Chemtrail Central
Register
Login
Member's Area
Member List
What's Popular
Who's Linking
Image Database
Search Images
New Images
Gallery
Link Database
Search Links
New Links
Chemtrail Forum
Active Topics
Who's Online
Polls
Search
Research
Flight Explorer
Unidentifiable
FAQs
Phenomena
Disinformation
Silver Orbs
Transcripts
News Archive
Top Websites
Channelings
Etcetera
PSAs
Media
Vote
  Chemtrail Central Forum
  Other Trails
  Source of the Anthrax

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author
Topic:   Source of the Anthrax

Topic page views:

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000

posted 10-30-2001 12:30 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Great article, a little slow coming up though...
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991490

quote:

Anthrax preparation indicates home-grown origin

16:04 29 October 01
Debora MacKenzie

As anthrax continues to turn up in US postal facilities, and postal workers, evidence is emerging that it is an American product. Not only are the bacteria genetically close to the strain the US used in its own anthrax weapons in the 1960s, but New Scientist can reveal that the spores also seem to have been prepared according to the secret US "weaponisation" recipe.

This is troubling, say bioterrorism specialists. While the terrorists behind the anthrax-laced mail US might have got hold of the strain of anthrax in several laboratories around the world, the method the US developed for turning a wet bacterial culture into a dangerous, dry powder is a closely-guarded secret.

Its apparent use in the current spate of attacks could mean the secret is out. An alternative is that someone is using anthrax produced by the old US biological weapons programme that ended in 1969 - in which case the scope for further attacks could be limited. Experiments to determine which is true are underway now in the US.


Particle size


Analysis of the physical form of the anthrax powder used in the attacks has lagged behind the genetic analysis. Bacteria from patients or contaminated surfaces can be multiplied up to provide enough DNA for analysis. But a physical examination requires a sample of the actual powder, and so far, only two are known. One is from the letter opened in Senator Tom Daschle's office in Washington on 15 October, the other from a letter sent to the New York Post.

Last week, US Senator Bill Frist announced that the powder in the Daschle letter was in particles 1.5 to 3.0 microns wide, a very narrow size range. The results of the physical analysis of the New York Post letter are not yet known.

The actual bacterial spore is ovoid and around half a micron wide. The whole trick to making anthrax weapons, says Ken Alibek, the former deputy head of the Soviet Union's bioweapons programme, is to turn wet cultures of bacteria into dry clumps of spores that are each between one and five microns wide, the optimal size to penetrate a human lung and stay there.

But dried spores tend to form larger particles, with a static electric charge that makes them cling doggedly to surfaces rather than floating through the air where they can be inhaled.


Fluidising agent


The Soviet Union got around this by grinding dried cultures along with chemicals that cause the particles to remain separate. Iraq is the only other state known to have tried making such a weapon, and it dried anthrax cultures along with bentonite, a clay used as a fluidising agent in powders. But last week the White House said there was no bentonite in the Daschle letter.

For its weapon, say informed sources, the US added various molecules, including surfactants, to the wet spores so that when they were dried, they broke up into fine particles within a very narrow size range of a few microns. There was no need to grind the powder further. Chemical tests are now being conducted to see if any traces of the US additives are present.

Grinding was considered the most likely way for terrorists to create anthrax powders, as the milling machinery is not hard to obtain. But it results in a wider range of particle sizes. Large particles can be filtered out, but smaller ones remain. The Daschle anthrax, say sources, looks instead like it was made according to the US recipe.


Anthrax stockpile


The question is, when? At its peak, the US bioweapons programme made 900 kilograms of dry anthrax powder per year at a plant in Arkansas. That stockpile was destroyed when the US renounced bioweapons in 1969. But small samples might have been saved without being noticed.

Experiments are now underway in the US to determine how many bacterial generations separate the anthrax being used in the attacks from the most closely related strains in a reference collection of anthrax, which includes the US weapons strain.

If the number is very small, and the anthrax closely resembles the weapons strain genetically, it could be a leftover from weapons production before 1969.

If, however, the bacteria have gone through many cell divisions since the most closely related strain was frozen, they might have been produced more recently. That would mean someone has obtained not only a virulent strain of anthrax, but the know-how to turn it into what was probably the most sophisticated anthrax weapon ever produced.



IP Logged

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000

posted 12-18-2001 03:56 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Anthrax on the wind...
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99991697

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 12-18-2001 04:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A34707-2001Dec12.html
Ft Detrick ships back more than Dugway sent?

IP Logged

Thermit
Tech


Houston, TX
2733 posts, Jul 2000

posted 12-18-2001 04:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thermit   Visit Thermit's Homepage!   Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting. They really can't keep up with their 'powders of death' now can they...

IP Logged

penumbra
quarky


North Carolina
668 posts, Apr 2001

posted 12-18-2001 09:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for penumbra     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
YIKES!!!! Anthrax on the wind?!? Plus the latest reports that to rid a building of anthrax it needs to be burned down. Makes me think that we have only seen the beginning of this. I really haven't worried too much about the anthrax, trying to avoid the media circus! Maybe I shoud be more paranoid rather than less?

IP Logged

mark sky
bin Rydin


SW coast of Oregon
1089 posts, Jun 2001

posted 12-20-2001 02:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mark sky     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49502-2001Dec15.html

IP Logged

3T3L1
Differentiated Mouse Fibroblasts


Lubbock, Texas
1347 posts, Mar 2001

posted 12-20-2001 09:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for 3T3L1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Relevant quotes:
Although many laboratories possess the Ames strain of anthrax involved in this fall's bioterrorist attacks, only five laboratories so far have been found to have spores with perfect genetic matches to those in the Senate letters, the scientists said. And all those labs can trace back their samples to a single U.S. military source: the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Disease (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick, Md.

Those matching samples are at Fort Detrick; the Dugway Proving Ground military research facility in Utah; a British military lab called Porton Down; and microbial depositories at Louisiana State University (LSU) and Northern Arizona University.

Of the domestic labs, Dugway has attracted the most attention from the FBI, he said.

Dugway is also the only facility known in recent years to have processed anthrax spores into the powdery form that is most easily inhaled.

It looks more and more like the anthrax sent through the mail was NOT created by a mad scientist working in a makeshift laboratory in his garage.

The terrorist used approximately two grams of spores per letter. I doubt that anthrax spores at Dugway were inventoried closely enough that, say, 10 grams of spores would even have been missed.

Two possibilities come to mind:

1. This is an inside job, by someone who wants to get back at "the system."

2. For some reason, the CIA was giving out samples of weaponized anthrax, and one of the recipients decided to put the samples to good use.

IP Logged

All times are CT (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:








Money Forum | The Web Hosting Forum | Papa Guru
Contact Us | Chemtrail Central


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c