posted 11-18-2002 10:55 AM               

A sterilized container as directed by nw labs was placed in an open secure area in the north end of the city.

The sample was sealed after the collection period and delivered to the lab. An analysis was performed on Aluminum and Barium only.

Aluminum

0.148 mg/l

Barium

0.006 mg/l

Cost of the test was $33.00

It is the scientific opinion of the lab that the aluminum content of the sample is HIGH and unusual.

Past Baseline Results will be made available to us and will be posted as part of our corporations commitment to identifying the results of continued atmospheric testing and modification.

Plant material chlorosis, as a result of plant inability to uptake nutrients may be an indication of metals (aluminum)in our mostly alkaline soils around Alberta.

We shall continue to submit samples for testing and suggest others invest in this inexpensive method of determining the possible results of chemtrails.

posted 11-18-2002 08:20 PM            

In atmospheric precipitation (i.e., rain and snow), aluminum concentrations up to 1.2 mg/L have been measured (ATSDR, 1999). The acid-leached concentrations of aluminum in rainwater samples collected in the North Atlantic for seven rainfall events ranged from 1.14 to 35.2 µg/L (ppb) (my note, that's from .001 to .035); total (dissolved plus particulate) aluminum concentrations ranged from 6.1 to 824 µg/L (my note, that is from .0061 to .824mg/l). During storms, higher concentrations of adsorbed aluminum occurred in the presence of high levels of suspended solids in stream surface water than in their absence.

So I guess it depends on if they were measuring the total aluminum, aluminum particles or disolved aluminum

posted 11-19-2002 02:25 PM            

http://pub31.ezboard.com/fcontrailsandchemtrails22884frm1.showMessage?topicID=922.topic

LOL.

I wouldn't try to post over there however. They are ALL ABOUT Censorship and a right wing agenda.

Kinda' reminds me of our lovely government....

posted 11-19-2002 11:18 PM               

I wasn't going to post the Lab name because any Environmental Lab can perform these analysis and its relevence isn't important. It looks like someone who I had previously held a great deal of respect for because of his research and reporting abilities has already posted the quality lab that others can use if they wish. The analysis should be in thermits mailbox as we've also forwarded it to our horticultural study group to try and determine if aluminum is the cause of some of the incredible stress we've seen in our forage crops and plant material.

>>emfx you are correct, this does not prove that the al came from one of the atmospheric programs going on in Alberta. It does establish that our kids are being exposed to aluminum from some source. Ever catch snowflakes on your tongue J. Future analysis and tests from other areas will establish whether this should be an ongoing concern. The quantities aren't extreme, but even that much aluminum should not be there.

Please do not fail to recognize the significance of the aluminum quantity within the sample. Our prevailing winds are from the NorthWest and the sample was taken from the NW corner of the City with very little industry beyond the City limits. Snow, like contrails is mostly made of ice, isn't it?

Our question to the Lab reffered to their scientific opinion whether this quantity of aluminum was high and unusual coming from a snow sample, and their response was yes.

Further aluminum research shows that some pulp mills emit less than 0.148mg/l of aluminum, even in their effluent.

posted 11-19-2002 11:29 PM            

Allegedly it has been stated by some....ethylene dibromide(also poisonous) is used in JP-8 a more recent fuel produced for (NATO)/military turbine fuel used in TURBINE(jet) aircraft....also believed to be in chemtrails.

I'm not too certain if in fact if ethylene dibromide is in JP-8 but it is in general aviation 100LL (prop planes) aircraft gas.

More about JP-8 here........
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum14/HTML/000003.html

posted 11-20-2002 11:56 AM            

I still havent made it to the Timmy's on the north side to chat. Were you at the Oct.4 meeting and info session on chemtrails here in town?

posted 02-12-2003 01:29 AM               

Snow sample results from accumulated or collected snowfalls 2002/2003.

North Edmonton Feb. 04, 2003 Al 0.066 mg/l B 0.004 mg/l

North East Edmonton Feb. 04, 2003 Al 0.030 mg/l Ba 0.002 mg/l

Cardiff Feb. 04, 2003 Al 0.041 mg/l Ba 0.002 mg/l

(City of Edmonton Tap Water on Feb. 04, 2003 Aluminum 0.028 mg/l Barium 0.052 mg/l)

North Edmonton Jan. 03, 2003 Al 0.085 mg/l Ba 0.018 mg/l

West Edmonton Dec. 06, 2002 Al 0.373 mg/l Ba 0.021 mg/l

East Edmonton Dec. 06, 2002 Al 2.83mg/l Ba 0.124 mg/l
Note: Due to the high reading our lab suggested performing an additional "dissolved aluminum" test.

Dissolved Al 0.027 mg/l

North Edmonton Nov. 12, 2002 Al 0.148 mg/l Ba 0.006 mg/l

The following test results are from the Snap Lake Diamond Mine environmental study.
(Additional benchmark information is most welcome)

Local Study Area (within 500m of mine buffer zone) Aluminum 1 mg/l Barium 0.061mg/l

Regional area (a 31km radius) Aluminum 0.0093 mg/l Barium 0.001 mg/l

As indicated in the "Regional" area, Aluminum was found at levels of 0.0093 mg/l and Barium at 0.001mg/l. "Edmonton results from the Dec.06 sample are nearly 250X higher than these 'benchmark' results".

The table is on p. 14 of 53 in the study, link: http://www.mveirb.nt.ca/Registry/EADeBeers/Section%2011%20 Environmental%20Health/11_1-6%20Environmental%20Health.pdf

Reference:

National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NADP/NTN). http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/

Snap Lake Diamond Mine http://www.debeerscanada.com/files/snap/infrastruct.html

US geological survey http://bqs.usgs.gov/acidrain/

Lowell Wood http://www.house.gov/hasc/testimony/106thcongress/99-10-07wood.htm

Dr. Sven Israelsson http://www.met.uu.se/eng/forsk/sven.html

posted 02-17-2003 05:26 PM               

"Lead: Demon or Saviour?

You hear a lot these days about how bad lead is, how old lead based products such as paint and automotive fuel are causing people to die. Why, one would think that it was some sort of Global Crisis! In fact, the harmfulness of lead is a myth spread by various mind control groups to keep people from filling the environment with radiation retarding lead. The ability of lead to block radiation is common knowledge, the stuff of pop-culture reference. But what people don't realize is that psychotronic radiation is just as unable to get through lead as the more commonly known, and less encountered, types of radiation, such as x-rays. By ridding our cities of their lead-filled, mind control shielding smog blankets; our lakes of lead enriched fish; and our homes of healthy, lead based paint-flake snacks; we are being deprived of a major form of psychotronic protection.

Question: Can lead foil be used in place of aluminum foil in a deflector beanie? Yes, it would work very well. The problem is finding lead foil. It is not as easily found as aluminum, and since all tests of aluminum have shown it to be highly effective in deflector beanie form, why put yourself out trying to find it? The advantages gained would be small and could be easily matched by increasing the thickness of the aluminum foil layers.

posted 02-21-2003 11:56 PM            

Have you tried a press release?

I've seen the first results that you showed me when we met before new years, and believe them to be from a credible lab. Do they have a problem being known to produce the results?

What are their thoughts on the matter?

It certainly makes one wonder (understated) where all that extra heavy metal is coming from.

posted 03-21-2003 09:15 PM               

Another Sunday snowfall which was proceeded by a small amount of rain. (Leaving sparkles on the skin as the rain evaporated or ran off)

Samples were collected and once again submitted to the lab for analysis.

Total Aluminum 0.108mg/L
Total Barium 0.066mg/L

Let's again look at the Al & Ba levels around an active diamond mine.

Within 500m of an area around the mine.

Aluminum 1 mg/l
Barium 0.061mg/l

Now let's review what the Al and Ba levels are within a 31km area around the mine.

Aluminum 0.0093 mg/l Barium 0.001 mg/l

Current BARIUM 66X higher than "natural" levels
Current ALUMINUM Over 11X higher than "natural" levels

Yes Rainheart, the Edmonton Sun ran an article on March 07, 2003

"Aluminum Found in Snow"

Are these two elements showing up as a result of atmospheric manipulations from KC-135's petro011 & 012? (as watched from the vantage point of the control tower)

It certainly makes one wonder (understated) where all that extra heavy metal is coming from.

posted 04-12-2003 02:32 PM               

That there are chemtrails? And due to the wintertime in Edmonton, it would not have been cloudseeding type of chemtrails, to reduce hail damage [remember that program run out of Penhold 100 miles south of Edmonton, in the 60s and 70's?].

That we are indeed being bombarded by way too much aluminum? - for what reason, do you have an idea? I think it could be to weaken us, make us senile so they can finish their plans for world domination and control; OR, to cause climate change, etc., also for control reasons.

In any case, I think its all bad. Or do you see anything legitimate and worthy that your data might indicate they are doing this spraying of aluminum for? [they say the hail seeding thing is over, even though it worked 90% effective in reducing insurance claims from hails]

posted 05-14-2003 12:50 AM               

We were hammered with as much snow in a week, that usually accumulates over the entire winter.

As part of a continued commitment to provide 'benchmark' data on Al & Ba levels in precipitation, samples were collected and submitted to our lab.

May. 05, 2003

Al 0.020 mg/l

Ba 0.001 mg/l

I would consider these values as 'close to natural' as can be expected.

There has been a minimal amount of 'unusual contrail development' over our part of the planet for several months.

Coincidence?

......Forecast......

Precipitation on the 4-5th of June.

"""Edited from Nov. to May, cause I'm just learning my months"""

posted 05-14-2003 09:04 AM            

Most unusual ICU812! Perhaps the weather is already owned?

>>Nov. 05, 2003<<

posted 06-03-2003 09:24 AM               

Once again Edmonton area is being saturated with precipitation, as forecasted weeks ago.

Chem activity was obvious days before this system moved in.

If we get enough precip. we will test for Al & Ba and post results here.

posted 06-03-2003 10:05 AM               

Thanks,