posted 11-07-2003 03:37 AM            

Hi Jeff,

As my children were trick-or-treating this year, I noticed several trails in the night sky. Unfortunately, due to the fact that the picture was taken at night (at 8:30pm), only a couple are visible in this shot. The second image is an exact copy of the first, with some Adobe Photoshop magic used to bring out some of the details. Talk about spooky!

I love the site. Keep up the good work.

[To see photos, click: http://www.rense.com/general44/ghth.htm

ALSO: http://www.rense.com/general44/njj.htm

Chemtrails Over NJ On Halloween
From Frederick Z
11-3-3

I am very skeptical about chemtrails being anything more a natural process. However, Saturday morning even made me wonder.

During Friday night I heard many planes overhead. I didn't think much of it because the local Air force base has many planes coming and going during the night. However, on Saturday morning the number of chemtrails I found was quite astounding. I would have taken a picture, however my camera is in the shop.

The thing that made me concerned about the chemtrails is that they all appeared in a parallel direction, and all appeared in a direction that normal fight traffic from NYC, Newark, Philly and McGuire do NOT take.

Also, the chemtrails clearly started and stopped at a certain distance. It almost appeared that spraying occurred until tanks had emptied. The only reason I am writing this is because I noticed many other people on the east coast also took note. I also find this very insidious because it occurred on Halloween night when many children spent a good deal of time outside.

posted 11-10-2003 10:45 PM            

November 10, 2003

Letters to the Editor

To all:

Pawel Biesaga’s depiction of night chemtrails was a good effort. There seems an increasing interest in keeping track of aerosol operations and their effect on the weather during the night as well as during the day. I have been monitoring, for example, the presence of unusually active clouds at night, indicative of my suspicion that water in the atmosphere is being replaced by some more reactive substance, to enhance weather control.

An important point in reference to photographing clouds and chemtrails at night, though, is the difficulty of photographing in low light. The pictures Pawel provided, for example, depict those portions of the chemtrails highlighted by the moon. If a chemtrail is not near the moon, or if the moon is not present, obtaining good pictures can be difficult if not all but impossible. Optic photographers, to get pictures at night, depend on the right film and camera settings. Most pictures submitted on the web seem to be those produced by digital cameras, but digital cameras do not have quite the latitude of use of optical cameras.

For the most part, digital cameras seem to have results similar to those produced by ISO 200 film. ISO 200 is the most common form of film employed in optical cameras, useful, mostly, for pictures in daylight or mildly dim lighting. Interior pictures, without a flash, though, can be muddy and indistinct. A flash, of course, will not do a great deal to illuminate odd clouds or chemtrails at night.

Adjusting exposure time, though, can increase the quality of a picture in low light. Some cameras might have a feature that produces slight control over shutter speed. But even that may not be enough. The camera I use, for example, does not seem to have an exposure of more than a second, while a shot in low light may need an exposure of a couple of seconds or more. I'm not sure if any digital cameras have been produced that emulate, say ISO 400, ISO 800 or more sensitive films, or which have an exposure time of more than a second. If anyone is familiar with any, they can mention them.