posted 06-11-2003 04:27 PM            

The first post I made, where I said I didn't want to turn it into a debunker zone, I was refering about THAT post, not the website! The website was a debunker zone before I got it. My initial intention with that post, was just that, to understand why and how people believed in chemtrails. I maintained this type of intention until the chemtrail forum was closed to "non-believers", I believe this was very wrong.. and let out a bit because of it.

My profession is a student, currently with nothing to do, being summer. My side profession is observer, which allows me to obtain such great and all powerful knowledge.

posted 06-11-2003 04:51 PM            

My style of writing? Don't you mean lack there of?

posted 06-12-2003 02:28 AM            

Starting flight school in the fall and will continue working on a degree next year.

posted 06-13-2003 04:38 AM            

Err.. I know what you mean though Graeme, about regardless of context.

posted 06-20-2003 11:19 AM            

Graeme.. I haven't figured it out yet. Something that will be useful for my career and something I can fall back on if that falls through.

Havla.. Nobody expects you to actually back down from anything on this site, regardless of how incorrect it is.

The Shield Project is just another conflicting piece of garbage in the whole conspiracy.. How do you people stick together and constantly agree when you all think the conspiracy is being carried out in different ways, for different reasons, by different people. Face it: None of you know what is really happening, I'll bet some of you will say so your selves, just that whatever is happening is 'wrong'. Evil trails.

posted 06-20-2003 12:46 PM               

We have a good BINGO.

posted 07-10-2003 10:08 AM            

The funny thing is that he relies upon the official news and official sources for information on the matter. Surely if there is a cover-up the government or whom ever would feed out false data.

How can we be certain that a rise in UV of X amount has taken place? How can we know if the depletion of ozone is more or less than what is reported?

We rely upon the information provided by others who have studied and know how to read all those graphs, sensors and other things which make it possible for us to "see" UV and Ozone Holes.

Mr. Thomas' rebuttle did little to provide proof either way in the matter. If anything, we find that he has given validation to some of the things written in the Sheild Letters.

David

posted 07-11-2003 12:15 AM               

The municipal council of Aigina in Greece has taken out a lawsuit "against any party responsible for carrying out, according to information in the press, dangerous aerial spraying over Aigina in the framework of experiments for dealing with the greenhouse phenomenon".

They were advised that there is not enough evidence of such spraying to justify legal action and it was suggested that they should abandon their suit.

This may take us to one of the reasons for the secrecy underlying the Shield Project and the resort to denial that it is occurring. If one admits that the spraying is taking place does it have to be justified in the name of "national security", the greater good of humanity, or what? What can justify the damage to individuals' property and health if such damage is being caused?

In the past I suppose "national security" has been the catchall excuse for governments harming and even killing their own citizens.

But hardly anybody could agree that this is an appropriate category for a programme supposedly addressing problems of environmental deterioration.

On the other hand if one agrees that the programme does not fit into this category and (because there is no legitimately acknowledged 'enemy') should in the public domain and openly discussed, one seems to come up against insurmountable legal problems.

I have the impression that the Will Thomas, Carnicom, etc. sectors of the campaign against secret spraying are not facing this issue. Their objective is to used existing mechanisms of government and law to stop the spraying. Thus Thomas's support for one of the current presidential hopefuls.