|
Author
|
|
Topic: Reluctant to post, but....... | Topic page views:
|
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 05-21-2002 12:40 AM
For anyone interested, I've added another video clip to my site that is shot the same day and within an hour prior to the "How Low Can They Go?" clip. This is typical of what I see as the reason "Why People Ask Questions" and I dubbed the clip thusly. If you can be bothered, with the file downloading, it makes for interesting viewing. Also no comment from me on the white "floaty" thing that distracts the camera momentarily. It was wierd. Anyway, if you've viewed the stills on my site you'll recognize the sky in clip. These were persistent trails, IMO, throughout the day. What they are in content, I cannot say. http://mochemtrails.topcities.com/ct001.html Right-click, let it download, go get a coke, order a pizza, hell the video might get done before the pizza. It'll get there none the less. 
|
godcent
New Member

Paonia, CO USA 6 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-21-2002 08:58 AM
Phantom, Just downloaded your new one...went out for a cup of joe while i waited. So WHAT is that white "floatie" thing...not so floaty, more like a projectile of some sort. Never saw that before. Our skies in Paonia Colorado, the western slope, are like that most days. In fact we notice more now when they DON'T spray...because spray days are more common. Thanks for your time and effort, and your site. I'll send my friends. Please read my post on "stories" and let me know if you've ever seen that before. Peace, Jeanine

|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 05-30-2002 01:49 PM
There really are no Chemtrails? Another Newbie bites the dust? Okay, let me step back and take a look here. 1 reply to this thread. 62 views of this thread. 932 members on this site. __________ I gotta take my socks off for the math. I'll be right back. Really.
|
FLKook
Chemspiracy Realist

East Central Florida 706 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 05-30-2002 04:46 PM
Hey Phantom I could only find the first video you did March 5th...could you post the direct link. I apologize for the keyboard lazies but I really looked for about two minutes. (double my usual limit...shameless grin)
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 05-30-2002 06:30 PM
Sorry about that Phantom. I just looked at the video. Good work. 
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-30-2002 07:41 PM
Whatever the unkown object is, it looks like it's doin' about mach20 !!! 
|
FLKook
Chemspiracy Realist

East Central Florida 706 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 05-30-2002 09:25 PM
Got it. Sorry, didn't catch the text link. So were you aware of this while you were taping or did you find it on the tape afterward?
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 05-31-2002 11:28 AM
Whoa everybody, the little floaty thing was just that. A little floaty tree seedling that happened by while I was filming the jet. However the jet was travelling awfully fast and leaving the trail you see. Remember, this was filmed the same day as the "How Low Can They Go" video. I hoped that at least some of you would see the difference in altitudes of this jet and the other on the same day, both laying persistent trails. I also thought these videos were of interest to those on this site. Mom always said, "See what ya git for thinkin'?"
|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1280 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 05-31-2002 12:06 PM
Phantom, with all respect to you and your video endeavors, it is a big file for some to download. Slow prosessors, low memory etc. More would view it I'm sure if it were smaller in size. Not all folks have that much patience or time. Is there anyway to make it smaller, faster to load? IMO  
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 05-31-2002 12:49 PM
David, Please see the attached thread and skip to my last post. This should help to explain. Thanks for your response. http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum4/HTML/000221.html Rev.1 Edit P.S. I won't delve too deeply here, but if there are those who's systems can't seem to allow upwards of 10 meg file downloads ( I've kept mine averaging around 6.8 meg) or they haven't the patience, or even the sense to do something else (even on their computer!) while downloading something pertinent to a topic of their particular interest, I personally couldn't care less. I only offer my observations for those who can be bothered. As of late, my site should crash for good soon and won't be revived.
PEACE
[Edited 1 times, lastly by PHANTOM911 on 05-31-2002] 
|