|
Author
|
|
Topic: no 'debunkers'? | Topic page views:
|
|
graeme
Senior Member
Sebastopol, CA, USA
171 posts, May 2003
|
posted 05-26-2003 12:54 AM
  
I'm sort of new here and am curious why debunkers aren't allowed in this forum? From what I've been reading through on this site, it seems as though there's a lot of very intelligent people here- believers and debunkers. What happened that they had to be separated? 
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 05-26-2003 10:39 AM
Hi graeme--some chem activists were not happy with debunkers posting in the main forum here, so Thermit thought it best to restrict the Chemtrail Forum...it is his ship and his call...and I must say that now babysitting here is a breeze! The debunkers are welcome to post in the other forums, including the Rumpus Room, which Thermit has so graciously provided, to even those previously banned.
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 05-26-2003 12:28 PM
Don't fret, Lulu... I'm sure someone with dubious motivations will find a way to sneak past the barbed wire and trip mines... 
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Chem11 on 05-26-2003]
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 05-26-2003 12:40 PM
The joy of this new set up Chem11, if that does in fact happen, with a flick of the switch, they will be disallowed posting priveledges in the Chemtrail Forum.
|
Jeanie
Senior Member
North East U.S.A.
551 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 05-26-2003 01:17 PM
The joy of this new set up Chem11, if that does in fact happen, with a flick of the switch, they will be disallowed posting priveledges in the Chemtrail Forum. Lulu, maybe you should start with yourself, being you are so good at finding missing posts, maybe you could uncover the post of a debunker you dragged over from somewhere else after the restriction was put into effect...
|
graeme
Senior Member
Sebastopol, CA, USA
171 posts, May 2003
|
posted 05-26-2003 04:53 PM
Last night I read through some old posts and a bit of the Rumpus Room, and I can't believe some of the dialogue that goes on here- and some of it's pretty vicious. Now it's clear why there needed to be some space. It's amazing to me how much this issue divides some people. Other than religion and politics, both broad subjects, I don't think I've come across anything like the difference in views on this subject and the extent that people hold those views. I think this site needs a PBS Documentary done on it.
By the way- anyone here live in NorCal and think that what is going on in the sky today looks like 'normal' contrails?
|
Jeanie
Senior Member
North East U.S.A.
551 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 05-26-2003 06:16 PM
Graeme I agree with you about the division, it's the nastiness that gets me. There are a few that are all on the same low level. Many of the quality people have disappeared yet there are still some good people left. I'd like to know in the future if come to a conclusion, fact or fiction...The owned media would never air this controversy...
|
graeme
Senior Member
Sebastopol, CA, USA
171 posts, May 2003
|
posted 05-26-2003 06:40 PM
Right now, the only conclusion I can come to is that there are some, not all, aircraft I've seen that the flight paths they are on only make sense if the location and placement of their trail was their intent. I know I keep saying that, but that is the best and most precise way I can comment on it. I don't want to make any blanket-statements and assume anything I don't know. It's the only way I can try to be onjective about something that has a million and one rumors surrounding it. Plus I'm trying to set you up to make you look silly- I'm joking...
|
Jeanie
Senior Member
North East U.S.A.
551 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 05-26-2003 07:03 PM
Science is not my specialty, but it seems to me, that the only way to settle the issue is to form a chemtrail investigating organization. Donations from members could fund some positively neutral, honest and true scientists to do sample testing. Otherwise we could go around in circles till doomsday and not settle the issue. Chemtrail believers and debunkers, what are your thoughts?
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 05-26-2003 07:18 PM
>>Last night I read through some old posts and a bit of the Rumpus Room, and I can't believe some of the dialogue that goes on here- and some of it's pretty vicious.<<Sometimes it gets out of hand the dialogue in the main forums, but this most always gets edited out (specifically *f* word) graeme. Don't forget it says upon entering the Rumpus Room "enter at own risk". I think it very open-minded of Thermit to have this uncensored area of Chemtrail Central. Where else can one express ones self with as much vulgarity as one feels the need to vent, without fear of the expressions being deleted? How many other related sites can boast such a Room? So yes, it is true that things sometimes get vicious here, given the nature of the conspiracy-based enigma, can any less be expected...at times? "Enter at own risk" is fair warning....
|
graeme
Senior Member
Sebastopol, CA, USA
171 posts, May 2003
|
posted 05-27-2003 12:35 AM
Lulu- I wasn't meaning to sound offended. I was just surprised of the emotional levels some here have taken this to. I'm glad there's a section here that people can let it all out. I gotta say I'm pretty impressed with this site as a whole.
Jeanie- I think it's a great idea, but I wouldn't have the foggiest idea on how to get something like that going, nor do I have a spare dime I could donate- as much as I would like to get some hopefully independent scientific answers. But don't let my negativity sway you.
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
