|
Author
|
|
Topic: Trail-Orb- Ring | Topic page views:
|
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x
736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 07-08-2003 10:51 PM
  
Many people have photographed orbs in the vicinity of trails.I had many shots on this roll of film. Only this one showed the apparent anomaly. A lab processing artifact? ...perhaps. Are others aware of such an effect?  
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit
Flagstaff, AZ
700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 07-08-2003 11:31 PM
I have one photograph taken over Boston, MA that shows an almost identical configuration to what is shown in the lower right-hand-corner of your image here. I.e. it is what I would describe as the remnant of a trail that has dissipated in a very symmetrical way. I will try to locate this photo - it is in the Image Database.Re: the sphere/orb in your image here: I see it - and although it could possibly be an artifact I would have to say that in this case I don't think it is. Perhaps one of our talented image editors could enlarge that one area and post it here. Do you remember the approximate date and time of day you took this photo?
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x
736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 07-08-2003 11:53 PM
Bad record keeping on my part.I do not have an accurate date for this particular photo. Timing was near mid-day. The data in the image database is my best estimate.
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit
Flagstaff, AZ
700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 07-09-2003 12:27 AM
.....Timing was near mid-day.....
Actually, that's the more important parameter in my opinion. At midday one would expect a spherical object to be pretty uniformly illuminated by the sun with very little "shading" on it.
I say the weight goes in the direction of sphere here.
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 07-09-2003 05:20 AM
This is extremely puzzling. The object is definatley no artifcat; it's three-dimensional. 250% enlargement and emboss filter:  http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/cgi-bin/db-search.cgi?template=img-detail&dbname=img&key2=1948&action=searchdbdisplay What's puzzling is that the sphere is reflecting the same amount of light as the aerosol ring itself. The solarize filter gives you a good idea if an object is constructed of the same material as it's neighbor, and this is a perfect match: 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/cgi-bin/db-search.cgi?template=img-detail&dbname=img&key2=1949&action=searchdbdisplay I don't think this is a solid, metallic object in this case. It seems more improbable to me that this is an 'aerosol sphere'(I've never heard of such a thing) but that's exactly what this appears to be...
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Chem11 on 07-09-2003]
|
IZAKOVIC
Senior Member
Rijeka, Croatia (Europe)
128 posts, Jan 2001
|
posted 07-09-2003 12:35 PM
This is not mid-day. The Sun would be overhead and the shadow would be on the bottom of the sphere and chemtrail remnants.It is perfectly normal that light-shadow pattern is the same with "orb" and chemtrail remnant.
The orb is a vehicle whose strong electromagnetic field has attracted and concentrated surrounding chemtrail compounds on it's surface. This is regular thing with flying triangles (TR-3B) when they get stationary in within saturated space. That orb is an extra dimensional vehicle whose modulated electromagnetic shield isolates it's gravitational environment (and it's inertial system) from our Universe. This is why UFOs can jump to high speeds.
Round orbs are UFOs, and triangles are U.S. TR-3Bs. There are lots of them on DS4, in the Joanne's Bossier section. IZAKOVIC http://www.deepspace4.com
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x
736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 07-09-2003 08:28 PM
Chem11, Thanks for the very enlightening graphic analysis. It's amazing what comes up with enlargement and selective filtering.IZAKOVIC, I had this roll of film in my camera for a long time,and took shots on several days, plus it was awhile before I had it developed. I didn't notice this object until I got the prints back from the lab. Unfortunately, I just plain don't have a good record of time and/or date. Just guessing. Had I know that I would serendipitously capture a UFO / ET, I would have been more careful. I was shooting with a 300 mm lens and never saw the orb by eye, or through the viewfinder of my 35 mm SLR. At the time I was clearly focusing on a significant trail being laid down. I think I'll spend some time going through image databases looking for "orbs" and add them to this thread for comparison. Thanks again to both of you !
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Sore Throat on 07-09-2003]
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x
736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 07-09-2003 08:46 PM
Orb Gallery:
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/358-img.jpg 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/73-img.jpg 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/1517-img.jpg 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/1091-img.jpg 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/1313-img.jpg 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/imgdb/img/705-img.jpg 
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/images/0202/bossier130202.jpg 
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 07-09-2003 09:31 PM
No problem, ST. Guess I'm gonna have to think about going a bit larger than 300mm to stand a chance of getting a real clear shot of these villains... quote:
It is perfectly normal that light-shadow pattern is the same with "orb" and chemtrail remnant. The orb is a vehicle whose strong electromagnetic field has attracted and concentrated surrounding chemtrail compounds on it's surface
I have a great deal of respect for your work, IZAKOVIC... but I am not quite convinced that this statement is supported by the facts (and having analyzed dozens of these photographs I think I can illustrate quite clearly and quickly that the light reflelcted from these silver spheres is quite different from the reflective properties of the trails themselves). Fortunately, Joanne's picture provides us with the opportunity to view three phenomena. A silver sphere/foo fighter (apparently metallic and solid), what appears to be another 'aerosol orb' type formation (non-metallic and non-solid) and a garden variety aircraft (definately metallic and solid). If I am correct, then the Silver Sphere's reflectivity will match the aircraft's. The aerosol blob/orb thing will match neither. 
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/cgi-bin/db-search.cgi?tem plate=img-detail&dbname=img&key2=1952&action=searchdbdisplay No surprises here. I can only conclude that these two 'spheres' are very different phenomena (though perhaps related to each other in some manner). Having time to mull this over a little bit, I'm not quite as surprised to see these suspended particles forming into spherical or circular patterns. The union of matter and energy often results in spherical formations in the natural world (the planet were stumbling about on would be but one example)...
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Chem11 on 07-09-2003]
|
IZAKOVIC
Senior Member
Rijeka, Croatia (Europe)
128 posts, Jan 2001
|
posted 07-10-2003 02:28 PM
Here is a close-up of U.S. flying triangle TR-3B that is slowly drifting thru sky saturated with chemtrail compounds at noon. Its cloaking device, which is electrooptical, is rendered useless by accumulation of dust on its surface due to electrostatic charge. As it has just started to move, chemtrail powder is starting to fall off creating a tail at the back.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0501/bossier240501.htm This two are vehicles of different kind. They either have no electrostatic charge on their surface, or their speed rate is such that does not allow accumulation of dust. I think that this second is the case. No cloaking device here that would attempt to blend them with the background, Identical light/shadow patterns show that this are real objects.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0201/bossier250201.htm Maybe it was just enough to obfuscate vehicle surface details.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/1200/bossier0812002.htm Like this one on the left whose surface has no active camouflage. Shadow is enough to betray its position.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0701/bossier1007011.htm
Another dirty TR-3B, this one stationary. Yellow sphere, whose illumination/ shadow pattern is consistent with that of the tree below it is probably mowing around.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0701/bossier100701.htm
and this one is mostly stationary
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0302/bossier2203021.htm If such a ball was illuminated from inside, this would significate that a vehicle has insulated itself inside it from surrounding time-space because it has just entered it, or it is just about to leave it,
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0102/bossier270102.htm or that its speed rate is highly variable.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0401/bossier170401.htm Or that cloaking device on TR-3B has gone in overdrive, with all pixels on. Same thing like when you are surpassing another car and fresh engine computer circuit board of your new Mercedes quits on you.
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/0202/bossier130202.htm
And so on.
All this images were taken by, and are available at Joanne Meehan's section of DS4 that starts here:
http://www.deepspace4.com/pages/chemtrails/bossier/bossier2000.htm Best regards. IZAKOVIC http://www.deepspace4.com
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit
Flagstaff, AZ
700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 07-11-2003 02:01 AM
Chem11 and IZAKOVIC -GREAT input here - thanks so much! I'm wondering what might emerge from similar image-editing on some of the more bizarre trails configurations in the Image Database. Re: anomalous craft - I personally think a great many of these are either military surveillance or pollution monitoring vehicles. Some of them may be military R&D test vehicles. And it wouldn't surprise me at all if at least some of them were from extra-planetary sources but I really don't know.
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x
736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 07-15-2003 01:34 PM
Chem11,Correction on the lens. It was a zoom that maxed out at 210 mm, not 300 mm. I've sent these images to Rense.
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 07-15-2003 06:58 PM
Thanks for the clarification, not that 90mm is that big a deal (just tell me you're not shooting Canon).  Deborah is... quote:
wondering what might emerge from similar image-editing on some of the more bizarre trails configurations in the Image Database.
I can tell you what caught my eye after running Sorethroat's original image thorugh the solarizing filter. These trails are extremely reflective when it comes to the visible spectrum of light; signifigantly more than the aircraft itself, which caught me by surprise.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Chem11 on 07-15-2003]
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x
736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 07-15-2003 10:32 PM
Nikon N6006AF Nikkor 70-210 mm, f/4-5.6 D
|
suckingeggs
Senior Member
344 posts, Mar 2003
|
posted 07-16-2003 02:46 AM
Having spotted six orbs since discovering chemtrails this year. I managed to video one last night. Unfortunately my tiny webcam could not get close enough. However, I saw two yesterday one in the morning which was moving faster that the others I have seen previously, and the one I videoed last night at 9.10 pm was as bright as the one I have seen during the day, even though the chem clouds had already turned pinky grey. This leads me to think that the silver glow is part of the mechanism, not related to the strength of sunlight? It disappeared twice before it went out of view. Travelling along a very disticnct chemtrail. As a side note HAARP or similar was active all day over my area, it was as if every chemtrail hit a wall at one stage and stopped the continuation of the cloud, only small break away trails entered this wall, and then were turned into waves.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by suckingeggs on 07-16-2003]
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
