posted 03-28-2001 03:40 AM            

You're wrong, SucksNSA. I do have more than just ribbons. I've got your comments, albeit idiotic and immature ones, to remind me why I go to work every day. Every cloud has a silver lining! (pun intended)

Once again, Miss NSASucks, you can't seem to post a thing on the subject of chemtrails because you're so busy changing the subject and personally attacking everyone. At least I try to remain on the subject, that is, until you deliver yet another fine example of literary buffoonery. Why are you wasting web space with your personal attacks? I've yet to see you answer this question directly.

As a matter of fact, I've yet to see you bring up any valid points to counter mine. Instead, you choose to ignore my points and attempt to discredit me. It doesn't matter who's writing it, if you can't directly answer the points, then there must be something to them. If you can't perform the simple task of replying to them directly then you are the lightweight that you come across to be. Go play with your dolls and quit the James Bond stuff. I've had you for lunch, and none of your off-subject baloney will change that.

You try to make yourself up to be so smart on the military and me being a "low level operative." The truth is, you are a pathological liar and spend so much of your time trying to B.S. your way through paragraph after paragraph of pure garbage. I've caught you already on more than one occasion. It seems to me like your primary goal here is to be someone that you're not and to feel important. You're important to someone, I'm sure, but not to me. So sorry. Boo hoo.

I hear that Laos is a great place to visit. Maybe you should look into a vacation?

Maverick

posted 03-28-2001 03:57 AM            

See just how civil he is at:
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum5/HTML/000012.html

I rest my case.

Maverick (not Andy)

posted 03-28-2001 11:52 AM            

You'll notice that Top Gun and Dirk Digler...have been continuously assaulted, when they have done nothing but express their views in a polite, diplomatic and respectful way.

Even after being continuously attacked, they still remain amazingly cordial. Why don't you be specific and name names: Military Lies attacked first. Delphie....just went ballistic on me for no apparent reason, and refuses to pull up a couch. Mark Skies assaults Dirk in poetry, and impugned his abilities as a pilot....and you have called people here who just express their views "agents" yourself RTW. You follow along in lock-step with little miss Delphie, after she chews me a new one after my out-o-body comments....for God knows what reason. As for "NSAsucks"...well, he just sees a government plot behind every corner....and my God, look at the things NSA just called Top Gun. "government pig" "Liar"....just to name some of the milder ones. You expect to just keep pushing someone at a bar...and expect them not to push back after awhile? Get real, RTW!

Many of the chemtrail crowd seems to have this Nazi mentality, where if someone disagrees and does not go along with the prevailing views exactly, and when you guys can't respond to an argument in an intellectual way, well then by all means, it's okay to just verbally attack someone in very personal ways and label them "disinfo agents".

And then, to top it all off, after your done, you turn around and blame it on the ones that have been attacked...and wonder why there is bickering! It's a maddening and illogical mentality to me. Again, I ask you people to watch Hannity and Colms and see which side of the isle your tactics seem to resemble....It might be enlightening. I do not throw the term liberal around lightly. Maybe when it comes to some of you, the term NUTSO is appropriate too!!!


[Edited 4 times, lastly by cydoniaquest on 03-28-2001]

posted 03-28-2001 08:47 PM            

And let me just say how obviously intelligent and knowlegable you are. We over at the agency were just remarking how we don't stand a chance with your level of wit and obviously keen powers of observation. You say so much with every thread, and you know our every move before we make it. Can't pull the wool over your eyes....you're too sharp for us. It is therefore my fervent hope that you will sleep soundly knowing that your friends at the CIA are watching over you like guardian angels. Nighty night.

[Edited 2 times, lastly by cydoniaquest on 03-28-2001]

posted 03-29-2001 02:24 AM            

...Saw George Bush in church the other day...NSA was out playing hooky....sounds like the work of you know who...

posted 04-27-2001 12:27 PM            

I've thought about it and, I think it's because Thermit knows that I'm looking for the truth about chemtrails too. As I've said before, I look at the problem from an historical viewpoint. Thermit and others may tend to look at it from a scientific viewpoint. Everyone has their own area of interest. The possibility that we have different methods shows that he is willing to allow views other than his own, as long as it leads toward an answer to the question. Maybe he thinks it's counter-productive and illogical to shut some one out of the conversation as long as there is some merit to their posts.

If chemtrails are not just contrails as the argument goes, then there has to be not only a scientific reason, but also a realistic and maybe political reason and motive behind why they exist. Some, like goldrush seem to have a need to denigrate anyone who doesn't look at chemtrails from a scientific viewpoint. I don't put someone down because they look at the problem with Flight Explorer. So why would you make negative remarks about a subject you either don't care about, or don't understand? I'm glad that Thermit is not so narrow-minded.

I think the fact that Thermit hasn't banned me is because he's not as susceptible as some moderators to the threats, ridicule and off-topic psycho-babble attempts by people (like yourself?) and other organized groups to get rid of me and others who have differnent opinions as to the origins of chemtrails.

posted 04-27-2001 01:30 PM            

As I said, that may be why Thermit keeps him around. Guess you have to have some humor in an otherwise disturbing topic? Nobody's perfect, not even me. I tend to take this very seriously in relation to historical events, so I may come across as humorless to someone who doesn't understand or care about my viewpoint or are more concerned with their own agendas?

I just can't take cydoniaquest seriously as someone who cares anything about chemtrails.
Everyone has their own opinion.