|
Author
|
|
Topic: NOW IT IS GETTING STRANGE ON CTC! | Topic page views:
|
|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1280 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 04-05-2003 09:03 AM
  
Pot and kettle thing again, eh sqeeker.
You know jack sh*t about who is exchanging IP's and for what. Go back to your dope loser.
quote:
as he does trying to start a witch hunt every month or so
Funny you should use the term 'witch hunt'. Hardy har har!!  
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 04-05-2003 12:40 PM
>>Swamp isn't banned?He said his password isn't working.
Makes me wonder.
Hmmmmmmmm..
Very interesting.<<
Mech ~ since Gas Bag sees fitting to post details of personal private e-mail exchanges between he and I, I will post some info from one of his that may clear up the wondering...?? quote:
moderators,
I tried to remove myself from Chemtrailcentral, but put in a wrong email
address. FLKook knows this is my work address, so please remove me from the
board. Thank you for the site, but it is getting too ugly here.Swamp Gas
Funny he didn't mention to you Mech, and how many others? that he himself put in a wrong e-mail and thus kinda banned himself, snort! and caused his own password messup as password is sent to e-mail given... Add this to the other lies and crap that are being circulated by David and Swamp Gas. Makes me wonder. hmmmmmmmmm. Very interesting.
|
Mech
New Member
posts,
|
posted 04-05-2003 01:45 PM
Ok Lulu.Swamp Gas told me recently that he couldn't sign in. I told him to contact Therm.
You can't fault me for wondering what is going on.
Upsetting to say the least. I wasn't aware of this.
This whole thing stinks any way you slice it.
It's a shame.
Carry on.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Mech on 04-05-2003]
|
David
Chemtrail Information Agent
1280 posts, Oct 2000
|
posted 04-05-2003 06:14 PM
Lies lulu? Like you sharing ip's is a lie, or your nasty mouth being a lie or you posting personal addresses is a lie?
Or you using CTC for you own personal vendetta is a lie lulu? Or taking CTC business to another board is a lie? Or you making nasty gay remarks is a lie lulu?
You are abusing your title of moderator, had anyone else done what you have done they would have been banned. Do the whole board a favor and ban yourself. You are trying to shift the blame and focus off of you to save your ass.
You should seek professional help, you are a sick, twisted woman...
|
Jeanie
Senior Member
North East U.S.A.
525 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 04-06-2003 11:06 AM
Did not see the questional picture but considering the character of Swamp Gas based on his many caring and upright posts I'd bet my LIFE that he is NOT some sick pervert like at least one or two others I can think of. End of Matter******
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 04-06-2003 11:14 AM
Here is the questionable picture Jeanie
http://www.bushfordummies.com/home.asp?did=24 Now some may think two naked hairy men locked in a passionate embrace, with the heads of Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney superimposed on, is OK, and not perverted, just really good friends is all? while others may think along the lines of gay porn. It's all in how you look at things I guess Jeanie. Aren't David and Swamp Gas really good friends? End of matter?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Lulu on 04-06-2003]
|
Jeanie
Senior Member
North East U.S.A.
525 posts, Nov 2001
|
posted 04-06-2003 08:12 PM
Lulu;;Saw the picture and felt the person who dreamed it up did so in poor taste. I did get the sense of what it was supposed to portray, the comaradary between Bush and Cheney and not really some sexual perversion. It was a mistake in judgement to post it but "Let those who live in glass houses throw the first stone." Let's chalk it up then simply to poor judgement not to be repeated and let let it go at that.
[Edited 2 times, lastly by Jeanie on 04-06-2003]
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-06-2003 11:31 PM
quote:
>>Lulu you are a damn liar, Swamp did not 'post' any gay porn.<<Oh yes he did you POS. Hey maybe David and Gas Bag get together and wank off to gay porn together ya think?
That was the 'gay porn' that David and Swamp Gas are supposed to be 'wanking off' together with? It's obviously political commentary and there isn't anything depicted that would garner an X rating (something of a requirement for material to be deemed pornographic)... or even an NC-17, for that matter. Not particularly pleasing to the eye... but a long way from The Seeker Does the Republican National Convention, I'm afraid. Without taking sides on any peripheral issues here, this image is clearly not pornography... under any community standards. Pardon me for butting in, but I'm a little sick and tired of unsubtantiated character assasination right at the moment. Quite honestly, if people want to read this kind of crap, they can damn well get their fill over at sleazyboard31.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Chem11 on 04-06-2003]
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 04-07-2003 12:54 AM
seems to me you are a little late in the game there dave...you had a chance to make a statement and posted somebody's really nice lawn... there's 6 that think the pic is offensive chem... That was the 'gay porn' that David and Swamp Gas are supposed to be 'wanking off' together with? the formum rules...quite simply vulgar covers it dave...a few others too...I don't particularly care to open a link to a page here and see *anything human* naked.... OK ? You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law. It's obviously political commentary and there isn't anything depicted that would garner an X rating (something of a requirement for material to be deemed pornographic)... or even an NC-17, for that matter. it's not an image that anyone one under 18 should view...and I'm being a bit liberal there... Not particularly pleasing to the eye... but a long way from The Seeker Does the Republican National Convention, I'm afraid. don't wait too long to see that there chief...the only party I support physically is the one I'm throwing... according to one of your posters at mega *fatbastard* you are a bit of a lonely man... sorry to hear it...jsutice was swift and clear eh chem ? I'm a little sick and tired of unsubtantiated character assasination right at the moment. I hear ya david's not man enough to say what he says to thermit ! I never have respect for men when they result to ridiculing women... what a POS.... now hop-a-long back to mega dave I think you've had a visitor.... REALLY
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-07-2003 09:56 AM
You go ahead and keep quoting that looney-tune Col. and the TOS, G... saves me the keystrokes... quote:
You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive...
I'm not real interested in any Survivor-esque display of alliances or one-upmanship on this thing. What's right is right, and whether by design or otherwise, this is the sort of thing I would expect from someone like Col. Dan/Fat Bastard and his ilk... Okay maybe a little one-upsmanship... quote:
don't wait too long to see that there chief...the only party I support physically is the one I'm throwing...
Careful, TS... you may go blind. Oops, too late... 
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 04-07-2003 04:20 PM
neither one of your ~weak~ inferences...is what I call a party dave...and no I don't want to hear about all the weird wild sex parties you left coast goons have...not interested...save those for your letters to the editor...passes the time for you I suppose...smirk and I have seen contrails before... 
|
KnewEyes
watcher
under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-10-2003 11:37 PM
I'm Baaaaack 
Been away building chembusters. Very rewarding work you know..
I see things are the same here,if not moreso.
Where did that sweet mild souled moderator Dan go? He was a nice fella don't you think? He was the embodiment of pure good intention.
Chem11, how are you? email me if you'd like.
I hope everyone is feeling good, and has their strength gathered up for the coming future. I think we're gonna need it!
Hey, How bout that Planet X...?
[Edited 1 times, lastly by KnewEyes on 04-10-2003]
|
PHXPilot
Your Mode C Veil is Showing
Phoenix, AZ, USA
800 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 04-11-2003 12:21 AM
I hope everyone is feeling good, and has their strength gathered up for the coming future. I think we're gonna need it!
Hey, How bout that Planet X...?Man, you believe in Chemtrails and planet X? You've got alot on your plate there. Anywho, May 15 will come and go with no horrific planet smashing. But there is supposed to be an awesome lunar eclipse on the 15th!
[Edited 1 times, lastly by PHXPilot on 04-11-2003]
|
KnewEyes
watcher
under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-11-2003 12:52 AM
>>>>"Man, you believe in Chemtrails and planet X? You've got alot on your plate there."<<<<<<Yup! I believe in a whole bunch of other stuff too. I guess you could call me a multifaceted thinker. Life would be boring if I got stuck on one subject. As for the May 15th arrival date.. who knows if that is true. There are no experts around who have "seen this happen before". Actually I think the May 15th date is wrong,, just to throw everyone off, and give the debunkers an extra bit of time to do their "I told ya so" dance.
Who knows the real date? Nobody.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by KnewEyes on 04-11-2003]
|
FLKook
Chemspiracy Realist
East Central Florida
706 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-11-2003 09:54 AM
Welcome back KnewEyes! I for one haven't been keeping up on the planet x theory (OK I confess not at all) and would appreciate any news or posts you have to offer on the subject. Maybe start a thread on Other Trails and enlighten us.
|
PHXPilot
Your Mode C Veil is Showing
Phoenix, AZ, USA
800 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 04-11-2003 04:21 PM
Ive been keeping tabs on the main Planet X'er Nancy, and shes getting pretty weird.Everything shes been proclaiming in recent months makes no sense at all, scientifically. Just go to www.badastronomy.com and check out the PlanetX board. Its populated with many astronomers positivley laughing their heads off at this theory.
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 04-11-2003 04:36 PM
always nice seeing this again
|
KnewEyes
watcher
under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-11-2003 05:01 PM
Thanks FLKook,
and you know me... I'd be happy to talk about X, and will for sure.
Seeker, Thank you too what a nice welcome back.Mr. Pilot... thats a typical debunkers statement and ploy to try and squelch the truth,, laughing their heads off and pointing fingers in the attempt to make someone feel foolish about speaking up about something (important). I for one dont become inhibited by such an action, because frankly my dear, I dont give a damn what you (or anyone for that matter) think about me or what I think or believe in. Just letting you know that from the get-go
They've been laughing and snickering about Nancy for years now, so what else is new. Funny how they are straining to laugh their loudest now, at this time... now that its been sighted and is here in the solar system.
Why else do you think they are doing their best to TOTALLY OBLITERATE the upper atmosphere from our sight day AND NIGHT, most recently. Ask anyone here,,, havent they been going a bit overboard with the spraying lately?
Don't want anybody to see the now visible with the naked eye newcomer which just happens to be in the coordinates Nancy has been saying all along it would appear in.
Whoops,,, too late! Some spray pilots must have been slacking because there are photographs!!
|
PHXPilot
Your Mode C Veil is Showing
Phoenix, AZ, USA
800 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 04-11-2003 06:54 PM
now that its been sighted and is here in the solar system.now visible with the naked eye newcomer Ummmm, no its not. Do we have any photos of this "planet X"? No. You supposedly have one, but it is farking lens flare. It should be the size of Jupiter in the night sky right now, and...nothing. Ive been watching the sky, and I see absolutely nothing abnormal.
|
PHXPilot
Your Mode C Veil is Showing
Phoenix, AZ, USA
800 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 04-11-2003 07:16 PM
Oh, and here is Nancys explaination of why the Auroras occur.
http://www.zetatalk.com/science/s06.htm Geez, and you wonder why she loses credibility. "Our statement will elicit argument from astronomers..." Gee, I wonder why. Who should we believe?
Scientists and Astronomers?
or Old Lady?
|
KnewEyes
watcher
under those cloud-like things
665 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-11-2003 08:14 PM
http://www.chemtrailcentral.com/ubb/Forum6/HTML/001101.html
|
PHXPilot
Your Mode C Veil is Showing
Phoenix, AZ, USA
800 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 04-11-2003 08:54 PM
I have already seen everything on that page.Have you not taken a look at Badastronomys forum yet? They have all seen these photos, researched them, and have debunked them. Go take a look, its fun for all ages. Why are people so hesitant to look at somthing that may prove that a killer death planet is not hurtling through the solar system. Would you rather keep believing that the earth will be destroyed even though evidence says it will not? If you want to, go ahead.
|
PHXPilot
Your Mode C Veil is Showing
Phoenix, AZ, USA
800 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 04-11-2003 09:02 PM
From BadAstronomy.com:Planet X is claimed to be on an orbit that brings it close to the Sun every 3600 years. Now, if we assume that this orbit obeys the laws of gravity, then we can calculate its distance at any given time. This depends on the math of gravity, which is pretty well understood.
However, the equations used to figure distance based on orbital velocity are not simple, but I used the method as described by Dr. Joseph Gallant, Assistant Professor of Physics at Kent State University, which allows for plug-and-chug solutions. I find that one year before the event, Planet X must be about 900 million kilometers away from the Earth, give or take a hundred million. This is much closer to Earth than Saturn, and just a bit farther than Jupiter! That was written last May. Planet X is supposed to detroy earth in a month or so. We can conclude from this that Planet X should be the brightest thing in the sky right now. Enough to blind you if you were to look at it at night. But apperantly, the only photographic "evidence" you have is very poor images of various space objects. We should be able to get good photos of PX with farking disposable cardboard cameras if theres only a month to go before destruction. Again, what should we believe? Orbital physics?
or Old Lady who claims to talk to aliens?
|
FLKook
Chemspiracy Realist
East Central Florida
706 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-11-2003 09:45 PM
If being laughed at were to deter free thinkers, we'd have none at all. Take heart PHX, P/V and FastTalker errrr emmm I mean walker are equal opportunity debunkers.
|
Chem11
megasprayer news
The Homeland
1366 posts, Apr 2001
|
posted 04-11-2003 09:54 PM
Well hey, Kneweyes!What's a nice grrl like you doing in a place like this? Check out the CT club, if you haven't already... I got into Trouble the last time I opened my mouth about Planet X and Zeta Talk, so I think I'll sit this one out; we'll find out soon enough who's who and what's what. Suffice to say that there is a wealth of astronomical evidence to make a case for the existance of a tenth planet in an elliptical orbit. As for it's imminent return to our solar system and some sort of cataclysmic effect on our own planet... well, like I said, we'll see.
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 
