Chemtrail Central
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Flight Explorer
Silver Orbs
News Archive
Top Websites
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Other Trails
  On The Verge of Re-Creating Creation

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Topic:   On The Verge of Re-Creating Creation

Topic page views:

Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ
700 posts, Jul 2000

posted 01-29-2001 01:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Deborah     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
January 28, 2001

On the Verge of Re-Creating Creation. Then What?


Ask a philosopher, a theologian, an artist or a composer how close humanity is to understanding the mystery of cosmic creation, and you are liable to get an answer that is majestic, inspiring and extremely imprecise. Ask a physicist the same question and the answer will be much more cut-and-dried: about 10 millionths of a second.

If the theory that the universe began in a single tremendous explosion more than 10 billion years ago is correct, as most scientists believe, then a few millionths of a second after that instant, the cosmos was filled with a fiery sea of particles that scientists refer to - inelegantly - as a quark-gluon plasma.

At a government laboratory near Exit 68 on the Long Island Expressway, physicists appear close to recreating a drop of that primordial sea by smashing together the central cores of gold nuclei at nearly the speed of light. And next summer NASA plans to launch a new satellite whose observations, along with experiments like those on Long Island, could help scientists work out a mechanistic, gears-and-levers theory of the genesis moment itself - the hows, if not the whys, of creation ex nihilo.

That final revelation, if so florid a word is apt in this context, may still be decades off, if indeed some hidden flaw does not bring the whole logical structure crashing to earth before then. But this may be a good time to ask whether, as science treads over those final 10 microseconds, there is a human epiphany - something to match the scale of "The Divine Comedy" or Handel's "Messiah" - waiting at the other end.

If so, will it leave any room for those glorious cultural expressions of creation's mystery, or simply reduce them to the status of historical knickknacks? When all terms in that equation are filled in, what becomes of the scientific quest itself?

Few scientists willingly take up those loaded questions. Not surprisingly, some religious and philosophical thinkers who are familiar with the latest scientific work are already considering them. In fact, in a few decades scientists may be surprised to find these thinkers there waiting for them.

"What is important in creation is not envisioning God up on some platform pushing the mighty `On' switch," said Dr. Owen Gingerich, a historian of science at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who is a member of the Anabaptist faith and who is noted for his writings on religion and science. "Rather, it is the design and intention that went into it, how it unfolds. In that sense, driving it back farther and farther with a gluon soup doesn't have any moral implication at all, because that doesn't take away from the grandeur of the design."

Mr. Gingerich said a cosmic explosion would merely add layers of meaning to the Biblical God's "Let there be light." But others have suspected, not without reason, that the cultural and emotional landscape after science passes through often resembles the site of a monster truck rally the day after the last race is run and the last six-pack discarded.

"The cold star-bane has cloven and rent their hearts in twain," Yeats famously sneered in a warning on the dangers of regarding the heavens scientifically, "and dead is all their human truth."

Indeed, evidence for scientists' deafness to the cultural and aesthetic implications of their work can be found in the very words they use to describe the creation event. They call it the Big Bang, a term coined in the 1950's by a British cosmologist, Sir Fred Hoyle, who was intentionally belittling the theory because he didn't believe in it. END

I would like to suggest that "revelations" are but bridges to yet other mysteries which lead to other revelations and so on. No beginning, no end. Only conscious living energy striving to express and understand itself. Let us hope that those who labor under the delusion that there is, in fact, a "Final Answer" don't end up permanently ruining things for the rest of us.

Edited to finish comment.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by Deborah on 01-29-2001]

IP Logged

Senior Member

Sedona, AZ 86339
149 posts, Oct 2000

posted 01-29-2001 08:25 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sedona     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"Only conscious living energy striving to express itself". Yes. The next big revelation for those scientists who are not already stiffened into tiny grooves will be one which the more spiritually awake have always known. The universe is alive and conscious to the very core. Furthermore, it all unfolds from within, according to a stupenduously glorious and mysterious design. I expect it will be a long time before we catch much more than dazzling glimpses of the bare outline of creative evolution. The universe will turn out to be so brilliant, so wise, so far beyond our present human conceptions of spiritual reality and spiritual will... that we will look back and wonder how the human race ever lived at all in such an all-pervading darkness.

IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Money Forum | The Web Hosting Forum | Papa Guru
Contact Us | Chemtrail Central

Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c