|
Author
|
|
Topic: Chemtrail and Environmental Analysis | Topic page views:
|
|
Show-Me Truth
Senior Member
Location 0 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 12-14-2003 04:26 PM
Hi CTC,Though I have read a good portion of this forum, I have not found much in the way of what I would expect to be a staple of chemtrail understanding, and that is, more far reaching attempts at physical analysis. While there are excellent observations as well as explantions (which I believe) for these observations, I would wonder, what if any types of attempts to "prove" the effects of these chemtrails and their makeup, exist. While chemtrails have been widely documented for scientific weather/military research being dispersed, I am unaware that those witnessing them have tried to show the direct effect. Someone on the other forum mentioned C. Carnicom's site as having done analysis, and I read some of, but has anyone here performed any thing like this? I understand a simple test (can't remember which site I saw it on, might have been here) was to simply place clean black cloth outside in position to collect rain, and then later view it under a black light. Anyone heard of this? The particles are said to glow intensly. I also understand cloud seeding operations like the link I posted to ai do air monitoring sampling also. I do not know what elevation they are allowed to fly at or what the cost,but it seems so obvious and simple that if a non-corrupted air sample could be taken right after one of these chemplanes had distributed their load, MUCH could be learned. It is a shame the public has to think about being detectives because their own government believes in constant deceipt and manipulation, but so it is. As I have said in other forums here, part of my background is in environmental science, as well as some others here, and I have a personal Direct interest in this chemtrail "spraying" as it occurs on average about twice a week here over Mid-Missouri. "They", seem to "hate" the sun. And while the "right brain" side of me continues to observe and understand what is happening on one level, the "left brain" side desires a more physical assessment. So that brings me back to, 'Is anyone here attempting to do scientific or even "psuedoscientific" analysis on either high altitude trails or air/surface sampling at ground level? Thanks, SmT 
|
Sore Throat
Senior Member
x 736 posts, Sep 2000
|
posted 12-14-2003 06:36 PM
ShowMeTruth,This is where to start. Find a jet that you can charter...check the hourly rate. Then ask them if they have the facilities to collect an ambient air sample at altitude...remember that you are in a pressurized cabin. Ask them what these "minor" modifications would cost. Since you have a background in environmental science, it should be easy to get estimated costs from an accredited laboratory for the appropriate analyses...metals, organics, biologicals. Be sure to tell them you want identification of all "unknowns". Don't forget the requirements for chain of custody, analytical blanks, and statistical significant replicates. We wouldn't want to upset those who are so willing to provide a critical appraisal. So there you go...quite simple really. Just add it up, take out a home equity loan and get some of those recently printed dollars and you are in business.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Sore Throat on 12-14-2003] 
|
Jim Phelps
New Member

Knoxville, Tn. USA 16 posts, Dec 2003
|
posted 12-16-2003 08:58 PM
So there you go...quite simple really.Just add it up, take out a home equity loan and get some of those recently printed dollars and you are in business. ========= Excellent !! 
|
Show-Me Truth
Senior Member
Location 0 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 12-16-2003 10:19 PM
Hi Sore Throat and Jim and any others,So yes, I guess a cost analysis would be the best place to start. Perhaps I will indeed contact AI and see what they charge to collect an air sample. I believe, if I remember, they offered this service. Perhaps we're talking several 1000's, I don't know. I personally am not considered economically "rich", but I would give 100 bucks to see what this crap is coming down, blocking my sun, an purportedly causing illness. I bet many others also. Coming up with the required amount to pay for a sampling, is certainly NOT out of the question. I realize it is frustrating to know that something is occuring, and try to convey it to others, only to deaf ears. I imagine how Noah felt. But sampling again, seriously, is not economically impossible, nor technologically. I would appreciate any further positive input. Thanks. Working together, SmT 
|
mark sky
bin Rydin

SW coast of Oregon 1089 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 12-17-2003 01:22 AM
SmT~ it is not really very funny but you would have to have been here several times before when we went through this exercise there is an outfit in clearlake CA that does this for the big daddy $z the labs as well the whole encilada is there we little pains in the ass as it were took up a collection plate and the rest is history God no longer excepts evi dence God only takes your vision and thought visa and master card no good anymore (dollar falling these daze)
|
mark sky
bin Rydin

SW coast of Oregon 1089 posts, Jun 2001
|
posted 12-17-2003 01:29 AM
PS some think God is nothing otters no it as Gold Oil Drug G.O.D. inc others know something else entirely different some who speek of God make God small enough that we might concieve of God most who speek of God bring us down to some level of hatered emotional state where we can blank out
|
Show-Me Truth
Senior Member
Location 0 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 12-17-2003 09:33 PM
So as you say, Mark, been there done that, eh? Mmmmm. And it didn't work out?? Ok, I won't pry as to what went wrong  I am though, surprised some "big name" with some bucks to spare, wouldn't want to help out. Wouldn't that be nice. Know anybody??? Just as a fun little experiment though, have you ever tried to capture rain on a black cloth, and run it under a black light? I haven't but maybe I'll give it a try, just for grins. Someone posted they had tried this with excellent results,the thought being that the metal chaf, of course, is washed down in the rain. Despite the hardship of air monitoring at high elevations, it would seem that sampling at ground level would be quite useful information too. If intitial results of some crude sampling indicated much higher levels of metals, then perhaps it would be worth refining the method. Perhaps though, sampling aside, maybe if we all just tell everyone we see as often as possible to look up, the number of politically active aware people will show the need for FUll Disclosure. One would think Eventually, it's gotta come out, offficially that is. I just hope it's before the effects of metal and chemical, and perhaps biological poisoning cause us all to end up in the hospital. Or worse. SmT

| |