posted 12-13-2002 05:56 PM
American's Give Up Freedoms for False Security
By Ted RallThe official seal of the Pentagon's new Total Information Awareness
Office (TIA) bears a spooky eye above a pyramid – you know the one,
it's on the back of the one-dollar bill – peering at the globe. The
fact that the TIA was quietly funded under the auspices of the bill
creating the new Department of Homeland Security suggests that its
mission is a vital part of the war on terrorism. But Europe and Asia,
the two main continents of the eastern hemisphere, which appear on
the TIA logo, are not in fact its principal targets. You are.
Rear Admiral John Poindexter, the scandal-scarred Iran-Contra figure
who heads the $62.9 million "data mining" operation for the Defense
Department, says that the TIA's mission is "to detect, classify and
identify foreign terrorists – and decipher their plans – and thereby
enable the U.S. to take timely action to successfully preempt and
defeat terrorist acts." Sounds like a magnificent idea. So why do
such unusual allies as the American Civil Liberties Union, The New
York Times, William Safire and Republican senator Charles Grassley
say it's dangerous?
According to the TIA's website, Poindexter's new office will
"develop architectures for a large-scale counter-terrorism database,
for system elements associated with database population, and for
integrating algorithms and mixed-initiative analytical tools ...
invent new algorithms for mining, combining, and [refining] ...
revolutionary new models, algorithms, methods, tools, and techniques
for analyzing and correlating information in the database to derive
actionable intelligence."
In English: Total Information Awareness will use sophisticated
computer-modeling programs to search every database they can get
their hands on. They'll scan credit card receipts, bank statements,
ATM purchases, Web "cookies," school transcripts, medical files,
property deeds, magazine subscriptions, airline manifests, addresses
– even veterinary records. The TIA believes that knowing if and when
Fluffy got spayed – and whether your son stopped torturing Fluffy
after you put him on Ritalin – will help the military stop terrorists
before they strike.
Most of this raw data is already available to businesses trying to
market their products. The TIA represents the first full-scale
attempt by a government agency – the Department of Defense – to
collect and analyze that information. "There has obviously been a
growing problem within the private sector over collection of
information for targeted marketing," says David Sobel, general
counsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "What's
different now is the government is putting major resources into
getting access to privately collected data."
Critics are understandably anxious that the TIA is merely the Bush
Administration's latest effort to emulate the most unsavory aspects
of Soviet society. "If the Pentagon has its way, every American –
from the Nebraskan farmer to the Wall Street banker – will find
themselves under the accusatory cyber-state of an all-powerful
national security apparatus," warns Laura Murphy of the ACLU.
Is Poindexter more interested in digging up dirt on Bush's political
foes than fighting Islamist terrorism? Should we believe him when he
says that he respects the Fourth Amendment? Short of running a TIA
profile on the man, there's no way to know whether he's hoping to
turn the United States into a police state. For the sake of argument,
let's assume that the TIA plans to respect our privacy rights and
that it won't yield to the temptation to use its findings to smear
political opponents.
Even if Poindexter and his domestic spying operation means well –
and that's a big if – the TIA is a classic case of fighting your last
battle all over again.
Like Attorney General John Ashcroft's Operation TIPS (Terrorism
Information Prevention System) – the Orwellian Justice Department
program that asks cable installers, postal workers and meter readers
to turn in their customers if they see any suspicious behavior – the
TIA assumes that the next big attack will be committed by members of
Arab "sleeper cells" living in the United States. Why do we assume
this? Because that is what happened on Sept. 11, 2001.
Presuming there will be an exact replay of Sept. 11 has led to long
security lines at airports and no screenings whatsoever at train
stations and bus depots. Which targets would you go after if you were
a terrorist?
As proven by their ability to elude arrest, Osama bin Laden and his
allies are no fools. As Al Qaeda operatives plot their next attack
against the United States, they will exploit the weaknesses we aren't
aware of or have chosen to ignore. Another plane hijacking is
unlikely, at least for the foreseeable future. So are strikes carried
out by illegal-immigrant operatives with a fondness for strip joints
living in the United States. Terrorists are opportunists, not serial
killers predictably utilizing identical methods for each act.
Whatever you least expect: expect.
Since most of the data the TIA analyzes relates to loyal American
citizens, Total Information Awareness creates the potential for abuse
of governmental power on an unprecedented scale. Because it won't
track the most likely future terrorists – people who live in, for
example, Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia – it's a waste of money
that furthers the illusion that our government is protecting us.
Since Sept. 11, George W. Bush has asked us to trade our precious
freedoms for a little security. The TIA forces Americans to sacrifice
privacy for nothing.
Source:AlterNet