|
Author
|
|
Topic: Chemtrail Identifiers Revisited | Topic page views:
|
|
Swedishoo
Vigilante
North Pinellas County, Florida
280 posts, Aug 2000
|
posted 11-05-2000 11:04 PM
  
Seeker, I spent many hours typing up the mortality chart, not many years.
|
Norrin Radd
Senior Member
92 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 03:42 AM
Jay,I tried the flight explorer software. I tried it for 2 months. Unfortunatly, you need at least 2 people to be able to indetify jets outside and then spot them on the software. I tried to do it by myself, but I believe it is not possible. We get a decent amount of traffic over Akron,OH and I could not be sure of what I was looking at, without help. I am curious Jay, aren't there any issues that you feel are worth fighting for, besides debunking chemtrails? Did you know that recently the Energy Department just admitted that there is 10 times the amount of such wastes in the soil and in inadequate containers than previously estimated ? OOOPS, I guess they were off just a little, hey 90% off is pretty close. A mistake of this magnitude is a little suspicious, don't you think? So, are there any "other" issues that you are concerned about ? Brent
Saturday October 21 1:00 PM ET
Paper: Government Ups Estimate of Plutonium Waste
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Energy Department has increased by 10 times its estimate of how much plutonium and other man-made radioactive material has been released in the ground or buried in poorly built containers, The New York Times said on Saturday. The Times said that the department for years had stated that more than 97 percent of plutonium and related waste generated by the first four decades of nuclear weapons production was in ``retrievable'' storage awaiting burial at a new depository. Only about 3 percent had been placed in soil or buried, it said. Energy Department officials now say there is 10 times the amount of such wastes in the soil and in inadequate containers than previously estimated, the Times said.
|
nodebbunker
Senior Member
Indiana USA
200 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 09:54 AM
Brent, That was exactly my argument at Chemtrails.org last February about FE. But I was so determined to prove Jay wrong, I developed a system and followed it 3-4 days a week since March. It was definitely worth the energy, time and $ to discover I was not a "victim." I still subscribe to FE, but because of the system I followed, I can predict what areas, especially in the Midwest and gulf regions, will see jet contrails just by looking at the Goes8 satellite and the ADDS weather page. What was once a doom and gloom scenerio perpetrated by the power of suggestion has become a fun hobby.If you would like some assistance and willing to commit the time, please e-mail me at cdebgo@zipmax.com. Just call me "The operative formerly known as Chickie Deb." ------------------
just a housewife from Indiana
|
cydoniaquest
nobody
nowhere
803 posts, Aug 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 11:25 AM
DELETED BY THE ARTIST FORMALLY KNOWN AS CYDONIAQUEST
[Edited 1 times, lastly by cydoniaquest on 01-13-2001]
|
nodebbunker
Senior Member
Indiana USA
200 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 01:14 PM
Sorry, Cy. I sent Thermit 2 screens, one with plane info showing and that's the one he DIDN'T post. Instead of asking me all these questions, why don't you quit playing games and just subscribe yourself? You've been led to the water, now drink!But I must note that you have the tenacity of a ringer. ------------------
just a housewife from Indiana
|
Norrin Radd
Senior Member
92 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 02:12 PM
Flight Explorere can't possibly explain the many strange things I have seen. One of these things I observed was two jets, at very close to the same altitude, flting right at each other. I was watching a jet with a contrail, when all of a sudden I saw another jet of the same type, flying stright at the first, without a contrail. I only had a split second to take the picture and I didn't have time to focus. Both jets were exactly the same size in the sky, thus showing they were very close to the same altitude. This is just one example of unexplainable jet activity I have seen.
|
Thermit
Tech
Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 02:27 PM
  Can't wait to hear the explainations for that...
|
cydoniaquest
nobody
nowhere
803 posts, Aug 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 02:52 PM
DELETED BY THE ARTIST FORMALLY KNOWN AS CYDONIAQUEST
[Edited 1 times, lastly by cydoniaquest on 01-13-2001]
|
Thermit
Tech
Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 03:19 PM
I know those were somewhat rhetorical questions posted about FE, but I'll post that second screen in the FE thread...
|
Thermit
Tech
Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 03:25 PM
I started a new thread for discussion on Norrin Radd's picture.
|
Blackclaw
New Member
Dayton, Ohio
7 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 09:33 PM
Hi Cy,"Blackclaw, this depends on their mission doesn’t it? Now if they were on a mission to cover as much airspace as possible with a spray then they would not fly single file formation! Make sense?" Well sure. But then why fly in such close formation? Why not a one mile spread between each aircraft?
------------------
-Blackclaw
|
Thermit
Tech
Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 09:46 PM
Possibly because multiple Trail runs in the same vicinity will create a more natural looking cloud afterwards. This series, shot by Phil, shows this exact process being performed. This is also the reason for creating Chemtrail strips, as they will look like a small cloud after sometime.
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 11-07-2000 09:55 PM
Ahemmm,Thermit just what do you think is the composition a cloud ? The only difference between a contrail and a natural cloud is cirrus contrailus would not exist without de' plane.... good bye blue sky.... ------------------
T/S
[Edited 1 times, lastly by theseeker on 11-07-2000]
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
This topic is 5 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 
