posted 07-19-2001 01:25 AM            

Now, Toxdoc, the DOD and the DOE have repeatdetly sprayed civilian population centers for counter bioweapon purposes and have flatly admitted to do soing so. Your assertion that "Chemtrails do not exist. Fact." is as ignorant as it is arrogant.

The idea that so many people are perceiving something that 'doesn't exist' is preposterous. Surely this is obvious? I'm still waiting to see some sort of reasonable explanation or debunking tactic from the sceptic's faction. And what do I get?

Chemtrails do not exist. Fact. Chemtrail believers kill infants.

posted 07-19-2001 01:35 AM            

this is too easy...chem what is the halflife of radioiodine in soil ?

T/S

posted 07-19-2001 03:33 AM            

so chem, 8 days of radioactive fallout causes these type of statistics ? this event kills twice as many people as the worst disaster ?....the articles focus' was on that substance I-131, there were other components...maybe I read it wrong...or my terminology off...help me here...

From the 380 million person-rads of total exposure roughly 120,000 extra cases of thyroid cancer can be expected to develop, resulting in some 6,000 deaths [See note]. For comparison, the worst industrial disaster in history (Bhopal, India; 3 December 1984) killed about 3000 people and injured 150,000.

If you'll notice that in the mutilations, all areas ingestible, digestible, and excretable of the animals were taken...now it does not take a rocket scientist to figure this one out...also the groin which is the lymph node area as described were taken as well...all these area's are "CANCER RISK" area's....

A soil tid-bit some facts exist here like this one:

but most were exposed indirectly through consuming milk from cows or goats that grazed on contaminated pasture land.

http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/030906175X?OpenDocument

the cancer rate in my county is 5 times the national average....I'm a little sensitive to this issue...

T/S

posted 07-19-2001 03:55 AM            

I'm glad you posted that map. I'll see if I can dig up something comparable with regards to cattle mutes tomorrow. But right off the top of my head, I can't understand how your theory would apply to cases being reported in Fla, for instance. Or human mutilations being reported in South America.

posted 07-20-2001 02:00 AM            

Recent Discussion

posted 07-20-2001 03:27 AM            

The analogies between this and the current aerosol spraying program being conducted are endless.

There are those that will tell you a program this large could not possibly remain secret. They are correct.

The issue is, at this point, almost common knowledge.

They will then tell you that that some insider would have surely stepped forward if this program posed as great a risk to public health as so many of us a have claimed.

I would point out that Manhattan Project's secrecy was successfully maintained.

I would point out that the Atomic Energy Commision was fully aware of the health hazards involved in this earlier atmospheric testing and chose not to inform the American people, for fear that a public outcry would jeapordize their agenda.

How can seemingly intelligent people, who are aware of these facts, be so impossibly blind to the reality of our current situation?

How can they be so indifferent to the suffering and illness that so many people are reporting in connection with these poderous 'contrails'?

The only analogy I can make is to the members of the Nazi Party that still, to this day, maintain that the Holocaust was a 'hoax'. There were never any concentration camps. The video footage was 'faked'. And on and on and on.

It took, what, forty years for the full effects of atomic atmospheric testing to be released to the public? Even twenty-five years after the testing had stopped the DOD and the DOE stonewalled any attempt for public disclosure of this information?

Guess what? That's not going to happen this time. The people responsible for this latest round of atmospheric testing are going to spill their guts. I want to know just what the hell I have been exposed to for these last three years.

posted 07-20-2001 09:10 AM            

What's your theory about how the mutilations are happening? Or are they just normal contrails? Oops...no! That's a different discussion.

[Edited 1 times, lastly by 3T3L1 on 07-20-2001]

posted 07-20-2001 10:29 AM            

Thanks for that Rommel link LTC8K6. Makes sense that small scavengers would eat the soft parts, although I'd think any decent size critter would want to just rip into the meat, Seringetti style...

posted 07-20-2001 12:53 PM            

If I drop dead of a heart attack, and a dog comes along awhile later to gnaw on me, I won't bleed either. There will be very little blood visible the next morning. Most of my blood will be coagulated at the lowest point of my body due to gravity. That part of my body will show lividity, verifying that I have been lying in that position since death.

posted 07-20-2001 02:44 PM            

The only theory that explains this cauterization is that a portable, high power laser was employed. Scavengers, to my knowledge, are not equipped with this kind of technology.

posted 07-21-2001 04:31 PM            

quote:

---

An Alien Harvest (1989) by Linda Moulton Howe details much of the story, including photographs of wounds described as weird, bizarre, suspicious and inexplicable. She claims that her photos reveal that tissue gathered from mutilator cuts in Arkansas on March 11, 1989, revealed the following characteristics under microscopic examination:

The line is pinpoint thin;
The line was subjected to high heat, probably 300 degrees Fahrenheit or above, leaving a hard and darkened edge;
The cuts were made rapidly, probably in two minutes or less, because there is no inflammatory cell destruction which typically begins in a few minutes after any trauma to tissue.

---