posted 02-19-2003 04:16 PM            

Self Governing Forums? http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/000049.html

>>Has one word left her keyboard to tell these two to back off a bit, NO.<<

Lol David...you got a crystal ball?...you know what leaves my e-mail and what it says and where it goes? What a joke. More BS David.

Hey Thermit if you want me to step down just say the word and I will...no hard feelings.

>>Her onesided view on who needs to be banned and who needs to be told to tone down is tearing this board apart.<<

More BS David, membership is growing steady day by day, despite all you bitching and whining and endless arguements with seeker.

>>YES. Is she infit to moderate?<<

ROFLMAO...I think you are the infit one David IMO.

posted 02-19-2003 06:56 PM            

quote:

---

David, you and other members had a chance to moderate the individual forums. There wasn't enough interest to pursure this great idea. I was all for this idea.

---

Hard to argue with that. It was a good idea, but not many people seemed interested in pursuing it.

quote:

---

There is talk of banning three and not one of them is these two. Unfair, biased. Has one word left her keyboard to tell these two to back off a bit, NO.

---

Whose talking of banning whom, David? Admittedly, I don't have the time to post here all that often, and when I do the board is often inaccesible, but I haven't seen any of this talk.. one of those 'off-the-boards' kind of deals?

quote:

---

I have to agree with LuLu here. Who cares what BJM and seeker have to say. Isn't this forum about getting to the truth and allowing people to speak freely their opinions?

---

Again, I'm not sure if I have a right to express an opinion on this or not... but most of the 'truth-seeking' seems to revolve around whether 'chemtrails' are real or a figment of the collective imagination. Very simply, you are being positioned into a disingenuos either/or arguement by these so-called sceptics when the truth probably lies somewhere firmly in the middle. Of course, you aren't likely to get that far when you arguing over simplistic terms like 'chemtrails' or 'contrails' for the millionth time.

Try calling them what we know them to be and see what happens. The disinformation artists will DEMAND that you refer to them as either chemtrails or contrails.

So, yeah, shrugging your shoulders and saying 'who cares' when such a large and vocal part of your membershship shapes the direction of the forum seems ill-advised for anyone who wishes to gain any real understanding into what is happening to our atmosphere and see this issue move forward.

posted 02-19-2003 08:41 PM            

quote:

---

When someone like Delicious went on a rampage making untrue accusations about persons emailing them,[/b] and making requests to the moderators for information they had no right to request,LuLu did the right thing.

---

As far as the banning thing goes, Lulu knows exactly what I'm talking about.
There is a lot of back stabbing on this board and Lulus prints are all over the knife.

posted 02-24-2003 10:02 PM            

quote:

---

Ok then how about when seeker accused me of phone harassment, hinted he had me pegged with caller ID. I asked for proof, he refused, just where the hell were the moderators then?

---

David, that issue is between you and Seeker and has nothing to do with the board. I didn't see you throwing your hat in the ring when we were looking for mods, it ain't all it's cracked up to be. There is no way to keep everyone happy. Personally I err on the side of freedom of ideas and speech. Unless there is a blatant ongoing trashing of the rules a "tone it down" is preferrable to banning.

Is there a link to this banning talk? Usually the mod forum will have some brief discussion but I have seen nothing here on the public threads. I've missed a lot here this past few weeks too.

posted 02-25-2003 03:24 PM            

Lulu made a comment that she is profiling those who post often. Lulu would you explain exactly what that means so my imagination doesn't run away with me.

posted 02-25-2003 04:41 PM            

By all means Jeanie, let the imagination run wild...geniuses call this day dreaming beneficial...to mankind I'm sure a lot of people take mental notes of other posters...I do, I also write certain things down as a heads up such as the sick, violent, delusional, and dangerous Guided Muscle (GM)/The Military Lies/erasuredude...whom in case you didn't know it Jeanie, a while back erased (DELETED!!!) most of this site after his troll/rantings/bible-thumping/mania persona got banned, and rightly so, lucklily Thermit was able to resurrect CTC from the ashes.

I take note of certain interesting government and military visitors--you never know when this will be useful--comes in handy in moderator talk. Did you read where Thermit mentioned the Office of the President was visiting here...

I take most notes on multiple ID posters, some are harmless, mistakes, others not so and are trolls which nobody likes...trolls tend to post a lot as soon as they come on the scene (there are exceptions to this "rule" tho...look at Mech )

And I also take notes on certain debunkers such as the banned ROFLMAO...obvious trouble makers.

I studied psychology so it's natural that I incorporate physchoanylsis is all my walks of life...this being another walk Jeanie.

Most posters I have no written notes on...just mental notes...or some little mental image of their face that matches the words and especially avatar...in a friendly way...(like Cydoniaquest for example, I always pictured him as about 300 lbs slouched over his keyboard day and night with ass-crack big time and a swarm of flies buzzing over his greasy-haired head)I'm probably not the only one that does this? imagining...

Hope I answered your question Jeanie

posted 02-25-2003 09:26 PM            

LOL not at all Jeanie--Mech is the exception to the rule... hence ~

"there are exceptions to this "rule" tho...look at Mech"

Mech is definitely not a troll.

Hope this clears up any confusion Jeanie.