posted 04-22-2001 12:55 AM            

So you log onto napster

search user: FREEDOMSINGER

than get the file for your own destruction, which is: hthiefNSAsucks

ORRRRRRRRRRRRR: Thermit will figure you out a way to get it here, if he hasn't already gone bedy-bye!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted 04-22-2001 01:59 PM            

The song sucks...but it's a think-piece. Retro...sixties...angst...hell-no,we-won't-go...kind of thing from the past.

I'm not sure about the Artist part, but the POS part certainly applies!

posted 04-22-2001 03:39 PM            

...sucks doesn't it?

posted 04-22-2001 03:51 PM            

removed mp3 from server to save space...

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 05-15-2001]

posted 04-22-2001 03:54 PM            

Truth be told, our musical tastes are very similar. I just wanted to hear your song. Is there something wrong with that? I've been on Napster for quite a while. If I had wanted to be sneaky about it, I would have changed my online "handle" with Napster so you wouldn't know it was me. Oh well, I like A Perfect Circle, too. Thanks anyway.

Maverick

posted 04-22-2001 04:35 PM            

Nsa- not bad....I expected something a lot worse than what I actually heard. (that's the closest you'll get to a compliment from me.) If that was you singing, your voice sounds a lot like Jello Biafra (DKs.)

posted 04-22-2001 04:39 PM            

Production values are better than I expected as well...

How 'bout doing something chemtrail related? Get THAT on Napster!

BTW, I just heard that the USAF is bombing innocent missionaries in Peru. I haven't checked out the particulars yet, but I'm sure it's going to be another proud day for America (sigh).

posted 04-22-2001 04:57 PM            

I guess they knew too much, right NSA?

posted 04-22-2001 04:59 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Chem11:
BTW, I just heard that the USAF is bombing innocent missionaries in Peru. I haven't checked out the particulars yet, but I'm sure it's going to be another proud day for America (sigh).

Hey TG69, do you guys take requests? There's a certain missionary I know desperateley in need of a few hundred lbs. of 'anti-personnel' payload.

---

Chem11:

Why? Is this another attack or an attempt to throw this thread off topic? Where did you hear that the USAF was involved? Or is this just made up to try to flame me?

The Peruvian Air Force pulled the trigger. There is no USAF presence in Peru. There's a pending F-16 sale to Peru's chief rival, Chile. The A-37 (a Cessna, originally a trainer but retrofitted with guns and weapons pylons) involved in this attack was built in the 1950s and sold to them sometime in the late '60s-early '70s. Nowadays, the Peruvians are actively aquiring Russian Migs instead of our stuff.

The U.S. Customs Service, however, flies airborne radar aircraft to help with the interception of drug smugglers. They offer their services to Central and South America to keep the drug runners from getting near our borders. These aircraft (mostly Cessna Citation bizjets with F-16 radars in the nose) are used to identify aircraft that are not in communication with Air Traffic Control. The Peruvians then do the intercepting with their own aircraft and make the determination as to whether or not to do anything about it. The only thing that U.S. Customs Air does is tell them where the unkonwn aircraft in their airspace is.

There is a contingent of USAF F-16s at Curacao on 24-hour alert to intercept aircraft that fly that far north without communication. Curacao is an island in the Carribean on the north shore of South America, which is nowhere near Peru.

There were no "bombs" used, either. It's kind of hard to drop freefall ordinance on a flying object. I believe that a gun of some type was used.

Be sure you "check out the particulars" next time before you try to incite another flamefest. And no, I don't take requests. Good try.

Maverick

posted 04-22-2001 05:22 PM            

Bullets or bombs, it hardly makes a difference. Those people are just as dead.
And it's our 'drug war', not the Peruvian peoples, as evidenced by our involvement.

I don't think we've had the pleasure of meeting before. For the record I think having a military pilot around could come in handy.

For instance, what's your take on the 'foo-fighters' or other related phenomena?

posted 04-22-2001 05:24 PM            

The funny thing is, a lot of times the real drug smugglers are off-duty Peruvian and Colombian Air Force pilots. The pilots doing the drug smuggling and the pilots doing the intercepting work together in the same squadrons and it's a rare day when these countries' Air Forces shoot something down. Usually, the Customs aircraft will vector the A-37s (which have no radar) to the "smuggler" and the Peruvian pilots will suddenly be "out of gas" or have some type of aircraft problem that requires them to abort the intercept. I think that the Missionaries were an easy target because none of the Peruvian Air Force pilots were doing any smuggling that day. So, this unidentified aircraft became an easy target to show that Peru is a "team player" in the war on drugs. Unfortunately, it turned out a lot different than anticipated because they didn't know the true mission of the people on board the aircraft.

posted 04-22-2001 05:39 PM            

Just read your last post. No offense taken. I'm just used to being flamed a lot here, even after posts I make which are completely non-confrontational.

Anyway, I definitely believe in foo fighters (and I love the band, too.) I haven't personally seen anything yet, but I have locked something up on radar a few times that did some pretty interesting things before breaking my radar lock.

One of the pilots in my squadron (who is working at another base now) had an encounter with something when he was flying. I never got the story out of him, though, because of all the ribbing that he got after he mentioned it.

For the record, I beileve in a government UFO cover-up and definitely think that we have recovered a saucer or two with little grey bodies in them. A great site for checking this stuff out is http://www.blackvault.com. The kid genius behind this site, John Greenwald, has been able to work wonders through the FOIA to get documents from many agencies. He's also branched out to get documents ranging from remote viewing to Y2K as well. And, the great thing is that everything is unedited U.S. Government stuff, not a conspiracy theorist's opinion. Anyway, it's a great site. I'm sure that a lot of you know about it already, and this is old news. Maybe some of you should approach him about doing some FOIA requests on Chemtrails?