posted 01-19-2002 10:43 PM            

Thanks for your interest.

posted 01-24-2002 10:19 AM            

quote:

---

I felt pretty foolish after the fact,for arguing with a NASA scientist

---

posted 01-24-2002 01:31 PM            

NASA, Stennis Space Center (NET-SSC)
RA50, Bldg. 1100
Stennis Space Center, MS 39529
US

Netname: SSC
Netblock: 148.114.0.0 - 148.114.255.255

Coordinator:
Cluff, James (JC398-ARIN) james.cluff@SSC.NASA.GOV
(228) 688-2249

Domain System inverse mapping provided by:

NS.SSC.NASA.GOV 148.114.16.83
LUNA.SSC.NASA.GOV 148.114.7.3

Record last updated on 09-Nov-1998.
Database last updated on 23-Jan-2002 19:55:55 EDT.

posted 01-24-2002 01:40 PM            

Pat Minnis is a PhD: I am still struggling -- at an advanced age -- to chase down my MBA. Pat is well-known throughout the aerospace community as one of the top atmospheric scientists around. He also has a clean white lab coat and undoubtedly makes more money than I.

On the other hand, I play guitar and banjo better, am much better-looking, and substantially more modest.

But thanks for the compliment LOL!

Regards,

posted 01-28-2002 09:53 AM            

I regret having to inform you that Deb is not the same as I. Although I do work for a large aerospace firm, my real job is with a top-secret Society that really runs the NSA, CIA, FBI, KGB, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. My family has been doing this for centuries, and, as the oldest son of an oldest son, my hereditary position in the Society goes back over six hundred years.

Deb, on the other hand, is none of these. She is completely ignorant of the links between my family, Adam Weishaupt, the Skull and Bones, the Masons, Trilateralists, and the NWO. Unlike me, she does not know the truth about the mystick and magick attributes of the numbers eleven, as well as the numbers one through ten and twelve through a bazillion. Again, Deb is completely innocent of such things, so please don't accuse her of any such alliances.

She is a reptoid, though.

regards,

posted 01-28-2002 09:59 PM            

Having been banned about a year ago from here for being a person who disagreed on the subject, I am a guest so I try to be as gracious as a hungry reptoid can possibly be.

Here's my research (sorry, I'm a little behind getting current pages up)
http://cdebsjournal.topcities.com/leadpage.htm

and my website (free)http://worldzone.net/international/chickiedeb/

My e-mail address: cdebgo22@hotmail.com

I live in the first suburb west of Indianapolis, near the airport. I won't publish my phone number because I hate the phone.

And I am just a housewife from Indiana. I've never met a "fed" unless you consider people in the military or postal workers as "feds." There are many false stories about me on these message boards.

Sorry to hear about your rock incident, but if it came from a plane, it would be interesting to hear how. Spider webs falling from the sky have been around and reported long before either you or I were a thought - http://www.weird-wi.com/oddities/cobwebs.htm

I had my first spider web experience a few months ago, and if it happens again, I will eat one on videotape, because they are spiderwebs.

As for the blood cells in the sample, the person who made that report is not qualified to make such a judgement and has yet to produce a certitfied lab sample of anything. People qualified to make that judgement, based on the photos of the slides, disagree.

posted 02-02-2002 05:58 PM            

Spinning Spider Stories summary at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/LLNews/message/1026

As to the spider STORIES, let's remind people that these strands were seen in this fashion when CHEMTRAILS first were heavily reported beginning in late '98. Last year these were noted heavily in TX then later here in IN after NATO planes were patrolling our skies to keep U.S. 'safe.' Here are some interesting PROPERTIES of these strands vs. REAL spider material. THINK ABOUT THIS! We're TOLD that these strands were from 'gossamer' spiders. Perhaps you've read the story "Charlotte's Web" where the babies shoot webs in the air and take off in the world. Spiders can spin 2 types of web material. Sticky or not sticky. The type used for 'flying' obviously is NOT STICKY. I've SEEN spiders do this. They shoot a few strands up and the wind catches them and they take off. The strands they shoot are 2' at their LONGEST! My wife and I were traveling N on SR231 in IN. Almost every roadsign held up by 2 posts had CHEMTRAIL STRANDS caught on the posts. We stopped at a small shopping mall and I stopped to gather some of the strands. They were up to 9 FEET in length! They all were WHITE and lightly tacky with the properties of silly string. Some of this material stuck to the roof of the car. It was a MUCH GREATER DIAMETER than any spider would have spun. Within 1 day, the material had dried out. The strand on the car roof had faded to clear and become dry and brittle. So brittle, that when touched it turned to powder. Similar accounts are found for the initial material found in late '98 during initial CHEMTRAIL sightings. No, Deb and the media are SPINNING us stories again. She is very much in DENIAL. For if these were real 'spider webs' their PROPERTIES would have remained CONSTANT! Yep, you can have a web in your home in a corner and it might gather dust, but it's not going to CHANGE SHAPE, SIZE, STRENGTH! Spider webs are known for their amazing strength. Wet or dry this crap was WEAK! And given the initial diameter of the material, it should have been VERY STRONG IF it had been real spider web. IT WASN'T! And....WHERE WERE ALL THE SPIDERS??? With all this stuff falling from the sky, you'd think I'd have seen quite a few. NOPE! Nobody else that I talked to did EITHER! So DRY UP TrickyDeb! She's real consistent in her MIS-DIRECTION and LIES! I'm very much looking forward to that time God Himself hands out rewards and she gets hers. God doesn't look kindly on those that LIE to support this sick New World Order. I very much think she'll regret her efforts for ... oh ETERNITY! What we've had here was physical PROOF of this material. A logical conclusion is that a spray plane put online had faulty or mal-adjusted spray nozzles. This allowed the material to fall in whole strands verses being blasted into tiny ALMOST invisible particulate. The refined 'process' generates tiny fibers that CAN be seen under fluorescent tube blacklights or as Clifford shows here: http://www.carnicom.com/bio4.htm This tiny particulate MATCHES the physical properties of these 'strands' on November 3 except they are but tiny pieces instead of a long strand.

posted 02-02-2002 06:13 PM            

I'm being 'nice' here. I'm a bit more vocal on my own newsletter. We feel there's definetly some kind of 'agenda' afoot here.

When I began posting material on her 'debunkster' site, she accused me of 'stalking' her and thought that might frighten me away from sharing information there.

BTW, those with BRAINS KNOW that many scientists and so-called 'experts' are paid to LIE to support a particular aim or agenda. So automatically supporting an opinion from a PAID GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE as absolute truth is ludicrous!

NOTE how she consistently puts her 'faith' into a government that has betrayed and MURDERED its people over and over again.

HELLO!??? Our 'beloved' pres is about to put 350,000 FOREIGN NATO troops on our highways for ROADBLOCKS and CHECKPOINTS at the same time they're going to draft your sons and daughters and sacrifice them fighting for OIL!!! See anything wrong with this picture?