posted 06-21-2001 10:40 PM
Some of you may have already seen this before, but it's a keeper and worth
passing around again. ____________________________________________ The Response
The following is a genuine hoot. This was an actual letter sent to Ryan
DeVries from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, State of
Michigan. Wait till you read this guy's response - but read the entire
letter before you get to the response.
Mr. Ryan De Vries
2088 Dagget
Pierson, MI 49339
SUBJECT: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm
County
Dear Mr. De Vries
It has come to the attention of the Department of environmental Quality
that
there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced
parcel
of property. You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or
contractor who did the following unauthorized activity: Construction and
maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring
Pond.
A permit must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity. A
review of the Department's files shows that no permits have been issued.
Therefore, the Department has determined that this activity is in
violation
of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and
Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being
sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated.
The Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially
failed during a recent rain event, causing debris and flooding at
downstream
locations. We find that dams of this nature are inherently hazardous and
cannot be permitted. The Department therefore orders you to cease and
desist all activities at this location, and to restore the stream to a
free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from
the
stream channel. All restoration work shall be completed no later than
January 31, 1998.
Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so that
a
follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff. Failure to
comply
with this request or any further unauthorized activity on the site may
result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement action. We
anticipate and would appreciate your full cooperation in this matter.
Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any questions.
Sincerely, David L. Price
District Representative Land and Water Management Division
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RESPONSE
Dear Mr. Price
Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County
Your certified letter dated 12/17/97 has been handed to me to respond to.
First of all, Mr. Ryan De Vries is not the legal landowner and/or
contractor
at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan. I am the legal owner and a couple of
beavers are in the (State unauthorized) process of constructing and
maintaining two wood "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my Spring
Pond. While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their dam
project, I
think they would be highly offended that you call their skillful use of
natural building materials "debris."
I would like to challenge your department to attempt to emulate their dam
project any time and/or any place you choose. I believe I can safely
state
there is no way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam
resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam
determination and/or their dam work ethic. As to your request, I do not
think the beavers are aware that they must first fill out a dam permit
prior
to the start of this type of dam activity.
My first dam question to you is (1) Are you trying to discriminate
against
my Spring Pond Beavers or (2) do you require all beavers throughout this
State to conform to said dam request?
If you are not discriminating against these particular beavers, through
the
Freedom of Information Act I request completed copies of all those other
applicable beaver dam permits that have been issued. Perhaps we will see
if
there really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams,
of
the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the
Public
Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan
Compiled
Laws, annotated.
I have several concerns. My first concern is - aren't the beavers
entitled
to legal representation? The Spring Pond Beavers are financially
destitute
and are unable to pay for said representation - so the State will have to
provide them with a dam lawyer. The Department's dam concern that either
one
or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event causing flooding is
proof that this is a natural occurrence, which the Department is required
to
protect. In other words, we should leave the Spring Pond Beavers alone
rather than harassing them and calling their dam names. If you want the
stream "restored" to a dam free-flow condition - please contact the
beavers
- but if you are going to arrest them (they obviously did not pay any
attention to your dam letter being unable to read English)
In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their
unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green and
water
flows downstream. They have more dam right than I do to live and enjoy
Spring Pond. If the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental
Protection lives up to its name, it should protect the natural resources
(Beavers) and the environment (Beavers' Dams). So, as far as the beavers
and
I are concerned, this dam case can be referred for more elevated
enforcement
action right now. Why wait until 1/31/98? The Spring Pond Beavers may
be
under the dam ice then and there will be no way for you or your dam staff
to
contact/harass them then.
In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention a real
environmental
quality (health) problem in the area. It is the bears. Bears are actually
defecating in our woods. I definitely believe you should be persecuting
the
defecating bears and leave the beavers alone. If you are going to
investigate the beaver dam, watch your step! (The bears are not careful
where they dump!) Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being
unable to contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending this
response to your day office via another government organization - the dam
USPS. Maybe, someday, it will get there.
Sincerely, Stephen L. Tvedten
The University of Texas at Austin
Office Community Relations/Accounting unit
P.O. Box 7367
Austin, TX 78713
_________________________________________________________________