posted 03-01-2003 11:38 AM            

Question: Please explain why the sun is continuously shielded from shining directly on the earth. It's a Big job and they do their darndest but they can't quite reach 100% of the time.

I pretty well understand what this chemtrail thing is all about and why the sun is is being masked. I just hope the perpetrators come to their senses soon because of the extreme detrimental effect of air, water, soil and all living things. They better get their a----in gear and replace fossil fuel with non-harmful sources of energy. That is IF they can give up their huge profits.

posted 03-01-2003 12:33 PM            

Apparently Switzerland has nice skies too...

posted 03-01-2003 05:15 PM            

I can enter a lat-long in my FMS/GPS system on the Learjet and fly to that point and be within feet of it. Much more reliable than looking for some X-shaped cloud (that you really can't see well anyways) drifting about in the upper atmosphere.
When we did our training maneuvers in the Military Operations Areas, we defined the boundaries of the area by inputting them into the GPS. Not by chasing clouds or contrails around in the sky.

This does sound like a more effective way of positioning ones aircraft in an exact location in the sky. Maybe the sprayers are being told to mark their position in the sky so they can be tracked by satellite to confirm the area where the spraying is to be carried out for that particular day. Of course that is just my theory.

One other thing I’d like to comment about the source of all the particulates.

Quote: Phx piolot
If he said that it was from smokestacks, you would surly say "Riiiiiight, CaptWalker, smokestacks. How could you even think that? Theres no evidence that it came from smokestacks." Then you would say "Its obviously from airplanes spraying chemicals."

I know for several years now the EPA has been coming down hard on any type of burning devices. Wood stoves, industrial polluters.... etc. Even now there’s no outdoor burning allowed unless you first obtain a permit and then that’s only on permissible days. Looks to me that these traditional sources of pollution are becoming a thing of the past. It’s only logical for the public to suspect airplanes as the next possible source of pollutants. They fly in the air, they burn fuel that create exhaust... why should they be excluded from the list of possible pollution sources? When one considers the auto industry and all the changes they’ve had to make for their cars to burn fuel cleaner. All because of new laws.... Yes I think the citizens of this country have a right to know what’s causing their skies to be obscured with a grey or white haze on almost a daily basis in some areas.

posted 03-01-2003 05:29 PM            

This aswell, can be carried out far more effectively by GPS. I have the ability on my computer to track all aircraft flying that have IFR flight plans filed. I can tell you exactly where a certain aircraft is at any time. And that is with my PC! The military/government has zillions of other resources at their disposal to track aircraft other than giant Xs in the sky.

And we need to clear somthing else up. I have never tried to debunk the fact that aircraft are polluting the atmosphere. We need to establish the fact that "chemtrails" are, apperantly, a purposful and blatant spraying of chemicals. "Polluting", on the other hand, is exaust from jet engines produced by the burning of jet fuel contaminating the atmosphere. I am not debating the fact that aircraft produce pollutants.

posted 03-01-2003 06:05 PM            

I'll say it was...have you checked out this thread justlookup?
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001726.html

posted 03-01-2003 08:35 PM            

FLKook, our Image Database Editor, would assist you in resizing and uploading if image file is too big. Just e-mail her...