Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Other Trails
  Rods.....

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   Rods.....

Topic page views:

LWR
Cognitive Dissonance

Menlo Park, Ca, USA
224 posts, Apr 2001

posted 06-11-2001 02:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LWR     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Info, theory, pix, video etc.
All that and more can be gaped at
Rat Cheer http://www.roswellrods.com/pre.html

IP Logged

David
Chemtrail Information Agent


1290 posts, Oct 2000

posted 06-11-2001 05:46 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for David     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
LWR thank you for the link. They sure are strange looking little things.
Suprising what is on this planet that we never see.
The ones I have seen do not appear very large, in fact quite small. I used the edge of the roof line to block the sun, then could see them.

IP Logged

Lulu
ice behaving badly

right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000

posted 06-12-2001 10:43 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lulu   Visit Lulu's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Good topic here LWR. Rods and aerial life forms are fascinating and just waiting to be discovered it seems. I received a cool e-mail this morning from mbx99 (Michael Bonnickson). He gave me another link of his work to check out at. Flight of the Seraphim is truly inspirational. Thank you Michael!!
http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/angels/seraphim.html

see also: http://liquid2k.com/mbx99/index.html
for amazing animations.

IP Logged

Lulu
ice behaving badly

right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000

posted 06-12-2001 02:19 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lulu   Visit Lulu's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Another interesting link with a different theory/viewpoint I'd like to add to this thread sent to me from LTC8K6 today. Please check it out http://www.xenophilia.com/s/rods.htm
Thanks LTC!

IP Logged

Lulu
ice behaving badly

right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000

posted 06-12-2001 05:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lulu   Visit Lulu's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The following is LTC's thoughts on rods:


Lulu,

The roswell rods page used to have a message board. We tried to explain to
Jose what happens when insects fly in front of a video camera. The main
thing being that the closer an object is to the lens, the shorter the
distance it must travel to enter and exit the frame. Angular velocity is the
fancy term for it. The closer something is to the lens, the faster it
appears to be going. We had a long tussle over that and other issues such as
how some video cameras operate and whether they do or don't default to a
slower shutter speed with less light. Jose told everyone to use the "sports"
setting, but we said that the camera would only use the highest speed
possible for the available light, and that wouldn't necessarily be fast
enough to freeze motion. At any rate, the place where Jose filmed a lot of
his rods is called the cave of the swallows in Mexico, and swallows eat
insects. You can draw your own conclusions, but Jose took down the message
board during the discussions. Jose did some tests which were shot at
1/10,000sec shutter speed and insects were indeed frozen. None of his rods
films were ever shot at those speeds, however, as indicated by blurry
backgrounds and other blurry objects. The cave diver video was touted as a
high speed shot until we pointed out the motion blurred cave walls. I am a
hobby photographer and I always thought they were insects, particularly
after I saw the video of a swallow chasing a rod and keeping up with it. Sol
had a whole page which he called BUGRODS, but it seems to be down. He did a
lot of work and concluded that they were insects and their angular velocity
was causing them to look like rods. Also you have to remember that the video
is shown at 30 frames per second, regardless of what shutter speed it may
have been shot at. That is, each frame covers 1/30th of a second. Something
traveling only 10mph still travels around 6 inches per frame or 15 feet per
second.

As an example, suppose we set up two poles that are 20 feet apart. We set up
our camera so that the poles are lined up with the edges of the frame. An
insect traveling 20mph flies across the frame in between our 2 poles. 20mph
= 30 feet per second, so right away we know that we will have to be quick to
see this insect on the tape. It will cross the frame in 2/3 of a second and
will only be on 20 frames of the video at most. You would have to slow the
tape down to see it, even though it is only going a measly 20mph. If we zoom
in a little, we will have even less time to see it, because our frame width
is now smaller and the insect will appear on even fewer frames, as it has
less distance to travel to enter and exit the frame.

Regards,

LTC8K6

P.S. The high speed cameras that one guy set up were Redlake cameras from
Kodak, I believe. Sorry this is so long winded, but the many reasons for
motion blur are complex.


IP Logged

Moose
Senior Member

Fargo, ND
24 posts, Jan 2001

posted 06-12-2001 08:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Moose     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Several years ago, I was watching an episode of PBS's Nova one night, entitled "Kaboom" about the history of explosives. About 25 minutes into the story they showed a super-slow-mo film taken of a shack exploding somewhere out in the desert. Sure enough there was something that flew and curved in front of the camera as the explosion built in slow motion behind it, and even on the very fast film the object was still a blur. It looked alot like a "rod", and moved so fast that even watching the videotape of it on slow motion it was still hard to catch! I think local libraries sometimes carry the Nova series for check-out.

IP Logged

LWR
Cognitive Dissonance

Menlo Park, Ca, USA
224 posts, Apr 2001

posted 06-12-2001 09:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LWR     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There is a video I saw that was filmed by National Geographic...underwater, looking up.
Damned if a rod did not break thru the surface as it entered the water and went by the camera man who saw nothing at the time. THAT was the one that convinced me. Any one else seen that? Anyone know where the clip is?

IP Logged

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000

posted 06-12-2001 09:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
They mention the National Geographic rods here...
http://www.rense.com/ufo6/rodstran.htm

IP Logged

Lulu
ice behaving badly

right here
2553 posts, Dec 2000

posted 06-14-2001 01:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lulu   Visit Lulu's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ecerpt from an e-mail I received from mbx99 this morning concerning rods:


"Please know that the images & animations from "Sky~View 2000" were made with the focus always set to infinity & the zoom factor was moderate. The roof line in many scenes was 8 feet from the camera. The small tree top when present was 30 feet from the camera. One of the animations seems to clearly show a white object rising from beyond the 30 foot distant tree top. Birds in my digital recording look exactly like birds. Some insects were noted in this recording & their behavior was as would be expected of insects. Most if not all of the objects that I have presented are unlike any insects that I know of. Please note the clusters of small white objects in some of the animations. These are examples of a swarming that I saw that day. Dozens of these swarms were seen. All swarming that I saw were at least 100 feet from the camera. I have been an avid sky watcher for decades & this is the only day I have ever seen such swarming. They were easily discernable from the multitude of other activity going on by their very rhythmic motion. Magnetics & the orbit of an electron would always come to mind when seeing them.
StarGate-1 the TV show had some creatures that seemed similar. Spherical energy based life form. This show aired about 3-4 days ago on Dishnetwork. I will extract & send you some better examples of this as my time permits."

Thanks for the informative e-mail Michael!

IP Logged

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000

posted 06-14-2001 01:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
You know, I could easily believe a lot of rods are actually bugs, but it is harder for me to see how this was a bug...




[Edited 1 times, lastly by Thermit on 06-14-2001]

IP Logged

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000

posted 06-14-2001 02:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

IP Logged

lotus perception
New Member


american
1 posts, Dec 2002

posted 12-02-2002 02:05 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lotus perception     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am wondering if these "rods" that are now the new fad in atmospheric anomalies, have anything whatsoever to do with the physics field of "superspace" because they term them as "space worms" that are collective particles of energy that are travelling in and out of our dimension through, suprise; "wormholes"!! I myself have been able to see these figures since long before 1994, and live nowhere near roswell???

IP Logged

zoobie555
Tired, need to get to bed earlier.


Conroe, Texas, USA
185 posts, Jan 2003

posted 01-05-2003 12:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for zoobie555     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Of all unexplained phenomenon, ie. aliens, ufos, bigfoot etc. I believe that the most likely to be real and that will be accepted by mainstream science in a relatively short time is the existance of RODS. Just a personal opinion. When I saw the first stills of them posted on the internet years ago, I was not at all convinced, but having seen more recent photos and videos, the visible evidence is overwhelming, more so even than chemtrails. We'll be hearing a lot more from the mainstream about rods in the next few years, although it may be a long time until we really know what they are.

IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Money Forum | The Web Hosting Forum | Papa Guru
Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c