|
Author
|
|
Topic: THE ANSWER TO THE CHEMTRAILS MYSTERY(probably!) | Topic page views:
|
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 08-19-2001 12:13 PM
   
Mr. Kunz, you stated: Translation: Either there isn't any such things as tachyons, or, if there is, no one has ever seen or even detected one yet.Two pieces of matter in opposite time direction may not be observed by each other. The speed of light = zero time. At the zero point, the object appears to actually become light, and beyond that there is no observation. Therefore another way of detection besides visual observation must be used to to prove the existence of "tachyons".
don't have any evidence for them -- not yet...exactly, not yet...but it is only a matter of time.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Lulu on 08-19-2001]
|
3T3L1
Differentiated Mouse Fibroblasts
Lubbock, Texas
1347 posts, Mar 2001
|
posted 08-19-2001 12:17 PM
The speed of light = zero time. I'm not understanding this, Lulu. Could you please explain it further for me?
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 08-19-2001 02:39 PM
quote:
Anything travelling at the speed of light is frozen in time. The general reaction to this statement is "Huh?" but with a bit of explanation it can be made clear. It all goes back to Einstein's theory of relativity: time is relative to the observer. Once again skimming over the details (which, it seems, only Einstein would understand), we discover that as an object accelerates, time slows down relative to that object. It seems that time and speed come together at - you guessed it - the speed of light. This is to say that a person riding a beam of light would be frozen in time - relative to everyone else, he could travel for several million years without aging a single second. To himself (since, relative to himself, he will always be stationary) time appears normal - it's just that the rest of the universe seems to be aging infinitely quickly!
http://www.worldvisions.ca/~apenwarr/useless/11/light.html
|
Delphi
Mystic Warrior
S. Bossier, Louisiana
1583 posts, Mar 2001
|
posted 08-19-2001 03:28 PM
The excessive momentum carried by an Faster than light particle constitues a unique tachyon signature. The production of a tachyon in a bubble- or spark-chamber can be inferred if energy-momentum accounting leads to a big deficit in the energy column. In at least 12 or so accelerators around the world, thousands of pictures of high energy collisions are taken every day, each one a potential portrait of a tachyon! Blessings, Joanne ^j^
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 08-20-2001 12:01 AM
Duncan,Thanks for the reply, and you can dispense with the formal references, me anyway, seeker will do just fine, just don't call me shirley  But if you postulate a gamma ray burst from a source outside the solar system, the closest source that I know of, Proxima Centauri, is 4.3 LY, or 2.54539 X 10 ^13 miles, away. actually that was not my inference but the authors....I'm just wondering what known event would cause the drop in the solar wind... black hole passing near our system maybe ? might be a good time to mail Holger Pedersen T/S
|
BobB
Senior Member
LInden,Texas,United states of America
67 posts, Jul 2001
|
posted 08-20-2001 04:11 AM
I want you all to think of our current understanding of physics as it relates to our knowledge of physics 100 years ago.The point is, we now have a totally different perspective on it, and in another 100 years many of the "facts" we now "know" will seem ludicrist.Trust me, we are not even close to understanding the universe and how it was formed.
|
RidesTheWind
visionary
The Void
1359 posts, Feb 2001
|
posted 08-20-2001 07:20 AM
The speed of light has changed!
http://www.100megsfree4.com/farshores/nlight2.htm
[Edited 1 times, lastly by RidesTheWind on 08-20-2001]
|
3T3L1
Differentiated Mouse Fibroblasts
Lubbock, Texas
1347 posts, Mar 2001
|
posted 08-20-2001 09:11 AM
Schoolmarm here. You can see that this is real science because of all the hedging:
1. They changed the title to something less provocative.
2. They use "may"--"the speed of light - may have been ever so slightly smaller"
3. They use "if"--"'It's just a very nice piece of information, if it stands up.'"
4. They use "cautious"--"'I'm quite cautious about whether to believe this result,' Bahcall said."
5. They ask for more grant money--"The scientists hope to confirm their results using a different telescope, perhaps the Very Large Telescope at the European Southern Observatory in Chile."
|
BobB
Senior Member
LInden,Texas,United states of America
67 posts, Jul 2001
|
posted 08-23-2001 05:12 AM
According to Einstiens theory of relativity, even if two obserbvers are moving away or toward each other at very high velocity the speed of light originating from one source and being recieved by the other is always 1.86 x (10)5 miles per second. This part of the theory has been proven to be true
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 
