an alternative condition that might have led to the pnuemonia. Preliminary results from an NCHS comparability study have shown that the ICD-10 coding rule change will result in a substantial decrease in the number of reported pneumonia-related deaths (CDC, unpublished data, 1999).

In response to ICD-10, CDC requested that the 122 cities report pneumonia deaths to the surveillance system if pneumonia is listed anywhere on the death certificate. This may partially account for the observed increase in reported P&I deaths above threshold levels; baseline and threshold levels of P&I mortality are estimated using the previous 5 years' mortality data. CDC continues to evaluate the impact of these changes in reporting criteria on P&I mortality estimates."

My memory was a little off, but this is what I was remembering.

IP Logged

LTC8K6
35 HOTEL / MOLE / LAME MORON

Tar Heel State
267 posts, Oct 2000

posted 10-25-2000 09:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LTC8K6     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
ST,

"Note: Since the "reporting changes" went into effect only before the 1999-2000 flu season, the 0.8% increase in the Seasonal Baseline and Epidemic Levels should only have been from that point forward. As even a child (but perhaps not a Rooster) could plainly see, this elevation of baseline levels have been extended back through the 1997, 1998, 1999 seasonal data, WHICH IS TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE!!!!"

Maybe this is too simplistic but, if they raised one year's baselines for whatever reason, wouldn't they also have to raise a previous year's baselines to make comparisons between the two years valid? Comparisons on a chart would not be valid if both baselines were not adjusted in the same manner, would they? If you don't make the adjustment, you'd have to have a footnote and calculations for each comparison to even them out. Much simpler to raise them all and say that's what you did.

IP Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:  1 2 

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Money Forum | The Web Hosting Forum | Papa Guru
Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c