Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Health
  Our Stolen Future

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   Our Stolen Future

Topic page views:

KnewEyes
watcher


under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001

posted 03-15-2002 12:25 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for KnewEyes     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Research on endocrine disruption has exploded since Our Stolen Future was published
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The New York Times reports that the Bush Administration plans to reject new, more protective arsenic standards that would have lowered permissible contamination in drinking water by 80%, from 50 parts per billion to 10 parts per billion. The old standard had been implemented in 1942, the new one proposed by the Clinton Administration. Ironically, this announcement comes shortly after new research revealed that arsenic is an endocrine disruptor with demonstrable effects on gene expression at the level of the new proposed standard. The Bush decision leaves the American public exposed without a protective safety factor. In a recent study, the National Academy of Sciences concluded that the old standard could easily result in a cancer risk of 1 in 100. They claim the new standard is not justified economically. According to the New York Times, mining companies played a role in the Bush Administration decision. They were also heavy contributors to the Bush campaign.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
22 July 2001. India's national newspaper, The Hindu reports on a scandal in the Indian state of Kerala: "the cashew plantations in Kasargod district, Kerala, have been devastated by an unusually large number of cancer deaths, neurological disorders and different kinds of physical and mental impairment. Recent reports in the media and studies done in the area indicate a strong link between the spraying of a pesticide called endosulfan and the deteriorating health of the local people. The State administration appears to be oblivious to the situation." A local physician first attempted to bring this to the attention of medical authorities in 1997, reporting an unusually large number of people suffering from diseases of the central nervous system and soliciting the intervention of medical researchers in the baffling problem. The Hindu Times reports that n a local random survey, he recorded 202 cases of people from about 400 houses in an area of four square kilometres with psychiatric problems, mental retardation, epilepsy, congenital anomalies, cancer deaths, suicides as well as those currently suffering from cancer. In a second story, The Hindu wrote about "a people's movement in Kasargod district to end the spraying." A local NGO, the Thanal Conservation Action and Information Network, played an important role in drawing attention to the poisonings.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Las Vegas Sun editorializes against using human guinea pigs to test the toxicity of perchlorate, a rocket fuel contaminating the water of millions of people in the US west and a known thyroid disrupting chemical. The tests, sponsored by Lockheed Martin, would be used to justify avoiding clean-up costs. The Sun correctly concludes these tests are unethical. The editorial misses the reality, however, that the tests are also scientifically useless because the results they would produce would reveal nothing about the most vulnerable sector of the population to perchlorate, the developing fetus and young children. Lockheed Martin's strategy is to test the less vulnerable, adult men, and then claim, on that basis, that there is no human risk.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Sacramento Bee reports on a new study by the Environmental Working Group, analyzing drinking water contamination by perchlorate, a thyroid disrupting chemical used in rocket fuel. "EPA officials say the bulk of the estimated 20 million people affected by the chemical live in Los Angeles, San Diego and other Southern California cities that take some of their water from the Colorado River." Read EWG's report...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
So Very Much More @...
http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/New/newstuff.htm#tassc

IP Logged

KnewEyes
watcher


under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001

posted 03-15-2002 02:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for KnewEyes     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

Bush to dump nuclear waste in earthquake zone

By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles
15 March 2002
From the air, or from the lonely wastes of Highway 95 in the middle of the Mojave desert, it looks the remotest place on earth. Yucca Mountain is no more than a long ridge surrounded by dust, sand and little else for dozens of miles. And yet it could be the source of the next big scandal to hit the American administration.

President George Bush has approved a plan to move 77,000 tons of nuclear waste from around the country to a storage area under the mountain, pushing forward where two previous administrations, including his father's, did not dare.

Yucca Mountain is about as unsuitable a repository site as one could imagine. The area is criss-crossed by no fewer than 33 earthquake faults. The rock is volcanic, there are volcanic cones in the area, and the latest scientific guesswork is that there has been an eruption in the past 20,000 years – a mere blip in the estimated 250,000- year toxic lifespan of nuclear waste. Moreover, scientific studies by former Department of Energy officials have found evidence that groundwater, currently running 300 metres beneath the site, has risen in the past and flooded the storage area. Were that to happen once the waste arrived, it could not only contaminate the drinking water of the few hundred people who live locally (including members of a native tribe, the Western Shoshone, who believe Yucca Mountain to belong to them under a 19th- century land treaty). Radioactive toxins are likely to reach the surface, evaporate and pose a grave health threat to a large area of the American West.

No other country has opted to create a central waste repository, and nuclear energy experts around the world will be watching to see what the United States does, and what the consequences are.

Alarm at the plan in America has been raised not just by environmentalists. The government's own scientific oversight body, the Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, reported in January that it found the Department of Energy's case for Yucca Mountain to be "weak to moderate" and contained "gaps in data and basic understanding".

That report did not, however, stop Spencer Abraham, the Secretary for Energy, from recommending presidential approval. "I have considered whether sound science supports the determination that the Yucca Mountain site is ... suitable for the development of a repository. I am convinced that it does," Mr Abraham wrote, without citing a single scientific authority. The President took only 24 hours to rubber-stamp his recommendation.

In Nevada, the rebellion is in full swing. Senator Harry Reid, a Democrat, has accused Mr Bush of betraying Nevada voters, without whose support he would not be President. Oscar Goodman, the Mayor of Las Vegas, which is 90 miles (140km) south-east of Yucca Mountain, has called Mr Abraham a "blockhead". The Nevada Governor, Kenny Guinn, a Republican, has said he will veto the President's decision, which means it will be sent to Congress for a vote. And that, expected some time in the next couple of months, is where the real battle will begin.

From the Bush administration's point of view, the issue is simple. The President likes nuclear power, just as he likes the entire energy sector. Nuclear power companies donated almost $300,000 (£211,000) to his campaign. He is keen to build reactors for the first time since the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. Unless the country's 131 reactors can find somewhere to send waste, they will have to cease production.

Yucca Mountain has been the only site under government consideration since 1987, when alternatives in New Hampshire and Texas were rejected because of political lobbying. (It might not have been a coincidence that George Bush Senior, then the Vice-President, was beginning his White House run and did not want to jeopardise his chances in the key New Hampshire primary.) That decision – known out west as the "Screw Nevada bill" – has been followed by many other, equally political, ones.

Ostensibly, Yucca Mountain was selected for its geology. But when the geological nightmare became clear, the Department of Energy said it would look only at how secure the waste containers would be. When the containers seemed unlikely to meet government standards, the Environmental Protection Agency watered down the standards.

The contradictions have multiplied since the Bush administration took office. Last year, the Department of Energy found that the law firm it had hired to help draft licences for Yucca Mountain was a lobbyist for the nuclear industry. No fewer than 14 lawyers from the firm, Winston & Strawn, had simultaneously billed the government and the Nuclear Energy Institute, the sector's chief lobbying body.

Lisa Gue, an analyst with the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, says this is further proof that the nuclear lobby is setting the rules. "The process itself has become disingenuous," she said. "The government hasn't proceeded honestly, it has merely sought justification for a foregone conclusion."

Mr Bush's opponents know the environment is an area of potential political weakness – after all, this is the President who tore up the Kyoto Protocol on global warming, tried to relax curbs on arsenic in drinking water, and has just told taxpayers that they, not the energy industry, will have to pay for toxic clean-ups.

Many Washington lobbyists have also expressed amazement at the way Mr Bush has flown in the face of scientific opinion. "Clinton was not much better when it came to environmental protection, but at least he was smart enough to listen to the scientists," one government science adviser said.

Even if Congress approves the plan – and plenty of members are recipients of nuclear energy funds – the battle will not end there. Nevada has threatened to withhold the water needed to build the repository. Legislators in other states are considering no- transit laws, meaning waste consignments – each of them a potential "mobile Chernobyl", and a tempting terrorist target -- could not cross their territory to Yucca Mountain.

The White House, for the moment, is unapologetic. Not going ahead, Mr Abraham wrote in his letter of recommendation, would be "an irresponsible dereliction of duty". As the controversy heats up, those words may come back to haunt him. http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=274554

IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c