|
Author
|
|
Topic: CT Reports..Please Post Here | Topic page views:
|
|
Catnip57
Senior Member

Central Washington 527 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 06:43 PM
Our morning started out just beautiful today... the skies were so clear... the clearest I've seen in days. But... I could see the trails starting in the eastern sky and they just kept coming all day. Now as I write this (4:35 p.m.) the sky is a mixture of blue and man made couldy haze. Our temperatures have dropped quite noticably today from what we were getting last week and it's really cold again. Guess I was getting spoiled with the nice weather we had last week. 
|
Nirvana
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 180 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 07:56 PM
We got a MASSIVE dose of spraying here in Seattle today. Yesterday was clear as a bell with similar humidity and temperature conditions as today. This is the most spraying I've ever seen here. It's similar to what some of you describe on the east coast.They started spraying in the morning, but the winds (~12 knot, 56% then 44% humidity) blew around the spray and made it less effective I think. More spraying in the early afternoon, and quite a bit in the late afternoon which is less typical here. I think they had to try hard to get a white-out due to atmospheric conditions. The sky was crisscrossed with trails all afternoon and became and more whited out. Classic "X" patterns, parallel trails, short bursts to cover open areas, and some odd weaving trails. Many were from fast and high-flying white planes as far as I could tell. Yesterday was the first clear day in a couple of weeks or so here. During that time we got a fair amount of rain. So, on the second day of clear sky, we get chem-bombed.

|
mark sky
bin Rydin

SW coast of Oregon 1089 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:04 PM
simalar here Nirvana yesterday the first clear one then today just afternoon a line of chem coming unshore getting worse as the afternnon progressed then a big 30 mile long spreading drippy fatty at 5 PM asmatik with heart pounding the dawgs are scrachting their ears off
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:11 PM
We got chemed pretty heavily for most of the day. Around 5:00 PM I saw a black trail in the sky. The cloud cover or mess was so heavy and black that it nearly blocked out the sun right before sunset. Whatever parts of the sky that weren't covered by the mess were gray and creme colored with nasty looking streaks. The haze is so thick right now that there is a halo around the moon. The temperature is 42 degrees with 92% humidity.Solar X-Rays:ACTIVE - Geomagnetic:Quiet 
|
hooligan
Senior Member
Seattle 76 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:47 PM
Yep Seattle was hit today for sure. It was clear and cold yesterday. This morning was clear with a few trails, I tried to convince myself it was only regular contrails. Some planes were too high to see at all, just the big fat trail. It got hazier and hazier and I could see that oily looking rainbow around the sun this afternoon around 4:30. The weather forecast changed for tonight from "very cold, down to 20" to "cloudy and low thirties." Now what did the weatherman see that made them change the forecast between 3 and 5pm? 
|
mark sky
bin Rydin

SW coast of Oregon 1089 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 02-25-2002 11:51 PM
roman~ do you know where Piqua is? i used to skate on the lake and sled down the banks of the ohio~ erie canal roast bucKeyes in the fall
|
Nirvana
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 180 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 01:11 AM
The chemclouds have almost completely cleared and the stars are shining bright. Humidity is currently 29%. Hooligan, just as a note, I think the local weather reports get their information mostly from the National Weather Service. Maybe the NWS is in with the chem guys... Art Bell is starting to talk more on his radio program about chem trails. He's having William Thomas on this Wednesday night. William has been seriously researching chemtrails since at least 1999. Art says William is going to present new evidence. 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 01:27 AM
The haze is getting thicker and according to GHCC, most of Connecticut is now covered by a large cloud mass. The temperature is holding at 42 degrees and the humidity is now 95%. It should be a real interesting sunrise.Solar X-Rays:ACTIVE - Geomagnetic:Quiet 
|
Deb
Senior Member
Plainfield, Indiana USA 163 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 08:07 AM
>>>Deb-- Could you please explain that map again? I'm not sure I understand why there are orange/red spots on the east and west sides of the country, but not in the middle. Don't planes have to fly over the middle of a jet route to get from one place to another? And why are cities like Milwaukee in the deep blue area of the map while Amarillo is in the yellow? Thanks for any enlightenment you can provide. 3T3<< 3, sorry for the delay in getting back on this. The red/orange spots are representive of heavy traffic areas. The other colors represent areas where the flight paths are less dense than the red/orange areas. Planes are not required to stay on the routes, (aka airways, flight paths). For simplicity, I won't explain how or why, but there is an explanation here - http://worldzone.net/international/chickiedeb//cgi/uploads/ControlTowerEx.html Another way to look at it is to imagine a city and it's suburbs at rush hour in the morning. Traffic headed into the city is heavy all around it, but the further out you go, past the suburbs, traffic is lighter because there is less population. There are more airports east of the Mississippi because there is more population to service. Traffic begins in the east, 3 hours before air traffic in the west begins. When traffic begins in the West, Mountain and Pacific time, the east has already been up and running. I did some captures on Flight Explorer yesterday morning between 6AM and 11AM, EST to show how this happens. Unfortunately, I had to split it up on 3 webpages because the server couldn't handle all the graphics on one page. The 2nd and 3rd pages are linked. http://chickiedeb.topcities.com/2002FEonly/022502MonFEamEST.htm Since this side discussion is getting lengthy, perhaps FLkook would prefer we move it out of her reports thread? 
|
watcher2002
New Member

O-klahoma where the winds come sweeping down the plains. 16 posts, Jul 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 10:02 AM
Update- Looking out right now, and absolutely NO activity at all. Normal clouds and all looks normal. Now we've not had activity for several days. Believe the last time we did was around the 12th of this month. When we have heavy activity, I take photos. Glad we're getting a break here in ok but sorry for the rest of you who are not.
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 10:07 AM
2-26-02 Rain, then snow yesterday. Went from nearly 70 degrees Sunday to 16 degrees last night. Gee, I wonder if someone IS controlling the weather? I Read this link at Hard Truth concerning Space Preservation Act. Interesting. http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20020212.htm 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 01:28 PM
The sky was real nasty looking this morning, but by noon the sky was almost clear. I just checked with GHCC and the mess that was covering us last night is now west of us. Now the haze is rolling in, but no signs of any spraying yet. Temperature 58 degrees with 53% humidity. Solar X-Rays:ACTIVE - Geomagnetic:QUIET
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Dan Rockwell on 02-26-2002] 
|
Nirvana
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 180 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 02-26-2002 07:54 PM
The sky was completely blue and clear of chemtrails today, in stark contrast to yesterday's chem-extravaganza.I saw three 'normal' contrails today. They disappeared within seconds. Humidity and temperature were similar today to yesterday. Today's humidity is currently 53%, temperature at 45 degrees near sunset. 
|
hooligan
Senior Member
Seattle 76 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 02-26-2002 11:40 PM
Solar X-rays:Active Geomagnetic Field:Quiet No CTs today. I was looking up and enjoying the blue when I saw something high up glittering in the sun. It was very high, staying in one place and I would not have seen it at all except when the sun hit it and it seemed silver and shiny. I could not see a shape to make out what it was. It did start moving slowly and after a couple of minutes I could not see it any more. Someone with me saw it too. Any ideas on what that was? Probably something very sensible, right?
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 01:01 AM
Hooligan, it might of been one of those silver orbs.We've had just about every type of cloud and haze cover imaginable today. The sunset was blocked again by messy looking black clouds with odd looking gray and brownish colored clouds almost filling the sky. After the sun set, the sky became completely black for a while. Now the sky is hazy and filled with black and white clouds. The haze isn't too thick though because I can see the moon and the few stars that are not obstructed by the clouds. No signs of any activity and I didn't see a chem-jet all day. Temperature 42 degrees with 70% humidity. Solar X-Rays:ACTIVE - Geomagnetic:QUIET 
|
Deb
Senior Member
Plainfield, Indiana USA 163 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 05:36 AM
Question. I'm curious as to why some of you are reporting temperature and humidity. Does that have to do with your geo-magnetic study?
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 12:25 PM
Deb, In a way, a few of us are comparing data on temperature and humidity and overlaping it with the solar and geomagnetic data as well as some other data. If anything, I am noting the abnormal temperature variations here in my little corner of Connecticut.The sky here is completely gray and it was actually snowing a little bit. The precipitation only amounted to .04 of an inch so we're not out of the woods yet with this little drought we've been having here. No signs of any activity. The temperature is 34 degrees with 99% humidity. Solar X-Rays:M CLASS FLARE - Geomagnetic:QUIET 
|
Scanner
benign presence

Shreveport, LA 207 posts, Sep 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 01:01 PM
Clear, blue skies, no trails, VERY cold and extremely dry. Broke all temperature records for February 26th last night. 32 degrees at noon today.
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 02:48 PM
32 degrees in La? Man that's cold.The haze is beginning to thin out now and there are some pretty large almost normal looking clouds floating by. The temperature here is 39 degrees with 49% humidity. No signs of any spraying yet. Solar X-Rays:M ClASS FLARE - Geomagnetic:QUIET 
|
Nirvana
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 180 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 06:47 PM
I've seen some trails amongst regular clouds, but it's been mostly overcast today and difficult to tell if they are chemtrails or contrails.Current humidity is 55%, temp is 44 degrees. I've uploaded three images from the big chemspray on Feb 25 to the image area. Search for author Nirvana. I especially like the third image as it distinctly shows where a plane has shut off it's chem-nozzle and continues to fly onward with just a small contrail. 
|
Catnip57
Senior Member

Central Washington 527 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 02-27-2002 09:20 PM
Yesterday, the 26th, was beautiful... today the weatherman forcasted clouds. Well.. we got the clouds and chemtrails too. The only difference between us and those of you in Seattle was that our clouds weren't quite as overcast and we could see the chemtrails quite easily.It's interesting how one day can be perfectly clear... the next day is full of trails and then the next day is clear and the day after it's full of trails again... It's like they're hitting us every other day for some strange reason. 
|
FLKook
Chemspiracy Realist

East Central Florida 706 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 02-28-2002 08:54 AM
Funny you should say that Catnip, we've been getting an every other day pattern for about a week now. Today they are on again but have started slowly. Yesterday was beautiful, day before muck for the masses.According to the contrail formation map we're supposed to be nada today. There weren't supposed to be any yesterday either but there were a few comet like normal contrails visible. Here's current solar info: Solar X-rays: M Class Flare Geomagnetic Field: Unsettled 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 02-28-2002 10:51 AM
The sky is nearly clear now with a few puffy white clouds. There is a definite haze in the sky and parts of it have a slight bruised purplish appearance. The temperature is 24 degrees now and has dropped 3 degrees since last night. The humidity is 52% and we're having wind gusts between 8 and 31 mph. I checked ith GHCC and there still seems to be a mess over Canada and I'm beginning to wonder what's going on there. No signs of any trails yet but I'll be out looking for them. One of my friends found some old UFO sighting report forms and I am having someone modify them to apply to Chem-jets so I'll not only be taking pictures, I'll be taking notes too. - All I need to know is the general dimensions of these jets like width and length so if someone could email me a spec sheet I'd appreciate it. Solar X-Rays:M CLASS FLARE - Geomagnetic:UNSETTLED

|
Duncan Kunz
Senior Member
582 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 02-28-2002 11:54 AM
Dear Phantom911:Thanks for the heads up link to that newspaper in Idaho. That was an interesting article. Most interesting was the comment that they had documentation showing a correlation between chemtrails and hospital admissions. I believe that a good study showing a correlation is just as important as in situ contrail collection and analysis for the purposes of legitimizing chemtrails in the eyes of the media. I wrote the paper the following letter, and e-mailed it today: "Gentlemen:
I read in a reprint of your February 2002 article "Conspiracy 'theorists' vindicated" (http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20020212.htm on your Internet site) that "Documentation exists establishing a correlation between spraying events and increases in hospital admissions for upper respiratory tract infections." As someone with an ongoing interest in the chemtrail controversy for three years, I have heard extensive anecdotal evidence of such a correlation. Given (1) the altitude of most of these contrails and thus the time it would take for them to settle to the ground; (2) the amount of lateral dispersion as a factor of settling time and prevailing winds; and (3) the difficulty of acquiring such admissions data from hospitals and doctors' offices, I'd assumed that valid correlative data would be extremely hard to come by. I am extremely interested in the documentation that you mention. Showing a sound correlation between such episodes of contrails and admissions to hospitals for respiratory distress is absolutely key to determining the existence, makeup, and possible reasons for the long-persistence contrails that have been the subject of such controversy. I'd very much appreciate your providing me with some of that documentation - or how to acquire it. This could be a major breakthrough in publicizing the chemtrail phenomenon. Thank you for your help; I hope to hear from you soon. Best regards, Duncan Kunz Duncankunz@cox.net Mesa, Arizona 480-891-2525" I'm looking forward to their reply. Hopefully, they'll provide me with the documentation, and I'll put it on 3T3's science forum.

|
Scanner
benign presence

Shreveport, LA 207 posts, Sep 2001
|
posted 02-28-2002 12:19 PM
Spoke too soon yesterday. Trails all over the place late yesterday and today. Some lingering, some not. Got that haze thing going again with clear skies behind. Scanner
|