posted 01-21-2002 07:00 PM            

1.)U.S. intelligence has revealed indications that we will sustain a bio/chem/or "dirty-nuke" attack. You probably heard this in the news within the pas¹½ ™"�æÛûVšxÊ�]
2.) Part of United States' vulnerablities is its lack of bio/chem detection devices (strategic and tactical analysis will reveal that DETECTION is step #2 in the failure triage; since preventative methods have failed) Proof of this can be seen with the introduction of "BIOSURVEILLANCE" into our integrated operational plan. Biosurveillance (as mentioned on techtv yesterday) is, for example, monitoring hospitals across America by CDC for sudden increases in admittance. A classic example of "open source", third-party-indicative, intel gathering.

3.) Bio/chem detectors can be tested WITH SIMILIAR MOLECULAR FINGERPRINTS, just like when humans receive vaccines --the injection often IS NOT the actual pathogen, it IS, however, something that presents the same silhouette as the disease. Don't think we have detectors that smell? Do a little research, like, on the detectors that "smell" the ammonia in the air given off by humans. Where would they use such a device? Nuclear weapons areas...Area 51 (sorry folks, it WAS a much NEEDED aircrat testing facility until a bunch of damn civilian UFO nuts drew attention to it) Anyway, bio/chem detectors are still in the R & D phases...ergo

4.) The chemtrails are caused by our defense forces conducting experiments. Specifically, they are spraying the air with a product that has THE SAME CHEMICAL SIGNATURE as many nasty things an attacker could use. It probably has other additives that help chemically, solvents, binders, additives, etc. Detecting equipment is being developed to sniff out the bad stuff from all the other crap Americans have clouded their skies with. It's just testing and I highly recommend letting the military-industrial-complex do its dark and dirty job of protecting civilians' lives. Let them be.

Now I wait for someone to connect this to HAARP and ELVIS (he shot Kennedy ya know!?) to make a Grand Whacko Unified Theory (G.W.U.T.)

posted 01-22-2002 11:48 AM            

Colonel, did you just say that some of those lines in the sky really are chemtrails???

Correction: The Colonel says in e-mail that he is not Mr. Skyjerker. I accept his statement and hereby apologize for my incorrect assumption.

posted 01-23-2002 01:41 PM            

I sure hope you're not a heterophobe though!!

Here's one for you and t/s... (not to mention most of the other 'debunkers' and debunker sympathizers);
http://straightpridewear.com/

____________________________________________

Victory in "Straight Pride" Case

American Family Association
P.O. Drawer 2440
Tupelo, MS 38803
1-662-680-3886

For Immediate Release: January 15, 2002

TUPELO, MS- The United States District Court in St. Paul, Minnesota has entered a permanent injunction in favor of the student who wore a shirt that said “Straight Pride” to school last January.

Elliott Chambers, a 16 year old student at Woodbury High School in St. Paul, was ordered by his principal, Dana Babbitt, not to wear the sweatshirt on January 17, 2001, because one student complained about it. In entering the final ruling, the court also declared unconstitutional the school dress code, which prohibited the wearing of “items with unacceptable writing or graphic depictions which offend anyone.” The order was entered pursuant to a settlement agreement reached after entry of a preliminary injunction barring the school from acting to prohibit the wearing of the “Straight Pride” shirts.

The lawsuit, filed by the AFA Center for Law & Policy (“the Center”) on behalf of Kendal and Lana Chambers as well as Elliott, alleged that Woodbury High’s display of inverted pink triangles -- the universal symbol for gay pride -- promoted homosexuality, and the disciplinary action against Elliott constituted viewpoint discrimination. Principal Babbitt acted quickly when a single student complained the “straight pride” message was offensive. By contrast, when Mr. and Mrs. Chambers told Mr. Babbitt they were offended by the pink triangles, he accused them of being homophobes and refused to remove them.

“We are pleased that Elliott’s rights have been vindicated,” commented Stephen M. Crampton, Chief Counsel for the Center. “But we are disappointed at the hypocrisy of posting the gay pride symbols throughout the school and then censoring the `straight pride’ message,” Crampton said. “If schools spent more time on education and less time on indoctrination the world would be a better place,” added Michael J. DePrimo, Litigation Counsel for the Center.

The Center for Law & Policy is the legal arm of the American Family Association, Inc., located in Tupelo, Mississippi, and is an ally of the Alliance Defense Fund. The Center restricts its practice to constitutional litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country.