posted 03-04-2001 03:36 AM
Like the weather and the oceans, the mantle beneith the
floating tectonic plates also involve convection cells, but
in a plastic medium that sets up wave patterns that may
may be modified by superimposition of additional waves.It is that fact that makes the following interesting:
ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES
>
> Have not seen the book referenced below, but could the
> abnormal activity on 3.39 MHz February 20 and prior be
> linked to the Seattle quake? If so, why would HAARP
> (supposedly funded by U.S. sources) be used to create quakes
> or other assorted EM mayhem on U.S. property? I picked up a
> signal so strong it went right off the S meter on my SW set
> at that frequency at 6:00 am on Feb 20th. Took an audio
> sampling of half an hour but can't make hide or hair of what
> HAARP is broadcasting, just that it's STRONG.
Answer: HAARP is operated by the unaccountable secret
organizations, a group that long ago made its own peace with
the enemy and today merely carries on the charade of
protecting the U.S. For example, the CIA, Mossad and the
Peoples Liberation Army together act as one giant transnational
corporation and NGO in a host of secret "research" ventures, including
weather modification and other geophyscial science. But this
alliance also has a mercenary side to it as well (see article on
weather modification, following the book notice, below).
> econews@ecologynews.com wrote:
> EARTH CHANGES: ENVIRONMENTAL WAR & GLOBAL EARTHQUAKES
>
> VANCOUVER, BC - In the aftermath of the Seattle, WA
> earthquake of 28 February 2001, Universebooks.com is
> immediately releasing a review pre-publication version of
> its new eBook on Environmental War and Global Earthquakes.
> You can now read a review copy of the challenging new eBook
> EARTH CHANGES (Universebooks.com) at:
> http://www.universebooks.com/earthchanges.html
> EARTH CHANGES explores the disciplines of catastrophic
> geology, seismology, vulcanology, parapsychology, and public
> interest policy analysis. Author Alfred Lambremont Webre
> develops a new field theory explaining how an age of global
> earthquakes might be fulfilled -- not by earth system
> mechanics, but by the deployment of a new generation of
> electromagnetic weapons, used in environmental warfare.
>
> Electromagnetic (EM) weapons are a possible trigger of
> cataclysmic earth events. EM fields can superheat the
> ionosphere, devastating magnetic bands around the earth, and
> in turn causing massive disruption of the earth's Tectonic
> plates. A January 17, 1995 earthquake in Kobe, Japan may
> have been triggered by clandestine deployment of EM weapons.
> EM strategic warfare includes weather, climate and earth
> event warfare. Researchers have reported the use of EM
> weapons in anti-population mind-control operations over
> major cities.
>.......
> Author Alfred Webre, a Yale Law School graduate, is a former
> member of the Governor's Emergency Task Force on Earthquake
> Preparedness, State of California, and author of the classic
> work on Earth Changes, THE AGE OF CATACLYSM (G.P. Putnam's
> Sons 1974).
> CONTACT: Geri DeStefano, PhD, editor@universebooks.com
> EcoNews Service
> http://www.ecologynews.com
------------------------------------
In an envrionment of government
secrecy the citizen must use the
methods of science to uncover
abuse and hold officials accountable.
Sufficient evidence has accumulated
to justify the suspicion that
cloud-generation technologies are
being used to redirect, attenuate
and intensify the natural course
of meteorological and oceanographical
events by changing lower-atmosphere
pressure (air density)-- what the
public is begining to call clandestine
weather modification.
An ezboard web resource for
interdisciplinary investigation
of the possibility of clandestine
weather modification has just been
created. People are invited to post
anything there which they deem
relevant to
1) interpreting the observations
and documents that have
occasioned the CWM explanation;
2) evaluating soundness of the
science that is being
attributed to CWM; or
3) refuting or supporting the
necessary implications of CWM
if it is taking place.
The following essay presents one
first-hand observer's grounds for
suspicion that chemtrails are
clandestine weather modification
in action.
Dick Eastman
---------------------
Numerous worldwide "chemtrail"
reports ( for examples, see www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm, www.chemtrailcentral.com ,
and www.rense.com ) support no
other explanation than that
large-scale operations are
underway that are modifying
the atmosphere with "treatment"
that only the most causal or
short-term observer might mistake
for the ordinary vapor-trail
condensation of jet aircraft
or natural cloud cover.
And when concerned citizens
bring this abnormality, so
obviously filling the sky,
to the attention of appropriate
authorities, including the
Environmental Protection
Agency -- a bureaucracy often
so direct and aggressive in
investigating all leads
on infractions of air-quality
regulations -- we quickly learn
that our government is neither
anxious to impound airplanes
and levy fines, nor willing to
ease growing public confusion
and fear concerning what
is being done to our atmosphere
and why.
The time has come to subject
the following as-yet-unrefuted
but also under-tested thesis
to every possible criticism and
test that disinterested research
can bring to bear.
The Clandestine Weather
Modification Thesis:
Since at least 1992 major
weather events have been
shaped by the application
of technologies that
alternately heat or cool
precise parcels of
the lower atmosphere,
thereby decreasing or
increasing, respectively,
the density of those
parcels, in order to alter
the pressure-system
dynamics that otherwise
would naturally obtain;
this being a means of
governing the movement
of heat and moisture
within the atmosphere, but
also of redirecting
wind-pushed currents of warm
or cool water near the surface
of the seas -- the
interaction of marine and
atmospheric events both
monitored and anticipated
by real-time sensors,
signal-processing, and
intervention hardware.
Let us consider the two
distinct sets of technologies
that give Clandestine Weather
Modification its directive
"push" and "pull" capabilities,
technologies involving the
generation of cloud, using
aircraft, and the dissipation
of cloud, using remote high-
energy radio-energy generating
stations respectively.
How "Chemtrail" Cloud "Pushes"
Weather Systems
If CWM is real, then the
non-dissipating cloud-cover-creating contrails/chemtrails terrifying
the observant are most-likely
being deployed to reduce the
amount of solar energy
reaching precisely determined
patches of the earth's survace,
land or ocean, in order
to effect lower-than-otherwise
surface temperatures and,
concomitantly, higher-than-otherwise
barometric pressure in the
troposphere, or lower atmosphere,
immediately above the patch.
(Consider a pan on a stove
with water heated a-little-short
of the boiling point. The heat
at the bottom of the pan sets
up convection currents,and thus
a circulating "weather" system
is created in the fluid medium.
But if only half of the pan's
bottom surface is heated, the
pattern of circulation will
change in complex, but not
wholly chaotic (unpredictable)
ways. It is to effect this kind
of dynamic pattern change that
carefully calculated loci of
chemtrailed cloud sunblock are
introduced in the thermally driven
atmosphere. In this way chemtrailing
redirects air-current flows, speeds
or slows them, or detains them in
places so the air can gain or loose
heat and moisture. And when
chemtrailing of cloud is done over
the sea, the same principle
results in a change in the winds
that push surface waters --a result
that puts the immense heat-energy
reservoir of the tropical seas at
the disposal of the weather modifiers,
giving them the capability of
steering great parcels of warm or
cooler sea water from one
geographical region to another
-- an action fertile in catastrophic
consequences of terrifying variety.
How Applied Radio Physics
"Pulls" Weather Systems
A second meteorological mystery
that the clandestine weather
modification thesis explains is
the sudden -- almost instantaneous--
disappearance of cloud before the
eyes of amazed onlookers.
This feat is the work of a second
technology, one that yields an
effect the opposite of that
caused by chemtrailing, i.e,
it eliminates high-altitude cloud
in order to allow more of the sun's
radiant energy to warm a targeted
patch of earth surface more than
would occur without this
intervention. This cloud-busting-
effected heating of patches of
surface decreases the density of
the air immediately above the
patch, causing that air to rise,
thereby creating a low-pressure
cell that will pull in (as wind)
higher-pressure air adjacent
to the patch. (This is like
adding extra heat to just
one small spot on the bottom of
a pan of water to affect
convection patterning.
To gain a better grasp of the
physics involved, get a wide
cake pan, two or three candles,
some liquid food coloring and
some candle holders. Place the
pan of water over an arrangement
of lit candles, then drop in
some of the food coloring
so that you can follow the
circulation of water in the
fluid "atmosphere." Change
the relative locations of
the candle-heated spots and
see how the convective
flow patterns change.)
Few meteorologists are familiar
with the story of Dr. Florence W.
van Straten and her discovery of
"cloud breaking."
Differential heating of parcels of
air to quickly dissipate natural
cloud accumulation is a process
pioneered in the late 1940's by
Dr. van Straten, then a Navy
meteorologist. Van Straten hit
upon the idea of using blowing
carbon black (i.e., soot) into the
atmosphere through a section of
stovepipe sticking out the opened
door of modified Superconstellation
"Hurricane Hunter." Carbon
black admits almost no light and
is more than 99 percent efficient in
capturing every bit of light energy
falling upon it.Van Straten knew
that theoretically "a pound of
very finely divided carbon
scattered in the bright sunshine
picks up enough energy each
minute to raise the temperature
of eleven tons of water from
the freezing point to the
boiling point." And even within
a cloud, there is still enough
light reflected from water
droplets and hitting the carbon
particles from all sides to
heat the cloud sufficiently to
undo vapor condensation.
In the very first experiment,
when a one-pound dose of carbon
was ejected into a cloud
formation growing from a base
of about 2,500 to a top at about
11,000 feet ("with crisp and
sharp edges and turrets looking
like boiling cauldrons, stretching
upward another thousand
feet or so") the carbon took
a few minutes to warm, but then
the results became dramatic,
as recorded from several
photo-reconnaissance planes
monitoring the experiment.
Multiple motion pictures from
different altitudes show
"that after several minutes
during which nothing happened,
the cloud suddenly spurted upward
from a point just above our
flight level. A tunnel formed
where we had flown though the
cloud, opening and widening
rapidly until the cloud was
sliced in two. The upper section
darted up several thousand feet,
becoming very wispy and
transparent. Moments after
its push upwards, it thinned out
and was gone. Almost
simultaneously, the bottom
half of the cloud turned very
dark and, as though a giant had
wiped a sponge over a slate,
it, too, disappeared. The
observers were unanimous in
testifying that there was
nothing gradual about the process.
'Now you see it. Now you don,t,'
the pilot of a jet plane flying
toward the cloud reported."
So regardless of its presence
or absence in current journals,
technology for removal of
sun-blocking atmospheric cloud
by increasing its interior
temperature has been established
by the most unassailable
criterion; it has been done.
(Perhaps not irrelevant is the
fact that van Straten was
immediately reassigned and
her project terminated
when the first progress report
of this revolutionary experiment
(including even more impressive
replications) reached the Pentagon;
"I was forced to return to
Washington because I was needed (?)
and the planes were needed elsewhere...
(yet) I was sure I had a tool for
performing significant work in
weather modification."
(Note: The question mark in the
preceding sentence is van Straten's.)
Source: Florence W. van Straten,
Weather or Not, (New York:
Dodd & Mead, 1966), chapter 12,
"Making and Breaking Clouds."
Clandestine Weather Modification
of course does not rely on
broadcasting soot to heat cloud.
Advanced radio physics has
yielded a technology that
permits high-frequency
high-energy waves to be
projected to the ionosphere
which in turn serves to reflect
and focus excited (heated)
electrons and ions onto
30-mile-diameter targets
thousands of miles from the
transmission point. This
means of heating objects
from a distance gives CWM
its weather-system "pull"
in two ways:
1) By heating cloud enough
for cloud dissipation to occur,
thereby permitting more of
the sun's radiation to reach
and heat targeted earth-surface
patches; and
2) By heating those land
and sea-surface patches (and
maybe the molecules and ions
of the unclouded lower
atmosphere itself) directly
with high-energy particle
streams focused down through
an already cloudless upper
atmosphere. (Note: this second
technique requires much more
transmission energy to achieve
a given amount of CWM pull, as it
does not rely on the sun to do
the additional "the heavy
lifting." (It should also be
remarked that the vast amounts
of electrical power this
techology requires can, in fact,
easily be supplied in abundance
by tapping natural gas at oil
wells of Alaska's North Slope.
In fact,Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency has long held a
patent that includes the design
of a 40-mile-square transmitter
for ionospheric bombardment
utilizing that very source.
The problem of
signal processing.
Data collection, data processing,
and the faster-than-real-time
modeling-for-prediction of nonlinear dynamical systems (where small
changes in initial conditions can
have incalculably divergent effects
if the "corrective interventions
cannot be calculated and applied
fast enough are not a problem for
CWM given present known
scientific capabilities.
Often presented as insurmountable
obstacles for weather modification,
the barriers imposed by tendencies
toward fundamental unpredictabilty
in systems of organized complexity
only exist if one is attempting to
change weather too far in the future
using only one single intervention
applied at time t = 0. Clandestine
weather modification, in order to
work at all, i.e., in order to
beat the tendency of nonlinear
dynamic systems to chaotic pattern
divergence, must utilize continuous
feedback and correction, and this
is exactly what existing weather
monitoring instrumentalities and
high-speed computers and software
have been capable of doing at
least since 1992.
Sociological, Political and
Economic Considerations
People in authority within the
United States Government and
various powerful non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) during
the course of World War II and
the Cold War have gained
managerial control over secret,
originally defense-related
applied technologies, including
-- as the increasingly complete
historical record now shows --
technologies that afford practical
control of discrete weather events
--as the experience of Florence
W. van Straten and the fate of
the great weather-modification
breakthrough -- what should have
been the triumph of her career --
described above, vividly
demonstrates.
Unfortunately it is in the
nature of secrecy in
organizations that those
bureaucrats and those CEO's
of NGOs who control events
through officially secret
means, soon come under strong
temptation to employ their
clandestine power to
affect economic markets for
the benefit of their own,
i.e., for the people who
enjoy the privilege of
privately networking "inside"
systems of governance, people
accountable to no one but
themselves. It is for such
as these that the existence
of a secret defense technology
for controlling weather would
present a great "moral hazzard,"
a temptation to help one's
family and friends to make a
lot of money from exclusive
knowledge and control of
future weather events.
Weather is the most powerful
and volatile variable in the
human food-supply system, and
as a consequence of this, in
the fluctuations of the
commodities and futures
markets worldwide.
Weather disasters involve
billions of dollars in emergency
funds, recovery loans,
and reconstruction investment.
Insurance companies are depleted
of capital, marginalizing
them as competition for other
big players in the financial
markets --cut in their supply
of loanable funds amounting
billions worldwide in the course
of the super-weather-disaster-
ridden 1990's.
Nor should we overlook the
suspicious new
"weather derivative" created
in recent years, a financial
instrument that permits big
finance to package and sell
risk-management "bets" on what
buyers assume to be crap-shoot
"acts of God" or of randomly
bridled and unbridled "nature,"
never suspecting that the
"game" has been loaded
by clandestine weather modification.
(British financiers developed the
first publically offered weather
derivatives, by the way.)
And finally there is the obvious
contingency that giant Wall Street
capitalized agribusiness is able to
buy up thousands of acres of small
family farms and Western ranches
following economic distress and
foreclosure of securitized first
and second mortgages, when crops
fail too many years in a row due
to drought, flood, or even merely
unseasonable "normal"
weather onsets.
In all of the above one should
keep in mind the economic reality
that, in an economic disaster,
assets are not destroyed, they
merely change hands.
Bad weather ruins crops, but
usually leaves the future
usefulness of the land unaffected.
What a hurricane destroys in
one decade -- temporarily
depressing real estate values,
may, ten years later, be the
jungle-lush site of
multi-billion-dollar up-scale
resorts owned by a consortium
of global investors.
In short, if one looks for a
"bottom-line" incentive that
would motivate development
of a CWM system that can
simultaneously cover larges
fractions of continental
and ocean surface with
chemtrailed cloud and can
utilize 40-square-mile
transmitters that suck
up tons of North Shore gas
volume to bounce high
energy off the ionosphere,
be aware: more-than-
ample economic stimulus
exists to make it all
worth while.
There you have it
-- the bare-bones CWM thesis.
And when you do join this
investigation, may you find the
rest of us all discoursing in
the spirit of John Stewart Mill
when he wrote:
"The only way in which a
human being can make some
approach to knowing the
whole of a subject is by
hearing what can be said
about it by persons of
every variety of
opinion and studying
all modes in which it
can be looked
at by every character
of mind. No wise man
ever acquired
wisdom in any mode
but this."
Dick Eastman
Yakima,Washington
U.S.A.
eastman@wolfenet.com
dickeastman@nwinfo.net
Every man is responsible to every other man.
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
posted 03-04-2001 03:36 AM
