Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Chemtrails
  Chemtrails - JP8 Tungsten Jet Fuel - Leukemia Clusters (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:  1 2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   Chemtrails - JP8 Tungsten Jet Fuel - Leukemia Clusters

Topic page views:

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 03-02-2003 06:21 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
as you ponder who is a fool or not, or any of that foolishness, ponder this collection of excerpts~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Apparently the additive package is injected by EXXON at the Benicia California refinery, as it enters the pipeline on its way to Fallon Nevada.

FROM> http://www.sagedesignsinc.com/solutions/jet.htm

“Project Type: Jet Fuel Pipeline Additive Control
Customer: Exxon Company USA, Benicia, CA
Equipment: Control Microsystems’ SmartWIRE™

Exxon has installed three SmartWIRE end-to-end telemetry systems to control a jet fuel additives shuttle value actuating devices. Each pulse from the control system adds a metered amount of the additive as the jet fuel enters the custody transfer flowmeter and pipeline for shipment direct to the customer.

mark sky’s NOTE, previous (1998-99) USAF publications note that the additive package was added at the air force base. (those links no longer exist on line)

FROM> http://www.afrlhorizons.com/Briefs/June01/PR0008.html
Propulsion Research Could Revolutionize Jet Fuel
Development of a cold flow fuel additive can lower commercial airlines operating costs.
AFRL's Propulsion Directorate, Turbine Engine Division, Fuels Branch, Wright-Patterson AFB OH
In 1989, the Propulsion Directorate began evaluating jet fuel additives to reduce coking and maintenance costs in aircraft engines and fuel systems. In 1994, the directorate selected an additive, designated SPECxAID 8Q462, to test on F-16s with Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-200 engines. The resultant additized fuel, designated JP-8+100,

FROM> http://jp8.org/JPoverview.htm

By the fall of 1996, JP-8 completely replaced JP-4 in the United States Air Force.
It has been estimated that approximately 60 billion gallons are used worldwide each year, with 4.5 billion used by the US Air Force, the US Army, and NATO. The US Navy uses JP-5, which is very similar to JP-8. JP-8 is also used to fuel heaters, stoves, tanks, and other vehicles in military service;
JP-8 is planned on being used at least until the year 2025 as the battlefield fuel for all U.S. military operations. The Department of Defense has recognized JP-8 as the single largest chemical exposure for its personnel. JP-8 without several additives is Jet A or commercial fuel. As a newer type of fuel, the hazards of the use of JP-8 are less fully known

FROM> http://www.aircareintl.org/aci/jet_info_jp8.htm

Jet Fuel Propellant Number Eight (JP-8)
General Information Sheet
Overview:
The Department of the Air Force, along with other government agencies and experts from universities throughout the U.S., has collaborated to conduct a study evaluating the acute effects of JP-8 on military personnel who perform aircraft maintenance duties. The Air Force Institute for Environment, Safety and Occupational Health Risk Analysis (AFIERA) is coordinating this effort.
JP-8 is a versatile and widely available kerosene-based fuel and it is used extensively by U.S. and allied NATO Countries ¾ aircraft, tanks, vehicles, heaters, and stoves. The Department of Defense (DoD) uses 5 billion gallons per year, with the USAF being the largest single user (2.5 billion gallons per year).
Prior to 1 976, JP-4 was the primary fuel used in by DoD. JP-4 was linked to many aircraft exploding in battle due to small arms fire. Hence, the DoD transitioned from JP-4 to JP-8 fuel (occurred over a twenty year period from 1976-1996)
Problem:
During the transition period, some USAF fuels workers complained of dizziness, lightheadedness, objectionable odor, skin sensitization, and inability to remove fuel from their skin. Some smelled like JP-8, or tasted fuel in their mouth, several hours after work. Others noted "sweating out jet fuel" during weekends, while away from duty.

Only very limited research has been done looking at health outcomes associated with JP-8 exposure in humans; most involved animal models. These studies have suggested possible neurologic disorders, hearing loss, postural balance deficiencies, neurotoxic effects, or neurobehavioral deficits among aircraft maintenance workers exposed to fuels.
Air Force JP-8 Acute Exposure Study:
The Air Force Surgeon General (USAF/SG) directed AFIERA to investigate the potential health effects posed by use of JP-8 in the military

This is the first study of its kind looking at acute exposure risk to JP-8 jet fuel for high-risk populations and exposed communities.

FROM> http://www.jp8.org/Witten_JP8.htm

Note the study date 1995

JP-8 Manuscripts
from the laboratory of
Dr. Mark L. Witten, Ph.D.
The University of Arizona
mwitten@peds.arizona.edu
Pretreatment with capsaicin 6 days prior to a JP-8 regimen of one hour/day for 7 days dramatically increases rats’ airway sensitivity to histamine. This also significantly decreases wet lung/wet body weight ratios. Capsaicin pretreatment causes a significant increase in alveolar epithelial permeability, and causes a huge increase in the rats’ airway sensitivity to histamine. The mechanisms of this action are unknown.
Pfaff JK, Parton K, Lantz RC, Chen H, Hays AM, Witten ML: Inhalation exposure to JP-8 jet fuel alters pulmonary function and Substance P levels in Fischer 344 rats. JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 15:249-256.
In a simulated military exposure protocol, Fischer 344 rats (F322) were used to investigate the pulmonary effects of JP-8 jet fuel inhalation.
Changes in pulmonary function were accompanied by a decrease in Substance P concentrations from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF).

Harris DT, Sakiestewa D, Robledo RF, Witten M: Immuno-toxicological effects of JP-8 jet fuel exposure. TOXICOLOGY & INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 1997, 13:43-55.
Chronic exposure to jet fuel has been shown to have adverse effects on human liver function, to cause emotional dysfunction, to cause abnormal electroencephalograms to cause shortened attention spans, and to decrease sensorimotor speed (3-5). Major alterations in immune function that are long-lasting may result in an increased likelihood of development and /or progression of cancer, as well as autoimmune diseases.

Harris DT, Sakiestewa D, Robledo RF, Witten M: Short-term exposure to JP-8 jet fuel results in longterm immunotoxicity. TOXICOLOGY & INDUSTRIAL HEALTH, 1997, 13:559-570.

The air force made a decision to use JP-8 even after its known effects. Exposure to these types of toxicants affects the immune system short-term, low concentration of JP-8 jet fuel exposure had effects on the immune system, which makes the host susceptible to infectious agents. Long lasting alterations to the immune system may result in the development and/or progression of cancer, as well as autoimmune disease.

THIS NEXT ONE IS 44 PAGES FROM> http://usapc.army.mil/miscellaneous/JP8HazardsStudy.doc

BIOLOGICAL AND HEALTH EFFECTS
OF JP-8 EXPOSURE
Glenn D. Ritchie, Ph.D.

Marni Y. V. Bekkedal, Ph.D.

LT Andrew J. Bobb (Ph.D.), MSC, USNR

CAPT Kenneth R. Still (Ph.D.), MSC, USN
This work was performed under JP-8 Jet Fuels Work Units.

Table of Contents Page

1. Introduction 3
2. Chemical and Physical Properties of JP-8 3
3. Chemical Constituents of JP-8 3
4. Self-Reported and Medically Diagnosed Health Effects in
Humans Exposed to JP-8 5
5. JP-8 Exposure Scenarios 6
6. Carcinogenicity or Mortality 7
7. Acute JP-8 Exposure Effects 7
8. Central or Peripheral Nervous System Effects 8
9. Reproductive System and Developmental Effects 10
10. Pulmonary System Effects 11
11. Heart and Circulatory System Effects 12
12. Dermal System Effects 13
13. Gastrointestinal System Effects 14
14. Immune System Effects 14
15. Musculoskeletal System Effects 16
16. Renal System Effects 16
17. Hepatic System Effects 17
18. Endocrine System Effects 18
19. Metabolic Effects 18
20. Genotoxic Effects 18
21. Blood System Effects 19
22. Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL), Acute Myelogenous
Leukemia (AML) 19
23. Human, Animal and In Vitro Consequences of Acute or Long-Term
Exposure to Specific Chemical Constituents of JP-8: 20
A. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) 20
B. Benzene 22
C. Toluene 23
D. Trimethylbenzenes 25
E. Xylenes 26
F. n-Hexane 26
24. Conclusions 27
25. References 28
26. Report Documentation Page (SF 298) 45



[Edited 1 times, lastly by mark sky on 03-02-2003]

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 03-02-2003 07:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
it is always fun to toss a stone into the pond
i like to see where the ripples go
dont you?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
toss...
NANOPORES
(I include this here because those same people who are “gifted” with grants to study the effects on JP8, ALSO do this kind of research, and of course… terrorism defense studies
(more “threads” from the web) (solid gold from 2025)
FROM> http://www.mcb.harvard.edu/branton/projects-TheoryModeling.htm

Theory and Modeling of Polymer Translocation through Proteins and Solid-State Nanopores
Theoretical work using explicit atomistic simulations to investigate how polymer molecules worm through narrow pores is being carried out by Professor Murugappan Muthukumar and his co-workers in collaboration with other members of the Nanopore Group at Harvard

FROM> http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~mpalmer/research.html

Overview: Bacterial pore-forming toxins and how they work

(more ways to insert DNA into you and those you love)

FROM> http://pauling.tamu.edu/medbiogen/bayley/hb_res.html
Bayley Lab Research Summary
New reagents for signal transduction research
The use of "caged" reagents allows the photogeneration of molecules on or in cells with spatial and temporal control. For example, in studies of signal transduction mechanisms, effectors and inhibitors can be released at predetermined sites. We have synthesized a water-soluble reagent, BNPA, for caging peptides and proteins by attaching a photocleavable protecting group to essential cysteine residues that have been introduced by chemical synthesis or site-directed mutagenesis. Upon irradiation, molecules inactivated by BNPA are reactivated (see Fig. 1).
In one application of BNPA, we have made a photoactivatable membrane pore. Bacterial proteins that form pores of various diameters are important tools in cell biology. By using them, small molecules and even proteins can be introduced into or removed from the cell interior. One drawback of native pore-forming proteins is the lack of ability to control when and where they are activated. Therefore, we caged a single-cysteine mutant of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin with BNPA to form an inactive derivative that is activated by light. The caged pore will be applied in our studies of neuronal modulation (the cellular basis of learning and memory) where it will be helpful to permeabilize one cell within a collection of cells (e.g. a neuron in a network) or one compartment of a single cell (e.g. the presynaptic terminus of a neuron).
Pore-forming proteins with triggers and switches
Beyond their utility in cell biology, pore-forming proteins may have applications in biotechnology. The proteins would be all the more useful if their pore-forming activity could be controlled by external stimuli.
One example of such control is the photoactivatable pore. In addition, we have been using genetic engineering to introduce a variety of triggers and switches into alpha-hemolysin

FROM> http://www.cstl.nist.gov/biotech/biomat/Projects/tissue_engineering.html

Objective


Our interest in biomaterials and biomimetics has been motivated by the desire to incorporate biological functionality into man made materials. Our research will focus on the synthesis, characterization, and fabrication of biomaterials; biomimetic membrane surfaces and devices, which will be designed to control, cell behavior and tissue development. A variety of signals can be conveyed to cells from a material, and both chemistry and mechanics of the material regulate signal transduction. Control of both bulk and surface chemistry/structure may be utilized to affect this regulation. These materials may be used as in vitro model systems to study basic biological questions, or as systems to regenerate lost or deficient tissue structure in vivo. One of our particular interests is to develop an in-vitro biomimetic enriched membrane construct to be used as a scaffold and biocompatible adhesive matrix to enhance the adsorption, adhesion, and incorporation of cell/polymer composites (grafts) with the neighboring host tissue.


IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 03-02-2003 08:49 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
note
i know that what is so hillariouse today
even though it will be here at your door tommorrow~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
from a turnip
or even an "onion"
i may be a fool for even trying
so OK "i am a fool"
feel better now?
anyway me and my friends though it was absolutely funny
duck and cover (it is red OCHER blush)
GOD i am glad this is only a test
this can not be real can ex?
i am nuts
you are sane
now can we get on with the game
lettuce dance

have you ever seen the atntics a addict goes through?
iraq as the second largest source of the product
it needs to empower "global change"

IP Logged

WiseQuakker
Senior Member


Mt. Vernon, WA, USA
141 posts, Aug 2000

posted 03-04-2003 02:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for WiseQuakker   Visit WiseQuakker's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
After dwelling on the photos, I realized that wind probably plays the biggest factor in how long fuel is visible after it is vented...... Im guessing it was very calm the day that EA-6B vented fuel.
-PHXPilot

As I recall, we were between weather systems that day in mid-February. There wasn’t a cloud in the sky, but I’m not certain just how calm it actually was at 700 mb (~10K feet). Turbulent aloft or not, I would certainly expect wind résistance, alone, against the mass of jettisoned fuel in freefall to effectively “atomize” it in relatively short order. Even a tub full of water, dumped from the top floor of the Sears Tower, ought to separate into particles tiny enough to catch people on the ground unaware of where any mist might have come from. I must say, though, your “holy crap” reaction to the photos is much the same as mine was, as I watched the whole thing live. I’m surprised that the Prowler had any fuel left by the time the pilot was through purging.

quote:
But, getting back to whats important (the conspiracies), are you saying that they are intentionally venting fuel over the city to cause disease and/or sickness?
-PHXPilot

Don’t be a prick, PP. You’re just trying to be cute with your sarcasm, right?

This much is certain. Below a certain altitude, and in the absence of a dire emergency, the dumping of large amounts of fuel over populated areas is, at best, just plain irresponsible. Excusing the practice, merely by stating that the mixture “atomizes,” is only a half-truth. Under the right atmospheric conditions, there is evidence that a significant amount of it still reaches the ground. Even a crusty old Navy Vet neighbor of mine complains about his having to continually get up on the roof and clean up the residue that is left behind on the skylights. He knows that what the pilots are doing is wrong.

There used to be a web page titled, “Military Fuel Jettison Restrictions” (http://www.afrc.af.mil/afrcepl/PUBS/Multi/AMC/11/11021005/11021005.pdf). If I remember correctly, the document did agree with my neighbor. Too bad I only bookmarked it and didn’t save it to disk. It doesn’t “Google” up anywhere anymore since I filed a report with the FAA, last October, and cited the web page. Yet another coincidence, I take it. I had called and described what appeared to be another intense horizon-to-horizon fuel dump over south Mount Vernon and was told to not worry about it, as the fuel “atomizes.”

Okay. Whatever...

IP Logged

theseeker
One moon circles

Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000

posted 03-04-2003 03:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for theseeker   Visit theseeker's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I remember asking the question of participants, with any number of 4000 plus flights zipping around at any time o' the day just how many of them were dumping fuel...and what ratio over populated areas...

I still remember this...

fuel dumping is restricted to unpopulated areas

reserved to my own judgement I chose to ignore it until it happens here....

to save human life is a resonable explanation...

still doesn't add up to no covert plan...just a serious bitch...

sup don

IP Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:  1 2 

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Money Forum | The Web Hosting Forum | Papa Guru
Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c