|
Author
|
|
Topic: New Spray Planes? | Topic page views:
|
|
Hornblower
Senior Member
central europe
91 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-27-2003 05:33 AM
  
http://www.kirotv.com/money/2224675/detail.html
May 23, 2003
"WASHINGTON -- The Pentagon has approved an Air Force plan to lease 100 modified 767 jetliners from Boeing Co. for use as refueling tankers, Sen. Maria Cantwell announced Friday. " 
|
emfx13
Moderator
Hayward Ca.U.S.A.
784 posts, May 2002
|
posted 05-27-2003 11:26 AM
Chance's are if your reading about it,they are NOT going to be used as sprayplane's.
|
ChemCaptain
Senior Member
United States
495 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-27-2003 02:07 PM
Well, chances are that no aircraft (other than let's say, MASS equiped C-130s) are spray planes, but we'll just ignore that.I'm still waiting for someone to show me a picture of a contrail and chemtrail and tell them apart.
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Senior Member
Canberra Australia
190 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-28-2003 12:24 AM
sounds fishy to me there is no way they need that many refueling planes they hardley ever use them anyway.
sounds like its time get the gaskmasks out.
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 05-28-2003 02:08 AM
used all the time in war...and as far as new spray planes I would be happy to see a pic of one of the old ones...
|
Hornblower
Senior Member
central europe
91 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-28-2003 06:24 AM
used all the time in war...No need to mention which warmaker we're talking out!
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 05-28-2003 08:16 AM
>>used all the time in war...<<Used all the time during peace. Its called training.
>>...there is no way they need that many refueling planes...<<
How do you know what they need? Are you some kind of miltary needs expert? 
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Senior Member
Canberra Australia
190 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-28-2003 10:55 PM
well for start they mainly only use refeuling planes on stealth bombers after 12 hour flights.
most of the f16's are refueled on the carrier some in the air rarley.
this a joke a waste of tax payers dollars.
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 05-28-2003 11:22 PM
LOLF-16s are not Navy planes and don't land on carriers. However, they do in flight refueling routinely. In fact Nearly ALL military aircraft(fighters, bombers, and even some helos) refuel in the air all the time. F.K.
[Edited 1 times, lastly by Feelin Kocky on 05-28-2003]
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Senior Member
Canberra Australia
190 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-29-2003 04:48 AM
well when you provide some proof of this.
i might belive you then.
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 05-29-2003 09:19 AM
Proof that F-16s are not carrier based planes or that B-2 bombers are not the only planes that get refueled on the air?F.K.
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 05-29-2003 10:49 AM
Try these first:
http://lava.larc.nasa.gov/BROWSE/refuel.html F-16 being refueled http://www.combatsim.com/htm/sept99/f4-refuel.htm http://www.dmna.state.ny.us/ang/f16reful.jpg
Here some more pics including a tanker being refueled: http://www.topedge.com/panels/aircraft/sites/kopack/refuel.html
Blue angels being refueled? Why not use a carrier? http://www.dmna.state.ny.us/ang/107drink.jpg More Navy planes being refueled in the air. http://www.defenselink.mil/photos/May1996/960425-N-4380F-002.jpg http://www.afrc.af.mil/hq/pa/gallery/09oct02/100902-01hires.htm http://www.afrc.af.mil/hq/pa/gallery/09oct02/100902-01hires.htm F-117 refueling in the air? http://www.afrc.af.mil/hq/pa/gallery/09oct02/100902-01hires.htm
F.K.
|
CONSPIRACY_MAN
Senior Member
Canberra Australia
190 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-29-2003 09:32 PM
fare enuff i belive you then.
what i was realy looking for was some milatay statistics.
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 05-29-2003 11:34 PM
>>what i was realy looking for was some milatay statistics.<<I know someone who might be able to give some numbers. I'll get back to ya. F.K.
|
Hornblower
Senior Member
central europe
91 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-30-2003 01:53 AM
quote:
Originally posted by ChemCaptain:
Well, chances are that no aircraft (other than let's say, MASS equiped C-130s) are spray planes, but we'll just ignore that.I'm still waiting for someone to show me a picture of a contrail and chemtrail and tell them apart.
Well if you click on the following url, about a third way down the page, there are some [mighty] Hercules aircraft pics. One has a pink cloud coming out of it's tail. I wonder what that is?  http://www.joevialls.co.uk/subliminalsuggestion/mindcontrol.html
|
Lulu
ice behaving badly
right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000
|
posted 05-30-2003 09:17 AM
Pretty in pink? 
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 05-30-2003 11:14 AM
Could that be fire retardant?
|
Dry Cough
Senior Member
Salem OR Marion
67 posts, May 2001
|
posted 05-30-2003 02:18 PM
there actually were articles in the news media about a month or so ago (I cannot remember where I read them - perhaps in a major news magazine like US News and World Report) where the military has issued new contracts to "replace the aging tanker fleet." Ergo, new chemplanes. If anyone can find any article on the net which backs that up that might help, but both my husband and I remember reading those articles in the magazines and even in our local paper.
|
PHANTOM911
Senior Member
341 posts, Oct 2001
|
posted 05-30-2003 03:34 PM
Could that be fire retardent? Nyaaaaahhh.....could be.For you refueling buffs, one from the past............. 
[Edited 1 times, lastly by PHANTOM911 on 05-30-2003]
|
msu94
Senior Member
Tucson, AZ
191 posts, Feb 2002
|
posted 05-30-2003 08:41 PM
I do not think that is retardant..That is dropped out in mass quantities at once, in order to have the desired effect.Yes, the C-130A and PB4Y-2 are grounded due to the two crashes last year. Both were filmed or photoed as they happened. Some newer tankers are desperately needed. The 130A models should not be flying, and the PB4s should be in museums or flying with CAF. Some more P-3s would be great if the military would release some out of storage. Or maybe this whole air tanker wildland firefighting is just a big ruse to dump chemicals right on people 
|
graeme
Senior Member
Sebastopol, CA, USA
171 posts, May 2003
|
posted 05-31-2003 01:48 AM
Dry Cough-
Check US Congressman Norm Dicks (D-Washington) webpage for information regarding the 100, and 400 more in the near future, new tanker jets. I don't have the link off the top of my head, Google it and you'll find it.
|
Hornblower
Senior Member
central europe
91 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 05-31-2003 02:06 PM
quote:
Originally posted by msu94:
I do not think that is retardant..That is dropped out in mass quantities at once, in order to have the desired effect.
Straight from the horse's mouth (Joe Vialls): "Agent Pink" [or you pick a name] was used to defoliate dense bush.
|
theseeker
One moon circles
Damnit...I'm a doctor jim
3403 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 05-31-2003 05:16 PM
why do I get the feeling hornblower's holding back info ?
can I call you horn ? or mr. blower ?
|
Hornblower
Senior Member
central europe
91 posts, Apr 2003
|
posted 06-01-2003 03:56 AM
"Putin will spray rain clouds to guarantee sunshine for celebrations Russian President Vladimir Putin says he can guarantee sunshine for the St. Petersburg's 300th birthday celebrations by ordering the Russian air force to spray chemicals on rain clouds. Ten planes will be kept ready for action in case rain clouds accumulate around the city, the Defence Ministry in Moscow confirmed. The planes will then spray the undisclosed chemicals on the clouds to make them rain outside the city and spare the celebrations from disruption. More than 50 world leaders including Tony Blair and President Bush are expected to attend the event that commemorates the founding of the city by Tsar Peter the Great in 1703." 5/21/2003
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_783584.html?menu=news.quirkies
|
Feelin Kocky
A Member
Underground Weather Control Bunker
537 posts, Jan 2003
|
posted 06-01-2003 09:20 AM
Oh is see. This is why the US is buying some newer tankers? Because the Russian president wants good weather in St. Petes?F.K.
|
Chemtrail Central Forum
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
This topic is 3 pages long: 1 2 3 
