|
Author
|
|
Topic: Mars ice could flood planet | Topic page views:
|
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 05-29-2002 12:46 AM
Tuesday, 28 May, 2002, 15:56 GMT 16:56 UK Mars ice could flood planet By Dr David Whitehouse BBC News Online science editor Scientists have revealed the full technical details of their discovery of vast reservoirs of ice beneath the Martian surface. So much ice has been found in the polar regions that if it were to melt it would deluge the planet. The ice may stretch far underground to regions where it is warm, raising the possibility of warm caverns of meltwater in which scientists hesitantly speculate conditions could be suitable for life. But they caution that we may never know until we have rock and ice samples returned to Earth by an unmanned probe for analysis. Third time lucky William Boynton, of the Lunar and Planetary Institute of the University of Arizona, US, is lead author on one of a trio of pioneering Mars papers published in this week's issue of Science magazine. He regards the sensational findings of ice below the surface of Mars as third time lucky. "Twice I was close to this," he told BBC News Online. "We detected the subsurface ice using an instrument on Mars Odyssey that was also on the Mars Observer spacecraft. "That probe reached Mars 10 years ago, but blew up when it got there - so, we could have found [the ice] then." Quick start And Dr Boynton could also have found it with the ill-fated Mars Polar Lander spacecraft. It crashed into the planet's polar regions in 1999. "It would have landed on precisely the place where we now see the ice. Polar Lander had a scoop that would have been able to dig and reach the ice so just think what we could have seen if that mission had been a success." Fortunately, Mars Odyssey has been a resounding success. "We started seeing the signal from the ice within a few days of starting our survey of the planet," he said. "We saw ice where we had expected to. The signal was so strong it just knocked us over." Lost oceans The Gamma-Ray Spectrometer, one of several sensors on board Mars Odyssey able to find evidence of ice reserves, is only able to look about a metre (three feet) beneath the surface. Mars water facts Ice crystals less than one metre (three feet) below Mars surface Located south of 60 degrees latitude Melted, would create planet-wide ocean 500 metres deep Nasa may commit to landing in less than 20 years "We can see an awful lot of water there," said Dr Boynton, "but why should it stop there? It may go down 10 metres, a 100 metres or even kilometres." The underground ice solves one of the deepest and longstanding mysteries about the Red Planet: where did the water go? All over its surface there is evidence that in the distant past copious amounts of water flowed. We can see dried up river lakes, ancient shorelines, and vast, empty canyons. Now, scientists know where all this water has gone - it is frozen deep underground. "This is where the lost oceans have gone," Dr Boynton told BBC News Online. It has been found exactly where it was predicted - Poleward of 60 degrees south, where the average temperature and soil properties would allow ice to form. Possibility for life If Mars were to become much warmer for some reason and the ice melted, it would drench the planet to an average depth of between half and one kilometre. But what of life? "Well, it's a little hard to say," speculated Dr Boynton. "If the ice is deep enough, there could be regions where it gets warm enough to melt and that would mean pockets of warm water underground. "That would be very exciting - but we will not know for sure until we bring back a sample for analysis." And the Mars Odyssey data has provided another ironic twist in the history of exploring the Red Planet. In 1976, two sophisticated American spacecraft, Vikings 1 and 2, landed on the planet. They scooped up some soil and looked for life. Most scientists believe they found none. But Viking 2 may have come close. "Our findings indicate that perhaps just a metre below Viking 2, there may have been a lot of ice. It may have got so far yet so close to finding ice on Mars," said Dr Boynton. And the scientist who endured two failed missions and 17 years to solve one of the greatest planetary mysteries chuckles to himself. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_2013000/2013114.stm

|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-29-2002 04:44 AM
Well, honestly I have good reason to believe this is disinformation. For one thing, no probe that we sent blew up when it got there. One alledgedly "lost power" just hours after it landed and began relaying what ultimately was the brief video any civilized human ever saw of it. I have seen logical and reasonable evidence that humans have been to mars, and even have a functional outpost there, in a joint venture with Russia. It has been reported by certain X-military personnel and scientists that remnants of a lost civilization were found there. A civilization which destroyed itself, through the same tribulations we face here. Power. Greed. Lust. Apathy. Belligerence. It blew up, did it??? Photo ©NASA just anomolous photo ©NASA
This is literally the sunset from mars. ©NASA This one is just creepy. ©NASA These two photos of Mars appear to be taken from a craft descending upon it. Notice the water, and the much like earth, BLUE sky. (These photos are not by NASA, and I am not sure of their ORIGIN  MARS: 4 degrees celsius 21 km/h wind 707 millibar airpressure Mars DOES have an atmosphere Mars DOES have H²0 Mars DOES have Oxygen Mars IS Survivable Ice exists on mars much like it does on earth. Mainly in the polar regions. I know it seems crazy, but keep an open mind. What you posted is a perfect example of disinformation from "BBC", who is on the "payroll", so to speak.
(most media/networks are)
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Alpha-Theta on 05-29-2002] 
|
Duncan Kunz
Senior Member
582 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 05-29-2002 01:10 PM
[Edited 5 times, lastly by Duncan Kunz on 06-06-2002] 
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member

341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 05-29-2002 04:03 PM
Welcome to the War Against Trivialism A-T. Now be warned. There are enquiring minds out here that want to know, so when you dish out a sampling of your stew, you'd better be ready to serve the full meal deal. And sometimes dessert! Master Duncan has picked apart your post for you making it very clear as to which of your statements need further disclosure on your part. (I think it's all of 'em) I am in agreement with his analysis of your post and likewise will await your response to his inquiries. Best of luck to you. It was interesting reading BTW. Then again, so was MAD magazine when I was much younger.
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-29-2002 04:27 PM
It's all quite simple really. It doesn't seem you have the capacity to think beyond the "belief system". All that jibberish you posted means nothing to me. You're obviously the one believing everything you read. Your views are common. Mine are not. You believe what NASA prints in external public documents, lol!! My conclusions are drawn without the detriment of such propoganda. What exactly do you think NASA has been doing the past 3 decades?? You also apparently believe everything you hear or read on the "news" and/or anything from accredited educational institutions. What you don't understand, and probably simply can't comprehend, is that the information flow is controled. Vital information is suppressed. Half truths are told. I have done the research myself for everything that I write. It is you who are relying on the propoganda of the MEDIA and CIVILIAN educational institutions to back your claims. Oh ya, I know I know, the "media" is "credible". I suppose you think politicians and bureaucrats are trustworthy as well, eh?? ROFL.Additionaly, I was simply expressing my belief on the subject. You don't have to agree. I am really not concerned with your approval or concurrence. Nor do I feel any need to prove anything to you. I must note that your flamboyant tone is unnecessary, but hey, if that's the caliber of person you are then so be it. You just stay glued to your TV and keep believing those NASA press releases and enjoy embracing your oblivion for the sake of your "fabricated" comfort. The typical "arrogant" and "grandiose" Americans are going to be the ones that suffer the most anyway. . Thanks for your ridicule though, just don't lose your marbles when you realize the joke is actually on you. -A-T
btw there is plenty documentation of Stanford taking on numerous research projects for black ops, along with a few others like MIT, and a bunch of west coast schools.(do the research*) They play a role in the disinformation just as much as anyone. 
|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-29-2002 04:31 PM
quote: Originally posted by PHANTOM911: Welcome to the War Against Trivialism A-T. Now be warned. There are enquiring minds out here that want to know, so when you dish out a sampling of your stew, you'd better be ready to serve the full meal deal. And sometimes dessert! Master Duncan has picked apart your post for you making it very clear as to which of your statements need further disclosure on your part. (I think it's all of 'em) I am in agreement with his analysis of your post and likewise will await your response to his inquiries. Best of luck to you. It was interesting reading BTW. Then again, so was MAD magazine when I was much younger.
Nothing but a petty flame. ROFL. You can attack me personally all you want, oblivious one. It's really quite amusing.

|
Alpha-Theta
Superior

ª×µ»ƒ³²² 694 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-29-2002 05:22 PM
This is the account of Edgar Rothschild Fouche; former military scientist and intelligence operative.Planet Mars does not have both an extremely thin atmosphere and a dusty atmosphere, beause this is an impossible combination. In extremely thin air, dust would fall down quickly and would never keep on floating in such thin air. Besides, the Martian atmospheric pressure is about 70% compared to the Earth's atmosphere, and is breathable too.Some American researchers discovered pyramids on Mars. In fact, they discovered those photographs that had been filed incorrectly under the Southern latitude and longitude on Mars when they should have been filed in the Northern part. They were deliberately taken out by NASA. But they just happened upon them by chance. But NASA has never admitted that those are real photographs of pyramids on Mars although they took them. A scientist at an observatory in England, recorded on one of his radio telescopes a report coming from an American spaceship in the days before the Americans had sent anybody up. And he knew it was a NASA Space Agency recording, because it had a certain code, a bip bip bip to it, but he did not have a decoder. The television station investigated all this, and they found another guy who had a decoder, and they wanted to bring the two together. Now during the attempt to bring the men together, the professor of astronomy was going to drive it to London, but he thought maybe something might happen, so he mailed his recording in a package. And then he drove, but he was killed on the way, a very strange accident, as he was found in his car down the side of the road, burnt all the way to his bones, as if it was done by a high intensity heat source other than conventional car petrol fire. Now this was all recorded in the British newspapers. Other newspaper stories told that the government of America and Russia were working together to establish bases on the Moon and Mars. Which explained the disappearance of quite a few scientists. And this was long before Sputnik or any other publicly known spacecraft. In fact, ancient bases on Mars have been and are still being refurbished.

|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1280 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 05-29-2002 06:15 PM
Alpha-Theta. Interesting subject matter. I remember reading a piece about the early photos of mars. In the article it stated that the first few shots were not altered and showed blue sky, and green on the surface, as in plant life. Subsequent photos showed the now familar 'red' planet. There is no shortage of photos showing anomalies on the surface and in some of the craters. Buildings,what appear to be blastdoors, tracks, possible spacecraft, etc.JPL dumped, + or -, 27,000 photos of Mars onto the net (only after a threat of law suits). Many scientists and non-scientists have been pouring over them and finding many strange and exciting things, some natural and others that appear to be made by intelligent beings. David 
|
Dan Rockwell
Hoka hey! - heyokas!

Stamford, CT, USA 1750 posts, Dec 2001
|
posted 05-29-2002 07:40 PM
It's definitely interesting subject matter. I've been following the exploration of mars since the Viking days and still have all the old articles floating around. - I've seen some of the data that NASA keeps spitting out and some of it just seems to be a little bit suspicious to me for some reason. Especially some of the image data.The Color of Mars http://mars-news.de/color/blue.html 
| |