posted 10-26-2003 11:40 PM            

October 26, 2003

To all:

On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at about a quarter to 6 in the evening, there were several chemtrails in the sky. Two were conventional, and oriented north-south. Another, in the same part of the sky - intersecting one of the chemtrails in the sky, in fact - was also oriented north-south, but this was dark in color, and it didn't seem to be a shadow of another trail!

Also in the sky was a chemtrail that pointed northwest-southeast, but, then, curved in a more east-west direction. Since there are no airports to the east, far enough away that departing flights, or approaching flights, could be high enough to produce what are considered conventional contrails, such trails are already considered unusual.

In thinking about this trail, I considered an apparently significant point about chemtrails.

The conventional "explanation" among "debunkers" is that chemtrails are the paths of jets flying normally, along already established routes. This means that, among other things, when conditions are different, the jets can be found flying these routes, but either leaving contrails, or no trails at all.

But not once have I seen jets fly curving paths, changing from one orientation to another, when they were leaving no trails! Infrequently, when they were leaving only contrails, I have seen jets change orientation, but even this was nowhere near as common as when they left chemtrails. The number of jets changing orientation when leaving contrails is about a third the number of chemtrails from jets that changed orientation. And no jet was ever observed changing direction, when it was leaving no trail!

To "define" chemtrails as the result of jets flying along long-established and commonly used routes, then, does not seem to hold water!

In pursuing the truth, it is important to remember that it can be important to look at everything.