|
Author
|
|
Topic: Would NASA Lie? | Topic page views:
|
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 03-06-2001 08:54 PM
 Just for the record, I don't really think NASA is involved in the Chemtrail cover-up, but hey, I could be wrong...
quote:
At this time, Dryden has never been involved in research using a U-2. After Francis Gary Powers was shot down over the Soviet Union during a CIA spy flight on 1 May 1960, NASA issued a press release with a cover story about a U-2 conducting weather research that may have strayed off course after the pilot "reported difficulties with his oxygen equipment." To bolster the cover-up, a U-2 was quickly painted in NASA markings, with a fictitious NASA serial number, and put on display for the news media at the NASA Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base on 6 May 1960. The next day, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev exposed the cover-up by revealing that the pilot had been captured, and espionage equipment had been recovered from the wreckage. 7 May 1956 - NACA Director Dr. Hugh L. Dryden issues a press release stating that U-2 aircraft are conducting weather research for NACA with Air Force support from Watertown, Nevada.
22 May 1956 - A second press release is issued with cover story for U-2 aircraft operating overseas.
1 May 1960 - Francis Gary Powers is shot down near Sverdlovsk.
6 May 1960 - U-2 with fictitious NASA serial number and NASA markings is shown to news media to bolster cover story of NASA weather research flights with U-2.
7 May 1960 - Soviet Premier Kruschev announces capture and confession of Powers.
1960 - Dr. Hugh L. Dryden tells senate committee that some 200 U-2 flights carrying NASA weather instrumentation have taken place since 1956.
2 April 1971 - NASA receives two U-2C aircraft for high-altitude research.
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/photo/U-2/HTML/index.html 
|
Norrin Radd
Senior Member
92 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 03-07-2001 04:05 AM
I heard the U2 was forced off course by some guy in a red suit with a bunch of reindeer, but hey, I try to keep an open mind about these things.Brent 
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 03-07-2001 09:30 AM
Hehe...that's right Norrin Radd, that was the original cover story, but then they realized it wasn't the Christmas season...
|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 03-07-2001 09:33 AM
Another mistruth? quote:
To the shock and amazement of many in the planetary science community, the Space Telescope Science Institute (STSI) on April 16th, 1999, released the first Hubble Space Telescope images ever taken of the Moon. What was shocking to so many of these scientists and researchers was not what was on the images, but rather that the images themselves even existed. You see, for more than 5 years, the STSI and NASA have been consistently claiming that the Hubble flatly could not image the Moon!
http://www.enterprisemission.com/hubble.htm 
|
Deborah
Take It To The Limit

Flagstaff, AZ 700 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 03-07-2001 10:02 AM
Heh heh.
|
Norrin Radd
Senior Member
92 posts, Nov 2000
|
posted 03-07-2001 11:28 AM
I wonder what is on the moon that NASA doesn't want us to know about?It seems lies and Government agencies go together better than peanut butter and jelly. I hope someday the American people wake up. Brent 
|
cydoniaquest
nobody
nowhere 803 posts, Aug 2000
|
posted 03-07-2001 12:34 PM
Speaking of stuff on the moon, in his book "Day After Roswell", Col. Philip J. Corso states that the military operates a base on the moon....the operation started back in the 50's. I think he said it was called operation Horizon.Now there are a lot of extraordinary things claimed in this book, but it makes fascinating reading never-the-less especially when you consider Philip Corso wrote this in his dying days for his family. I don't understand why a man would lie then....because it's been my thinking that old men who know they are going to die soon become more honest. Why not tell the truth at that point....what have you got to loose, and what good will money do you? Among many other things, he also claimed that the semi-conductor was one of the products of back-engineered alien technology obtained from the downed UFO at Roswell, which conflicts with my understanding that William Shockly and a team of two other scientists developed the semi-conductor at Bell labs. So I have some confused feelings about the book.....but if the claims are true, it would certainly explain why we haven't even thought about going back to the moon in a long, long time. Maybe there's something up there (like a base) that NASA, in cooperation with the military, doesn't want the people knowing about.

|
Thermit
Tech

Houston, TX 2733 posts, Jul 2000
|
posted 03-08-2001 04:18 PM
The following quote was taken from the Frasier TV show, aired on March 6th, 2001. Former astronaut, Senator John Glenn said: "Back in those glory days, I was very uncomfortable when they asked us to say things that I didn't want to say, and deny other things. Some peple asked, you know, 'Were you alone out there?' We never gave the real answer. We've seen things out there, strange things. But we know what we saw out there. And we couldn't really say anything, the bosses were scared of this. They were afraid of 'War of the Worlds' type stuff, about panic in the streets. And so we had to keep quiet. And now we only see these things in our nightmares or maybe in the movies. And some of them are pretty close to being the truth."
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=368
Ut-oh, I think the truth is starting to leak...

|
shatoga
Agent Provocateur
1117 posts, Nov 2002
|
posted 06-28-2003 11:19 AM
Good topic!would NASA lie? Never A Straight Answer isn't their nickname for nothing! 
| |