posted 11-26-2000 02:14 AM            

(ABC) Always Broadcasting Clinton

(NBC) Nothing But Clinton

(CNN) Clinton News Network

(CBS) Clinton Broadcasting System

(PBS) Isn't that what women get ?

posted 11-26-2000 11:10 AM            

(Also recent lawsuit against Fox by their own reporters re:failure to air segment about rBGH(?)...see post by Norrin Radd.)...

If FOX is standing up to the other networks, they do appear to be the good guys, because it does look like we have had this Clinton/Gore admin for 8 years that has in effect been working on behalf of interests outside of those that would benefit the U.S.! Imagine Communist China being able to dictate who our next president will be! If that is whats happening, and there seems to be more than enough evidence to support it, then I would support Bush %100 over Gore...,

It also seems that Israel is having some control over dictating who our next president will be...the overseas ballots from Israel. George Bush senior talked about ending the $3billion a year(!) we send over there, but that kind of talk ended with the looting of the American Savings & Loans, and then the Gulf War. Media totally dropped the ball on those issues.

BUT then I have to wonder about that Savings & Loan rip-off that plundered billions of dollars from trusting Americans nation-wide that has never been resolved publically and has been totally covered up by all of these networks. Evidence indicates that the Bushes were a big part. If that is true, wny haven't the Democrats brought that up? Probably because they were part of it too!

If you're lucky, you might hear some mention of the S&L Ripoff on C-SPAN by a caller. Same with Waco Massacre, OK City, Mena, AK drug-running, Clinton bodycount and everything else that the networks and political parties refuse to mention.

In my opinion (I know everyone has one), there is a "ruling elite", and the Republicans and Democrats are both part of it. There's a power struggle every 4 years between the two, but they still stay in control of our country. But the Dems seem to be willing to seize control at ANY cost, including financial aid from Communist China in exchange for giving up more control of Panama Canal, allowing Chinese made AK-47's to flood the U.S. and then attacking the Constitution (2nd Ammendment) by using those networks to lie to us....and THEN not prosecuting criminals in order to exert more control over the American people through fear, intimidation, and abuse of the legal system!

posted 11-26-2000 12:25 PM            

QUESTION; Could the Red Chinese be getting revenge on the U.S. though manipulation of the Clinton administration and mass media? Is the spraying a real attack by the Chinese with cooperation by Clinton administration? or just a government-instigated hoax to gauge Americans reactions as suggested by others?

_______________________________

An excerpt from... http://www.plausiblefutures.com/text/ciavirus.html

"Chaff was one of several unusual things that the North Koreans and Chinese
reported falling on their heads in 1952," write the authors.
Combined with reports of disease epidemics, there is enough evidence that germ
warfare during the Korean War was a fact, and not communist propaganda.

"The 581st ARC Wing operating in Asia under cover of a transportation service as a
means to carry out its mandate" is an example of covert warfare by the CIA,
an example of using a "cutout," or a third-party, to distance itself from illegal or
compromising activities.

When American fliers captured in Korea subsequently revealed that they were
engaged in biowarfare, the CIA denied everything. The Department of Defense
characterized the flights as "routine" while "some American congressmen worked
themselves in to a fury against the hated Chinese who supposedly were able to
brainwash their captives in to making false confessions."

Charges by the Chinese were dismissed "despite the fact that to there was
considerable overlap between the kinds of diseases that the United States was
preparing for its biological warfare program and those which the Chinese claim
followed attacks by US aircraft in the spring of 1952."

[Edited 1 times, lastly by defender on 11-26-2000]

posted 11-26-2000 02:01 PM            

If you want to know who controls the media, all you have to do is research one topic. If you research the CFR, you will prove to yourself that I am right. If not, you can pretend that they are just bias.

FOX News broke on to the scen doing a great job. Since they hired Dick(the spinmeister)Morris, I have seen them quickly devolve into a sewer system. Why do you think Matt Drudge quit?

I guess some people just don't want to know the truth.

posted 11-27-2000 10:22 PM            

SEEKER, you know better! I know you know better!

posted 11-28-2000 11:20 PM            

A panel of distinguished journalists, including Reed Irvine of ACCURACY IN MEDIA, intensively questioned "Thomas Schuman" [Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmenov], a Russian defector who caused immense damage to the KGB by revealing the extent to which Russian "sleepers" and left-wing sympathizers had been "planted" in journalistic and editorial positions throughout the American and Canadian media. Stories favourable to the Communist cause are given wide coverage; articles and book reviews which are unfavourable, however, are quietly "spiked" and allowed to "die." In the process, the typical North American"s thoughts and attitudes are subtly shaped and directed by a constant stream of carefully-crafted "disinformation."

"Media concentration and the virtual disappearance of independent newspapers and fearless investigative reporting often means that the only things you can really trust the media on are the sports results, the classified ads and the weather - and, not infrequently, they're even wrong about the weather! Add the biases and liberal preconceptions of the typical journalist to the political correctness strictures which now prevail and is it any wonder that somewhere and somehow the truth gets lost in the process of reporting it? Consciously or not, most journalists function as paid propagandists and newspapers present the viewpoints which the controlling elite wish us to hear and be influenced by."

posted 12-27-2000 08:45 PM            

I found this while surfing tonight....

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and
other great publications, whose directors have attended our meetings and respected
their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for
us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the bright lights of
publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and p
repared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an
intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting
of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

from:
http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/chapter14.htm