posted 11-07-2000 01:15 PM            

All the scientists around the world expressing grave concerns about global warming and ozone depletion...

they are wrong and misleading the public...their data is flawed, their analysis is incorrect and it's
only You who has the answer...

"Everything is OK...The Earth is in Balance".

What arrogance, and ignorance, unless of course such a position is based on calculated dis-information.

Either way, it's a damning conclusion.

A graphic example of Reynolds half-truths and disinformation:

"Volcanic Effects on Ozone Depletion"
http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/mandias/honors/student/volcano/ozone_depletion.html

"Although, the effects of large eruptions such as Mount Pinatubo, over time
account for less than 3% of the ozone depletion to date. These effects no matter how substantial only last for a maximum of 2-3 years while a CFC molecule in the atmosphere can cause damage to the ozone for 50 to 2000 years."

Be sure to look at the graph of the growth of the ozone hole at this location. Does this look likes Reynolds' "Earth in Balance?"

posted 11-07-2000 06:48 PM            

Global warming as portrayed is a hoax .

posted 11-07-2000 09:05 PM              

Oh, and we're also waiting for your barium lab analysis, and your airline filter lab analysis, and all the other things you promised before.

Is it really possible that sore throat is William Thomas, the parallelism is ominous, you know, the claims, the paucity of data, the hype over false green agenda items.

posted 11-08-2000 08:43 AM              

In virtually all spheres of life, including the so-called "commons" of the atmosphere, biosphere, and hydrosphere, such control is being siezed.

The subject of normal contrails and their effect on the atmosphere is one aspect which is currently being discussed by the UN IPCC.

IPCC is creating information to be used by policymakers within the UN system to create international control mechanisms on all the world's people, as a whole, with little check on it's ultimate power in furtherance of the euphemism called "world governance".

I fear government as I fear fire, it being a "feared servant and a cruel master". While the excesses of national governments can be
checked by other nations, sometimes only through violence, what can check a world government?

If either conscious or unconscious activity by "chemtrail" promoters results in action furthering false conclusions by the IPCC regarding aviation, which leads to further world control, that means one more advance for world government.

That's a possibility.

Art Bell, the preeminent media promoter of "chemtrails" said,

"Will there be a global government with a benevolent dictator, overseeing global law, global police and a global judiciary in an attempt to make the world cleaner, peaceful and prosperous? If that's what it takes to achieve these ends, so be it."
- The Quickening, page 309

posted 11-09-2000 08:41 AM            

I have posted on Cliff's board over the past year on threads titled "Green is the Scheme" on the old board and The Greens are Red" on the new board. Have you ever wondered why the Greens haven't gotten in on the contrail issue? I would think it would be their main objective the past few years, don't you? So why haven't they gotten on the bandwagon?