posted 12-18-2002 09:18 PM            

December 16, 2002

To all:
Those following the matter of chemtrails, unsurprisingly, utilize weather and satellite maps, to see what they are doing, or what conditions are like when they do it. Visible satellite images are frequently to be seen in discussions of the issue. Radar maps are also a commonplace. But, in examining various forms of radar weather maps, new occurrences have also been noted.
One of the most common is what is becoming termed a "radar ring", that is, a situation in which a radar station is represented as suddenly surrounded by a ring of supposed reflections. The rings can be solid, that is, a solid circle of reflections, often stretching far out from the station, with the station at the center. They can be annular, that is, a ring of "reflections", centered on the station, with an open area in the middle of the ring, and the radar station in the middle.
Texas has been a frequent site for such rings, most notably, the station near Amarillo. Florida has also had rings form around its stations, and there have been rings in the Northeast, as well.
For the most part, the issue of rings has been routinely dismissed by "debunkers" as simply a case of a radar transmitter or station breaking down. "Radars are allowed to break down", it has been quipped, as if chemtrail opponents feel that radars cannot malfunction.
Recently, however, within, in fact, the last couple of months or so, at least, a new situation has begun to make itself evident. A number of radar sites have begun to display what can be referred to as "bursts", that is, radial arrays of radar images, spreading out from the station in almost all directions, almost making the radar image look like a searchlight. These have been seen in a number of areas around the contiguous states; recently, however, these outbursts have been all but predictable to form around the radar station at Billings, Montana!
For at least the past month or so, the TAP radar maps, available, among other things, through the www.carnicom.com site, have displayed burst-like radar images, centering at Billings, Montana, at least a couple of times a week. More recently, they have begun to occur at least once a day! And, now, they seem to be occurring more than once a day. The times of the bursts are not always regular, but their occurring at least once a day could, apparently, be counted upon.
But it is here that the assertions of the "debunkers" fall apart. A random radar ring, forming once in a very long while, can be suggested to be caused by a breakdown of the radar equipment. The steady, repetitive, regular failure of a radar, at least once a day, with no one doing anything to repair it cannot be so easily dismissed! Whether they or their shills admit it, something certainly seems to be taking place, at least, near Billings, Montana.
Nor even can that be said to be the only quizzical outgrowth of radar imaging.
Very rarely, until the last few weeks, but, apparently, growing rapidly in frequency, is something novel for radar observations.
At least once a day, now, even a couple of times a day, sometimes, parallel streaks of radar "reflections" can be seen on the TAP radar images. They are unlikely to be part of the same group of objects, and almost surely not all one station's readings, since they frequently can form a phalanx several states wide! As the images scroll past, they reliably move in the direction they point, almost from one end of the country to another! They don't always keep the same formation, but, if a group of streaks forms in one part of the country in one image, there almost assuredly will be a follow-up group of streaks, also pointed in the same direction, and covering as much, if not more area, in the next frame. This will continue for up to three or four frames. Then they will disappear. In that time, ranging from one to one and a half hours, the streaks can march as much as halfway across the country! This can represent radar contacts moving at as much as 1000 mph or more! Never will a collection of streaks in one frame be followed by a different collection of streaks, pointed in a different direction, in the next! They always represent a progression in one direction across the map!
Because this represents the output from a number of stations, it cannot easily be represented as the result of a flaw in one station. Because it occurs every day, now, it cannot be represented as a malfunction that station personnel would try to fix! It may be advisable to keep an eye on these, as well.
I am posting this on the Chemtrail Central site, aware of the eminent likelihood of the individual calling themselves Lulu taking it on themselves to relocate it where they want it to be deposited. This apparent trend toward dismissive and arbitrary disposition of individuals' posts has become an apparent issue, recently. Many seem to take it askance, that a member of the administrative staff of the site would take it on themselves to decide what significance, or even implication, different posts would have.
But there is more to it than a simple act of hegemonic usurpation.
The individual who uses the i.d. Lulu purports to assign posts to different categories based on what they address.
But how does Lulu know what category different posts and observations relate to?
The observations I mentioned, for example, do not directly involve chemtrails, at least, not obviously. For that reason, Lulu would represent themselves as "justified" in relocating the post to a different section than "chemtrails".
But how would Lulu know that these observations do not involve chemtrails?
So far, the nature and purpose of chemtrails has not been completely established by the chemtrail opponents! How would Lulu know what, specifically, related to them?
The individual who calls themselves Lulu, for example, used the "explanation" of not dealing with chemtrails to "legitimize" placing my posts on an evident attempt at character assassination by "debunkers" elsewhere entirely on the site. Somewhere where posts are not often viewed, apparently, and where the subject of chemtrails is not reliably addressed! The "justification" was that the post was about an attempt at smearing my name, by having someone apparently take a false email address, jpenrod@yahoo.com, and use it to place inflammatory posts on a "debunker's" site. That, supposedly, had nothing to do with chemtrails!
Despite the fact that it represented an apparent tactic by chemtrail "debunkers" to ruin the reputation of someone who has opposed chemtrails! Despite the fact that it can represent a detailing of the suite of activities to be, possibly, expected of chemtrail "debunkers", and indicative of their character, or lack of it!
And can it not be that, among other things, chemtrails might represent as much an assault on the rights of citizens as character assassination is? And that would make my post fully worthy to be placed where I placed it!
The individual going by the name of Lulu, however, seems to purport that they have a deep enough understanding of the workings of chemtrails to know exactly what posts "relate" to them, and which don't.
But there can be a reason for someone having so intimate and inherent a familiarity with chemtrails, a familiarity not immediately available to chemtrail opponents.
They are a collaborator!
It appears that even this venue cannot be considered not necessarily to be shot through with vipers and turncoats!
It would not be the first time such a thing had happened. The history of civic concern is riddled with cases of unprincipled quislings putting up an appearance of righteous indignation to the mistreatment of the people, to prompt those in positions of influence to, essentially, “buy up their option”. After which, they would take the money and run!
Those wishing to post to this site may be well advised to think twice!