posted 01-22-2002 11:10 AM            

EMI, led by aristocrat Sir Joseph Lockwood, stands for Electrical and Mechanical Instruments, and is one of Britain's largest producers of military electronics. Martin was director of EMI's subsidiary, Parlophone. By the mid-sixties EMI, now called Thorn EMI, created a music divison which had grown to 74,321 employees and had annual sales of $3.19 billion.

EMI was also a key member of Britain's military intelligence establishment.

After the war, in 1945, EMI's European production head Walter Legge virtually took over control of classical music recordings, signing up dozens of starving German classical musicians and singers to EMI contracts. Musicians who sought to preserve the performance tradition of Beethoven and Brahms, were relegated to obscurity while "ex-Nazi" Party members were promoted. Legge signed and recorded Nazi member, the late Herbert Von Karajan, promoting him to superstar status, while great conductors such as Wilhelm Furtwangler were ignored.

From the beginning, EMI created the myth of the Beatles' great popularity. In August of 1963, at their first major television appearance at the London Palladium, thousands of their fans supposedly rioted. The next day every mass-circulation newspaper in Great Britain carried a front page picture and story stating, "Police fought to hold back 1,000 squealing teenagers." Yet, the picture displayed in each newspaper was cropped so closely that only three or four of the "squealing teenagers" could be seen. The story was a fraud. According to a photographer on the scene, "There were no riots. I was there. We saw eight girls, even less than eight."

In February 1964, the Beatles myth hit the United States, complete with the orchestrated riots at Kennedy Airport, previously mentioned. To launch their first tour, the media created one of the largest mass audiences in history. For an unprecedented two Sundays in a row, on the Ed Sullivan Show, over 75 million Americans watched the Beatles shake their heads and sway their bodies in a ritual which was soon to be replicated by hundreds of future rock groups.

On returning to England, the Beatles were rewarded by the British aristocracy they served so well . In October 1965, the four were inducted into the Order of Chivalry, and were personally awarded the accolade of Member of the British Empire by Queen Elizabeth at Buckingham palace.

Up from the Dregs:
The Rolling Stones

The credit for the origination of today's blatantly Satanic "heavy metal rock," goes to the English group, the Rolling Stones. Their rise to fame was closely connected with that of the Beatles.

The Stones, as they were called, were widely characterized as the counterparts to the Beatles. "The Stones" were "mean,'' "dirty" and "rebellious," whereas the Beatles were the well-groomed "Fab Four." Though seemingly competitors, they were merely two sides of the same operation. The Stones' first hit record was actually written by the Beatles, and it was Beatle member George Harrison who set up the arrangements for their first recording contract.

Following the same game plan as the Beatles, in the spring of 1963 the Rolling Stones appeared on one of England's most popular family television shows, Thank Your Lucky Stars. Only this time, the reaction by the middle-aged viewers was quite different from that to the Beatles. Hundreds of angry letters were sent, with a typical letter stating "It is disgraceful that long-haired louts such as these should be allowed to appear on television. Their appearance was absolutely disgusting."

The program, however, had exactly the planned effect. Rolling Stones' manager Andrew Oldham was elated at the response. He told the group, "We're going to make you exactly opposite to those nice, clean, tidy Beatles. And the more the parents hate you, the more the kids will love you. Just wait and see."

In 1964, the Rolling Stones appeared on the Ed Sullivan Show, as the Beatles had done earlier. This time though, the coast-to-coast audience beheld the spectacle of the television studio being ripped to shreds by Stones fans. Sullivan said on the air afterward, "I promise you, they will never be back on our show." The publicity, however, was exactly what was wanted. Within a few months, the group's records were selling millions of copies.

The plan was now to use both the Beatles and the Rolling Stones as the means to transform an entire generation into heathen followers of the New Age, followers which could mold into the future cadre of a Satanic movement and then deploy into our schools, law enforcment agencies and political leadership.

Enter Satan

In his book, The Ultimate Evil, investigator-author Maury Terry writes that between 1966 and 1967, the Satanic cult, the Process Church, "sought to recruit the Rolling Stones and the Beatles." During this period, Terry reports that a photo of Rolling Stones leader Mick Jagger's longtime girlfriend, Marianne Faithfull, appeared in an issue of The Process Magazine. The picture shows her supine, as if dead, clutching a rose. Terry's book goes on to implicate the Process Church cult in the Charles Manson and Son of Sam multiple murders. It was the former lawyer for the Process Church, John Markham, who recently ran the frameup trial against Lyndon LaRouche.

A key link between the Rolling Stones and the Process Church is Kenneth Anger, a follower of the "founding father" of modern Satanism, Aleister Crowley. Anger, born in 1930, and a child Hollywood movie star, became a devoted disciple of Crowley.

Crowley was born in 1875 and was called the "Great Beast." He was known to practice ritual child sacrifice regularly, in his role as Satan's high priest or "Magus." Crowley died in 1947 due to complications of his huge heroin addiction. Before dying, he succeeded in establishing Satanic covens in many U.S. cities including Hollywood. Anger, like Crowley, is a Magus, and appears to be the heir to Crowley.

posted 01-22-2002 01:03 PM            

If I'm not mistaken, some of those knighted by the queen of England include;

Paul McCartney
Bill Clinton
George Bush?

Clinton and daughter Chelsea both have attended Oxford in England, which is supposedly the home of a group of aristocrats (TPTB) who have been sworn to the overthrow of the U.S. government. (don't have the link at this time). Most of us know of Clinton admin. attacks against U.S. Constitution (2nd ammendment), cooperation with Red China, selling out his country etc.

McCartney has denied the fact that John Lennon gave the Beatles it's name in homage to American band, Buddy Holly and the Crickets. There is written evidence in Lennons notes of the day he wrote in the margins of a book related to Buddy Holly, his idea for the bands name.

I also mentioned in JJ&J thread that those 3 musician/singers were all American and had 11 letters in their name. To be fair, there were also British deaths in R&R royalty; Keith Moon (The Who), Brian Wilson (Rolling Stones), John Bonham (Led Zeppelin)... Wilson has 11 letters, but only the Americans (who could be considered R&R royalty in America) all had the 11 letters, for what it's worth.

BTW, I don't mean to imply that Hendrix, Joplin and Morrison were negative, as far as their music... far from it, just the idea that they may have been used and disposed of by TPTB. They may have been used, in a way, as a weapon by TPTB as a means of promoting alcohol, sex, drugs, R&R lifestyle that contibuted to the mass confusion, destruction of the nuclear family in the U.S. specifically.

By negative I was referring to the satanic-oriented groups that followed the 60's.

Morrison & the Doors questioned authority, Hendrix' rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner may have been enough to have him killed by some element of TPTB?
I'm not that familiar with Janis Joplin or her music.

Lyndon LaRouche, if you recall stated that the Queen of England was part of the world-wide drug trafficking, and was imprisoned in U.S. on allegedly trumped up charges. He was attacked by the media for what, at the time, seemed to be outrageous accusations.

(that's another whole different thread.)

BTW, I wonder how our founding fathers would have felt about American presidents being 'knighted' by the Queen of England!!??

....and, has it ever been done before?

posted 01-23-2002 03:05 AM            

© 1999 John Quinn/NewsHawk® inc.

Today is the birthday of Beatle John Lennon.

In honor of the man and his wonderful music NewsHawk Inc. has decided to take a look at what was going on "behind the scenes" of the 1960's "countercultural revolution"; to explore a bit how the world's most popular and undeniably talented rock band was without ANY doubt "used" by New World Order social manipulators (as were MANY other pop music groups) in an ongoing project designed to control the development of human society in the most fundamental ways.

There are direct links which tie these activities to certain covert scientific projects of an extremely advanced, esoteric nature which were exploring the realms of (manipulation of) consciousness, time, thought and indeed "reality" itself, which were being conducted during the same period of time on Long Island, N.Y.: activities which were part of the Phoenix/Montauk Project.

In fact we are talking about two sides of the same coin here. On one side, the covert, subtle manipulation and control of not only thought and human consciousness but of the most fundamental, subatomic, electromagnetic matrix of (perceived) reality itself, using newly-developed electromagnetic/radio frequency technologies of extraordinary, unheard-of power and potential. On the other side, directly and overtly shifting the paradigm, changing the basic concepts, widening the parameters--the envelope, changing the playing field and all the rules of play by which society defines itself within an exceptionally short period of time.

Factor in what was happening on more political levels such as the civil rights and anti-war movements, stir briskly while at full boil, and STAND BACK!

What's rather amazing in fact is that society did NOT disintegrate/implode/explode in the way the social manipulators had apparently hoped. The higher qualities of human nature seemed to consistently float to the surface--with some notable exceptions--and certainly began to acquire a significant, if not nearly irresistible momentum of it's own; pulling in larger and larger segments, of "straight"', conventional, "moral majority" type elements of society. obviously, the big plan was backfiring severely and something "needed to be done."

The Beatles were also part of the mass experimentation that contemporary society was being subjected to by the CIA, Britain's MI6 and the Tavistock Institute utilizing extraordinarily powerful mind-altering psychedelic/psychotropic drugs.

More than most of the other boys in the band, John Lennon became increasingly aware not only of the extent of corruption, co-opting and infiltration of the counterculture -- most CERTAINLY including the rock music scene -- by these same covert government intelligence elements.

Lennon was also aware than one of the "big guns" in the CIA/Tavistock/MI6 arsenal, LSD, had been having effect upon the population groups to which it had been funneled so extensively that was most unexpected on the part of the social manipulators--and to a large extent the effect was rather positive and beneficial.

Shortly before Lennon's death at the hands of what beyond the faintest glimmer of a shadow a doubt was a mind-controlled, "Manchurian Candidate" type assassin deployed by Tavistock/CIA/MI6, Mark Chapman to terminate a "loose cannon", Lennon had the audacity to massively and blatantly "out" the aforementioned consortium in a Playboy interview -- in which he made note of LSD's completely unforeseen liberating impact upon human society and civilization--pretty much thumbing his nose at the whole bunch and their whole trip; AND indicating as well that he was aware of the extent to which he and other pop musicians had been set up--to be used as dupes in massive social manipulation schemes.

Shortly afterward, New World Order head honcho and Satanist, globalist, CIA chief and Tavistock underling vice-president George Bush had Lennon slaughtered on the streets of new York; where he died in the arms of someone that a number of sources claim was the monarch agent deployed by MI6/CIA to keep the exceptionally intelligent Lennon constantly gravitating toward the social fringe; thereby keeping his potential influence at least minimized -- Yoko Ono. That's NOT to say that even IF this last supposition is true, that genuine love and a fulfilling relationship did not exist between the two and that Yoko's "programming", just like John's, broke up and fell apart.

And what about those Beatles, anyway? Anyone who has heard the Beatles' live tapes recorded in 1961 and 1962 on the "Reeperbahn" in Hamburg, Germany realizes that this was an incredibly talented and energetic bunch of rockers who no matter what would have undoubtedly had a significant impact upon popular music and thus upon society itself, regardless of things which occurred subsequently in their saga.

And without any doubt being given access to state-of-the art audio and recording technologies and facilities stimulated their creativity quite a bit--for the benefit of all; "MR. KITE" included.

Personally I think the Beatles were definitely "the greatest"--or damn close to it.

NewsHawk will be exploring this subject further in the weeks ahead.

posted 01-24-2002 07:42 PM            

Love your posts on rock & roll and mind control.

Just something I noticed. The Queeen can't knight a citizen of the U.S. (meaning he's not Sir William Jefferson Clinton).

She can only give them an honorary sort of knighthood or some member of the British Empire.

But she's another different thread, entirely.

posted 01-25-2002 05:33 PM            

I didn't know that about 'knighting'. I think whatever ceremony was involved it was downplayed, (though it was at least mentioned) by the media. I always thought that it was funny why our U.S. media (NBCABCCBSetc.) made such a big deal of British Royalty, coronations and all that.

I always thought, who gives a damn? But it must be indicative of what the media (or who pulls the strings of the media), thinks is important, or important for us to see? Maybe not, maybe it's just an excuse to waste valuable TV time on something that has no influence in our lives?

Maybe it's like golf, ratings are low for even big championship pro events, but they put them on anyway. I thinks it's because the CEO's of the networks and their cohorts like to watch it? So they don't really care about ratings in that case. That may be another sign that ratings are a scam in themselves. Like political polls. The decision makers or controllers of the ratings/polls are the ones who determine what's popular, not the people.

Bob, I always thought the Beatles were just too amazing almost like they were supernatural in the effect they had on society/culture. I grew up hearing it all the time and I loved it too. But now, some of these things about mind control etc. seem to make sense. The music, or some of it was designed to be used with drugs, to have certain effects on a targeted audiences for purposes other than just profit. Some of this music was politically inspired in ways that we, at the time could never have imagined?

Maybe our entire generation and current generations have been bred to accept and acknowledge drugs as a form of entertainment/rebellion. Now we have the makings(?) of a police state in the U.S., with more people (Americans), in U.S. jails than in any other country! Most of them are drug-related charges!

First, TPTB create a demand for the drugs, then they make them available, then they make them illegal, then they have an excuse to crack-down on a 'criminal society' that they themselves (TPTB) have created!!

I think it's true that some of them found out, like Lennon (and maybe Harrison, recently deceased, and stabbed in his own home last year?) and may have been a threat to the ones who pulled the other strings? (not the guitar strings! no pun intended).

posted 01-25-2002 06:09 PM            

BOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!! I love puns. Keep up the good work.

Re: media's fascination w/royalty. Ever since the U.S. had "Camelot" w/the Kennedys, they have gone nuts over the British (by design?). Some might say it's because we were "once" under the thumb of the Brits. (P.S. We still are, but again, this is another thread entirely).

The Floyd may be my fave band but The Beatles were my first intro. into rock & roll (them and The Moody Blues). The Beatles' music is/was incredibly amazing. I've never seen or heard another band like them nor have I seen another group have the same kind of effect on society/culture. Maybe it was designed that way...

Nowadays all we get are bubble gum bimbos and androids.

posted 03-02-2002 11:08 AM            

On the other hand, you may be right. King may be part of the good guys that has been promoted by 'the Forces of Light', like Oliver Stone, the Internet, C-SPAN? When people are given glimpses of the Truth, aside from all the disinfo & media noise out there, we eat it up because we're all hungry for the Truth. That would explain the success and popularity of successful people and organizations that can get beyond mainstream media censorship?

______________________________________________________

Here's something found recently related to the use of contemporary music;

(The Montauk Project is/was located in New York.)

quote:

---

"As I'm most certainly not a scientist, quantum or particle physicist, radio-electronics genius, ex-military-intelligence operative, or anything remotely like any of those, the question would be -- for what purpose could I possibly have been inducted (or is that abducted?) into the Montauk Project? Given that probably tens of thousands of youngsters of varying ages have been and are being (usually unwittingly) conscripted for "use" in virtually all phases and aspects of this Project and numerous other clandestine projects (I'd think from dishwashers and sanitation workers to particle physicists and everything in between -- the Montauk underground is in fact an underground city), there may be no way to say for certain how I may have been used. As there is such severe psychological and spiritual manipulation and abuse involved in the programming of conscripted victims, in addition to deliberate memory-tampering and other mind-wiping procedures, there may be no way to say for certain if I was so used at all.

It's conceivable and I think likely that inductees are scanned and evaluated for any particular abilities which they possess and are shunted accordingly into corresponding functions at the Montauk base. If that were to be the case, then very likely my talents, skills and abilities would probably be strongest in two fields: writing and music composition, and perhaps these talents (or others) were taken advantage of and utilized by Project administrators. I also think I might possess a bit of so-called "psychic" ability -- maybe more than I'm aware of. According to Preston Nichols, popular music has been used extensively by the operators of the Montauk Project as a tool for influencing the "collective unconscious" if you will; in particular that of the younger generation.

Nichols states that state-of-the-art recording facilities and psycho- acoustic techniques were utilized to "insert" subliminal programming into popular music which can trigger certain responses and changes in awareness; also that time-travel technology enabled this to be implemented both in the past as well as the present (and presumably the future too). Music was and is considered a very powerful and effective way to access the deeper emotional and instinctual levels of consciousness, and contemporary popular music has been thoroughly by intelligence agencies, secret societies and (secret) governments to that end. Such infiltration and subversion of other forms of communication and entertainment including television networks, the motion picture industry and the news media in general has been explored and documented, but I guess it's a bit of a shock for personal reasons to realize that contemporary music has not escaped such a fate. Mr. Nichols has further stated as well that, once again, the Mafia has worked and is working hand in glove with intelligence agencies in such operations involving mass communications."

by John A. Quinn

---

posted 03-02-2002 12:30 PM            

The author's entire case is based on the photo of Lennon autographing an album cover for Chapman and a photo of King that was taken around the same time. http://www.lennonmurdertruth.com/killersface.asp

Of course, the author mentioned Firestarter which was a pretty big mistake because it made it seem more of a retaliation by the government for, as I said before, King even suggesting that they were performing experiments.

posted 03-02-2002 01:17 PM            

To me it sounds like something from the National Enquirer, reportedly a CIA front used to smear targets, promote disinformation and ridicule real revelations, through 'guilt by association', like structures on Mars. Like, most people in the grocery store, (almost everybody goes to the grocery store, and has to wait in line, you can't help but notice their headlines)... when they see some of the stories, and then headlines about structures on Mars, for example, they think , "Oh yeah, right... I'm sure there are structures on Mars, it can't be true if it's in the National Enquirer!", hence, most people tend to think structures on Mars are not real.

But in this case with this 'King as killer of Lennon' story, the other function of rags like National Enquirer would come into play, that is; to send a threat/mesg to the targeted celebrity/personality. If this were a story made up by a CIA operation, they could just be sending a mesg to King, that he is now on their list. If you try to expose or knock TPTS, we're going to target you.

It could be like when Senator Tower from TX was killed in a plane crash, (one of 2 Iran-Contra senate investigators killed, both in plane crashes 1 day apart), just about 2 weeks prior to a media smear campaign, labeling him as a drunk, and a 'womanizer'.

Remember that King was also run down, severely injured, almost killed in or near his hometown some time ago. Since then, he took a leave of abscense, (several months just to recuperate). He's apparently been very low-key since then, staying out of the public eye. The mesg may have been sent (and received), as it was to Senator Tower and others who rock the boat.

BTW, I'm sure you're right about the Rap industry. To me, the purpose seems to glorify and promote a drug/sex/money/anger/hate culture?... mostly aimed at blacks and young whites who copy what they see in attitudes, style of clothes, language and actions.

It could be that some rap stars who may have bucked the system, or tried to make rap more positive may have been bumped off, like Tupac Shakur? I know that a few rappers have been shot to death, but I don't really know the details of those killings.

posted 03-05-2002 09:23 PM            

"What's rather amazing in fact is that society did NOT disintegrate/implode/explode in the way the social manipulators had apparently hoped. The higher qualities of human nature seemed to consistently float to the surface--with some notable exceptions--and certainly began to acquire a significant, if not nearly irresistible momentum of it's own...."

Pray that Chemtrails turn out the same.