|
Author
|
|
Topic: FAA Claims Air Force Jets Leaving Seattle | Topic page views:
|
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 04:46 PM
In a phone conversation with tha FAA Military division an aid told me this morning that the Special Air Force jets are leaving the Seattle area next week. They stated they had been on a Top Secret classified mission and it was nearing completion. Of course they couldn't elaborate as to what that mission was, they did say they had been doing a lot of 'work' off the coast. The FAA did mention that this was a special division of the Air Force and they had come from various areas of the country and would be leaving shortly. Sigh of relief. She did say though that part of the 'exercises' involved simulating hijackings and response time. I very politely inquired if that was why they were painting clear skies white and putting black haloes around the sun with giant Xs. She laughed and told me I needed to talk to ROC Headquarters about that and gave me a number to call. It was disconnected.
|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 06:03 PM
The FAA has a military division? That's a first. I guess you called the FSDO up in Seattle...maybe I ought to give them a call and ask for the "military division".Hey, and regarding "Top Secret classified" missions....I'm just chuckling here, because if it was "Top Secret", the FAA certainly wouldn't know about it, and if they did happen to know, they certainly wouldn't acknowledge to some Joe on the phone that a mission existed. 
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 08:55 PM
A real nice lady did just that. Feel free to call them. Auburn Washington. Air Traffic Control Tower. Ask for the military desk. Want the phone number?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Unhappy Trails on 06-10-2002] 
|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 09:10 PM
Ummm, is it the Auburn Airport? They don't have a tower there...and I have a book that has all the phone numbers to each airfield anyways. And they don't list a tower frequency, just a CTAF. The airport identifier that I'm looking at is S50, Auburn Municipal Airport. And they have a 3,400 foot long runway...I doubt they would even need a "military desk"...
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 09:41 PM
I just typed a long reply to your questions, but first...let me ask what you plan on doing with it? Why is it important to you?
|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 09:45 PM
I'd like to talk to this "military desk" myself and ask them some more specific questions that you probably can't ask because of a lack of a security clearance.
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 11:31 PM
More specific in what regard? What do you hope to accomplish?
|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-10-2002 11:47 PM
First, to verify that you did indeed talk to an FAA employee who works at a "military desk". Second, if you did indeed talk to them, I'd like to ask them exactly what kind of operation it was, and whether or not you took it out of context.In short, trails, I'd like to verify your claim. 
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 12:17 AM
Hey pacer, you've got all the manuals...look 'em up. I'm sorry if you're having trouble finding them. Maybe there's a typo in your book. Call information, I'm sure they'ld be glad to help you. Anyone living in or near the Seattle area, they're in the new phone book pg.60, lower right corner. Just ask for the 'military desk' to verify my claim. Sorry pacer, I won't give you anymore than I already have. 
|
mark sky
bin Rydin

SW coast of Oregon 1089 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 06-11-2002 12:37 AM
sigh opps
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 02:40 AM
Pacer, I don't think the FAA has a "military department" so to speak, but considering it is a federal agency I think it is obvious that they do regulate a certain amount of military aviation. Somebody has to control the airways, and I assure you the military is too busy with other things to worry about civilian air routes and craft, and i would assume this is where the FAA comes in. I think it is completely plausible that they would possibly have operational knowledge of military movement.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 06-11-2002]

|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 09:30 AM
Oh, now you're going to back down, Trails? I thought you were going to give me the number? Let me get this straight...you called the CONTROL TOWER at the AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT in Washtington state, correct? Or was it a different number? I've got all the numbers for the towers that actually exist, but Auburn is an uncontrolled field, basically a runway with a few hangars, and a place to get fuel. Maybe I'll call the FBO (Auburn Flight Services) and see if they've heard of this military desk. Maybe they can check p. 60 of the yellow pages for me. Alpha, the FAA does regulate military traffic insofar as when that military traffic is flying through the National Airspace System. But they do not have a seperate "military" division. If a military aircraft breaks a FAR (Federal Aviation Regulation), the FAA reports the violation to the aircrew's command, which then deals with the problem.

|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 10:10 AM
"...I needed to talk to ROC Headquarters..."Just out of curiousity, what is ROC? 
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 06-11-2002 12:33 PM
You are being Paced!Unhappy you're still faily new, So I have some advice for you, On this you can depend, Your words you must defend, Illuminated can read too! _____________________________ (The following is a joke, or attempt thereof.) Yo Pacer, I remember when ROC was The Republic of China. Maybe they run the FAA. They got enough forces in country right now!
PEACE 
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 05:55 PM
My claims are the claims of the FAA. I merely stated what they had told me. I thought my fellow Seattlites and Washingtonians would like to know that the jets are leaving. The information I got was miniscule. After 15 minutes on the phone 6 tiny pieces of information were thrown my way to appease my concerns. What is there to defend? I'm reluctant to post a phone number as this would trigger an onslaught of calls, which in turn would cause them to disconnect. I might just want to talk to them in the future. If you are who you say you are pacer, how come you're not privy to the FAA having a military desk? It only makes sense that there would be someone coordinating flights between commercial aircraft and military. Especially when they're as close as McChord AFB and Seatac airport. It makes total sense to me. What prompted the call in the first place is that when the military have been in the air, the commercial airliners have been grounded untill they leave. Then one after the other takes off. My friend who is a retired Airforce pilot said if anyone knows whats going on it would be the Auburn branch of the FAA. He was right. They did know but couldn't really talk about it. And the ROC? I've not a clue who they are. The number was disconnected. I'm done with this thread. Anyone in the Seattle area is welcome to look up the information I gave earlier and call and verify. Maybe we can all get together and celebrate. A salute to our Armed Forces as they fly away wondering what the hell it was they were spraying us with.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Unhappy Trails on 06-11-2002] 
|
Chem11
megasprayer news

The Homeland 1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 06-11-2002 06:38 PM
If by some miracle the chemjets are vacating Puget Sound, I will fly back to SeaWa and buy everyone in King County who posts on this board drinks at Polly Esther's for an entire night.You gotta dance to every ABBA track the Dj's spin, though... 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 06-11-2002 06:59 PM
ROC could be the Rocketry Organization of California http://www.rocstock.org/ or it could be Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, ANM-100S (ANM-ROC)http://www.faa.gov/avr/aai/Appx1.htm or... quote: ...FEMA headquarters, the Regional Operations Center (ROC) in Atlanta and various field locations.
http://www.fema.gov/nwz99/99208.htm quote: This overview illustrates response and recovery actions Federal agencies likely will take to help State and local governments that are overwhelmed by a major disaster or emergency. Key operational components that could be activated include the Regional Operations Center (ROC), Emergency Response Team - Advance Element (ERT-A), National Emergency Response Team (ERT-N), Emergency Support Team (EST), Emergency Response Team (ERT), Disaster Field Office (DFO), Catastrophic Disaster Response Group (CDRG), and Disaster Recovery Center (DRC).
http://www.fema.gov/r-n-r/frp/frpappd.htm
quote: FEMA Headquarters may activate an Emergency Support Team (EST) and may convene an executive-level meeting of the Catastrophic Disaster Response Group (CDRG). When FEMA activates the EST, FEMA will request FBI Headquarters to provide liaison. The responsible FEMA region(s) may activate a Regional Operations Center (ROC) and deploy a representative(s) to the affected State(s). When the responsible FEMA region(s) activates a ROC, the region(s) will notify the responsible FBI Field Office(s) to request a liaison.
http://www.fema.gov/r-n-r/frp/frpterr.htm

|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 10:28 PM
"I'm reluctant to post a phone number as this would trigger an onslaught of calls"I think you're reluctant to post a phone number because there is no phone number to the FAA control tower at the Auburn Municpal Airport, because there is no tower at that airport. I hate to call someone a liar, but either you misspoke about which control tower you called, or you made all of it up. Now which is it? "If you are who you say you are pacer, how come you're not privy to the FAA having a military desk?" I'm sure I would be privy to such info if it actually existed. I've asked the OSS guys at work today (they run our control tower) and they had never heard of it either. "It only makes sense that there would be someone coordinating flights between commercial aircraft and military. Especially when they're as close as McChord AFB and Seatac airport. It makes total sense to me." So, are you just speculating that such a thing SHOULD exist? Or do you know for a fact that such a thing DOES exist? You know how the military flights are coordinated with the civilian flights? BY THE SAME EXACT SYSTEM. Our flights are entered into the same FAA database as everyone elses. We don't have some super-special flight plan clearance system, nor do we fly special "military routes" (except MTRs, but those are low-level, i.e. less than 500 ft AGL). We fly the EXACT SAME ROUTES and talk to the EXACT SAME CONTROLLERS and request our clearances from the EXACT SAME CLEARANCE DELIVERY FREQUENCIES as all the other civilian traffic out there. You know who coordinates flights between McChord and KSEA? Seattle Center, that's who. And about the closest you'll get to a "military desk" is whoever happens to be receiving flight plans from McChord or Ft Lewis and inputting them into the system. "What prompted the call in the first place is that when the military have been in the air, the commercial airliners have been grounded untill they leave" Right. And I'm sure no one at Seattle complained about canceled flights, etc. If that were the case, you'd have every airline, business jet operator and commercial air charter operater complaining because they are losing money sitting on the ground. 
|
Unhappy Trails
Senior Member

Seattle, WA 256 posts, May 2002
|
posted 06-11-2002 10:56 PM
I'm done pacer. Sorry this has angered you so. Don't let it. Life's too short to be walking around in a constant state of frenzy. You'll figure it out...someday. Alabama you say? That sure is a long way from Washington state. Could it be pacer, that you just might not know everything about everything? And your ego just can't accept that? Try not to lose too much sleep over this O.K? Goodnight.
|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-12-2002 12:41 AM
Alabama or Washington, it doesn't matter...the FAA does things the same.The military does have representatives with the FAA, but they serve in the capacity to write letters of agreement (LOAs), and help resolve airspace issues with Military Operations Areas, etc. But they don't deal with traffic flow...that's soley the FAA's responsibility. We (the military) just "goes with the flow" of other commercial and private traffic out there. In any case, I'm not angry. I don't believe that you're simply lying to me, after all I did eventually find a number for the Seattle ARTCC, which is located in Auburn. See, I don't jump to conclusions so quickly...my post above stated that you either misspoke or was making it up, and I'm glad that I don't have to call you a liar....but an ARTCC is not a control tower, just for clarification. I sent them an email asking about military traffic in the area. Maybe they'll reply. 
|
Jim Peterson
New Member
6 posts, Jun 2002
|
posted 06-12-2002 12:55 AM
As a Seattle based pilot, the FAA that Unhappy trails is probably referring to is Seattle Center which is located in Auburn. McChord and Sea-Tac do run simultaneous flight operations and all talk to the same controllers, Seattle Approach control on 120.1 VHF and 290.9 UHF which is located in the bottom of Seattle Tower located at Sea-Tac airport. The approach and departure corridors of these two airports are quite aways apart. Aircraft going into Sea-Tac are higher than 5000 ft when they are over McChord AFB which gives them quite a bit of separation.
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 06-12-2002 01:13 AM
Welcome Jim.I was about to say that there is the Seattle Air Route Traffic Control Center located in Auburn. They're an ARTCC controlled by the FAA. http://www.lockheedmartin.com/atm/news/1998/atmnewe.htm The McChord AFB is in Tacoma southwest of Auburn and may have been doing something with FEMA and SARTCC. - Order 7610.4J regarding Special Military Operations under section 7 also comes to mind. http://www.faa.gov/ATpubs/MIL/Ch1/mil0107.html
The 446th Airlift Wing is stationed at McChord . - 0f course they are quote: Washington's only flying Air Force Reserve Unit. On any given day, the 446th flies missions around the globe in support of Department of Defense missions.
http://www.afrc.af.mil/446aw/ 
|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1290 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 06-12-2002 10:15 AM
"I hate to call someone a liar, but either you misspoke about which control tower you called, or you made all of it up. Now which is it?" (pretty demanding and accusing pacer)"my post above stated that you either misspoke or was making it up, and I'm glad that I don't have to call you a liar....but an ARTCC is not a control tower, just for clarification." YOU make the above statements because YOU cannot find the information, not because it did not exist. How about approaching this board and it's members with a bit more respect and less posturing and huffing, after all pacer YOU are a guest here.

|
PacerLJ35
Senior Member
Millbrook, AL, USA 456 posts, Apr 2002
|
posted 06-12-2002 01:25 PM
David:I wouldn't start pointing fingers about posturing and huffing and puffing. Anyhoo, you're just as much a guest here as I am. Back to Unhappy Trails. I apologize for any rudeness, but you did have me confused for a while. Based on what you DID say, it wasn't making any sense whatsoever. The "military desk" you likely spoke to was probably the person handling the departures out of McChord, but there isn't a "military" department that only handles military issues. There IS, however, a military advisor for each branch fo the services that works at the regional offices for the FAA. But they don't deal with traffic sequencing, but more related to airspace issues, waivers, and letters of agreements. For example, the FAA has a maximum speed limit below 10,000 feet of 250 knots. But the USAF has a waiver for some aircraft because flying at 250 knots would be dangerously slow for them. I thought about the "grounding" of airplanes you spoke of when the military aircraft departed McChord. I think your Air Force friend ment having to wait for IFR release. This is common for both military and civilian IFR departures. Our airfield is located very close to Montgomery Regional Airport, and it's common for us to have to wait a few minutes for an IFR release. They don't just make civilian traffic wait...we have to wait when civilian traffic is taking off too. Again, I seriously doubt that the FAA would tell you about anything that is top secret. Just telling people that there was a top secret operation going on would serve to only compromise the security classification. It may be possible that they were guessing themselves, maybe in an effort to satisfy your questions. Just a thought. 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 06-12-2002 01:32 PM
Pacer is right about there not being a control tower in Auburn. Below is a link to the listings of all the towers in the area. The closest towers to Auburn are in Seattle and Renton.Cities and the FAA offices located in them. http://www.nw.faa.gov/cities/wa-city.htm

|