|
Author
|
|
Topic: CHEMTRAILS' - A MILITARY OPERATION | Topic page views:
|
|
nsasucks
Chemtrails suck - alot!
Earth 530 posts, Jan 2001
|
posted 03-29-2001 12:56 AM
This was deliberately stolen from CTTUSA."CHEMTRAILS" - A MILITARY OPERATION Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:32:22 GMT From: "Richard Vizzutti" Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy"CHEMTRAILS" - A MILITARY OPERATION The following recorded message is a Dec. 8, 2000 call from Victoria Airport Authority's Manager for airport Planning and Environment to Victoria resident Mark Porter. The aviation environmental officer was responding to Mark Porter's call the previous day inquiring about intense aerial activity that left lingering X' s, circles and grid-like plumes over the British Columbia capitol on Dec. 6 and 7. According to Porter and other eye-witnesses, similar unusual plume patterns have been spread by large four-engine jets over Victoria for the past two years - most often on weekends. These aircraft have since been photo-identified as USAF KC-135 tankers. Similar precisely spaced sky patterns - disturbingly different than normal contrails - have been widely reported over the USA, Britain, other Canadian cities and many allied European nations during this two-year time period. ---------------------------------------------------- "Mark, it's [gives name], Victoria Airport Authority. Just calling you back from your comment. From what I gather, it's a military exercise, U.S. and Canadian air force exercise that's goin' on. They wouldn't give me any specifics on it. Hope that helps your interest. Very odd. Thanks a lot. Bye bye now." ---------------------------------------------------- William Thomas comments: Ever since "chemtrail" activity was first reported over dozens of U.S. states in January, 1998, civil and military aviation authorities have denied any military involvement - insisting instead that persistent plumes laid in grids, X's and parallel rows until they completely obscure sunny skies are normal condensation trails from airliners. With the exception of NBC news - which ran a balanced report and its own striking chemtrail footage on Memphis television early last year - mainstream corporate media have either ignored or ridiculed a story that made Project Censored's "alert list" of suppressed news stories in the year 2000. USA Today's March 7, 2001 coverage was typical. Ignoring official temperature and humidity data showing that contrails could not have formed on days and altitudes of intense aerial gridding over New Mexico, the brief story also failed to mention thousands of eye-witness sightings - including written reports from pilots, police officers and former military personnel perplexed by unusually dense and persistent plumes. Photographs made available to USA Today showing multiple chemtrail formations never appeared in that newspaper. In lampooning this "new conspiracy theory", one of USA Today's top reporters also failed to quote a single word from her extensive interview with this award-winning reporter who has continued his chemtrails investigation since breaking that story for the Environment News Service in 1998. In selectively excluding facts contradicting its bias, USA Today concluded that extensive grid patterns laid down by military tankers beneath airliners trailing no contrails at all - are "contrails blown together by the wind 
|
nsasucks
Chemtrails suck - alot!
Earth 530 posts, Jan 2001
|
posted 03-29-2001 12:58 AM
PART TWO OF SAME STORYAttempts by this reporter to ascertain the nature of this joint military operation have been rebuffed by Canadian Forces spokesmen. It is the official policy of Canada's National Defense department in Ottawa to never acknowledge or comment on military exercises taking place on or over Canadian soil. But an official admission by a Canadian aviation authority of a classified military operation taking place over a Canadian capitol contradicts earlier "explanations" and denials. Since joint US-Canadian military exercises have been going on for decades, it is significant that an aviation authority at one of Canada's busiest international airports refers to this particular operation as "very odd." It is now official: These are not airliners. These are not contrails. As US Air Force "Weather Force Specialists" onboard KC-135 and KC-10 jet tankers continue to fly chemical spray missions officially described by the USAF as "aerial obscuration", the citizens of Canada and the USA have yet to be appraised of the exact nature of this joint US-Canadian military exercise taking place over their schools and homes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ "Miltary operation" corroborated Dear Mr. Thomas, I am "S. T. B." from Parsonsfield, ME. I am a broadcast journalist and a disc jockey for WLKZ, Oldies 105 in Gilford, NH, as well as a freelance reporter who works with other radio stations in the Mt Washington Valley ( i.e. WMWV in Conway, NH) and western Maine. This is what I saw on 3/12/01: I'm on the air into the wee hours of Monday so I get up late. Lou was already up. I did not know he had already observed something at approximately 11:30 am. I was sitting at our kitchen table having my first cup of caffiene and just glanced out the window on the door to our small pantry and through that room's window. It was 12:10 pm and a beautiful cloudless crystal blue sky day. I jokingly said "Hmmm, contrails or chemtrails?" Lou had his back to the windows. He got up and looked out the kitchen window. He said he wasn't sure so I went outside. It was in the 30s. I looked up towards the southeast over West Pond and spotted "my jet". Then I spotted another jet north of "my jet". They were both over 30,000 ft. These were neither landing nor had they taken off from the Portland Jetport (approx. 35 miles SE of us by car). I looked due west and saw "lines" in the sky. Two lines that arched with the horizon, anotherwords miles long. I called Lou outside at the point and, again, moving NE to SW were 2 more jets. Now there were 4 jets that we could see in the sky at the same time. Lou and I watched this from 12:10 to 12:55 and in that time we saw over 30 jets, approx one every 1 1/2 minutes. They were overlapping eachother, i.e. others were still visible when a new one appeared. I had seen chemtrails and contrails before but never this many jets in such a short time at this altitude. We just don't have that kind of air traffic here. I called the Portland Jetport tower before leaving Parsonsfield and spoke to someone who has relatives here on West Pond. He said in that time span he had a total of 9 jets either in or out of the Jetport. He also said that they choose to filter out anything above 10,000 ft. He said they "own everything to 10,000 ft. and we could see the higher altitude craft if we wanted to but we filter that out." He mentioned the "Kennebunk VOR", a major navigational aid to international flights which is approx. 6-7 miles NW of Kennebunk, ME. Kennebunk is an hour from here by car. The "man in the tower" said "that amount of air traffic is unusual, even though you would see more international traffic in the afternoon." 
|
nsasucks
Chemtrails suck - alot!
Earth 530 posts, Jan 2001
|
posted 03-29-2001 01:00 AM
PART THREEThen he told me "off the record, I was called this morning and told I had to re-route some of my traffic as there would be a 'military excercise' in our area. Of course they wouldn't give me any of the particulars and I don't ask. I just do my job." He also said that his traffic, which he called "Parso" air space, combined with international and the military excercise might be why I was seeing such a "stepped up" amount of air traffic. I thanked him and Lou and I left the house heading for Limerick, ME, and Ossipee, NH. When we were on Rt 160 we could see even more jets. We could look in any one direction at a time and see five or six jets, all flying over 30,000 ft. Lou guestimated they were going well over 400 knots and that they were going well over the usual commercial airliner speed. Based on what I was seeing, I'd have to concur. Lou is ex Navy. He also said he was involved in joint military excerises and had been arround very large scale military excercises and had never seen anything that big. We saw one man heading towards NH on 160 as we were heading into Limerick and he almost went off the road beacuse he was leaning over his dashboard trying to look up. We know why. He saw what we did. He aknowledged us with a nod. As far as your eye could see looking southwest were lines and lines including two huge grids that were quite blatant. No "wind" could do that. These lines that came out of the tails of the jets were getting wider and wider. The lines that were further to the SW of us were starting to merge. If I looked at the lines towards the sun, I could see what looks like an oil and water mixture creating colors. I won't call it a rainbow, Rainbows aren't sinister. At this point we were over 1200 ft above sea level and I was watching one particular line with no obstructions. This started to break up (before spreading) into figure eights and rings. No, I'm not losing my mind, we both saw it. The rings looked as if someone was smoking a cigarette and blowing smoke rings. Then the rings et al spread and kept spreading just like all the rest of the chemtrails. We went on with our chores, turned arround and headed to Ossipee. The jets just kept flying and trailing lines that were hundreds of miles long. This continued all afternoon. We were in Ossipee and we could still see jets everywhere we looked. I have lived in Mamaroneck, NY near Kennedy, Laguardia and Newark airports and I can honestly say that while living in Mamaroneck, which is approx 30 minutes from NYC by train, I have never seen so many jets in the sky at that altitude all doing the same thing at the same time in my life! At approx 3:55 we headed home to Parsonsfield. They were still up there. What's worse is that these grids were now merging to the point of greying our beautiful skies just to the south and west of us and the "crap" was moving in our direction. The lines over our area were now merging. By 5:30 our beautiful day had turned dingy and hazy like air pollution and our sunset was dirty. Lou remembers seeing the last jets at about 5:15 pm leaving chemtrails. They were spaced further apart then the earlier jets. 
|
nsasucks
Chemtrails suck - alot!
Earth 530 posts, Jan 2001
|
posted 03-29-2001 01:01 AM
LAST PART I THINKI had a conversation with a news person in Portland. She is a news director at a TV station. She saw some of what we saw and after we spoke, she called a contact of hers in the Air National Guard who said he knew of "no military excercise in our area". Yeah, right. I had left a message for my "boss" at my radio station who called me back and told me they had seen what we had seen on the 12th and further that they counted 370 different jets/lines in the sky from the time the chemtrail spectacle had started till the time it had ended. They said that was a total, not that these 370 jets were in the air at the same time. The most jets they could see from where they were (there view is obstructed by trees on three sides of the bldg) at any one time was 17! That is incredible for this area! Yes, our radio staion is next door to a small airport. But my co-workers reported seeing these jets at altitudes in excess of 30,000 ft! Nothing landing next door would be over several hundred feet. I was told that everytime someone spotted a jet, they would use the "cross-hatch" method to count/record it. You know, up to four vertical lines and when you get to a fifth you put a diagonal line through the prior four. You have to understand this is "On Golden Pond" area. That movie was filmed up here, right near my radio station. And our house in Parsonsfield is on a "Golden Pond". You just don't see that kind of air traffic in the Lakes Region of NH or in western ME. Oh, we thought you might like to know that on 3/13/01, we had lousy weather. We were expecting it so the spraying took place just ahead of a front. Wednesday, 3/14/01was partly sunny in the early afternoon, temps in the 40s. Thursday, 3/15/01 was partly to mostly sunny all day and in the 40s. Thursday I saw 6 jets in the afternoon in Parsonsfield. Today, 3/16/01, it was mostly sunny all day, temps in the 40s. Lou saw 7 jets today. Neither of us saw any contrails that widened or caused colors when you looked towards the sun or merged with any other lines. Just normal air traffic on a normal day in Parsonsfield, ME We'll keep looking up and keep in touch. S.Tiffany B. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ Accredited media representatives: For a broadcast-quality chemtrails videotape , further documentation, and the phone number of this official source, please contact: William Thomas author, investigative journalist 
|
defender
TELEVISION IS MIND CONTROL

Level 64 1115 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 02-22-2002 07:28 PM
...
|
SDCADJ
Senior Member
San Diego, CA USA 65 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 05:52 PM
Excellent piece of investigative journalism.. Keep up the good work!

|
Deb
Senior Member
Plainfield, Indiana USA 163 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 09:38 AM
Investigative journalism taken a step further on the Tiffany Brendt story - http://worldzone.net/science/reality2u30/brendt1.html 
|
Chem11
megasprayer news

The Homeland 1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 11:54 AM
quote: There is a possibility that military weather experiments have taken place.
Something of an understatement, but strange talk from someone who has taken it upon themselves to attempt to 'debunk' the obvious. 
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 02-26-2002 12:37 PM
Don't forget the even more recent investigative journalism from that so-called debunker source... quote:
Fact: If you don't begin immediate use of Amaroli [drinking your own urine], you will surely become ill, and eventually succomb to chemtrail toxins. Those who love you and those whom you love must do likewise.Conclusion: Begin today your program of cleansing your body through Amaroli. Day by day you CAN become accustomed to it, and as your body cleanses itself of the chem-load it now carries, your Amaroli will become as pure and sweet as a mountain spring. Even aged Amaroli applied to the skin will become odor-free, and the mycoplasmic-fungal infections will disappear. Do it now, I beg of you, before it is too late.

|
Deb
Senior Member
Plainfield, Indiana USA 163 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 05:46 PM
Thermit, I don't understand why you are taking such exception to Jay's sense of humor? But you are entitled; everybody has different tastes. I have a tendency toward the more serious myself, but I certainly can appreciate the Amaroli website for the imagination and flow. (Even though urine therapy is a real practice and at one time was recommended for "chemtrail illness".)
|
Deb
Senior Member
Plainfield, Indiana USA 163 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 10:04 AM
BTW, Chem, if you're going to quote me, make sure you include the whole statement and not what context you wish to use for your own purposes- http://worldzone.net/international/chickiedeb/cgi/col2.shtml 
|
Chem11
megasprayer news

The Homeland 1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 12:05 PM
Excuse me, but I was under the impression that one Jay Reynolds was the author of that investigative report. I was, of course, quoting him and not you. And I did quote the entire statement. That statement was: quote: There is a possibility that military weather experiments have taken place.
Now. Are you having another senior moment here or what ChickieDeb? You are apparently seriously confused with regards to some very basic information. Which is your priviledge, but please don't run around barking nonsensical orders at the general population. This isn't the hoaxers board, you are not Jay Reynolds (as far as I know) and if you can't tell the difference, then there is something drastically wrong. 
|
eyesopen
This Space For Rent
Ventura CA 627 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 02:18 PM
Deb you have quoted me out of context before.
|
Deb
Senior Member
Plainfield, Indiana USA 163 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 05:21 PM
Excuse the confusion, ie. senior moment, Chem, but I don't see Jay posting here and I doubt he ever will. I took your comment to be directed at me since I made the post above about Jay's article of which I colloborated with him. And your quote is very similar to the statement on my page.Eyesopen, if you would point me to the quote you are referring and a correction, I will amend it. Please e-mail me at CDEBGO22@hotmail.com with your answer. 
|
David Carlson
New Member
315 Cotton St. Philadelphia, PA 19128 2 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 03-07-2002 11:38 AM
Chemtrails are simply government surveillance planes watching released Megan's Law offenders using (SAR) Synthetic Aperture (imaging) Radar and low-light TV cameras. Government jets can also track the vehicles of sexual offenders by listening to the Rf signals broadcast by transmitters imbedded in the computer chipsets of their vehicle computers. These Rf transmitters in any late model car can be activated remotely by satellite--perhaps some of you are familiar with "On Star." The chemical is probably simply ammonium chloride which is used in sky writing. The purpose of the trails is simply to warn offenders that they are being watched.Contact me at dave_ec@hotmail.com 
| |