Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Chemtrails
  WTC 'DUSTED' by ?

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   WTC 'DUSTED' by ?

Topic page views:

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-12-2003 11:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
apparently, i am not authorized to post in the science section of this site

"Sorry, but you are not authorized to post a new topic in this particular forum. Only moderators, administrators, and authorized users may post new topics in this forum."
was the maessage i got when i tried to post to that forum...


I tried to post in the "proper" slot
but was unababled
so i post this here...so don't go moveing it
OKanagan
you will find these fine particles interesting where ever they might be catagorized however

Sorry, Lulu and those who want proper functioning, but i am blocked from posting in the science forum

HERE IT IS >
Aerisole Nanoparticulate Metals from the WTC weapon

From> http://www-chem.ucdavis.edu/groups/kelly/kellyweb_wtc.htm

Physical and Chemical Analysis of Airborne Ultrafine Particulate Matter and Nanoparticles from the
World Trade Center Disaster Site
UC-Davis Delta Group
Prof. Thomas A. Cahill, Dept. of Applied Science, UC-Davis
Prof. Peter B. Kelly, Dept. of Chemistry, UC-Davis Prof. James Shakelford, Chem. Eng. and Materials Sci., UC-Davis Dr. Steven S. Cliff, Dept. of Applied Science, UC-Davis Prof. Jodye Selco, Dept. of Chemistry, University of Redlands
Michael Jiminez-Cruz, Sarah Riddle
News Reports:
“Unprecedented levels of pollutants were kicked up over New York City following the Sept. 11 attacks.” “No one has ever reported a situation like the one we see in the World Trade Center samples,’ said Thomas Cahill, a researcher at the University of California at Davis. University researchers took samples of dozens of substances at a site about a mile from ground zero between Oct. 2 and Dec. 25 in what they said was the most thorough analysis of dust and smoke in the wake of the attack.”
- Associated Press 2/12/2002
“The results of a UCD analysis of air samples taken at Ground Zero were released on Monday. The news is not good for those still working amid the rubble. The report found an extremely high concentration of ultra-fine particles in the air. These are particularly dangerous, because they can easily penetrate human lungs and enter the bloodstream.”
- KXTV (ABC) 2/12/2002
Sample site:
The particulate matter collection site (201 Varick Street) is one mile north-northeast of the disaster site. Regional meteorology shows that this site received material from the World Trade Center site about half the time.
Analysis:
The DELTA group at UC Davis analyzed the World Trade Center samples with all their methods yielding a very complete size segregated and time resolved particle characterization. See the DELTA homepage; http://delta.ucdavis.edu
Below are the Mass spec analysis of the WTC samples. These particular analysis were done by the Kelly group January/February 2002. (We apologize for the poor image quality of the spectra on the web.)


Laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectroscopy provides a chemical fingerprint for the species present in the aerosol. The negative ion spectra shows the analysis for the early hours of October 3, 2001 on the 0.24-0.1 micrometer size fraction aerosol. The sulfur observed by the s-XRF is shown to be in the form of sulfate. The carbon is observed to be present in graphitic/aromatic form.
Positive ion mass spectra will provide detailed information on the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in the aerosol due to combustion of building materials and diesel/vehicular exhaust. The mass spectra from October 4, 2001 on the 340 nm - 240 nm aerosol size fraction shows a variety of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as well as sodium and potassium ions.


FROM> http://www.disasternews.net/news/news.php?articleid=1781
'WTC cough' plagues workers

TRAVIS DUNN

NEW YORK (March 14, 2003) —
More than a year after the collapse of the World Trade Center, nearly 9,000 rescue workers and volunteers continue to experience severe health problems -- most notably what has come to be called the "World Trade Center cough."

"The situation was unlike anything we had ever seen," she said. "It's pretty shocking actually. It's a year after the disaster, and we're still seeing people with respiratory problems."
A study conducted of a sample group of 250 of these workers showed that about half "experienced persistent WTC-related pulmonary, ENT and/or mental health symptoms 10 months to one year following the New York terrorist attacks," according to press release posted on www.WTCexams.org.

Some of Ground Zero workers were "so damaged by it that they can't work now,"

FROM> http://delta.ucdavis.edu/collaborators.htm
DELTA Collaborators
FOR THE PRIMARY MISSION:
Major Collaborators (US):
Professor Tad Anderson, Atmospheric Sciences, Univ. of Washington, Seattle WA
Professor Catherine F. Cahill, Chemistry, University of Alaska, Fairbanks AK

FROM> http://delta.ucdavis.edu/projects.htm
DELTA Projects
International
The United Nations’ Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) in seven countries: Dr. John Miller, UN, Geneva
Bilateral agreements through University of California Pacific Rim (five Asian, two Latin American countries)
ACE Asia (Western Pacific) 2001-2003.
National
World Trade Center (New York)
BRAVO (Texas)
FrostFire (Alaska)
Air Resource Specialist (Colorado)
Desert Research Institute (University of Reno)
Regional
Lake Tahoe
California Air Resources Board - Fresno
Space & Naval Warfare Systems Center - China Lake

FROM> http://delta.ucdavis.edu http://delta.ucdavis.edu/http://delta.ucdavis.edu/
The DELTA Group
(Detection and Evaluation of Long-Range Transport of Aerosols)
Prof. Thomas Cahill, Dr. Steven Cliff, Michael Jimenez-Cruz, Jeanette Martin, Lee Portnoff, Prof. Kevin Perry, Victor Ray, Prof. James Shackelford, Tony VanCuren

The DELTA Group is a University of California at Davis based association of scientists from west coast institutions that collaborate in aerosol and climate studies. The group develops and utilizes advanced sampling and analytical techniques for climate studies, and cooperates in diverse research areas that use compatible cutting edge technologies and protocols.

Contact Information
Telephone
530-752-1120
FAX
530-752-9804
Postal address
The DELTA Group (DAS)
105A Walker Hall
University of California
Davis, CA 95616
Email
Webmaster: LPortnoff@ucdavis.edu

EDITORS NOTE > UC DAVIS wants to be a biolevel 4 lab



[Edited 1 times, lastly by mark sky on 09-12-2003]

IP Logged

Mech
Commitees of Correspondence


The Minuteman State
6025 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-12-2003 11:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Mech   Visit Mech's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yeah Mark those Bio labs are supposed to be popping up everywhere across the US...not just at UCDavis.

I can imagine what they want to produce at those labs.

Here's another WTC article.

from THIS latest cover-up.

Study Finds WTC Fires Spewed Toxic Gases for Weeks
1 hour, 43 minutes ago
Sept. 9, 2003

By Ellen Wulfhorst

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The burning ruins of the World Trade Center spewed toxic gases "like a chemical factory" for at least six weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks despite government assurances the air was safe, according to a study released on Wednesday.

The gases of toxic metals, acids and organics could penetrate deeply into the lungs of workers at Ground Zero, said the study by scientists at the University of California at Davis and released at a meeting of the American Chemical Society in New York.

Lead study author Thomas Cahill, a professor of physics and engineering, said conditions would have been "brutal" for workers at Ground Zero without respirators and slightly less so for those working or living in adjacent buildings.

"The debris pile acted like a chemical factory," Cahill said. "It cooked together the components and the buildings and their contents, including enormous numbers of computers, and gave off gases of toxic metals, acids and organics for at least six weeks."

The report comes amid questions about air quality at Ground Zero and what the public was told by the government.

Last month, an internal report by Environmental Protection Agency Inspector General Nikki Tinsley said the White House pressured the agency to make premature statements that the air was safe to breathe.

The EPA issued an air quality statement on Sept. 18, 2001, even though it "did not have sufficient data and analyzes to make the statement," the report said.

The White House "convinced the EPA to add reassuring statements and delete cautionary ones," Tinsley said. Among the information withheld was the potential health hazards of breathing asbestos, lead, concrete and pulverized glass, the report said.

New York leaders including Sen. Hillary Clinton have called on the Justice Department to investigate.

EPA acting administrator Marianne Horinko has defended the agency, saying it used the best information it had available.

According to the newly released UC-Davis study, after the towers collapsed, tons of concrete, glass, furniture, carpets, insulation, computers and papers burned until Dec. 19, 2001.

Some elements of the debris combined with organic matter and chlorine from papers and plastics and escaped to the surface as metal-rich gases that either burned or chemically decomposed into very fine particles that could easily penetrate deep into human lungs, it said.

Specifically, the study said samples from Ground Zero found four types of particles listed by the EPA as likely to harm human health -- fine metals that can damage lungs, sulfuric acid that attacks lung cells, fine undissolvable particles of glass that can travel through the lungs to the bloodstream and heart and high-temperature carcinogenic organic matter.

Measurements made at Ground Zero in May 2002, months after the fires were out, showed levels of nearly all the fine components had declined more than 90 percent, the study said.


[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 09-12-2003]

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-13-2003 12:14 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
FROM> http://www.ecoisp.com/perspectives29.asp
Ground Zero Air Pollution Unprecedented
By Dr. Thomas Cahill

{Dr. Thomas Cahill, a University of California-Davis professor emeritus of physics and atmospheric sciences and a research professor in applied science, heads the UC Davis DELTA Group for Detection and Evaluation of Long-range Transport of Aerosols, a collaborative association of aerosol scientists at several universities and national laboratories. He presented these remarks February 23, 2002 at the Investigative Hearing of the National Ombudsman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency at New York City.}
It became clear to our research group by about September 15 that the situation at the site of the World Trade Center collapse was unprecedented. Media reports and satellite observations showed that the heavy rains of September 14 and the hard work of the New York Fire Department had not prevented continuing massive emissions of a particularly bitter and acrid smoke.


Dr. Thomas Cahill (Photos courtesy University of California-Davis)

Thus, when on September 28, 2001, Dr. Robert Leifer, of the Department of Energy's Environmental Measuring Laboratory in New York, called to ask if I could send one of our DELTA Group air samplers to his laboratory for analysis of the smoke, I naturally agreed. It was my understanding at the time that this was in support of local EPA efforts.
I had worked with Bob for 15 years on aerosol studies and knew him to be expert in our continuously sampling rotating drum technology. Within five hours, we prepared a DRUM sampler, just back from NSF studies in Asia, and had it air expressed to Dr. Leifer.
After Dr. Leifer sent the air samples back to us at UC Davis, our DELTA Group team and its resources - all volunteered - began analysis of the particles by size, time and composition. We used seven separate DELTA Group techniques at Davis and DOE's Lawrence Livermore and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories. We were pleased to find that we had a very high percentage of valid samples - more than 95 percent.
Our studies are continuing, and we have released

our early findings on particle mass from the samples collected October 2 through October 31 to the Department of Energy Environmental Measurements Laboratory on February 11. Additional data will be made available as soon as we complete our standard quality assurance protocols.


Thomas Cahill explains to reporters what is in the Lower Manhattan air near Ground Zero.

Our sampling site, at 201 Varick St., was roughly a mile north northeast of the collapse site. Regional meteorology from NOAA's HYSPLIT trajectory model identified periods when smoke and dust could have been blown to the site. On a few occasions, the smoke plume blew directly to the sampling site.

This finding of high levels of very small particles led us to release our data on February 11, in hopes that the information could help focus and direct cleaning and re-entry activities in New York City near the collapse site.

The presence of coarse particles immediately after days of rain indicated that they were being continually re-generated from a dry, hot source, not re-suspended from roadways and other surfaces.
The very fine particles were high in a number of species generally associated with combustion of fuel oil - such as sulfur, vanadium, and nickel, and incineration of plastics and other organic matter.
There was also an unusual, very fine, silicon-containing aerosol. This latter type of aerosol can be produced only by very high temperatures, including vaporization of soil and glass.

We had seen this previously, but at much lower concentrations, in the plumes of coal-fired power plants in the EPA BRAVO study in Texas, the burning oil fields of Kuwait, and Beijing during the winter coal heating season.
In the case of metals, we saw many different species in the very fine particles. Most, including lead and mercury, were at low concentrations at our site, but some, such as vanadium, were the highest that we have seen recorded

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-13-2003 12:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?srch=105&FORM=AS5&q=http%22%2f%2fdelta.ucdavis.edu

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-13-2003 12:36 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
FROM > http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003/Leuren-Moret-Gen-Groves21feb03.htm

Letter from Leuren Moret to Congressman McDermott
with
Declassified memo to Gen. L.R. Groves 1943 – a blueprint for DU
21feb03
"If you can't clean it up, don't use it." Doug Rokke
The Invisible War: Depleted Uranium and the Politics of Radiation 2000

February 21, 2003

The Honorable Jim McDermott, Congressman
Washington State 7th Congressional District
1809 7th Avenue
Suite 1212
Seattle, WA 98101-1399
(206) 553-7170
(206) 553-7175 FAX

RE: Declassified 1943 memo to General L.R. Groves – a blueprint for depleted uranium

Dear Congressman McDermott,

Mr. Joe Pemberton, a lawyer in Bellingham, Washington, has asked me to provide you with scientific information on the critical and overlooked issues of particle size, penetration of gas masks, and mobility of depleted uranium formed under battleground conditions. It is also powerful scientific information to counter false statements recently made by the White House1 and the DOD2.

I am writing this letter out of concern for the military personnel who may now be serving on or near the Gulf War battlefields in Iraq and may be quartered in areas already contaminated by depleted uranium munitions. But they are not my only concern. The Gulf War Veterans who are now suffering severe health consequences have also been exposed to depleted uranium, chemicals and biological materials including vaccines while serving in Iraq and Kuwait.

The children and people of Iraq have been the greatest victims from exposure to depleted uranium15 used in the Gulf War and will continue to be. Over time, they cannot escape the chronic, low level exposure to internal radiation from depleted uranium and its decay products (see Attach. 7) as it cycles and recycles through their environment3 in water, air and food products.

Depleted uranium dust will continue to be an extreme hazard to soldiers, civilians, populations in countries downwind6,8, and the environment as a radiological contaminant to all living systems for ten half-lives or 45 BILLION years.

I am a former Lawrence Berkeley Lab and Lawrence Livermore Lab scientist, and now work with a group of independent scientists called the Radiation and Public Health Project4. Together this group has written ten books on the health effects of low level radiation. Presently I am writing a science report on depleted uranium for the United Nations Human Rights Subcommission, now investigating the illegality and use of depleted uranium munitions. I have written the Foreword (Attach.1) to Discounted Casualties: The Human Cost of Depleted Uranium by Akira Tashiro5.

Attached (Attach. 2) is a declassified memo to General L. R. Groves, director of the Manhattan Project, dated October 30, 1943. Major Doug Rokke provided me with this memo. It summarizes a report written by Manhattan Project physicists Drs. James B. Conant, A. H. Compton and H.C. Urey on the dissemination of very fine radioactive material as a method of warfare. It is a “blueprint” for depleted uranium as it has been used in Iraq, Kuwait, Kosovo, Bosnia and Afghanistan during the past decade. The memo details the use of very fine and superfine particles of radioactive materials as a military weapon. Depleted uranium, produces very fine and superfine particles in large amounts as it burns. The 1943 memo outlines what was known in 1943 and below are my comments:

- A gas warfare instrument: the memo indirectly referred to fission products from Fermi’s nuclear pile or radioactive waste like depleted uranium. The pyrophoric effect of depleted uranium, which spontaneously burns when heated to 170 C (once it is fired) and on impact, effectively forms very large numbers of extremely fine (0.1 micron) and submicroscopic particles as small as 0.001 micron or 10 Ångstroms (see Attach. 3 - Chart “Characteristics of Particles and Particle Dispersoids”) as described in the memo. Particles in this size range behave like a gas when inhaled, disperse in the lungs to the blood lung barrier where the white blood cells (greater than 7microns in diameter) engulf the tiny particles of depleted uranium and carry them throughout the body. Once these particles have been engulfed by blood cells or lodged in tissues, they may not be detectable in the urine. Contaminated personnel will take the depleted uranium home, deposited in tissues throughout their bodies.

There is no known treatment for exposure.

- It will permeate a gas mask filter: particles in the 0.1 micron range will penetrate even a HEPA filter (High Efficiency Particulate Airfilter – see Attach. 4 - HEPA chart) in large numbers. The filters in gas masks issued to military personnel are much less efficient than HEPA filters. There are 1 billion particles of 0.1 micron diameter in a cubic meter of normal air. It is clear that a man (without a gas mask) breathing at a normal rate (about 28 cubic meters per day6) and retaining 75% of the very fine particulate matter in the respiratory system6 will inhale very large numbers of very fine particles in a short time period.

In a day an average man would normally inhale 28 million particles in the 0.1 micron range through a gas mask with HEPA filters. It would take one billion fine particles to fill the period at the end of this sentence. On the battlefield during live fire, the high concentrations of fine and very fine depleted uranium particles could increase the numbers inhaled in the small particle range by magnitudes.

The gas masks issued to military personnel now deployed to the Gulf Region are defective and do not provide even a minimum of protection to personnel. Recently I went on a speaking tour in 3 northeastern states with Major Doug Rokke, January 25-February 1, 2003. In nearly every talk we gave, a National Guardsman or other military person would tell us that their masks fell off when they tilted their heads.

Air filters in gas masks also fail as they are wetted by moisture from breathing or are used in the rain.

There is no possible protection from exposure to very fine particles of depleted uranium through filtering of air.

- As a terrain contaminant: the dispersal of very fine particles of depleted uranium will contaminate the terrain and deny access to either side except at the risk of exposure. That includes civilians and animals who may live there after the battle. The half-life of depleted uranium – 4.5 billion years – leaves the contaminated terrain radioactive forever.

Small particles less than 1 micron in diameter do not settle from the air (see Attach. 3 – Chart “Characteristics of Particles and Particle Dispersoids”) but become incorporated into atmospheric dust (see Attach. 5 - Chart “Natural Aerosols”) and are transported around the earth until they are removed (“rainout”) by rain, pollution or snow3. Seasonal climate change, agricultural activities, fires and other natural and man-made disturbances will continue to remobilize particles in the upper dust level contaminating terrains off the battlefield.

Weathering of larger particles of depleted uranium deposited on the battlefield7 will contribute to concentrations of depleted uranium fine and superfine particles in the air and upper dust level.

Air monitors in Hungary8 and Greece during bombing in Kosovo and Bosnia measured Uranium 238 carried by the wind from the battlefields. Seasonal fluctuations of depleted uranium particles in the air have been reported in Kuwait6.

- Water and food contamination: the depleted uranium dust will cycle through the environment both on and off the battlefield contaminating water supplies and food. Food grown in contaminated areas will be transported to markets and contaminate populations and areas far from the battlefields. Wind, water, birds9 and animals who transport the depleted uranium in their droppings, slowly contaminate wider and wider areas.

- Internal contamination: inhalation of very fine depleted uranium dust particles is extremely damaging to the respiratory tract and will get into the blood stream where it is carried by blood cells and contaminates tissues throughout the body. These “hot particles”10 will continue to emit alpha and gamma radiation (see Attach. 6 - photo “Hot particle in lung tissue”) as they travel throughout the body or where they rest in tissue. After the Uranium 238 nucleus decays, the radioactive daughter product which forms (see Attach. 7) will continue to decay to other isotopes as many as four times. This will increase the level of radioactive exposure by magnitudes. Depleted uranium particles lodged in tissue will decay and continue emitting higher levels of radioactivity from daughter isotopes into the surrounding tissues.

SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS: The health effects from exposure to a combination of radiation, chemicals, and biological agents was not addressed in this WW II memo. This is a critical issue on the battlefield and should be considered in studies of Gulf War Illness. The combination of radiation with heavy metals, chemicals and biological toxins accelerate and increase the adverse health effects of exposure. The effects are unknown since very little research exists in this field11.

THIS IS AN ISSUE WHICH SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN FUTURE CONFLICTS SUCH AS THE PLANNED BOMBING OF IRAQ.

MEASUREMENTS OF DU IN TISSUES FROM 71 DEAD RESIDENTS OF BASRA:
Dr. Hari Sharma, a radiochemist living in Canada and member of the Radiation and Public Health Project, has measured depleted uranium levels in the tissues of 71 residents of Basra who died after the Gulf War from cancers12. They were in the age range of 35-50 years. He found high concentrations of depleted uranium in tissue samples from these individuals. The levels were about the same throughout the tissues, suggesting that very fine particles were transported in the blood and deposited or lodged throughout the body.

WORLD TRADE CENTER AIR STUDIES:
Dr. Thomas Cahill, Emeritus Professor of Physics and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of California at Davis, conducted an independent study of the air around Ground Zero at the World Trade Center after the 9/11 disaster13. Using very sophisticated monitoring instruments14 which detect very fine and ultra fine particles, Cahill and his group monitored the smoldering pile at the WTC for 5 months following the disaster from one mile north of the center. They measured concentrations of particles in six size ranges from 2.5 microns to 0.09 microns13. They reported the highest concentrations of very fine particles of metals ever reported in the US13, and unprecedented numbers of very fine and super fine particles13. This air monitoring study of the WTC provided new information about very fine and superfine particles which have rarely been studied. Burning metals and other materials at high temperatures generate very large amounts of very small particles. For this reason depleted uranium which has burned is particularly hazardous.

The EPA has verified that depleted uranium was in the plane that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 18,19 and that the crash site was contaminated. Residents of New York City detected radiation on hand held geiger counters at the WTC site. The EPA not only failed to protect emergency response personnel at both sites, but did not report or measure13 concentrations of very fine particles at any of the 9/11 plane crash locations. These are the most hazardous to health, and many personnel who worked at the crash sites are now very ill.

Dr. Cahill also studied the Kuwaiti oil field fires following the Gulf War.

ECRR: RELEASED JANUARY 30, 2003
A new report from the European Parliament has been released “2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk: Health Effects of Ionising Radiation Exposure at Low Doses for Radiation Protection Purposes” Regulators’ Edition: Brussels, 2003 10. The report was written by 46 international scientists and has over 550 references to epidemiological studies which include nuclear site leukemias, Chernobyl infants, minisatellite mutations, weapons fallout cancers, DU Gulf Veterans, and Iraqi children.

The report concludes that the International Committee on Radiation Protection (ICRP) determined international standards for risk and dose effects from studies on A-bomb survivors which were based on high dose, external, acute exposures. The ICRP model only considered cancer as a health risk associated with radiation exposure. The ICRP model, using “bathtub” chemistry, “steam engine” physics, and deceptive reporting, produced faulty and fraudulent estimates of risk and dose effects. Additionally, because the ICRP model is based on acute, high dose, external exposure it cannot accurately determine risks or dose response for internal, chronic, isotopic exposures. For this reason, the ICRP and ECRR models are mutually exclusive.

This new ECRR report based on epidemiological studies, concludes that the health effects of low level radiation exposure have been underestimated by the ICRP model by 100-1000 times. It also includes other health effects due to radiation exposure from global weapons fallout. In addition to cancer it estimates the number of foetal deaths, infant mortality, and predicts “a 10% loss of life quality integrated over all diseases and conditions in those who were exposed over the period of global weapons fallout”.

The committee concluded that underestimates of risk and dose effects for depleted uranium exposure could be very great since the effect at the cell level may be very different than other types of radiation exposures. For this reason the health effects of depleted uranium exposure in Gulf Veterans will be investigated in depth by this committee and will be presented in a new report.

Internal exposure to depleted uranium is a “novel” exposure to an altered form of natural isotopes. The size, shape, surface texture, density, chemical composition and other physical and chemical factors of the particles greatly affect the health impact and damage to the cells of any biological system from depleted uranium exposure. Particle size may be the most overlooked and one of the most important characteristics of depleted uranium dust formed on the battlefield. After burning, depleted uranium is altered both physically and chemically and estimates of risk to health and dose effects cannot be based on previous studies of naturally occurring uranium. In the Research Report Summaries7 of depleted uranium studies done for the military between 1974 and 1999, they clearly provide information and concerns in these studies about the hazards of depleted uranium both to health, exposure on the battlefield and damage to the environment. This summary is well worth reading as it provides a timeline of the military politicizing decisions on the use of depleted uranium over 25 years. For example, in a 1980 Army report17:

This report provides an excellent history of the logic behind the Army’s decision to use DU as a
kinetic energy, armored-piercing munition. DU’s final selection over tungsten was based on
several reasons, including the lower initial cost of the penetrator itself and its better overall
performance. DU and tungsten were rated even for “producibility”. Tungsten had the advantage
for safety, environmental concerns, and deployment.

RADIATION RESPECTS NO BORDERS
Depleted uranium is being used as an effective munition on the battlefield and as a radiological weapon to destroy the genetic future of the Iraqi people15. Before the Gulf War, Iraq was the most developed and advanced country in the Middle East16. Writing, religion, poetry, music and science began in the region which includes Iraq, the Cradle of Civilization. The ability of the Iraqi people has been recognized for millenia. The Iraqi people are more feared than Saddam Hussein by the US. Their talent for creativity, ability to be self-determined, and their natural resources have made them the target of the US Government, US oil companies and the Department of Defense.

In November of 1991, Richard Berta, the Western Regional Inspector for the Department of Energy who was based at the Lawrence Livermore Lab where I worked, told me: “The Pentagon exists for the oil companies…”

The use of depleted uranium by the Department of Defense has created a slow Chernobyl in the Middle East.

With my best wishes and hopes that this radiation nightmare will finally come to an end, and with thanks for your efforts to move the issue into the light,

Leuren Moret
President, Scientists for Indigenous People
City of Berkeley Environmental Commissioner
Past President, Association for Women Geoscientists
2233 Grant Street Apt. 1
Berkeley, CA 94703
Phone/FAX (510) 845-3139

REFERENCES:

White House statement on “depleted uranium scare”. http://www.whitehouse.gov/ogc/apparatus/index.html

DOD Colonel Bob Cherry – Letter to Editor, February 2003, Olean Times Herald.

Letter from Dr. Ernest Sternglass August 23, 2001, RE: “Radiation and Dust Particles”

Radiation and Public Health Project http://www.radiation.org

Discounted Casualties: The Human Cost of Depleted Uranium by Akira Tashiro, Chugoku Shimbun 2001. http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/uran/index_e.html

“Estimating the Concentration of Uranium in Some Environmental Samples in Kuwait After the 1991 Gulf War” by F. Bou-Rabee, Appl. Radiat. Isol., Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 217-220, 1995.

Research Report Summaries on Depleted Uranium from 1974-1999, conducted at National Laboratories and military labs. http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabl1.htm#TAB%20L_Research%20Report%20Summaries

“Did NATO Attacks in Yugoslavia Cause a Detectable Environmental Effect in Hungary?” by A. Kerekes et. al, Health Physics, Vol. 80 (2), February 2001, pp.177-178.

“Birds Bring Radioactivity Ashore” by Andy Coghlan, New Scientist, January 4, 2003, p.5.

2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk: Health Effects of Ionising Radiation Exposure at Low Doses for Radiation Protection Purposes Regulators’ Edition: Brussels, 2003. http://www.euradcom.org

The Petkau Effect – The Devastating Effect of Nuclear Radiation on Human Health and the Environment by R. Graeub, 2nd Edition, Four Walls Eight Windows, New York (1994).

Personal communication: email March 28, 2002.

“N.Y. air hazards found: EPA assurances contradicted by UCD scientists” by E. Lau and C. Bowman, Sacramento Bee February 12, 2002.
SacramentoBee-2-12-02-NYairHazardsFound-EPAassurancesContradictedByUCdavisScientists.pdf [PDF file]

Detection and Evaluation of Long-Range Transport of Aerosols (DELTA) Group http://delta.ucdavis.edu/

A Different Nuclear War: Children of the Gulf War by Takashi Morizumi http://www.savewarchildren.org

Children of Iraq: The Dream of the Future UNICEF, printed by Express International – Lebanon (1988).

Richard P. Davitt “A Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Depleted Uranium and Tungsten Alloy as Penetrator Materials”, Tank Ammo Section Report No. 107, Dover, NJ: US Army Armament Research and Development Command, June 1980. http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/du_ii/du_ii_tabl1.htm#TAB%20L_Research%20Report%20Summaries

“Depleted uranium: devastation at home and abroad” by Leuren Moret, San Francisco Bay View, November 7, 2001. http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/02.01/020117moret.htm

“Tödliches Uran-Recycling” by Geseko von Lüpke, NATUR January 2002. http://warp6.dva.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=112520

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1: “Forword” by Leuren Moret to Discounted Casualties: The Human Cost of Depleted Uranium by
Akira Tashiro, Chugoku Shimbun (2001).

Attachment 2: Declassified memo to General L.R. Groves, Director of the Manhattan Project, October 30, 1943.
Source – US Army Major Doug Rokke

Attachment 3: TABLE: “Characteristics of Particles and Particle Dispersoids” from the HANDBOOK OF CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 53rd Edition. This chart provides the particle range which is very wide for metallurgical dusts and fumes, a range from 100 microns to 0.001 microns (10 Angstroms). Particles smaller than 0.1 microns will coagulate and form larger particles, but the greatest number or population of particles will be in the 0.1 micron range (see Chart “Natural Aerosols”). This particle range is smaller than blood cells, bacteria, pollens, spores and other typical air contaminants. Very fine particles are extremely hazardous to health because they are carried by the blood throughout the body. The rate of radiation exposure from one very small particle can be more than is allowed for a whole body exposure in one year (see photo “Hot particle in lung tissue”).

Attachment 4: CHART: “Penetration of a HEPA filter as a function of particle size” from 18TH DOE NUCLEAR AIRBORNE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND AIR CLEANING CONFERENCE, Baltimore 1984. Experimental penetration of particles through a HEPA filter – determination that approximately 0.1% in the 0.1 micron particle range will pass through the filter. If there are 100,000 particles 0.1 micron in diameter per cubic centimeter of air, then 120 per cubic centimeter of air will pass through a HEPA filter. In one day an average man will inhale 28 million particles in the 0.1 micron range through a HEPA filter.

Attachment 5: CHART: “Natural Aerosols” from ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 7th Edition (1992), McGraw Hill.
This chart provides the average size distribution for natural aerosols in atmospheric dusts. The largest population or number of particles in an aerosol dust is in the 0.1-0.01 micron range. Depleted uranium particles in this size range will be incorporated in atmospheric dusts and will travel indefinitely, transported by winds.

Attachment 6: PHOTO: “Hot” or radioactive particle in lung tissue” photo by Del Tredici, Burdens of Proof by Tim Connor, Energy Research Foundation (1997). This is a photo of a “hot particle”, in this case a 1 micron particle of plutonium, and shows the alpha tracks emitted from that particle in one year.

Attachment 7: Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia 5th Edition (1976) Decay paths for natural uranium – Table 1 The Uranium Series, and Table 3 The Actinium Series. The decay paths for uranium are very complex but decay through a number of steps before they become stable and are no longer radioactive. Each of these steps produces a radioactive daughter product which will be more radioactive than the original uranium atom.

If you have come to this page from an outside location click here to get back to mindfully.org


17apr03

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-13-2003 01:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
now if THIS scientist ~ "commites suicide"

you will know...

[Edited 1 times, lastly by mark sky on 09-13-2003]

IP Logged

Deborah
Take It To The Limit


Flagstaff, AZ
700 posts, Jul 2000

posted 09-13-2003 07:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Deborah     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
.....The EPA has verified that depleted uranium was in the plane that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11 18,19 and that the crash site was contaminated. Residents of New York City detected radiation on hand held geiger counters at the WTC site. The EPA not only failed to protect emergency response personnel at both sites, but did not report or measure 13 concentrations of very fine particles at any of the 9/11 plane crash locations. These are the most hazardous to health, and many personnel who worked at the crash sites are now very ill..... END Excerpt

-------------------------=>

God Help Us.

IP Logged

Lulu
ice behaving badly

right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000

posted 09-13-2003 07:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lulu   Visit Lulu's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That is odd mark, it must be a glitch of some sort, because every member can post in the Science forum. Maybe try a test post in Science in a few days to see if you can?

Shocking excerpt Deborah!

IP Logged

Deborah
Take It To The Limit


Flagstaff, AZ
700 posts, Jul 2000

posted 09-13-2003 07:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Deborah     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
12 February 2002
The Sacramento Bee

N.Y. air hazards found
EPA assurances contradicted by UCD scientists

An independent analysis of air around Ground Zero shows the collapse of the World Trade Center towers spewed enormous amounts of potentially lethal, extremely tiny particles unrecognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's air monitoring.

The ominous findings by scientists at the University of California, Davis, contradict repeated assurances by EPA Administrator Christie Whitman that the air around the wreckage largely was safe to breathe.

"They had an unprecedented situation, and they applied the usual approaches," said Thomas Cahill, a physicist and international authority on air pollution who led the study.

He released early results Monday that showed lung-penetrating pollutants in startling concentrations, about 500 times more than what's in the air on the smoggiest days in the Sacramento Valley..... [continued]
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/1622685p-1698856c.html


Additional excerpt:

.....Cahill's team sent a custom-designed air sampler to New York in October at the request of Robert Leifer, a scientist with the U.S. Department of Energy's Environmental Measurements Laboratory.

The project was not funded by the government; the UC Davis researchers donated their time..... END Excerpt

-------------------------=>

Lulu -

The "shocking excerpt" is taken from mark sky's previous posting of the material from this link:
http://www.peacecourier.com/depleted_uranium.htm

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Deborah on 09-13-2003]

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 09-13-2003 10:23 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I do not not know what this means yet http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/chem1/WTCchemistrytable.html
many of the obsqure "elements" are recorded here

[Edited 1 times, lastly by mark sky on 09-13-2003]

IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Money Forum | The Web Hosting Forum | Papa Guru
Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c