posted 09-30-2002 02:16 AM            

(hearsay)

where's the link ?

(unposted)

how can you prove the same person posted IT ?

(you can't)

assumption is not fact....no matter what it may LOOK like...

I like concrete dan...not assume~fault...

sleeping dogs dan....nite friend

posted 09-30-2002 02:24 AM            

Now he's already said he'd be willing to do the flying for you, if you guys can just get together the cash and an FAA waiver to add some collection equipment. Why not take him up on the offer. It's perfect. You could have Mark or Dan Rockwell ride shotgun and direct him anywhere you want to go. We'd all love to see it. My only comment was that I feel sorry for the poor guy who foots the bill only to find out that this thing is a big hoax. Now that kind of dissapointment is going to be painful. Still...if you want to do it, there is NOBODY who wants to stop you. Pacer wants to help you succeed at this. We all do. There is not a debunker around who would want to prevent you from doing this. It would be great entertainment! As long as you got the money...Pacer's got the time and the interest. I guarantee you, there is no pilot alive who wouldn't jump at this opportunity. Sounds like an incredible amount of fun. I'm sure he'd get you right into any "chemtrail" you name....Just get him the jet and the equipment of your choosing....

posted 09-30-2002 02:35 AM            

stevie wonder can see that...

a big meow there...

posted 09-30-2002 02:36 AM            

cydoniaquestIllumi~Naughty AKA Yodabreath Posts: 1451(9/29/02 8:13:16 pm)Reply

Re: I'm all for in-situ sampling!

Someone said they had a pilot picked out already....but I think you'd be the perfect guy for the job. You understand the chemtrail issue. You know what they are looking for. You know exactly where to fly to get the sample. I think this is a great idea....It would be good to get people from both sides on that airplane though, and make sure everything is acceptible to the hard core chemmies among them. I wonder if some collection device (a bit more scientific than the windshield) couldn't be rigged somewhere else though, almost like a pitot tube device maybe?[edited for my own good health] The above commentary brought to you by the excessive consumption of Snapple
Edited by: cydoniaquest at: 9/29/02 9:14:04 pm

posted 09-30-2002 02:40 AM            

prove it !

u/t your full of crapola...if not about this everything else...

why are you so intent on gathering other peoples money ?

are you a member of the "toogood" family ?

sheesh

posted 09-30-2002 02:55 AM            

quote:

---

TELL US YADABREATH Who's the snitch?

---

What are you talking about U/T?

Snitch about what?

posted 09-30-2002 03:53 AM            

quote:

---

he does not have a mastery of it, he just cuts and pastes the necesary code for the circumstance...
stevie wonder can see that...

a big meow there...

---

ROFL. If that were true I might be offended. we can definitely say that in comparison to Seeker I have a mastery of it. And in all actuality I don't cut and paste, I type the code, but who cares. Only a lame soul would make such asinine assumptions based on their own 'sycophancy'. Word of the day. Or can you not read? But you know that, otherwise you wouldn't constantly feel the need to antagonize me. again, transparent. And how ironic, we were just talking about hearsay... and there you go, hypocritally mouthing of slanderous comments. ROFL. Do you even think before you post? Sometimes I wonder.

Seeker said in light of hearsay and assumption:

quote:

---

what is that in the court of law dan ?
(hearsay)

where's the link ?

(unposted)

how can you prove the same person posted IT ?

(you can't)

assumption is not fact....no matter what it may LOOK like...

I like concrete dan...not assume~fault

---

Contra dick tory - hypo critic al - element ary - trans parency Get it??

As a matter o' fact, i've been doing ascii art for years. and html is the easiest language in the world. I have no need to cut and paste. Perhaps you should learn for yourself instead of whining because you and your buds have to 'copy' my code and then not be able to fix it when they forgot to copy the closing tags. LMAO

I think we've already had a similar discussion regarding computing, one in which you were also OWNED. perhaps I should dig up the link..... Your just lucky this isn't an official 'debate' or you would have been gone a long time ago, sycophant. Also, by the looks of your site, you'd be lucky to be successful at even a cut and paste operation. ROFL. also, perhaps we should mention the fact that you got the dialectizer site from my post, later used it and took full credit for it. But yet you make an unsubstantiated assumption that I paste everything. LOLOLOLOL. just STFU. You are a total and complete idiot and honestly the words you type aren't even worth the virtual bytes that they consume. And remember seeker, watch out for that blue screen. You've encountered it before by becoming arrogant and cocky. Of course, you tried to claim it was a malicious code, which maybe it was, but you'll never be able to prove it, and I can't remember. LOL.

'chow' ROFL Seeker=OWNED (again)

©®™ AT heh

posted 09-30-2002 05:12 AM            

quote:

---

LYING SLIMEY SPY

---

Hardly. I think you're overrating her U/T. ROFL. She may be lying and slimey but she is in no way anything close to a spy. Maybe a wanabe spy. And she sure isn't a competent debunker, nor a person of plausible signicant intellect. I'm thinking wanna-be across the board.

Don't worry U/T, forget these shady characters. I think I can probably get access to some good hardware through some of my phi kap bros around the nation. In-Situ is just stupid anyway. People need to wake up and stop living in the 80s . It's 2002 and storms can be predicted on Jupiter. You think an In-Situ sampling is required, nevertheless an In-Situ that is non-objectively obtained through deceptive premeditation to commit fraud for a compensated service? Bwu hah. I've got a little black book and I think it may be time to break it out. I think it's time for exposition.

quote:

---

See Lulu...I told you Pacer would do it

---

posted 09-30-2002 05:22 AM            

quote:

---

supposed government debunkers....right????

---

posted 09-30-2002 06:56 AM            

quote:

---

Let someone like Thermit or Dan Rockwell, who can be scientific and objective about the whole thing ride along and conduct the experiment, and it's a done deal.

---

ROFL. From infantile antagonist to judicator in 2.5 seconds. well done. And if you want an objective scientific analysis you're going to need someone who considers all aspects of science. Not just meteorology and thermal dynamics like yourself and bud Canex. How about this, how I about I go so I can debunk your lame ass along the way. And i'll even pick the coordinate and the plume. How's that Yoda? And who are you YODA? A self proclaimed government hacker?? (NIPR?)

ROFL thats OWNAGE²

posted 09-30-2002 07:04 AM            

Lulew,
You were asking if that if the sampling found a chemtrail rather than a contrail, what would I have said. Obviously, you would have proved that there is such a thing as chemtrails. My reasoning, as I see now, was totally biased because I assumed only one outcome for the sampling. Sorry, I just can't shake this idea that we already know what is up there.

Yoda,
How do you know what I look like? You one of them gummint spies?

posted 09-30-2002 07:29 AM            

remote field emission scanning electron microscopy

posted 09-30-2002 10:56 AM            

quote:

---

Hardly. I think you're overrating her U/T. ROFL. She may be lying and slimey but she is in no way anything close to a spy. Maybe a wanabe spy. And she sure isn't a competent debunker, nor a person of plausible signicant intellect. I'm thinking wanna-be across the board.

---

A/T...at the risk of seeming completely redundant, let me just ask...Were you dropped on the head as a kid? You don't know by now that I'm a he....not a she? And it's not spying. I'm the government debunker, with the hacker skills remember. It's my job to know what you turkeys are up to.

And what's with this insult crap? If you'll do the math...you'll notice that I'm the one who's been trying to have an intelligent discussion here. You’ve been constantly flying fast and furious with the arrogant insults. You keep changing the subject back to you and your HTML skills. You keep ignoring my comments on the actual subject of chemtrails. That’s what I’m here to talk about.

posted 09-30-2002 04:28 PM            

Now, having been educated as a geologist, and worked in a petrography lab, the above quote caused me to sit there in dumb-founded silence, gazing in awe and trying to comprehend the enormity of ignorance presented before me.

posted 09-30-2002 04:36 PM            

pacer, how do you tell the difference between a contrail and a chemtrail ?

dumbfounded in Oklahoma...

sheesh

posted 09-30-2002 04:57 PM            

LuLu, I wish I were smart like you. ROFL. Did I say smart? I meant transparent. sorry. um just stfu and get an education.

remote field emission scanning electron microscopy

btw, did I mention:
remote field emission scanning electron microscopy

in-situ is not as accurate and much more of a pain than remote field emission scanning electron microscopy. (it's basically an in depth remote lab analysis)

Pacer:
Get your dictionary, idiot savant

posted 09-30-2002 05:11 PM            

My my such a nasty personality you have there...only one idiot here as far as I can tell...a repetitious one at that ! LOL can you please post the scrolling dancing baby just one more time...ROFLMAO

You are a hoot! And talk about transparent...

posted 09-30-2002 05:15 PM            

For those of you that don't know: A member of CTC was attempting to organize a coordinated effort to actually test a plume. However, those she trusted have conspired to, well, read the posts above and add 2 + 2. In- Situ is still an option but I woudn't trust anyone around here with a 10 foot pole. Besides, anyone that has significant educaton knows that there are much more effective ways of gathering information on atmospheric particulates. heh.

It's hilarious. I've got the wanna be debunkers and their minions throwing personal attacks at me left and right. woo hoo! That's how you know you've won, intellectualy speakin'.
Don't believe me? Get an education, then you'll realize.

And lulu, if you like my scrolling baby boy so much, just copy and paste it because that's all your intellect will allow.

posted 09-30-2002 05:39 PM            

LOL... who's the idiot????

Defender would be proud indeed !

posted 09-30-2002 06:04 PM            

Am I the only one who thinks Alpha should get out more, have a beer and relax? Dude, the World isn't out to get ya! Just a few people on this board

Pacer, I'm ex-mil currently flying bizjets for a civilian company, ocnl on military contracts.

Deborah / Lulu, nice pics of trails in the Gulf. From the turning radii you have a number of fighters contrailing there. Top left and right, pairs on Combat Air Patrol (CAP), top center a trail from a larger a/c probably a tanker, given that's it's flying a standard "racetrack" kind of pattern, the bottom pictures are basically the same stuff.

Again, they are similar to pictures from the Battle of Britain C1940, where aircraft preforming high energy manouvers would contrail and leave similar patterns. Were they Chemtrailing as well?