|
Author
|
|
Topic: One Simple Fact About Contrails... | Topic page views:
|
|
defender
TELEVISION IS MIND CONTROL

Level 64 1115 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 11-19-2001 03:35 PM
Promises, promises......
|
Chem11
megasprayer news

The Homeland 1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 11-19-2001 11:45 PM
Make no mistake, she won't reply here because she refuses to address any and all evidence that contradicts her tired and often contradictory arguements.She'll take the time for school-yard insults, but reviewing evidence isn't of the slightest interest to the one who calls herself 'Chickie Deb'. I'll tell you what she is interested in because I've seen this before. She allies herself with key people on a forum, creates a controversy and waits for her buddies to come rushing to her defense. She then proceeds to confirm observers worst suspiscions regarding her true nature and agenda, permanently damaging her associates credibility. This is straight out of Psychological Operations; fifth columnist divide and conquer tactics. Congratulations on another job well done, Chickie Deb. Consider yourself debunked. 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim 3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 11-20-2001 02:24 AM
chemster, if this is pic what your talking about :
this is a contrail chem, if your skinny body dumped a bucket of water at altitude in the same increments from a plane the same thing would have happen...that pic is a excellent example of radically different parcels of air, I guess you'll tell me it's psuedemonus arginosa (not spell checking this) or anthrax, or medicine ? some would consider this pollution, and even though it does not bother me, because the jury is still out on contrail effects, I would agree...but a sinister plot, or population innoculation....well Jacob McCandles said it best.... NOT HARDLY ! with loving regards.... T/S 
|
3T3L1
Differentiated Mouse Fibroblasts

Lubbock, Texas 1347 posts, Mar 2001
|
posted 11-20-2001 07:56 AM
FWIW, what theseeker said is also what Deb said in her e-mail. My problem is that I couldn't find evidence of humidities above 0.5 anywhere in the vicinity of that trail. It's a single piece of data, though. No one data point proves or disproves anything. You look at the weight of the evidence. So let's keep gathering evidence and quit fighting, please? 
| |